Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 79
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Nephrol ; 18(1): 13, 2017 Jan 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28077080

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Age and number of recipients in need of kidney re-transplantation are increasing. Re-transplantation practices and outcomes in elderly recipients are not previously explored. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the outcomes of recipients 65 years and older receiving their second deceased donor allograft. METHODS: The study was designed as a retrospective registry based study. All recipients 65 years or older who received a deceased donor kidney transplant at Oslo University Hospital between 2000 and 2014 were included in the study. Survival outcomes were compared between recipients of first (TX1) and second (TX2) allograft. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models with patient survival, uncensored graft survival and death-censored graft survival as outcomes in the analyses. RESULTS: Seven hundred and thirty-tree recipients > 65 years received a first (n = 687) or second (n = 46) deceased donor kidney transplant. Five years uncensored graft survival rates were 64% in TX 2 and 67% in TX 1 (P= 0.789). Estimated five years graft survival rates censored for death with functioning graft were 88% in TX2 and 90% in TX1 (P=0.475). Adjusted hazard ratio for uncensored graft loss (TX2 vs. TX1) was 1.24 (95% CI 0.77 - 2.00). Adjusted hazard ratio for graft loss censored for death with functioning graft (TX2 vs. TX1) was 1.70 (0.72-4.02). CONCLUSIONS: Older recipients of second transplants have outcomes that are comparable to the outcomes of age-matched first transplant recipients, and far better than previously documented for older transplant candidates remaining on dialysis treatment. Advanced age by itself should not be a contraindication for re-transplantation. Best results are achieved with short time on dialysis before re-transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/mortalidad , Supervivencia de Injerto , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Trasplante de Riñón/estadística & datos numéricos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Determinación de la Elegibilidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Noruega/epidemiología , Selección de Paciente , Sistema de Registros , Reoperación/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Donantes de Tejidos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Diabetologia ; 59(4): 844-52, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26713324

RESUMEN

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Mortality due to cardiovascular disease (CVD), particularly coronary artery disease (CAD), is high in type 1 diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). We aimed to determine whether normoglycaemia, as achieved by successful simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantation, could improve long-term outcomes compared with living donor kidney-alone (LDK) transplantation. METHODS: We studied 486 type 1 diabetic patients with ESRD who underwent a first SPK (n = 256) or LDK (n = 230) transplant between 1983 and 2012 and were followed to the end of 2014. Data were retrieved from the Norwegian Renal Registry and hospital records. Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariate Cox regression, with correction for recipient, donor and transplant factors, were used to examine potential associations between transplant type and all-cause and CVD- and CAD-related mortality. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 7.9 years (interquartile range 4.3, 12.9). The adjusted HR for CVD-related deaths in SPK recipients compared with LDK recipients was 0.63 (95% CI 0.40, 0.99; p = 0.047), while the HRs for all-cause and CAD-related mortality were 0.81 (95% CI 0.57, 1.16; p = 0.25) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.36, 1.12; p = 0.12), respectively. Compared with the LDK group, SPK recipients were younger and received grafts from younger donors. Cardiovascular mortality was higher in patients transplanted between 1983 and 1999 compared with those who received their grafts in subsequent years. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In patients with type 1 diabetes and ESRD, SPK transplantation was associated with reduced long-term cardiovascular mortality compared with LDK transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante de Páncreas , Adulto , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Nefropatías Diabéticas/cirugía , Femenino , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Donadores Vivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 31(5): 831-41, 2016 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26361801

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study examines the time trends in incidence, prevalence, patient and kidney allograft survival and causes of death (COD) in patients receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT) in Europe. METHODS: Eighteen national or regional renal registries providing data to the European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association Registry between 1998 and 2011 were included. Incidence and prevalence time trends between 2001 and 2011 were studied with Joinpoint and Poisson regression. Patient and kidney allograft survival and COD between 1998 and 2011 were analysed using Kaplan-Meier and competing risk methods and Cox regression. RESULTS: From 2001 to 2008, the adjusted incidence of RRT rose by 1.1% (95% CI: 0.6, 1.7) annually to 131 per million population (pmp). During 2008-2011, the adjusted incidence fell by 2.2% (95% CI: -4.2, -0.2) annually to 125 pmp. This decline occurred predominantly in patients aged 45-64 years, 65-74 years and in the primary renal diseases diabetes mellitus type 1 and 2, renovascular disease and glomerulonephritis. Between 2001 and 2011, the overall adjusted prevalence increased from 724 to 1032 pmp (+3.3% annually, 95% CI: 2.8, 3.8). The adjusted 5-year patient survival on RRT improved between 1998-2002 and 2003-2007 [adjusted hazard ratio (HRa) 0.85, 95% CI: 0.84, 0.86]. Comparing these time periods, the risk of cardiovascular deaths fell by 25% (HRa 0.75, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.77). However the risk of malignant death rose by 9% (HRa 1.09, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.16) in patients ≥65 years. CONCLUSION: This European study shows a declining RRT incidence, particularly in patients aged 45-64 years, 65-74 years and secondary to diabetic nephropathy. Encouragingly, the adjusted RRT patient survival continues to improve. The risk of cardiovascular death has decreased, though the risk of death from malignancy has increased in the older population.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/tendencias , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Sistema de Registros , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo
5.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 30(6): 1028-37, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25637641

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Infections and malignancies are the most common non-cardiovascular causes of death in patients on chronic renal replacement therapy (RRT). Here, we aimed to quantify the mortality risk attributed to infections and malignancies in dialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients when compared with the general population by age group and sex. METHODS: We followed 168 156 patients included in the ERA-EDTA registry who started RRT in 1993-2007 until 1 January 2012. Age- and cause-specific mortality rates per 1000 person-years (py) and mortality rate ratios (MRRs) compared with the European general population (WHO) were calculated. To identify risk factors, we used Cox regression. RESULTS: Infection-related mortality was increased 82-fold in dialysis patients and 32-fold in transplant recipients compared with the general population. Female sex, diabetes, cancer and multisystem disease were associated with an increased risk of infection-related mortality. The sex difference was most pronounced for dialysis patients aged 0-39 years, with women having a 32% (adjusted HR 1.32 95% CI 1.09-1.60) higher risk of infection-related mortality than men. Mortality from malignancies was 2.9 times higher in dialysis patients and 1.7 times higher in transplant recipients than in the general population. Cancer and multisystem disease as primary causes of end-stage renal disease were associated with higher mortality from malignancies. CONCLUSION: Infection-related mortality is highly increased in dialysis and kidney transplant patients, while the risk of malignancy-related death is moderately increased. Young women on dialysis may deserve special attention because of their high excess risk of infection-related mortality. Further research into the mechanisms, prevention and optimal treatment of infections in this vulnerable population is required.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal/mortalidad , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/efectos adversos , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Infecciones/etiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/etiología , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
6.
BMC Nephrol ; 16: 179, 2015 Oct 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26519164

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Whether the choice of dialysis modality in patients with end stage renal disease may impact mortality is undecided. No randomized controlled trial has properly addressed this issue. Propensity-matched observational studies could give important insight into the independent effect of peritoneal (PD) opposed to haemodialysis (HD) on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. METHODS: To correct for case-mix differences between patients treated with PD and HD, propensity-matched analyses were utilized in all patients who initiated dialysis as first renal replacement therapy in Norway in the period 2005-2012. PD patients were matched in a 1:1 fashion with HD patients, creating 692 pairs of patients with comparable baseline variables. As-treated and intention-to treat analyses were undertaken to assess cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Interaction analyses were used to assess differences in the relationship between initial dialysis modality and mortality, between strata of age, gender and prevalent diabetes mellitus. RESULTS: In the as-treated analyses, initial dialysis modality did not impact 2-year (PD vs. HD: HR 0.87, 95 % CI 0.67-1.12) or 5-year all-cause mortality (HR 0.95, 95 % CI 0.77-1.17). In patients younger than 65 years, PD was superior compared to HD with regard to both 2-year (HR 0.39, 95 % CI 0.19-0.81), and 5-year all-cause mortality (HR 0.49, 95 % CI 0.27-0.89). Cardiovascular mortality was also lower in the younger patients treated with PD (5-year HR 0.38, 95 % CI 0.15-0.96). PD was not associated with impaired prognosis in any of the prespecified subgroups compared to HD. The results were similar in the as-treated and intention-to-treat analyses. CONCLUSION: Survival in PD was not inferior to HD in any subgroup of patients even after five years of follow-up. In patients below 65 years, PD yielded superior survival rates compared to HD. Increased use of PD as initial dialysis modality in ESRD patients could be encouraged.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Sistema de Registros , Diálisis Renal/mortalidad , Diálisis Renal/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución por Edad , Comorbilidad , Diálisis , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega/epidemiología , Puntaje de Propensión , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Kidney Int ; 86(1): 162-7, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24284516

