Development of a model of interprofessional support interventions to enhance brace adherence in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: a qualitative study.

PURPOSE: Brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is recognized as effective if the brace is worn as prescribed (20 to 23 hrs/day). Because of its negative biopsychosocial impact on adolescent patients' quality of life, brace adherence is a common problem (average bracewear of 12 hrs/day). The purpose of this paper is to develop an interprofessional support intervention model to enhance brace adherence in adolescents with scoliosis. METHODS: We enrolled 9 health professionals working with braced patients to participate in individual interviews. Interview guides were built following the Information-Motivation-Strategy Model (DiMatteo et al., Health Psychol Rev 6:74-91, 2012) and the Interprofessional Care Competency Framework (Education UoTCfI, Toronto Acad Health Sci Network, 2017). Thematic analysis was performed to identify the most relevant concepts for designing the intervention model. A panel of 5 clinical experts was recruited to review and validate the intervention model. RESULTS: Participants suggested educational, motivational, functional, psychological and interprofessional teamwork strategies to improve the support provided to patients and parents and potentially increase brace adherence. Using the emerging themes and their relationships, we designed an Interprofessional Adherence Support (IPAS) intervention model that identifies the actors, activities, structure and intended impacts of the intervention. According to the expert panel, the IPAS model is highly relevant to respond to the brace adherence problem and has potential for implementation in practice. CONCLUSION: We designed an interprofessional support intervention model based on professional perspectives in response to the brace adherence problem in adolescents with scoliosis. Plans for implementation of the IPAS model at our scoliosis clinic are under development and considered essential for improving brace treatment outcomes.

Use of virtual reality in managing paediatric procedural pain and anxiety: An integrative literature review.

AIMS: This integrative review aimed to identify, analyse and synthesise studies investigating the clinical efficacy of virtual reality (VR) distraction for children undergoing varying painful and anxiety-inducing medical procedures across different hospital settings and to identify implications for research and clinical practice. BACKGROUND: Virtual reality has been leveraged as a distraction tool in the healthcare setting to help patients manage procedural pain and anxiety. Initial studies in the burn wound care setting using VR as a non-pharmacological analgesia led to the use of VR during other medical procedures. DESIGN: An integrative review of the literature was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines across four electronic databases. Published studies between 2000 and 2020 investigating the clinical efficacy of VR in managing paediatric procedural pain or anxiety were included for review. RESULTS: Reviewed studies collectively included 2,174 patients aged 6 months-18 years used VR during burn wound care, post-burn physiotherapy, dental, needle-related and other procedures. Additionally, ten studies included samples with adults, for which paediatric data could not be isolated (n = 507). Overall, studies supported the efficacy of VR in managing procedural pain and anxiety in the paediatric setting. CONCLUSION: Virtual reality is redefining pain management by immersing children in a virtual world, reducing pain and anxiety at the hospital. A notable gap was the neglected use of VR in children with chronic conditions receiving orthopaedic procedures as part of their standard care. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Ultimately, VR distraction will reduce the fear associated with medical interventions, preventing increased pain sensitivity, exacerbated anxiety and healthcare avoidance in adulthood. Nurses will play an important role in ensuring the smooth integration of VR in clinical practice by championing the technology and transferring evidence-based methods for VR use.

Decreasing Pain and Fear in Medical Procedures with a Pediatric Population (DREAM): A Pilot Randomized Within-Subject Trial.

