Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Pain Pract ; 19(7): 751-761, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31188514

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic abdominal pain can be due to entrapped intercostal nerves (anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome [ACNES]). If abdominal wall infiltration using an anesthetic agent is unsuccessful, a neurectomy may be considered. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) applies an electric field around the tip of the cannula near the affected nerve to induce pain relief. Only limited retrospective evidence suggests that PRF is effective in ACNES. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, nonblinded, controlled proof-of-concept trial was performed in 66 patients. All patients were scheduled for a neurectomy procedure. Thirty-three patients were randomized to first receive a 6-minute cycle of PRF treatment, while the other 33 were allocated to an immediate neurectomy procedure. Pain was recorded using a numeric rating scale (NRS, 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain possible]). Successful treatment was defined as >50% pain reduction. Patients in the PRF group were allowed to cross over to a neurectomy after 8 weeks. RESULTS: The neurectomy group showed greater pain reduction at 8-week follow-up (mean change from baseline -2.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] -3.9 to -1.7) vs. -1.5 (95% CI -2.3 to -0.6); P = 0.045) than the PRF group. Treatment success was reached in 12 of 32 (38%, 95% CI 23 to 55) of the PRF group and 17 of 28 (61%, 95% CI 42 to 72) of the neurectomy group (P = 0.073). Thirteen patients were withdrawn from their scheduled surgery. Adverse events were comparable between treatments. CONCLUSIONS: PRF appears to be an effective and minimally invasive treatment option and may therefore be considered in patients who failed conservative treatment options before proceeding to a neurectomy procedure. Anterior neurectomy may possibly lead to a greater pain relief compared with PRF in patients with ACNES, but potential complications associated with surgery should be discussed.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Desnervación/métodos , Síndromes de Compresión Nerviosa/complicaciones , Síndromes de Compresión Nerviosa/terapia , Tratamiento de Radiofrecuencia Pulsada/métodos , Pared Abdominal , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Nervios Intercostales/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor , Ondas de Radio , Piel , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Trials ; 18(1): 362, 2017 08 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28768538

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Some patients with chronic abdominal pain suffer from an anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES). This somewhat illusive syndrome is thought to be caused by the entrapment of end branches of the intercostal nerves residing in the abdominal wall. If ACNES is suspected, a local injection of an anesthetic agent may offer relief. If pain is recurrent following multiple-injection therapy, an anterior neurectomy entailing removal of the entrapped nerve endings may be considered. After 1 year, a 70% success rate has been reported. Research on minimally invasive alternative treatments is scarce. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment is a relatively new treatment for chronic pain syndromes. An electromagnetic field is applied around the nerve in the hope of leading to pain relief. This randomized controlled trial compares the effect of PRF treatment and neurectomy in patients with ACNES. METHODS: Adult ACNES patients having short-lived success following injections are randomized to PRF or neurectomy. At the 8-week follow-up visit, unsuccessful PRF patients are allowed to cross over to a neurectomy. Primary outcome is pain relief after either therapy. Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction, quality of life, use of analgesics and unanticipated adverse events. The study is terminated 6 months after receiving the final procedure. DISCUSSION: Since academic literature on minimally invasive techniques is lacking, well-designed trials are needed to optimize results of treatment for ACNES. This is the first large, randomized controlled, proof-of-concept trial comparing two therapy techniques in ACNES patients. The first patient was included in October 2015. The expected trial deadline is December 2017. If effective, PRF may be incorporated into the ACNES treatment algorithm, thus minimizing the number of patients requiring surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Nederlands Trial Register (Dutch Trial Register), NTR5131 ( http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=5131 ). Registered on 15 April 2015.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal/cirugía , Pared Abdominal/inervación , Ablación por Catéter , Dolor Crónico/cirugía , Desnervación/métodos , Nervios Intercostales/cirugía , Síndromes de Compresión Nerviosa/cirugía , Piel/inervación , Dolor Abdominal/diagnóstico , Dolor Abdominal/fisiopatología , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/fisiopatología , Protocolos Clínicos , Desnervación/efectos adversos , Humanos , Nervios Intercostales/fisiopatología , Síndromes de Compresión Nerviosa/diagnóstico , Síndromes de Compresión Nerviosa/fisiopatología , Países Bajos , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Prueba de Estudio Conceptual , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Proyectos de Investigación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA