Associations of dexamethasone's effect on morphine consumption after total knee arthroplasty-Subgroup analyses.

The DEXamethasone twice for pain treatment after Total Knee Arthroplasty (DEX-2-TKA) trial showed that adding one and two doses of 24 mg intravenous dexamethasone to paracetamol, ibuprofen and local infiltration analgesia, reduced morphine consumption (primary outcome) within 48 h after TKA. We aimed to explore the differences in the effect of dexamethasone on morphine consumption in different subgroups. Quantile regression adjusted for site was used to test for significant interaction between the predefined dichotomised subgroups and treatment group. The subgroups were defined based on baseline data: sex (male/female), age (≤65 years/>65 years), American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA)-score (ASA I + II/III), visual analogue score of preoperative pain at rest (≤30 mm/>30 mm), pain during mobilisation (≤30 mm/>30 mm), type of anaesthesia (spinal anaesthesia/general anaesthesia and spinal converted to general anaesthesia), and prior daily use of analgesics (either paracetamol and/or NSAID/neither). These analyses were supplemented with post hoc multivariate linear regression analyses. Test of interaction comparing sex in the pairwise comparison between DX2 (dexamethasone [24 mg] + dexamethasone [24 mg]) versus placebo (p = .02), showed a larger effect of dexamethasone on morphine consumption in male patients compared to females. Test of interaction comparing age in the pairwise comparison between DX1 (dexamethasone [24 mg] + placebo) versus placebo (p = .04), showed a larger effect of dexamethasone on morphine consumption in younger patients (≤65 years) compared to older. All remaining subgroup analyses showed no evidence of a difference. The supplemental multivariate analyses did not support any significant interaction for sex (p = .256) or age (p = .730) but supported a significant interaction with the type of anaesthesia (p < .001). Our results from the quantile regression analyses indicate that the male sex and younger age (≤65 years) may be associated with a larger analgesic effect of dexamethasone than the effects in other types of patients. However, this is not supported by post-hoc multivariate linear regression analyses. The two types of analyses both supported a possible interaction with the type of anaesthesia.

Prolonged effects of dexamethasone following total knee arthroplasty: A pre-planned sub-study of the DEX-2-TKA trial.

OBJECTIVES: The DEX-2-TKA trial demonstrated that one and two doses of 24 mg intravenous dexamethasone reduced opioid consumption and pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We aimed to investigate the prolonged effects of dexamethasone after the 48-h intervention period. DESIGN: This was a prospective, pre-planned questionnaire follow-up on postoperative days 3-7 of patients in the DEX-2-TKA trial that randomly received: DX1 (dexamethasone 24 mg + placebo), DX2 (dexamethasone 24 mg + dexamethasone 24 mg), and placebo (placebo + placebo) perioperatively and 24 h later. SETTING: A multicenter trial performed at five Danish hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed 434 of 485 adult participants enrolled in the DEX-2-TKA trial. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was difference between groups in average of all numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores reported in the morning, at bedtime, and the daily average pain on postoperative days 3-7. Secondary outcomes were sleep quality and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) pain intensity levels for postoperative days 3-7 were: DX2 3.2 (2.1-4.3); DX1 3.3 (2.3-4.1); and placebo 3.3 (2.5-4.7). Hodges-Lehmann median differences between groups were: 0 (95% confidence interval - 0.54 to 0.2), P = 0.38 between DX1 and placebo; 0.1 (-0.47 to 0.33), p = .87 between DX1 and DX2; and 0.1 (-0.6 to 0.13), p = .20 between DX2 and placebo. We found no relevant differences between groups on sleep quality on postoperative days 3-7 nor for patient satisfaction with the analgesic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We found that neither one nor two doses of 24 mg intravenous dexamethasone demonstrated prolonged effects on overall pain or sleep quality on postoperative days 3-7 after total knee arthroplasty. We also found that dexamethasone had no effect on patient satisfaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03506789 (main result trial).

