Serum total carbon dioxide as a prognostic factor for 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis.

OBJECTIVE: Metabolic acidosis is commonly associated with the disease severity in patients with sepsis or septic shock. This study was performed to investigate the association between serum total carbon dioxide (TCO2) concentration and 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis. METHODS: This study was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients with sepsis or septic shock. The relationships between serum TCO2 and 28-day mortality, bicarbonate, pH, lactate, and anion gap were determined with cubic spline curves. The patients were divided into four groups according to their serum TCO2 concentration: Group I (TCO2 > 20 mmol/l), Group II (15 < TCO2 ≤ 20 mg/dl), Group III (10 < TCO2 ≤ 15 mmol/l), and Group IV (TCO2 ≤ 10 mmol/l). RESULTS: A total of 3168 patients were included in the analysis, and the overall mortality rate was 24.1%. Serum TCO2 concentrations below 20 mmol/l showed an almost linear correlation with mortality as well as with lactate, bicarbonate, and pH. The 28-day mortality rates of Group I, II, III, and IV were 18.3%, 23.6%, 32.6%, and 50.0%, respectively (p < .001). In Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, the groups with lower serum TCO2 concentrations had a higher risk of 28-day mortality compared with Group I: Group II (Hazard ratio (HR), 1.35; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.11-1.64), Group III (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.37-2.21), and Group IV (HR, 2.72; 95% CI, 2.03-3.64). CONCLUSIONS: Serum TCO2 concentrations of 20 mmol/l or less were associated with 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis.

The index of oxygenation to respiratory rate as a prognostic factor for mortality in Sepsis.

OBJECTIVES: An index combining respiratory rate and oxygenation (ROX) has been introduced, and the ROX index is defined as the ratio of oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry/fraction of inspired oxygen to respiratory rate. In sepsis, hypoxemia and tachypnea are commonly observed. We performed this study to investigate the association between the ROX index and 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis or septic shock. METHODS: This retrospective study included 2862 patients. The patients were divided into three groups according to the ROX index: Group I (ROX index >20), Group II (ROX index >10 and ≤ 20), and Group III (ROX index ≤10). RESULTS: The median ROX index was significantly lower in the nonsurvivors than in the survivors (12.8 and 18.2, respectively) (p < 0.001). The 28-day mortality rates in Groups I, II and III were 14.5%, 21.3% and 34.4%, respectively (p < 0.001). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, Group III had an approximately 40% higher risk of death than Group I during the 28-day period (hazard ratio = 1.41, 95% confidence interval 1.13-1.76). The area under the curve of the ROX index was significantly higher than that of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The ROX index was lower in nonsurvivors than in survivors, and a ROX index less than or equal to 10 was an independent prognostic factor for 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis or septic shock. Therefore, the ROX index could be used as a prognostic marker in sepsis.

Moderate to severe hyperphosphataemia as an independent prognostic factor for 28-day mortality in adult patients with sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Ischaemic tissue injury caused by tissue hypoperfusion is one of the major consequences of sepsis. Phosphate concentrations are elevated in ischaemic tissue injury. This study was performed to investigate the association of phosphate concentrations with mortality in patients with sepsis. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with sepsis conducted at an urban, tertiary care emergency department (ED) in Korea. Patients with sepsis arriving between March 2010 and April 2017 were stratified into four groups according to the initial phosphate concentration at presentation to the ED: group I (hypophosphataemia, phosphate <2 mg/dL), group II (normophosphataemia, phosphate 2-4 mg/dL), group III (mild hyperphosphataemia, phosphate 4-6 mg/dL), group IV (moderate to severe hyperphosphataemia, phosphate ≥6 mg/dL). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to evaluate the independent association of initial phosphate concentration with 28-day mortality. RESULTS: Of the 3034 participants in the study, the overall mortality rate was 21.9%. The 28-day mortality rates were group I (hypophosphataemia) 14.6%, group II 17.4% (normophosphataemia), group III (mild hyperphosphataemia) 29.2% and group IV (moderate to severe hyperphosphataemia) 51.4%, respectively (p<0.001). In the multivariable analyses, patients with severe hyperphosphataemia had a significantly higher risk of death than those with normal phosphate levels (HR 1.59; 95% CI 1.23 to 2.05). Mortality in the other groups was not significantly different from mortality in patients with normophosphataemia. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate to severe hyperphosphataemia was associated with 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis. Phosphate level could be used as a prognostic indicator in sepsis.

A new chest compression depth indicator would increase compression depth without increasing overcompression risk.

PURPOSE: Adequate chest compression (CC) depth is critical for effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Pediatric resuscitation guidelines recommend that CC be at least one-third of the anterior-posterior (AP) chest diameter or approximately 4 cm in infants and 5 cm in children. We aimed to find a better indicator of CC depth that maximizes CC depth while also minimizing injury. BASIC PROCEDURES: Chest computed tomographic images of patients aged 8 years and younger were measured for external diameter (ED) (AP distance from skin to skin) and internal diameter (AP distance between internal surface of anterior chest wall and anterior surface of vertebral body) at the midway of the lower half of the sternum. Compressible depth was defined as 1 cm short of internal diameter. We determined that up to a 10% estimated risk of overcompression is acceptable and approximated a quantile regression line for the 10th percentile of compressible depth on ED. After rounding coefficients, we used its equation as a new indicator. MAIN FINDINGS: A total of 426 images were analyzed. The new indicator had a slope of 0.5 and an intercept of -1.9 cm (1 fingerbreadth). Compared to one-third ED, the new indicator would provide deeper CC with average difference of 1.9 mm (95% confidence interval, 1.6-2.2 mm) without increasing the risk of overcompression (both 4.9%). Chest compression of 4/5 cm would provide deeper CC compared to the new indicator (difference, 3.5 mm; 95% confidence interval, 2.7-4.1 mm); however, its overcompression risk was too high (31.5%). PRINCIPAL CONCLUSION: Chest compression of one-half ED minus 1 fingerbreadth maximizes CC depth without increasing overcompression in pediatric population.

Comparison of body water status and its distribution in patients with non-septic infection, patients with sepsis, and healthy controls.

OBJECTIVE: Although fluid resuscitation is the cornerstone of treatment for sepsis, the role of body water status in sepsis is poorly understood. This study aimed to understand how body water and its distribution are modified in patients with sepsis and those with non-septic infection compared to healthy individuals. METHODS: Two groups of adults presumed to have non-septic infection (n=87) and sepsis (n=54) were enrolled in this prospective study in a single emergency department, and they were compared to sex-, age-, and height-matched (1:3 ratio) healthy controls (n=11,190) from retrospective data in a health promotion center. Total body water (TBW), intracellular water (ICW), and extracellular water (ECW), determined using direct segmental multi-frequent bioelectrical impedance analysis (InBody S10) were expressed as indices for normalization by body weight (BW). The ratio of ECW to TBW (ECW/TBW) was evaluated to determine body water distribution. RESULTS: TBW/BW, ICW/BW, and ECW/BW were significantly higher in the non-septic infection group than in the healthy group (P<0.001), but ECW/TBW was not significantly different (P=0.690). There were no differences in TBW/BW and ICW/BW between the sepsis and healthy groups (P=0.083 and P=0.963). However, ECW/BW and ECW/TBW were significantly higher in the sepsis group than in the healthy group (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared to the healthy group, the ratio of body water to BW was significantly increased in the non-septic infection group, while ECW/BW and ECW/TBW were significantly increased in the sepsis group. These indices could be utilized as diagnostic variables of body water deficit in septic patients.