BACKGROUND: Many children with injuries, including burns and fractures, experience moderate to severe pain during medical procedures. Recent studies claim that nonpharmacologic pain management using virtual reality (VR) could distract children from procedural pain by engaging multiple senses. AIMS: The aims of this pilot randomized clinical trial were to assess the acceptability and feasibility of VR distraction in children with burns or fractures undergoing painful medical procedures, as well as the staff nurses, and assess the preliminary efficacy of VR distraction on pain intensity, pain-related fear, and subsequent recall of both. MATERIALS AND METHOD: A within-subject study design, in which participants served as their own control, was used. A total of 20 children from 7 to 17 years old with an injury were recruited at the surgical-trauma outpatient clinics of the Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine (CHU Sainte-Justine). Each participant received both standard and experimental treatments through randomized order. Pain (numerical rating scale) and pain-related fear (Children's Fear Scale) measures were taken before the procedure and after each sequence, followed by a measure of children's (graphic rating scale) and nurses' acceptability of the intervention through their satisfaction level. Recall of pain intensity and pain-related fear were assessed 24 hours after the procedure. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used, with a significance level at 0.05. RESULTS: Results showed that VR distraction was an acceptable and feasible intervention for children and nurses of these outpatient clinics. Preliminary effects showed that, compared to standard of care, children participants reported a significant decrease in pain intensity (p = .023) and pain-related fear (p = .011) during VR as well as less recalled pain-related fear (p = .012) at 24 hours after the procedure. No side effects were reported. CONCLUSION: VR is a promising intervention with children undergoing painful procedures because it is immersive and engages multiple senses. It is a low-cost intervention well accepted by children and nursing staff at this clinical site and is easy to implement in daily practice for procedural pain management.

Nurturing and quiet intervention (NeuroN-QI) on preterm infants' neurodevelopment and maternal stress and anxiety: A pilot randomized clinical trial protocol.

OBJECTIVES: Primary objective of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the NeuroN-QI and the study procedures. Secondary objectives are to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the NeuroN-QI by the nurses, assess the nurses' training needs about the components of the NeuroN-QI, and estimate the preliminary effects of the NeuroN-QI on infants' neurodevelopment as well as maternal stress and anxiety at infants' 36 weeks of gestational age. DESIGN: A two-group pilot parallel randomized clinical trial stratified by center. METHODS: The pilot study will be conducted in two neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). A sample of 24 mother-infant dyads born between 26 and 316/7 gestational age will be randomized into an experimental or control group. Fifty nurses will be recruited. The NeuroN-QI consists of four 2-hour skin-to-skin contact sessions/week with a 15-minute auditory stimulation by mothers with controlled ambient levels of light and noise. A 1-hour quiet period will follow where infants will rest in their incubator/crib with their mother's milk for olfactory stimulation and where the light and noise control will be continued. In the control group, mother-infant dyads will do four skin-to-skin contacts per week and receive standard care. Acceptability and feasibility of the NeuroN-QI in addition to maternal stress and anxiety will be measured through questionnaires, while infants' neurodevelopment will be assessed with Assessment of Preterm Infant Behaviour and General Movement Assessment. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot trial will address knowledge gaps and generate evidence in neonatal care by evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of a multi-component developmental care intervention. IMPACT: This project is an innovative step towards optimizing the neurodevelopmental trajectory of infants in NICUs and consequently promoting their long-term health outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04593095.

Immersive virtual reality vs. non-immersive distraction for pain management of children during bone pins and sutures removal: A randomized clinical trial protocol.

AIMS: To examine the efficacy of an immersive virtual reality distraction compared with an active non-immersive distraction, such as video games on a tablet, for pain and anxiety management and memory of pain and anxiety in children requiring percutaneous bone pins and/or suture removal procedures. DESIGN: Three-centre randomized clinical trial using a parallel design with two groups: experimental and control. METHODS: Study to take place in the orthopaedic department of three children hospital of the Montreal region starting in 2019. Children, from 7-17 years old, requiring bone pins and/or suture removal procedures will be recruited. The intervention group (N = 94) will receive a virtual reality game (Dreamland), whereas the control group (N = 94) will receive a tablet with video games. The primary outcomes will be both the mean self-reported pain score measured by the Numerical Rating Scale and mean anxiety score, measured by the Child Fear Scale. Recalls of pain and anxiety will be measured 1 week after the procedure using the same scales. We aim to recruit 188 children to achieve a power of 80% with a significance level (alpha) of 5%. DISCUSSION: While multiple pharmacological methods have previously been tested for children, no studies have evaluated the impact of immersive virtual reality distraction for pain and anxiety management in the orthopaedic setting. IMPACT: Improved pain management can be achieved using virtual reality during medical procedures for children. This method is innovative, non-pharmacological, adapted to the hospital setting, and user-friendly. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03680625, registered on clinicaltrials.gov.