Risk and Epidemiology of Periprosthetic Knee Fractures After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic knee fractures (PPKFs) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are uncommon, but potentially serious injuries. We analyze the risk and risk factors for a PPKF in standard primary TKA patients who have osteoarthritis and a minimally (cruciate-retaining TKAs without a femoral box cut) or posterior-stabilized TKA. In addition, we report the risk for patients who have other underlying knee disorders and/or a higher level of TKA constraint. METHODS: All primary TKAs were identified from the Danish National Patient Register and the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register using data between 1997 and 2022. Subsequent fractures were identified through the International Classification of Diseases diagnosis code, Nordic Medico-Statistical Committee procedure code, or indication for revision TKA. RESULTS: We included 120,642 standard primary TKA patients who had 1,659 PPKFs. The cumulated proportions were 0.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3 to 0.4) at 2 years 0.8% (0.7 to 0.8) at 5 years. At 10 years, the cumulated proportion was 1.7% (1.6 to 1.8), with 1.3% in the femur, 0.2% in the patella, and 0.2% in the tibia. Significant risk factors were (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI]); ipsilateral hip arthroplasty (2.3 [2.0 to 2.6]); women (2.1 [1.8 to 2.4]), osteoporosis (1.4 [1.2 to 1.7]); age 80+ (1.4 [1.3 to 1.6]), uncemented TKA (1.3 (1.1 to 1.5) and Charlson Comorbidity Index score 3+ (1.4 [1.1 to 1.8]). An additional 22,624 primary TKA patients who had other underlying knee disorders and/or a higher level of implant constraint were included with 633 PPKFs. The 10-year cumulated proportions were 8.3% (95% CI 6.9 to 9.8) when the underlying disorder was a previous fracture, 2.8% (2.2 to 3.5) for rheumatic disorders, and 5.2% (2.6 to 10.6) for osteonecrosis. In patients who had condylar constrained knees, it was 6.9% (5.1 to 9.4), and 12.4% (8.0 to 16.04) for hinges. CONCLUSIONS: In standard primary TKA patients, the 10-year cumulated proportion of PPKFs was 1.7%, and ipsilateral hip arthroplasty, women, osteoporosis, advanced age, uncemented TKA and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index increased the risk. Higher risks were observed in non-osteoarthritis patients and/or patients who had a higher level of TKA constraint.

Major lower extremity amputations - risk of re-amputation, time to re-amputation, and risk factors: a nationwide cohort study from Denmark.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Re-amputation after lower extremity amputation is frequent. The primary aim of our study was to investigate cumulative re-amputation risk after transtibial amputation (TTA), knee disarticulation (KD), and transfemoral amputation (TFA) and secondarily to investigate time to re-amputation, and risk factors. METHODS: This observational cohort study was based on data from the Danish Nationwide Health registers. The population included first-time major lower extremity amputations (MLEA) performed in patients ≥ 50 years between 2010 and 2021. Both left and right sided MLEA from the same patient were included as index procedures. RESULTS: 11,743 index MLEAs on 10,052 patients were included. The overall cumulative risks for re-amputation were 29% (95% confidence interval [CI] 27-30), 30% (CI 26-35), and 11% (CI 10-12) for TTA, KD, and TFA, respectively. 58% of re-amputations were performed within 30 days after index MLEA. Risk factors for re-amputation within 30 days were dyslipidemia (hazard ratio [HR] 1.2, CI 1.0-1.3), renal insufficiency (HR 1.2, CI 1.1-1.4), and prior vascular surgery (HR 1.3, CI 1.2-1.5). CONCLUSION: The risk of re-amputation was more than twice as high after TTA (29%) and KD (30%) compared with TFA (11%). Most re-amputations were conducted within 30 days of the index MLEA. Dyslipidemia, renal insufficiency, and prior vascular surgery were associated with higher risk of re-amputation.