RESUMEN

Previous studies have suggested that living kidney donors maintain long-term renal function and experience no increase in cardiovascular or all-cause mortality. However, most analyses have included control groups less healthy than the living donor population and have had relatively short follow-up periods. Here we compared long-term renal function and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in living kidney donors compared with a control group of individuals who would have been eligible for donation. All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) was identified in 1901 individuals who donated a kidney during 1963 through 2007 with a median follow-up of 15.1 years. A control group of 32,621 potentially eligible kidney donors was selected, with a median follow-up of 24.9 years. Hazard ratio for all-cause death was significantly increased to 1.30 (95% confidence interval 1.11-1.52) for donors compared with controls. There was a significant corresponding increase in cardiovascular death to 1.40 (1.03-1.91), while the risk of ESRD was greatly and significantly increased to 11.38 (4.37-29.6). The overall incidence of ESRD among donors was 302 cases per million and might have been influenced by hereditary factors. Immunological renal disease was the cause of ESRD in the donors. Thus, kidney donors are at increased long-term risk for ESRD, cardiovascular, and all-cause mortality compared with a control group of non-donors who would have been eligible for donation.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Donadores Vivos , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Causas de Muerte , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega/epidemiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/mortalidad
8.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 29(10): 1956-64, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25061126

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are actively promoted, their use at the start of haemodialysis (HD) seems to be decreasing worldwide. In this paper, we describe recent trends in incidence and prevalence of vascular access types in Europe from 2005 to 2009 and their relationship with patient characteristics and survival. METHODS: Ten European renal registries participating in the ERA-EDTA Registry provided data on incidence (n = 13,044) and/or prevalence (n = 75,715) of vascular access types. We used logistic regression to assess which factors influence the likelihood to be treated with an AVF rather than another type. RESULTS: The use of AVFs at the start of HD showed a significant decreasing trend from 42% in 2005 to 32% in 2009 (P < 0.0001), while the use of central venous catheters (CVCs) increased from 58 to 68% (P < 0.0001). A similar evolution pattern was observed for the prevalence; use of AVFs decreased from 66 to 62% and use of CVCs increased from 28 to 32%. There was a large international variation in the use of the different vascular access types. Female patients [adjusted odds ratio: 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-0.90] and those ≥80 years (0.77, 95% CI: 0.67-0.90) were least likely to start HD with an AVF. CONCLUSION: In Europe, there is a decreasing trend in the use of AVFs and an increasing trend in the use of CVCs at the start and after the start of HD. We cannot explain all between-country variations we found, and more research is needed to clarify how healthcare around vascular access is organized in Europe.


Asunto(s)
Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/tendencias , Cateterismo Venoso Central/tendencias , Catéteres de Permanencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Diálisis Renal , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Sistema de Registros , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
9.
Clin Transplant ; 28(4): 479-86, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25649861

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to investigate whether serum levels of intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, graft loss, or mortality in kidney transplant patients with optimal transplant function. METHODS: From the Norwegian Renal Registry, we identified 522 patients who received a first kidney transplant from 2001 to 2008 with optimal transplant function defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2, more than one yr after transplantation. Cox's proportional hazard models were used to assess the association between iPTH measured 10 wk after transplantation and the composite endpoint. The estimates were adjusted for age, gender, serum calcium, serum phosphate, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and time on dialysis prior to transplantation. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 3.9 yr (interquartile range, IQR: 2.0-6.0 yr). Patients in the third iPTH quartile (9.3-14.4 pM) had the lowest risk for reaching the composite endpoint. Patients in the fourth iPTH quartile (>14.4 pM) had an increased risk compared to those in the third quartile (HR: 2.60, 95% CI: 1.10-6.16, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: In patients with optimal transplant function, iPTH levels are associated with a clinical outcome consisting of cardiovascular events, graft loss, and all-cause mortality.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/sangre , Rechazo de Injerto/sangre , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón , Hormona Paratiroidea/sangre , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Biomarcadores/sangre , Calcio/metabolismo , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Rechazo de Injerto/mortalidad , Supervivencia de Injerto/fisiología , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/fisiopatología , Pruebas de Función Renal , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia
10.
Clin Transplant ; 28(1): 120-6, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24351078