Nurses' practices regarding procedural pain management of preterm infants.

BACKGROUND: It is well known that preterm neonates can feel pain which can be expressed through specific behaviors and signs. Repeated and untreated pain has consequences for the preterm neonates such as hypersensitivity to pain, as well as important repercussions on their motor and intellectual development. The use of non-pharmacological interventions for pain management by nurses is imperative to prevent these consequences in the NICU. The aim of this study is to survey neonatal nurses' interventions for pain management of preterm neonates. METHODS: Twenty (20) nurses were recruited for this pilot observational survey study. Standard pain management interventions used by nurses during heel prick were evaluated by means of a questionnaire. In addition, 11 out of the 20 nurses were observed during heel prick to evaluate what and how interventions were done. RESULTS: All infants (n = 11) received at least one pain management intervention during heel prick. Heterogeneity in pain management practices used by nurses is considerable. For 95% (19/20) of nurses, sucrose is a standard intervention reported in the survey but observations showed that it not always applied (64%). Positioning is more used (64%) by nurses than reported in the survey (45%). Swaddling also was also reported as a standard intervention by 45% of nurses, but it does not appear to be adequately performed (36%). CONCLUSION: According to the results, it would be essential to review nurses' knowledge and skills regarding standard pain management interventions, during painful procedures, as the quality of these practices is questionable. Homogeneity of the standard of care is particularly important in research to allow an appropriate comparison between study groups and prevention study bias.

Pain and quality of life of children and adolescents with osteogenesis imperfecta over a bisphosphonate treatment cycle.

The objective was to describe the pain and quality of life among children and adolescents with any osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) type over one intravenous bisphosphonate treatment cycle from a child and parental perspective. A prospective, observational study was conducted, where children and adolescents evaluated their pain intensity, location, and quality, as well as quality of life before, 1 week after treatment, and 6 months later. Quality of life was also evaluated from the parental perspective at the same three time points. Thirty-three child/parent dyads participated. The results showed that pain intensity on the 0-10 self-report scale after the Zoledronate infusion (median = 0, range = 0-6) was not different from pre (median = 2, range = 0-10) and 6-months post-scores (median = 2, range = 0-8) (p = 0.170). Children and adolescents with OI reported experiencing pain mainly in the ankles and the anterior and posterior shoulders. They selected evaluative pain descriptors such as uncomfortable (n = 16, 48%) and annoying (n = 13, 39%). Children and adolescents' functioning and quality of life did not change significantly across the bisphosphonate treatment cycle (p = 0.326), parents perceived an improvement immediately after the treatment compared to before (p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Children and adolescents with OI experience mild, yet complex pain localized across several body areas. There is little fluctuation in the pain intensity and functioning of children with OI undergoing bisphosphonate treatment. What is Known: • Acute and chronic musculoskeletal pain remains a major issue in OI. • Pain has a negative impact on quality of life. What is New: • New and unpublished methods and findings describing the pain and quality of life of children and adolescents with OI over one intravenous bisphosphonate treatment cycle from a child- and parental-proxy perspective. • Children and adolescents with OI experience pain intensity that is mild, yet complex in quality and localized across several body areas.