Mortality after major lower extremity amputation and association with index level: a cohort study based on 11,205 first-time amputations from nationwide Danish databases.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Mortality after major lower extremity amputations is high and may depend on amputation level. We aimed to examine the mortality risk in the first year after major lower extremity amputation divided into transtibial and transfemoral amputations. METHODS: This observational cohort study used data from the Danish Nationwide Health registers. 11,205 first-time major lower extremity amputations were included from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2021, comprising 3,921 transtibial amputations and 7,284 transfemoral amputations. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality after transtibial amputation was overall 11%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 10-12 (440/3,921) during the study period, but declined from 10%, CI 7-13 (37/381) in 2010 to 7%, CI 4-11 (15/220) in 2021. The 1-year mortality was 29% overall, CI 28-30 (1,140 /3,921), with a decline from 31%, CI 21-36 (117/381) to 20%, CI 15-26 (45/220) during the study period. For initial transfemoral amputation, the 30-day mortality was overall 23%, CI 22-23 (1,673/7,284) and declined from 27%, CI 23-31 (138/509) to 22%, CI 19-25 (148/683) during the study period. The 1-year mortality was 48% overall, CI 46-49 (3,466/7,284) and declined from 55%, CI 50-59 (279/509) to 46%, CI 42-50 (315/638). CONCLUSION: The mortality after major lower extremity amputation declined in the 12-year study period; however, the 1-year mortality remained high after both transtibial and transfemoral amputations (20% and 46% in 2021). Hence, major lower extremity amputation patients constitute one of the most fragile orthopedic patient groups, emphasizing an increased need for attention in the pre-, peri-, and postoperative setting.

Half of all hip and knee arthroplasty patients may be potential day-case candidates: a nationwide register study of 166,730 procedures.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The overall potential pool of day-case candidates on a national level in hip and knee arthroplasty is unknown. We aimed to estimate the proportion of hip and knee arthroplasty patients eligible for day-case surgery based on contemporary widely used criteria and determine whether there has been a change in the proportion of eligible patients over time and, secondarily, to investigate the proportion of eligible patients discharged on the day of surgery. METHODS: Based on data from the Danish National Patient Register, we identified all patients undergoing primary unilateral hip or knee arthroplasty from January 2010 to March 2020. Using a modification of day-case eligibility criteria proposed by a national multicenter collaboration, we sorted patients into either day-case eligible or ineligible. A day-case procedure was defined as discharge on the day of surgery. RESULTS: We included patients comprising a total of 166,730 primary total hip (THA), total knee (TKA), and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). 48% (95% confidence interval [CI] 48-49) were eligible for day-case surgery, with a decline from 50% (CI 49-51) in 2010 to 46% (CI 46-47) eligible in 2019. More UKA patients were day-case eligible (55%, CI 54-56) than THA (47%, CI 47-48) and TKA patients (49%, CI 48-49). A maximum of 8.0% (CI 7.4-8.5) of eligible patients were discharged on the day of surgery in 2019. CONCLUSION: 48% of the Danish hip and knee arthroplasty patients were potential day-case candidates, with a small decline in eligibility from 50% in 2010 to 46% in 2019. Day of surgery discharge among day-case eligible patients peaked at 8% in 2019. Thus, the potential for more day-case surgery seems large.

Incidence and survival of multiply revised knee arthroplasties in Denmark 1998-2021: a nationwide register-based study.

PURPOSE: The primary aim of our study was to identify the absolute incidence and implant survival of multiply revised knee arthroplasties based on nationwide register data. The secondary aim was to determine the change in the absolute incidence and implant survival of multiply revised knee arthroplasties Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study of primary knee arthroplasties using several nationwide Danish registers. All primary knee arthroplasties performed in Denmark from 1998 to 2021 were identified. From these primary arthroplasties, revision procedures were identified. Kaplan-Meier plots were used in survival analysis to estimate the likelihood of implant survival. RESULTS: 161,384 primary knee arthroplasties and their revisions performed between 1998 and 2021 were identified; of 13,786 (8.5%) revisions there were 10,638 1st revisions, 2,148 2nd revisions, 624 3rd revisions, 223 4th revisions, and 153 procedures that had been revised more than 4 times. The 10-year revision-free survival of primary arthroplasties was 92.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 92.2-92.5). First-time revisions had a 10-year revision-free survival of 75.9% (CI 74.9-76.9). The 10-year survival of second- and third-time revisions was 65.1% (CI 62.6-67.6) and 57.8% (CI 53.4-62.5), respectively. The 10-year implant survival probabilities of primary knee arthroplasties were 91.4% in 1998-2009 and 93.3% in 2010-2021 (difference 2.2%). The 10-year implant survival probabilities of 1st revisions were 77% in 1998-2009 and 75% in 2010-2021 (difference -2.4%). CONCLUSION: We found that 0.3% of all primary knee arthroplasties resulted in 3 or more revisions. The implant survival decreased for each consecutive revision, with almost half of the 3rd revisions being re-revised within 10 years. The 10-survival of the primary implant was higher in 2010-2021, and the 10-year survival of the 1st revision was higher in 1998-2009.

