Previous radiotherapy improves treatment responses and causes a trend toward longer time to progression among patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse events.

BACKGROUND: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are frequently encountered by patients during immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment and are associated with better treatment outcomes. The sequencing of radiotherapy (RT) and ICIs is widely used in current clinical practice, but its effect on survival has remained unclear. METHODS: In a real-world multicenter study including 521 patients who received ICI treatment for metastatic or locally advanced cancer, RT schedules and timing, irAEs, time to progression, overall survival, and treatment responses were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Patients who received previous RT and developed irAE (RT +/AE +) had the best overall response rate (ORR 44.0%). The ORR was 40.1% in the RT -/AE + group, 26.7% in the RT -/AE - group and 18.3% in the RT + /AE - group (p < 0.001). There was a significantly longer time to progression (TTP) in the RT + /AE + group compared to the RT -/AE - and RT + /AE - groups (log rank p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively), but the trend toward longer TTP in the RT + /AE + group did not reach statistical significance in pairwise comparison to that in the RT -/AE + group. Preceding RT timing and intent had no statistically significant effect on TTP. In a multivariate model, ECOG = 0 and occurrence of irAEs remained independent positive prognostic factors for TTP (HR 0.737; 95% CI 0.582-0.935; p = 0.012, and HR 0.620; 95% CI 0.499-0.769; p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Better ORR and a trend toward longer TTP were demonstrated for patients with RT preceding ICI treatment and development of irAEs, which suggests that RT may boost the therapeutic effect of immunotherapy in patients with metastatic cancers.

A Retrospective Analysis of Systemic Oncologic Treatment in Older Patients With Advanced Soft-tissue Sarcoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Almost half of all patients with soft-tissue sarcoma are over 65 years of age, and the proportion of older patients is increasing. Despite this, they have been underrepresented in clinical trials and only limited data are available to guide treatment decisions. The aim of this study was to investigate treatment patterns and outcomes in older patients with soft-tissue sarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients over 50 years old treated for advanced soft-tissue sarcoma at the Helsinki University Hospital between January 2000 and July 2020 were included. Data on patient and tumor characteristics, treatment, and survival were retrospectively collected. A total of 152 patients were included: 14.5% (n=22) were over 75 years old, 34.2% (n=52) were 65-74 and 51.3% (n=78) were 50-64 years old. RESULTS: The outcomes of the oldest group differed from those of younger patients; they were more likely to receive single-agent treatment as first-line therapy (90.9% vs. 28.8% and 24.4%, p<0.001) and had the lowest relative dose-intensity (70% vs. 88% and 95%, p<0.05). They experienced grade three to four hematological adverse events less frequently (38.1%, 56.9% and 72.7%, respectively, p=0.031), and received fewer lines of treatment (median of 1, 2 and 2, respectively, p=0.01). In patients aged ≥75 years, there was no association between further lines of therapy and improved survival. Compared to the youngest group, the oldest patients had a greater risk of dying (hazard ratio=1.7, 95% confidence interval=1.0-2.8, p=0.041) and their median overall survival was only 7.4 months, compared to 14.3 and 12.9 months in the two younger groups. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that older patients tolerate chemotherapy when treatment is tailored to their needs but may not benefit as much as younger patients.

Local relapse of soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities or trunk wall operated on with wide margins without radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: The quality of surgical margins is the most important factor affecting local control in soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Despite this, there is no universally accepted consensus on the definition of an adequate surgical margin or on which patients should be offered radiation therapy. This study focuses on local control and its prognostic factors in patients with trunk wall and extremity STS. METHODS: Adult patients with a final diagnosis of trunk wall or extremity STS referred to a single tertiary referral centre between August 1987 and December 2016 were identified from a prospective institutional database. Patients were treated according to a protocol instituted in 1987. The classification of surgical margins and indications for radiation therapy were based on anatomy and strict definition of surgical margins as metric distance to the resection border. Local treatment was defined as adequate if patients received either surgery with wide margins alone or marginal surgery combined with radiation therapy. Margins were considered wide if the tumour was excised with pathological margins greater than 2.5 cm or with an uninvolved natural anatomical barrier. After treatment, patients were followed up with local imaging and chest X-ray: 5 years for high-grade STS, 10 years for low-grade STS. RESULTS: A total of 812 patients were included with a median follow-up of 5.8 (range 0.5-19.5) years. Forty-four patients had a grade 1 tumour: there were no instances of recurrence in this group thus they were excluded from further analysis. Five-year local control in the 768 patients with grade 2-3 STS was 90.1 per cent in patients receiving adequate local treatment according to the protocol. Altogether, 333 patients (43.4 per cent) were treated with wide surgery alone and their 5-year local control rate was 91.1 per cent. Among patients treated with wide surgery alone, deep location was the only factor adversely associated with local relapse risk in multivariable analysis; 5-year local control was 95.3 per cent in superficial and 88.3 per cent in deep-sited sarcomas (hazards ratio 3.154 (95% c.i. 1.265 to 7.860), P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: A high local control rate is achievable with surgery alone for a substantial proportion of patients with STS of the extremities or superficial trunk wall.