RESUMEN

This prospective observational cohort study is an extension of a previous study reporting effects of cytomegalovirus (CMV) on graft and patient survival in 471 patients who underwent kidney transplantation between 1994 and 1997. CMV pp65 antigen was measured every 7-14 d during the first three months after transplantation, given as number of CMV pp65-positive cells per 10(5) leukocytes. A positive test was defined as CMV infection. None of the patients received CMV prophylaxis or preemptive treatment. During a median of 13.7 (7.1-14.9) yr, the number of death-censored graft losses was 118 (25%) and of patient deaths 224 (48%). CMV infection was an independent significant risk factor for mortality in multivariate analysis (HR = 1.453, 95% CI 1.033-2.045, p = 0.032), adjusting for patient and donor age, preemptive transplantation, HLA-DR and -AB mismatches, living donor, acute rejection during the first three months, donor-recipient CMV IgG antibody status and diabetic nephropathy. In univariate analysis, CMV infection was significantly associated with death-censored graft loss but the association was not significant in multivariate model. CMV infection early after kidney transplantation is a predictor of overall mortality but not of death-censored graft loss after a median observation period of 13.7 yr.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/mortalidad , Rechazo de Injerto/mortalidad , Supervivencia de Injerto , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Adolescente , Adulto , Citomegalovirus/patogenicidad , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Supervivencia de Injerto/fisiología , Humanos , Pruebas de Función Renal , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fosfoproteínas/sangre , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Proteínas de la Matriz Viral/sangre , Adulto Joven
11.
Clin Transplant ; 28(1): 134-40, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24372653

RESUMEN

The association between serum uric acid and kidney graft and recipient survival is uncertain. During 2000-2011, we measured serum uric acid at week 10 after transplantation. Of 2748 transplanted patients, 2200 (80.1%) attended this visit. After a median follow-up of 7.4 yr, 378 patients had died, 143 from a cardiovascular cause, and 185 patients lost their graft. The third quintile of uric acid levels (357-405 µM) had the lowest mortality risk and was used as reference group. In Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for graft and patient characteristics, the fifth quintile of uric acid levels (>474 µM) was independently associated with cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.87 [1.55-5.32], p = 0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR = 1.57 [1.09-2.25], p = 0.02). Also, the lowest quintile of uric acid levels (<309 µM) showed a trend toward increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR = 1.79 [0.90-3.58], p = 0.10) and all-cause mortality (HR = 1.31 [0.89-1.93], p = 0.18). The increased risk at low uric acid levels was confined to diabetic recipients. Uric acid was not associated with death-censored graft loss. In conclusion, uric acid has a J-shaped association with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in kidney transplant recipients.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores/sangre , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Rechazo de Injerto/mortalidad , Trasplante de Riñón , Ácido Úrico/sangre , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/sangre , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Rechazo de Injerto/sangre , Supervivencia de Injerto/fisiología , Humanos , Lactante , Fallo Renal Crónico/sangre , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Pruebas de Función Renal , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
12.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 94(2): 173-8, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23995623

RESUMEN

The increased risk of squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) in renal transplant recipients (RTR) is related to impaired immunosurveillance as a consequence of immunosuppressive therapy. Since dendritic cells (DC) play an important role in immunosurveillance, we investigated the quantity of DC subsets and macrophages in normal skin of RTR and immunocompetent controls by immunohistochemistry. In this comparative study Langerhans' cells (LC) were present in similar numbers in RTR and controls. The number of CD11c+ DC was significantly reduced in RTR, particularly in patients on triple treatment therapy, compared with controls. Macrophages were significantly increased. Plasmacytoid DC were not detected in normal skin. The reduced quantity of CD11c+ DC and increased number of macrophages in normal skin of immunosuppressed RTR may contribute to the increased incidence of SCC in RTR. This finding underlines the role of DC subsets in immunosurveillance, and may have implications for our understanding of the effect of immunosuppression on DC subsets.