The impact of comorbidity status on knee function 1 year after total knee arthroplasty: a population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Few studies have examined the impact of comorbidity on functional and clinical knee scores after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We compared the effect of having a high Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), relative to a low CCI, on changes in the American Knee Society Score (AKSS) functional and clinical scores from baseline to week 52 after TKA in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: This population-based cohort study included 22,533 patients identified in the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register from 1997 to 2021. Patients were classified as having low, medium, or high comorbidity based on CCI. The outcome was defined as the mean change (from preoperative to 1-year post-TKA) in functional and clinical knee scores measured by the AKSS (0-100). The association was analyzed using multiple linear regression by calculating mean change scores adjusting for sex, age, weight, cohabiting status, and baseline AKSS. RESULTS: The prevalence of patients with low, medium, and high comorbidity was 75%, 21%, and 4%, respectively. The mean change score in functional AKSS for patients with high comorbidity was -6 points (95% confidence interval [CI] -7 to -5) compared with low comorbidity. The mean change score in clinical AKSS for patients with high comorbidity was -1 point (CI -2 to 0) compared with low comorbidity. CONCLUSION: Patients with knee OA and medium or high comorbidity can expect similar improvements in functional and clinical AKSS after TKA to patients with low comorbidity.

Implementation of outpatient hip and knee arthroplasty in a multicenter public healthcare setting.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Length of hospital stay after hip and knee arthroplasty is about 1 day in Denmark with few patients discharged on the day of surgery. Hence, a protocol for multicenter implementation of discharge on day of surgery has been instituted. We aimed to describe the implementation of outpatient hip and knee arthroplasty in a multicenter public healthcare setting. METHODS: We performed a prospective multicenter study from 7 public hospitals across Denmark. Patients were screened using well-defined in- and exclusion criteria and were discharged on day of surgery when fulfilling functional discharge criteria. The study period was from September 2022 to February 2023 with variable start of implementation. Data from the same centers in a 6-month period before the COVID pandemic from July 2019 to December 2019 was used for baseline control. RESULTS: Of 2,756 primary hip and knee arthroplasties, 37% (95% confidence interval [CI] 35-39) were eligible (range 21-50% in centers) and 52% (range 24-62%) of these were discharged on day of surgery. 21% (CI 20-23) of all patients (eligible and non-eligible) were discharged on day of surgery with a range of 10-31% within centers. This was an additional 15% (CI 13-17, P < 0.001) compared with patients discharged in the control period (6% in 2019). CONCLUSION: We found it possible to perform outpatient hip and knee replacement in 21% of patients in a public healthcare setting, probably to be increased with further center experience.

Pain treatment after total hip arthroplasty: Detailed statistical analysis plan for the RECIPE randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The RECIPE trial systematically investigates the effects of different combinations of paracetamol, ibuprofen and dexamethasone for pain treatment after total hip arthroplasty. To preserve transparency, minimise risk of bias and to prevent data-driven analysis, we present this detailed statistical analysis plan. METHODS: The RECIPE trial is a randomised, blinded, parallel four-group multicenter clinical trial for patients undergoing planned primary total hip arthroplasty. Interventions are initiated preoperatively and continued for 24 h postoperatively. Primary outcome is total opioid consumption 0-24 h after end of surgery. Primary analysis will be performed in the modified intention to treat population of all patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty, and all analyses will be stratified for site. We will perform pairwise comparisons between each of the four groups. The primary outcome will be analysed using the van Elteren test and we will present Hodges-Lehmann median differences and confidence intervals. Binary outcomes will be analysed using logistic regression. To preserve a family-wise error rate of <0.05, we will use a Bonferroni-adjusted alfa of 0.05/6 = 0.0083 for all six pairwise comparisons between groups when analysing the primary outcome. We will systematically assess the underlying statistical assumptions for each analysis. Data will be analysed by two blinded independent statisticians, and we will write abstracts covering all possible combinations of conclusions, before breaking the blind. DISCUSSION: The RECIPE trial will provide important information on benefit and harm of combinations of the most frequently used non-opioid analgesics for pain after primary hip arthroplasty.