Treating and reducing anxiety and pain in the paediatric emergency department-TIME FOR ACTION-the TRAPPED quality improvement collaborative.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: In 2013, the TRAPPED-1 survey reported inconsistent availability of pain and distress management strategies across all 15 Canadian paediatric emergency department (PEDs). The objective of the TRAPPED-2 study was to utilize a procedural pain quality improvement collaborative (QIC) and evaluate the number of newly introduced pain and distress-reducing strategies in Canadian PEDs over a 2-year period. METHODS: A QIC was created to increase implementation of new strategies, through collaborative information sharing among PEDs. In 2015, 11 of the 15 Canadian PEDs participated in the TRAPPED QIC. At the end of the year, the TRAPPED-2 survey was electronically sent to a representative member at each of the 15 PEDs. The successful introduction of the chosen strategies by the QIC was assessed as well as the addition of new strategies per site. The number of new strategies introduced in the participating and nonparticipating QIC sites were described. RESULTS: All 15 PEDs (100%) completed the TRAPPED-2 survey. Overall, 10/11 of QIC-participating sites implemented the strategy they had initially identified. All 15 Canadian PEDs implemented some new strategies during the study period; participants in the QIC reported a mean of 5.2 (1-11) new strategies compared to 2.5 (1-4) in the nonactively participating sites. CONCLUSION: While all PEDs introduced new strategies during the study, QIC-participating sites successfully introduced the majority of their previously identified new strategies in a short time period. Sharing deadlines and information between centres may have contributed to this success.

Tailored Web-Based Interventions for Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Efforts have multiplied in the past decade to underline the importance of pain management. For both acute and chronic pain management, various barriers generate considerable treatment accessibility issues, thereby providing an opportunity for alternative intervention formats to be implemented. Several systematic reviews on Web-based interventions with a large emphasis on chronic pain and cognitive behavioral therapy have been recently conducted to explore the influence of these interventions on pain management However, to our knowledge, the specific contribution of tailored Web-based interventions for pain management has not been described and their effect on pain has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this systematic review was to answer the following research question: What is the effect of tailored Web-based pain management interventions for adults on pain intensity compared with usual care, face-to-face interventions, and standardized Web-based interventions? A secondary aim was to examine the effects of these interventions on physical and psychological functions. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of articles published from January 2000 to December 2015. We used the DerSimonian-Laird random effects models with 95% confidence intervals to calculate effect estimates for all analyses. We calculated standardized mean differences from extracted means and standard deviations, as outcome variables were measured on different continuous scales. We evaluated 5 different outcomes: pain intensity (primary outcome), pain-related disability, anxiety, depression, and pain catastrophizing. We assessed effects according to 3 time intervals: short term (<1 month), medium term (1-6 months), and long term (6-12 months). RESULTS: After full-text review, we excluded 31 articles, resulting in 17 eligible studies. Only 1 study concerned acute pain and was removed from the meta-analysis, resulting in 16 studies available for quantitative assessment. Compared with standard care or a waiting list, tailored Web-based intervention showed benefits immediately after, with small effect sizes (<0.40) for pain intensity (10 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], n=1310, P=.003) and pain-related disability (6 RCTs, n=953, P<.001). No other improvements were observed at follow-up in the medium and long terms. Compared with the active control group, no improvements were found for the primary outcome (pain intensity) or any of the outcomes except for a small effect size on pain catastrophizing (2 RCTs, n=333, P<.001) immediately after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Tailored Web-based interventions did not prove to be more efficacious than standardized Web-based interventions in terms of pain intensity, pain-related disability, anxiety, and depression. An interesting finding was that some efficacy was shown on pain catastrophizing compared with active control interventions. Considering the diversity of approaches used in tailored Web-based interventions for chronic pain management, their efficacy is yet to be explored. Moreover, their contribution to acute pain management is embryonic. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42015027669; http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42015027669 (Archived by WebCite at http://www. webcitation.org/6uneWAuyR).

Distraction Kits for Pain Management of Children Undergoing Painful Procedures in the Emergency Department: A Pilot Study.