Asunto(s)
Antígeno CD11c/metabolismo , Células Dendríticas/inmunología , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Trasplante de Riñón , Piel/metabolismo , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Células Dendríticas/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Células de Langerhans/metabolismo , Macrófagos/metabolismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros
13.
Ren Fail ; 36(1): 9-16, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24028283

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: For the majority of the older patients in dialysis, the treatment will be lifelong. Thus, quality of life (QoL) is a crucial outcome. Our aim was to assess the QoL of older Norwegian dialysis patients and to investigate the impact of early (estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR ≥10 mL/min) versus late (eGFR <10 mL/min) start in dialysis, comorbidity, nutritional status and physical capacity. METHODS: A self-report questionnaire including SF-36 (QoL) and the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA; nutritional status) was mailed to all patients (n = 320) ≥75 years registered in the Norwegian Renal Registry (NRR) as being in dialysis by September 2009. Reply was received from 233 patients (73%). Medical data including comorbidities and eGFR at dialysis start (obtained for 194 patients) were retrieved from the NRR. Functional capacity was determined from the SGA. RESULTS: Compared to reports from younger dialysis patients, our patients scored poorer on all SF-36 subscales. Early start in dialysis was registered for 52 patients, 142 patients started late, 51.4% were well nourished (SGA A), 32.3% moderately malnourished (SGA B) and 16.4% were severely malnourished (SGA C). No significant association between any SF-36 scores and early versus late start, nutritional status or comorbidity was found. Better physical function was significantly associated with better scores on all SF-36 scales. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that physical function is important to all QoL aspects. Increased focus on physical rehabilitation seems pertinent. Early start of dialysis treatment was not associated with better long term QoL scores.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Diálisis Renal , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/fisiopatología , Masculino , Noruega/epidemiología , Estado Nutricional , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo
15.
Clin Transplant ; 27(2): E151-6, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23351013

RESUMEN

Long-term triple immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine (CsA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and prednisolone may be excessively powerful for many transplant recipients. We compared withdrawal of either MMF or CsA in stable kidney transplants on triple immunosuppression. The study was a prospective, randomized, controlled 12-months trial in stable kidney transplants. The patients who withdrew CsA were given MMF 2 g/d, and CsA troughs were between 75 and 125 ng/mL in MMF withdrawal. Planned inclusion was 298 patients. The study was prematurely aborted after inclusion of 39 patients. Acute rejection rates were 6/20 (30%) in the MMF group compared with 0/19 (0%) in the CsA group (p = 0.02). Time to acute rejections was 4.0-28.7 months after withdrawal. Trough concentrations of mycophenolic acid (MPA) and CsA showed therapeutic levels. The subjects have been observed for eight yr, and of the 28 patients remaining on randomized therapy, the MMF patients preserved graft function better than CsA patients. Death-censored graft survival was 75% and 95% (p = 0.18) and patient survival was 70% and 68% (p = 0.99) in the MMF and CsA groups, respectively, at the end of long-term follow-up. CsA withdrawal was associated with a high rate of acute rejections. Initially, the treatment of acute rejections was successful. However, five of six lost their grafts in the long term.