Knee function, quality of life, pain, and living conditions after distal femoral resection knee arthroplasty for non-tumor indications.

BACKGROUND: Distal femoral resection knee arthroplasty is a limb salvage procedure. The impact of distal femoral resection arthroplasty on patient function and health status is unknown. The aim of this study was to report knee function, quality of life, knee pain, and living conditions after distal femoral resection knee arthroplasty for non-tumor indications. METHODS: Of 52 patients (52 knees) undergoing distal femoral resection knee arthroplasty in a single institution between 2012 and 2021, 22 were excluded as 3 patients had ≤90 days follow-up, 6 had died, and 13 declined or were unable to participate for unrelated reasons. Thus, 30 patients were included and interviewed by telephone in March 2021 (mean follow-up 3.5 years after surgery). Patient completed the Oxford Knee Score (0-48, 48 best), EQ-5D-5L, and the Copenhagen Knee ROM, and information on pain and living conditions was obtained. RESULTS: The mean age was 67.9 years (SD 13.6), and 21 (70%) were female. Mean total Oxford Knee Score was 29.9 (SD 10.5), mean Copenhagen Knee ROM flexion was 116° (SD 21.6), and mean extension was - 2° (SD10.1). Mobility aids were used by 18 (60%) patients, i.e. a cane (30%), walker (26.7%) or wheelchair (3.3%). Mean EQ-5Dindex score was 0.70 (SD 0.22) and mean EQ-5D VAS score was 55.4 (SD 23.9). Nine (30%) patients used paracetamol or NSAID and 2 (6.7%) used opioids for knee pain. Mean VAS knee pain score was 1.30 (SD 2.2) at rest and 2.8 (SD 3.1) when walking. Most (90%) patients lived in their own home, with only 3 patients in nursing homes. Two-thirds (66.7%) required no home care, 5 (16.6%) received home care 1-2 times over 2 weeks, and 5 (16.6%) every day. CONCLUSION: Distal femoral resection knee arthroplasty appears to be a viable treatment option for non-tumor indications. Acceptable patient outcomes were achieved in terms of functional status and quality of life, especially considering treatment alternatives such as femoral amputation.

Patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction after revisions of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasties for unexplained pain vs aseptic loosening.

PURPOSE: Does patients revised for unexplained pain after mUKA present the same PROM and satisfaction scores 1-3 years after revision as patients revised for aseptic loosening?". METHODS: 104 patients undergoing revision of mUKA's for the indications unexplained pain and aseptic loosening were included in the period January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2020. from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register. 52 patients were revised for unexplained pain and 52 for aseptic loosening. Patient demographics did not differ between the two groups. PROMs [Oxford Knee Score (OKS), EQ-5D-5L, Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)] and questions about satisfaction with the surgery were sent to digitally secured mailboxes. Pearson's Chi-square test and Wilcoxon Rank Sum test were used to test for statistical differences between groups. RESULTS: The median OKS 1-3 years after revision was 26 (IQR 22) for unexplained pain vs 34 (IQR 12) for aseptic loosening, p = 0.033. The median EQ-5D-5L Index after revision was 0.7 (IQR 0.6) for unexplained vs 0.8 (IQR 0.1) for aseptic loosening, p = 0.014. The median FJS after revision was 48 (IQR 10) for unexplained pain vs 52 (IQR 14) for aseptic loosening, p = 0.1. The mean satisfaction with the surgery on a 0-100 scale (100 = not satisfied; 0 = very satisfied) was 55 (IQR 60) for unexplained pain vs 50 (IQR 67) for aseptic loosening, p = 0.087, and patients revised for unexplained pain were less likely to find their knee problem importantly improved (p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing revision of mUKAs for unexplained pain presented poor postoperative PROM scores, and PROM scores were worse compared to those of patients revised for aseptic loosening. Patients revised for unexplained pain were less likely to find their knee problem importantly improved. This study support the evidence against revisions for unexplained pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Satisfaction 1 to 3 Years After Revisions of Total Knee Arthroplasties for Unexplained Pain Versus Aseptic Loosening.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown if patients are relieved of pain after knee arthroplasty revision for unexplained pain. The aim of this cross-sectional case-control study was to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and satisfaction 1 to 3 years after revision of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) for the indications of unexplained pain versus aseptic loosening. METHODS: We included 384 patients undergoing TKA revision for the indications of unexplained pain and aseptic loosening from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2020 from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register. A total of 81 patients were revised for unexplained pain and 303 for aseptic loosening. Questionnaires including PROMs (Oxford Knee Score, EQ-5D-5L, and Forgotten Joint Score) and satisfaction with the surgery on a 0-100 scale (100 = not satisfied; 0 = very satisfied) were sent to digitally secured mailboxes. Time from revision to data collection was a median 3.1 years (range, 1.4-4.4 years). RESULTS: Median Oxford Knee Score was 25 (interquartile range [IQR] 15) versus 31 (IQR 18) 1-3 years after revisions for unexplained pain versus aseptic loosening, P = .009. Median EQ-5D-5L was 0.6 (IQR 0.4) versus 0.8 (IQR 0.3) for unexplained pain versus aseptic loosening, P = .009. Median Forgotten Joint Score was 50 (IQR 7) versus 50 (IQR 16) for unexplained pain versus aseptic loosening, P = .905. Satisfaction was 75 (IQR 38) for unexplained pain and 50 (IQR 73) for aseptic loosening, P < .001. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing TKA revision for the indication of unexplained pain had worse results on PROMs than those revised for aseptic loosening. Likewise, patients revised for unexplained pain were less satisfied compared to patients revised for aseptic loosening. This information is valuable to both surgeons and patients when candidates for revision surgery are selected, to obtain the best possible outcomes.

No difference in short-term readmissions following day-case vs. one overnight stay in patients having hip and knee arthroplasty: a nationwide register study of 51,042 procedures from 2010-2020.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Day-case hip and knee arthroplasty has gained in popularity, but there are conflicting results regarding readmissions. We aimed to investigate differences in 30- and 90-day readmission rates between day-case patients and patients with a single overnight stay following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified day-case (DC) and overnight (ON) THA, TKA, and UKA patients, operated on between 2010 and 2020, from the Danish National Patient Register. Day-case surgery was defined as discharge on the day of surgery. Overnight readmissions within 30 or 90 days of surgery were considered readmissions. We compared readmission rates between DC and ON patients within arthroplasty types using logistic regression adjusted for patient characteristics and year of surgery. We included 29,486 THAs (1,353 DC and 28,133 ON), 15,116 TKAs (617 DC and 14,499 ON), and 6,440 UKAs (1,528 DC and 4,914 ON). RESULTS: The 30-day readmission rates were: DC-THA 4.4% vs. ON-THA 4.4% (adjusted odds-ratio [aOR] 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-1.6), DC-TKA 4.7% vs. ON-TKA 4.4% (aOR 1.1, CI 0.69-1.5), and DC-UKA 3.0% vs. ON-UKA 3.0% (aOR 1.1, CI 0.78-1.5). Similarly, no significant differences were present between DC and ON THA, TKA, and UKA regarding 90-day readmissions or time to readmission. CONCLUSION: We found no differences in readmission rates between day-case THA, TKA, and UKA patients and patients with a single overnight stay.

Hip survival after periacetabular osteotomy in patients with acetabular dysplasia, acetabular retroversion, congenital dislocation of the hip, or Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease: a cohort study on 1,501 hips.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous studies on hip survival following periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) have reported isolated data for the treatment of 1 underlying condition, making comparison between patient groups difficult. We report the hip survival after PAO in patients with acetabular dysplasia (AD), acetabular retroversion (AR), congenital dislocation of the hip (CDH), and Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD) with total hip arthroplasty (THA) as primary endpoint and secondarily the risk of subsequent hip-related operations other than THA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1997 to December 2021, 1,501 hips (1,203 patients) underwent PAO in a single center (Odense University Hospital). We identified conversions to THA and other subsequent hip-related operations through patient files and the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR). RESULTS: 123 (8.2%) of the total cohort of 1,501 hips were converted to THA within the study period. The overall Kaplan-Meier hip survival rate was 71% (95% confidence interval [CI] 61-79) at 24 years with a mean follow-up of 7.6 years (range 0.02-25). The individual Kaplan-Meier hip survival rates at 15 years were 81% (CI 76-86) for AD, 94% (CI 91-96) for AR, 84% (CI 66-93) for CDH, and 66% (CI 49-79) for LCPD. In total, the overall risk of additional hip-related operations was 48% (of which 92% were screw removal). CONCLUSION: Encouragingly, 71% of hips were preserved 24 years after PAO. We found that AR patients had the highest (94%) PAO survivorship at 15 years compared with the other underlying hip conditions. Almost half of PAO patients may undergo later additional surgery, of which screw removal is the primary intervention. Overall long-term survival, risk factors for conversion to THA, and risk of additional surgery are relevant information for shared decision-making.

10-year evolution of day-case hip and knee arthroplasty: a Danish nationwide register study of 166,833 procedures from 2010 to 2020.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: No previous studies have investigated the use of day-case arthroplasty in Denmark on a national scale. We investigated the frequency of day-case surgery in total hip (THA), total knee (TKA), and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) from 2010 to 2020 in Denmark. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Primary unilateral THAs, TKAs, and UKAs performed for osteoarthritis were identified in the Danish National Patient Register using procedural and diagnosis codes. Day-case surgery was defined as discharge on the day of surgery. 90-day readmissions were defined as any overnight admissions following discharge. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2020 Danish surgical centers performed 86,070 THAs, 70,323 TKAs, and 10,440 UKAs. From 2010 to 2014, less than 0.5% of THAs and TKAs were day-case procedures. They increased to 5.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.9-5.8) of THAs and 2.8% (CI 2.4-3.2) of TKAs in 2019. From 2010 to 2014, 11% of UKAs were day-case procedures, but they increased to 20% (CI 18-22) in 2019. This increase was driven by a few surgical centers (3-7 centers). In 2010, readmission rates within 90 days of surgery were 10% after THAs and 11% after TKAs, and 9.4% for both THAs and TKAs in 2019. Readmission rates after UKA fluctuated between 4% and 7%. CONCLUSION: From 2010 to 2020 the use of day-case surgery in THA, TKA, and UKA increased in Denmark, driven by only a few centers. During the same period readmissions did not increase.

Study protocol for discharge on day of surgery after hip and knee arthroplasty from the Center for Fast-track Hip and Knee Replacement.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Limited data exists on the implementation process and safety of discharge on the day of surgery after primary hip and knee arthroplasty in a multicenter setting. We report our study protocol on the investigation of the feasibility, safety, and socioeconomic aspects following discharge on day of surgery after hip and knee arthroplasty across 8 fast-track centers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a study protocol for a prospective cohort study on discharge on day of surgery from the Center for Fast-track Hip and Knee Replacement. The collaboration includes 8 centers covering 40% of the primary hip and knee arthroplasty procedures undertaken in Denmark. All patients scheduled for surgery are screened for eligibility using well-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eligible patients fulfilling discharge criteria will be discharged on day of surgery. We expect to screen 9,000 patients annually. Duration and outcome: Patients will be enrolled over a 3-year period from September 2022 and reporting of results will run continuously until December 2025. We shall report the proportion of eligible patients and patients discharged on day of surgery as well as limiting factors. Readmissions and complications within 30 days are recorded with real-time follow-up by research staff. Furthermore, patient-reported information on willingness to repeat discharge on day of surgery, contacts with the healthcare system, complications, and workability is registered 30 days postoperatively. EQ-5D, Oxford Knee Score, and Oxford Hip Score are completed preoperatively and after 3 months and 1 year. Finally, outcome data will be used in the development of a prediction model for successful discharge on the day of surgery.