To assess the feasibility, usefulness, and acceptability of using distraction kits, tailored to age, for procedural pain management of young children visiting the emergency department and requiring a needle-related procedure. A pre-experimental design was piloted. A kit, tailored to age (infants-toddlers: 3 months-2 years; preschoolers: 3-5 years), was provided to parents before their child's needle-related procedure. Data was collected to assess feasibility, usefulness, and acceptability of the kits by parents and nurses. Pain was measured pre-, peri-, and postprocedure using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale. A total of 25 infants and toddlers (mean age: 1.4 ± .7 years) and 25 preschoolers (mean age: 4.0 ± .9) participated in the study. Parents and nurses considered the kits useful and acceptable for distraction in the emergency department, especially in the postprocedural period. Addition of more animated and interactive toys to the kits was suggested. In the infants-toddlers group, mean pain scores were 1.6 ± 2.5 preprocedure, 7.1 ± 3.0 periprocedure, and 2.5 ± 2.5 postprocedure. In the preschoolers group, mean pain scores were 1.6 ± 3.0 preprocedure, 4.8 ± 3.4 periprocedure, and 2.0 ± 3.2 postprocedure. Distraction kits were deemed useful and acceptable by parents and emergency nurses. They are an interesting nonpharmacologic option for nurses to distract children, giving them a sense of control over their pain and improving their hospital experience. Future research should address the feasibility of distraction kits for a broader population of patients and a variety of painful procedures.

Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of clinical trials of spinal manipulative therapy for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. METHODS: Search strategies were developed for PubMed, CINHAL, and CENTRAL databases. Studies were included through June 2016 if they were prospective trials that evaluated spinal manipulative therapy (eg, chiropractic, osteopathic, physical therapy) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Data were extracted and assessed by 2 independent reviewers. Cochrane risk of bias tools were used to assess the quality of the included studies. Data were reported qualitatively because heterogeneity prevented statistical pooling. RESULTS: Four studies satisfied the inclusion criteria and were critically appraised. The findings of the included studies indicated that spinal manipulative therapy might be effective for preventing curve progression or reducing Cobb angle. However, the lack of controls and small sample sizes precluded robust estimation of the interventions' effect sizes. CONCLUSION: There is currently insufficient evidence to establish whether spinal manipulative therapy may be beneficial for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The results of the included studies suggest that spinal manipulative therapy may be a promising treatment, but these studies were all at substantial risk of bias. Further high-quality studies are warranted to conclusively determine if spinal manipulative therapy may be effective in the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

The psychosocial experience of individuals living with osteogenesis imperfecta: a mixed-methods systematic review.

PURPOSE: Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a genetic disorder (prevalence: 1:10,000), leading to bone fragility, frequent fractures, and varying degrees of physical limitations. Despite a substantial amount of research on the genetics, pathophysiology, and treatments related to OI, there remains a paucity of knowledge concerning the lived psychosocial experience of the OI population. This mixed-methods systematic review aimed to review, appraise, and synthesize the literature on the psychosocial experience of children and adults with OI with the goal of identifying implications for research, practice, and policy-making. METHODS: Using a systematic methodology, quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies were accessed through database searching, screened, assessed for eligibility, and appraised. Data from the selected studies fulfilling the eligibility and quality criteria were extracted and synthesized using thematic analysis with an inductive approach. RESULTS: A total of four qualitative and 20 quantitative studies, with various study designs and methodologies ranging in quality, were included in the review (n = 800; comprising 610 children and 175 adults with OI types I, III, IV, and V, ten parents and five healthcare professionals). Six themes were identified: intellectual feats, isolation and feeling different, fear of fractures, coping with challenges, adapting by learning new skills, and social relationships. CONCLUSION: These findings highlighted key aspects of the experiences of children and adults with OI and will be essential for improving the quality and direction of research, tailoring clinical interventions addressing the psychosocial needs and quality of life of individuals with OI, and raising awareness among caregivers, healthcare professionals, administrators, and policy-makers associated with the OI population.

[Different philosophical traditions for knowledge development in nursing sciences]. / Différentes traditions philosophiques pour le développement des connaissances en sciences infirmières.

INTRODUCTION: doctoral studies in nursing engage a critical reflections about philosophical traditions inherent to knowledge development. BACKGROUND: critical realism, hermeneutics, postmodernism and poststructuralism refer to philosophical traditions that are generally less explored in nursing, although they are attracting greater attention. OBJECTIVE: this paper offers an introductory presentation to these traditions as the authors also reflect upon their contribution to nursing knowledge development in. METHOD: for each tradition, ontological and epistemological properties are presented to provide an overview of their main features. Contributions to nursing knowledge development are then discussed. RESULTS: ontology refers to stratified, fixed and changing, or multiple realities, depending on the philosophical tradition. Likewise, epistemology emphasizes the explanatory power of knowledge, intersubjectivity, or inherent power dynamics. DISCUSSION: the diversity of philosophical traditions represents an asset that can significantly contribute to the advancement of the nursing discipline. CONCLUSION: clarification of the philosophical dimensions that underlie knowledge development is essential for doctoral nursing students in the process of developing their research projects and future programmes of research.