Asunto(s)
Ciclosporina/administración & dosificación , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Trasplante de Riñón , Ácido Micofenólico/análogos & derivados , Prednisolona/uso terapéutico , Privación de Tratamiento , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Anciano , Ciclosporina/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Terminación Anticipada de los Ensayos Clínicos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Micofenólico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 27(4): 1485-91, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21821835

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recently, a Japanese model used to predict 10-year risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in IgA nephropathy (IgAN) patients was published. We tested the applicability of the Japanese model in predicting 10- to 20-year risk of ESRD and all-cause mortality in a cohort of Norwegian IgAN patients. METHODS: A cohort of IgAN patients (1988-2004) were identified in the Norwegian Kidney Biopsy Registry (NKBR) and ESRD or death during follow-up through 2008 was identified through record linkage with the Norwegian Renal Registry (ESRD) and the Norwegian Population Registry (deaths). Data from the NKBR were used to classify patients into nine different prognostic groups (0-1, 1-5, 5-10, 10-20, 20-30, 30-50, 50-70, 70-90 and >90% risk of ESRD) according to the Japanese prognostic model. The predicted risk was compared to the measured risk of ESRD in the different prognostic groups. RESULTS: In eight of the nine risk groups, representing 597/633 (94%) of the patients in our cohort, the observed 10-year risk was within or close to the expected 10-year risk of ESRD. ESRD occurring after >10 years of observation was most frequent in the groups with 5-30% expected risk at 10 years of follow-up. A close association between risk of ESRD and risk of death prior to ESRD was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The Japanese prognostic model is applicable to predict 10-year risk of ESRD in Norwegian IgAN patients. A new finding in the present study is that the model can also be used to predict which patients have the highest risk of developing ESRD after 10-20 years of follow-up as well as all-cause mortality risk.


Asunto(s)
Glomerulonefritis por IGA/complicaciones , Glomerulonefritis por IGA/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Modelos Teóricos , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Masculino , Noruega/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Sistema de Registros , Medición de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo
17.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 27(9): 3621-31, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22555254

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To examine the time trend and international differences in access to the waiting list and renal transplantation of patients with end-stage kidney disease. METHODS: We included all patients (n = 30 961) from Austria, Norway, the Netherlands and Scotland who started renal replacement therapy (RRT) between 1995 and 2003 with their kidney transplant waiting list data (until 31 December 2005) and follow-up data on RRT and mortality (until 31 December 2007). The outcome measure was access to the waiting list within 2 years and to a first renal transplant within 4 years from the start of RRT, expressed as incidence per million age-related population (p.m.a.r.p.) per year. To estimate trends over time, mean percentage annual change (MPAC) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: In each country, the number of patients starting RRT > 65 years increased significantly over time, whereas the number of renal transplants did not increase to the same extent. Only in Norway were almost all patients on the waiting list transplanted within 4 years of RRT start if they were < 65 years. In patients who started RRT > 65 years, the access to renal transplantation was high in Norway (49 p.m.a.r.p.) and low in Austria ( < 26 p.m.a.r.p.), the Netherlands and Scotland (both < 10 p.m.a.r.p.) but increased significantly in Austria (MPAC = 9.8%; 95% CI = 3.9-16.9) and the Netherlands (MPAC = 9.0%; 95% CI = 3.2-15.0). CONCLUSION: Only in Norway, virtually all patients on the waiting list < 65 years received a transplant within 4 years after the start of RRT and, remarkably, also most of those > 65 years of age.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Trasplante de Riñón/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal , Listas de Espera , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Austria/epidemiología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Noruega/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Escocia/epidemiología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo
18.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 27(3): 1256-64, 2012 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21865215

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists concerning the timing of the first kidney transplantation for children who need to start renal replacement therapy (RRT). Our aim was to estimate the effect of timing of the first transplantation on patient survival in children, for the first time also taking into account the mortality on dialysis before transplantation. METHODS: We included 2091 patients who started RRT between the age of 3 and 18 years in the period 1988-2007, from 13 European renal registries. A multistate model was used to simulate patient survival assuming (i) pre-emptive transplantation, (ii) transplantation after 1 or 2 years on dialysis and (iii) remaining on dialysis. RESULTS: Over the 20-year period, the highest 8-year survival probabilities were achieved in children transplanted pre-emptively {living donor (LD): 95.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 93.1-98.8], deceased donor (DD): 95.3% (95% CI: 90.9-99.9)} rather than after 2 years of dialysis [LD: 94.2% (95% CI: 91.6-96.8), DD: 93.4% (95% CI: 91.0-95.9)], although these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Even after taking mortality on dialysis into account, the potentially negative effect of postponing transplantation for 1 or 2 years was relatively small and not statistically significant. Therefore, if pre-emptive transplantation is not possible, starting RRT with a short period of dialysis and receiving a transplant thereafter seems an acceptable alternative from the perspective of patient survival.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Diálisis Renal/mortalidad , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pronóstico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Donantes de Tejidos , Adulto Joven
19.
Arthritis Rheum ; 63(3): 733-7, 2011 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21360503