The use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement and systemic antibiotic prophylactic use in 2,971,357 primary total knee arthroplasties from 2010 to 2020: an international register-based observational study among countries in Africa, Europe, North America, and Oceania.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) and systemic antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) have been used to reduce periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates. We investigated the use of ALBC and SAP in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This observational study is based on 2,971,357 primary TKAs reported in 2010-2020 to national/regional joint arthroplasty registries in Australia, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Romania, South Africa, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK, and the USA. Aggregate-level data on trends and types of bone cement, antibiotic agents, and doses and duration of SAP used was extracted from participating registries. RESULTS: ALBC was used in 77% of the TKAs with variation ranging from 100% in Norway to 31% in the USA. Palacos R+G was the most common (62%) ALBC type used. The primary antibiotic used in ALBC was gentamicin (94%). Use of ALBC in combination with SAP was common practice (77%). Cefazolin was the most common (32%) SAP agent. The doses and duration of SAP used varied from one single preoperative dosage as standard practice in Bolzano, Italy (98%) to 1-day 4 doses in Norway (83% of the 40,709 TKAs reported to the Norwegian arthroplasty register). CONCLUSION: The proportion of ALBC usage in primary TKA varies internationally, with gentamicin being the most common antibiotic. ALBC in combination with SAP was common practice, with cefazolin the most common SAP agent. The type of ALBC and type, dose, and duration of SAP varied among participating countries.

Outcome After Treatment of Distal Fibula Fractures Using One-Third Tubular Plate, Locking Compression Plate or Distal Anatomical Locking Compression Plate.

Surgical treatment of lateral distal fibula fractures is associated with high risk of reoperation and complications. The primary aim was to report risks of surgical site infection (SSI) and reoperation ≤1 year after treatment with one-third tubular plate, locking compression plate (LCP) or distal anatomical LCP. Secondary to investigate associations between patient, fracture and operative factors and risk of SSI and reoperation. Retrospectively, we evaluated a consecutive cohort of 588 patients having osteosynthesis of distal fibula with a one-third tubular plate (n = 417), LCP (n = 115) or distal anatomical LCP plate (n = 56) at Bispebjerg Hospital, Denmark from January 2010 to December 2015 with 1-year follow-up. The risk of SSI was 15% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12-18) after treatment with one-third tubular plate, 30% (95% CI 23-39) after LCP and 41% (95% CI 29-54) after distal anatomical LCP. We found a significant association of SSI and LCP (p = .005) and distal anatomical LCP (p < .001). Other factors associated with increased risk of SSI were age>70 years (p < .001), smoking (p = .004), DM (p = .007), surgery time ≥90 minutes (p = .006) and surgery delay of 3-6 days (p = .007). The risk of reoperation ≤1 year was 10% (95% CI 6-11) for one-third tubular plate, 21% (95% CI 14-29) for LCP and 25% (95% CI 16-38) for distal anatomical LCP. We found a significant association between distal anatomical LCP and risk of reoperation (p = .008). The only other risk factor associated with risk of reoperation was surgery delay of more than 7 days (p = .004). We conclude that LCP plate and the distal anatomical LCP plate should only be used after careful considerations.

Patient safety in distal femoral resection knee arthroplasty for non-tumor indications: a single-center consecutive cohort study of 45 patients.

BACKGROUND: Distal femoral resection knee arthroplasty may be a viable option for several indications other than bone tumors. Resection knee arthroplasty appears to be becoming more common, but patients requiring this type of surgery are often elderly and with high comorbidity. The aim of this study was to report in-hospital complications, readmissions, reoperations, and mortality after distal femoral resection knee arthroplasty for non-tumor indications. METHODS: We retrospectively identified a consecutive cohort of 45 knees (45 patients) treated with distal femoral resection knee arthroplasty in a single institution between 2012 and 2021. Indications for surgery were failure of osteosynthesis (8), primary fracture treatment (2), periprosthetic fracture (22), and revision arthroplasty with severe bone loss (13). A major reoperation was defined as a major component exchange procedure or amputation. Mean follow-up was 3.9 years. RESULTS: The mean age was 71.3 years (SD 12.3), and 64.4% were female; 8.9% were ASA I, 40% ASA II, and 51% ASA III. Median length of stay was 7 days (range 3-19) with no major in-hospital complications, but 55.6% (n = 25) required blood transfusion. The 90-day readmission rate was 17.8% (n = 8), of which 50% was prosthesis-related. Four patients (8.9%) underwent major reoperation due to infection (n = 2), mechanical failure (n = 1), or periprosthetic fracture (n = 1). The mortality rate was 0% ≤ 90 days and 2.2% ≤1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Distal femoral resection knee arthroplasty in this fragile patient population appears to be a viable and safe option considering that it is a limp salvage procedure most cases.