Guided Imagery for Adolescent Post-spinal Fusion Pain Management: A Pilot Study.

Orthopedic surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis entails anxiety and severe postoperative pain. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate an intervention for adolescent post-spinal fusion pain management in patients from a tertiary care hospital in Montreal, Canada. Participants were adolescents and young adults ages 11 to 20 years undergoing spinal fusion. Participants were randomized to standard care or standard care with adjunct intervention. The intervention consisted of a DVD with information and guided imagery/relaxation exercises to practice at least three times a week at home. A nurse screened the DVD with the patient preoperatively and at discharge (T1) and telephoned 2 weeks post-discharge (T2) to reinforce the technique. Both groups completed questionnaires at T1, T2, and T3 (1-month postoperative follow-up). Outcome measures included pain intensity, anxiety, coping mechanisms, and daily activities. From March 2010 to June 2011, we enrolled 40 of 45 eligible participants (n = 20 per group), average age 15 ± 2.1 years, 7 participants were male. Compared with the control group, the experimental group experienced significantly less overall pain at all time points, with moderate to large effect sizes at T2, T3 (p ≤ .007). Worst pain in 24 hours was moderately decreased at T2 (p = .01). State-trait anxiety remained high. On a 10-point scale, a median 2.5-point benefit was seen in eating and sleeping (Mann-Whitney test, p = .002), and 2 points in walking (Mann-Whitney test, p = .003). Coping strategies showed no significant differences. Addition of a guided imagery and relaxation exercise DVD for home use was more effective than standard care alone for postoperative pain. Our nonpharmacologic adjunct looks promising. Larger sample size and longer (6-9 months) follow-up will permit refinement.

Treating and Reducing Anxiety and Pain in the Paediatric Emergency Department: The TRAPPED survey.

BACKGROUND: Management of children's pain and anxiety in the emergency department is likely suboptimal. OBJECTIVE: To determine the availability of currently used strategies in Canadian paediatric emergency departments. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey involving all centres of the Pediatric Emergency Research Canada group was performed. The primary outcome was the availability of specific procedures for pain and anxiety management for children in the emergency department. One person per centre was identified to complete the survey. Data were collected from October 2013 to January 2014 using an electronic survey tool. RESULTS: All 15 Pediatric Emergency Research Canada centres agreed to participate. The verbal numerical scale was widely used (80%) to assess pain. One-half of respondents (53%) had access to a child life specialist. The following techniques were available for minor procedures: television as a distraction tool (87% of respondents), topical anesthetic before intravenous needle insertion (73%) and positioning of the child on parent's lap (60%); most remaining centres reported that these could be easily implemented. Intravenous morphine was available at every centre. Intranasal fentanyl was available (60%) or considered to be easy to implement (33%). Few centres reported availability of clinical guidelines regarding pain for doctors (27%) and nurses (40%); all respondents considered them to be easy to implement. CONCLUSIONS: There was wide variation in paediatric pain and anxiety management strategies among tertiary care Canadian emergency departments. Several pain-reduction procedures (distraction, positioning on parent's lap, topical anesthetic, intranasal administration) were identified that could be easily implemented to address the gap.

HISTORIQUE: La prise en charge de la douleur et de l'anxiété de l'enfant à la salle d'urgence est probablement sous-optimale. OBJECTIF: Déterminer l'accès aux stratégies à jour dans les salles d'urgence pédiatriques canadiennes. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Les chercheurs ont effectué une enquête transversale auprès de tous les centres du Groupe de recherche en urgence pédiatrique du Canada. Les résultats primaires étaient la disponibilité d'interventions précises liées à la prise en charge de la douleur et de l'anxiété des enfants à la salle d'urgence. Ils ont repéré une personne par centre pour participer à l'enquête. Ils ont colligé les données d'octobre 2013 à janvier 2014 au moyen d'un outil de sondage électronique. RÉSULTATS: Les 15 centres du Groupe de recherche en urgence pédiatrique du Canada ont accepté de participer. L'échelle numérique verbale était largement utilisée (80 %) pour évaluer la douleur. La moitié des répondants (53 %) avait accès à un spécialiste de l'enfance. Les techniques suivantes étaient disponibles pour les interventions mineures : télévision comme outil de distraction (87 % des répondants), anesthésique topique avant l'insertion de l'aiguille intraveineuse (73 %) et installation de l'enfant sur les genoux du parent (60 %). La plupart des autres centres ont déclaré que ces mesures pouvaient facilement être adoptées. La morphine intraveineuse était accessible dans tous les centres. Le fentanyl intranasal était accessible (60 %) ou considéré comme facile à adopter (33 %). Peu de centres déclaraient posséder des directives cliniques sur la prise en charge de la douleur pour les médecins (27 %) et les infirmières (40 %). Tous les répondants les considéraient comme faciles à adopter. CONCLUSIONS: Les stratégies de prise en charge de la douleur et de l'anxiété variaient considérablement entre les salles d'urgence des centres pédiatriques de soins tertiaires canadiens. Plusieurs interventions de réduction de la douleur (distraction, installation sur les genoux du parent, administration d'anesthésique topique et administration intranasale) étaient considérées comme faciles à adopter pour corriger les lacunes.

Case report of atopic dermatitis with refractory pruritus markedly improved with the novel use of clonidine and trimeprazine.

We report a 6-year-old boy with severe atopic dermatitis and refractory pruritus. The novel use of clonidine, an adrenergic agonist, along with trimeprazine, led to dramatic improvement. This represents the first case report of clonidine's effect in relieving pruritus in atopic dermatitis.

The use of virtual reality during medical procedures in a pediatric orthopedic setting: A mixed-methods pilot feasibility study.

Medical procedures cause pain and anxiety in children. Distraction techniques, including virtual reality (VR), may be used in healthcare settings to reduce rates of undertreated procedural pain and anxiety. A mixed-methods, concurrent triangulation design was piloted at a pediatric orthopedic hospital to assess the feasibility, clinical utility, tolerability, and initial clinical efficacy of VR distraction during medical procedures received by patients with complex musculoskeletal conditions. Questionnaire, scale, interview, observation, and focus group data were collected from patients, their parents, and healthcare professionals. Triangulation of key quantitative and qualitative findings produced final themes and meta-themes. A total of 44 patients and their parents undergoing intravenous insertions (n = 30), pin removals (n = 7), blood draws (n = 3), Botox injections (n = 2), dressing change (n = 1), and urodynamic test (n = 1) were recruited along with 11 healthcare professionals performing the medical procedures. The following themes resulted from triangulation of data sources: VR intervention was (a) feasible because VR was easily implemented into the clinical workflow, (b) clinically useful as VR was accepted by stakeholders and easy to use, (c) tolerable as VR caused minimal discomfort, and (d) showed initial clinical efficacy in managing procedural pain and anxiety. These findings will inform policies and procedures for VR use in practice and a sustainable implementation across the [name of hospital removed for peer review] network.

A randomized clinical trial of a nurse telephone follow-up on paediatric tonsillectomy pain management and complications.

AIMS: To determine the effect of a nurse telephone follow-up on paediatric post-tonsillectomy pain intensity, complications, and use of other healthcare services. BACKGROUND: After tonsillectomy, children experience moderate-to-severe pain for days. Parents tend to give insufficient analgesia, with resulting increases in pain and postoperative complications. In adults, nurse telephone follow-up for ambulatory surgeries reduces postoperative pain. DESIGN: The study design was a randomized clinical trial. METHODS: In this trial, children aged 4-12 years undergoing elective tonsillectomy in June-October 2010 were assigned to a nurse telephone follow-up with parents on postoperative days 1, 3, 5 and 10, or standard care with no follow-up but data collection. Outcomes included pain intensity, analgesics administered, complications, and healthcare use. RESULTS: Of 45 participants, the intervention group (n = 24) received more analgesics on postoperative days 1 and 3, increased their fluid intake at days 1 and 3, but had more constipation at day 3 than the control group (n = 21). There was no significant difference regarding pain intensity or use of healthcare resources. CONCLUSION: Nurse telephone follow-up was beneficial for some pain management and prevention of complications, although better analgesic treatments are needed. The intervention was simple, safe, and appreciated by parents.

Efficacy of an ibuprofen/codeine combination for pain management in children presenting to the emergency department with a limb injury: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Fractures and severe sprains generate moderate to severe pain (>3/10). Despite this fact, pain management in children presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with a musculoskeletal trauma is still suboptimal. Few studies have focused on the efficacy of a combination of an opioid with an anti-inflammatory drug to relieve this type of pain. STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of a combination of codeine with ibuprofen to ibuprofen alone on the intensity of pain experienced by children presenting to the ED with a musculoskeletal trauma to a limb. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial included patients aged 6 to 18 years. After triage, subjects were randomized to either ibuprofen (10 mg/kg, max 600 mg) and codeine (1 mg/kg, max 60 mg) orally, or ibuprofen (10 mg/kg, max 600 mg) and a placebo orally. Pain was assessed with the visual analog scale (0 to 10) at triage, and at 60, 90, and 120 min after medication administration. Differences on mean pain scores were compared between groups over time. RESULTS: We recruited 81 patients, 40 in the experimental group and 41 in the control group. No significant differences were observed in mean pain scores between groups at any time point. Mean pain scores were moderate at 90 min in both experimental and control groups (4.0 ± 2.4 vs. 4.1 ± 2.0, respectively). Side effects were minimal. CONCLUSION: The addition of codeine to ibuprofen did not significantly improve pain management in children with musculoskeletal trauma to a limb. Pain control provided by the medications remained suboptimal for most patients.

Effects of pharmacogenetic profiles on pediatric pain relief and adverse events with ibuprofen and oxycodone.

Introduction: Individual genetic variation may influence clinical effects for pain medications. Effects of CYP2C9, CYP3A4, and CYP2D6 polymorphisms on clinical effectiveness and safety for ibuprofen and oxycodone were studied. Objective: Primary objectives were to AU2 evaluate if allelic variations would affect clinical effectiveness and adverse events (AEs) occurrence. Methods: This pragmatic prospective, observational cohort included children aged 4 to 16 years who were seen in a pediatric emergency department with an acute fracture and prescribed ibuprofen or oxycodone for at-home pain management. Saliva samples were obtained for genotyping of allelic variants, and daily telephone follow-up was conducted for 3 days. Pain was measured using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised. Results: We included 210 children (n = 140 ibuprofen and n = 70 oxycodone); mean age was 11.1 (±SD 3.5) years, 33.8% were female. Median pain reduction on day 1 was similar between groups [ibuprofen 4 (IQR 2,4) and oxycodone 4 (IQR 2,6), P = 0.69]. Over the 3 days, the oxycodone group experienced more AE than the ibuprofen group (78.3% vs 53.2%, P < 0.001). Those with a CYP2C9*2 reduced function allele experienced less adverse events with ibuprofen compared with those with a normal functioning allele CYP2C9*1 (P = 0.003). Neither CYP3A4 variants nor CYP2D6 phenotype classification affected clinical effect or AE. Conclusion: Although pain relief was similar, children receiving oxycodone experienced more AE, overall, than those receiving ibuprofen. For children receiving ibuprofen or oxycodone, pain relief was not affected by genetic variations in CYP2C9 or CYP3A4/CYP2D6, respectively. For children receiving ibuprofen, the presence of CYP2C9*2 was associated with less adverse events.