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess graft and patient survival as well as causes for graft loss and patient death after renal transplantation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Eighty-seven renal transplantations were performed in 77 patients with SLE from 1972 to 2005. Each recipient with SLE was matched (for date of transplant, age, donor source [living versus deceased], and sex) with 2 renal graft recipients who had non-SLE glomerulonephritis, and the SLE and non-SLE groups were compared with regard to graft survival and patient survival. RESULTS: The mean ± SD age of SLE patients at the time of transplantation was 37.4 ± 12.8 years, and the majority of SLE patients were female (80.5%). SLE patients were well matched to control transplant patients for date of transplant, age, and donor source (living versus deceased donor). The death-censored graft survival rate for SLE patients receiving transplants corresponded closely to that for the control groups; the 1-, 5-, and 10-year graft survival rates were 88%, 81%, and 71%, respectively, for SLE patients, and 91%, 83%, and 74%, respectively, for patients with non-SLE glomerulonephritis (P = 0.31). Patient survival differed significantly; the rates of survival for recipients with SLE were 94%, 83%, and 71% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. The corresponding rates of patient survival in the non-SLE glomerulonephritis cohort were 96%, 92%, and 85% (P = 0.018). Cardiovascular events were the most prominent cause of death in SLE patients (66.7%, versus 39.5% in the control group; P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Transplant patients with SLE have a graft survival rate that matches that of recipients with non-SLE glomerulonephritis. SLE patients who receive transplants have a lower survival rate than control patients. The excessive mortality in SLE is attributed to a greater number of cardiovascular deaths.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/mortalidad , Nefritis Lúpica/mortalidad , Nefritis Lúpica/cirugía , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Glomerulonefritis/mortalidad , Glomerulonefritis/cirugía , Rechazo de Injerto/mortalidad , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Donadores Vivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia
20.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 10: 46, 2012 May 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22559816

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To assess health- related quality of life (HRQOL) with SF-12 and SF-36 and compare their abilities to predict mortality in chronic dialysis patients, after adjusting for traditional risk factors. METHODS: The Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) with the embedded SF-12 was applied in 301 dialysis patients cross-sectionally. Physical and mental component summary (PCS-36, MCS-36, PCS-12, and MCS-12) scores were calculated. Clinical and demographic data were collected. Mortality (followed for up to 4.5 years) was analyzed with Kaplan Meier plots and Cox proportional hazards, after censoring for renal transplantation. Exclusion factors were observation time <2 months (n = 21) and missing component summary scores (n = 10 for SF-36; n = 28 for SF-12), thus 252 patient were included in the analyses. RESULTS: In 252 patients (60.2 ± 15.5 years, 65.9% males, dialysis vintage 9.0, IQR 5.0-23.0 months), mortality during follow-up was 33.7%.(85 deaths). Significant correlations were observed between PCS-36 and PCS-12 (ρ = 0.93, p < 0.001) and between MCS-36 and MCS-12 (ρ = 0.95, p < 0.001). Mortality rate was highest in patients in the lowest quartile of PCS-12 (χ² = 15.3, p = 0.002) and PCS-36 (χ² = 16.7, p = 0.001). MCS was not associated with mortality. Adjusted hazard ratios for mortality were 2.5 (95% CI 1.0-6.3, PCS-12) and 2.7 (1.1 - 6.4, PCS-36) for the lowest compared with the highest ("best perceived") quartile of PCS. CONCLUSION: Compromised HRQOL is an independent predictor of poor outcome in dialysis patients. The SF-12 provided similar predictions of mortality as SF-36, and may serve as an applicable clinical tool because it requires less time to complete.


Asunto(s)
Indicadores de Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas/normas , Calidad de Vida , Diálisis Renal/mortalidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Algoritmos , Comorbilidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega/epidemiología , Diálisis Peritoneal/mortalidad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Insuficiencia Renal/etiología , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA