Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Respir Res ; 18(1): 34, 2017 02 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28187789

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) has been grouping the allergic and hypersensitivity disorders involving the respiratory tract under topographic distribution, regardless of the underlying mechanisms, triggers or concepts currently in use for allergic and hypersensitivity conditions. In order to strengthen awareness and deliberate the creation of the new "Allergic or hypersensitivity disorders involving the respiratory tract" section of the ICD-11, we here propose make the building process public. METHODS: The new frame has been constructed to cover the gaps previously identified and was based on consensus academic reports and ICD-11 principles. Constant and bilateral discussion was kept with relevant groups representing specialties and resulted in proposals submission into the ICD-11 online platform. RESULTS: The "Allergic or hypersensitivity disorders involving the respiratory tract" section covers 64 entities distributed across five main categories. All the 79 proposals submitted resulted from an intensive collaboration of the Allergy working group, relevant Expert working groups and the WHO ICD governance. CONCLUSION: The establishment of the ICD-11 "Allergic or hypersensitivity disorders involving the respiratory tract" section will allow the dissemination of the updated concepts to be used in clinical practice by many different specialties and health professionals.


Asunto(s)
Guías como Asunto , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades/normas , Colaboración Intersectorial , Neumología/normas , Hipersensibilidad Respiratoria/clasificación , Hipersensibilidad Respiratoria/diagnóstico , Humanos
2.
Pediatr Radiol ; 43(5): 605-11, 2013 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23184069

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiac MRI has become widespread to characterize cardiac lesions in children. No study has examined the role of deep sedation performed by non-anesthesiologists for this investigation. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that deep sedation provided by non-anesthesiologists can be provided with a similar safety and efficacy profile to general anesthesia provided by anesthesiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of children who underwent cardiac MRI over a 5-year period. The following data were collected from the medical records: demographic data, cardiac lesion, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, sedation type, provider, medications, sedation duration and adverse events or interventions. Image and sedation adequacy were recorded. RESULTS: Of 1,465 studies identified, 1,197 met inclusion criteria; 43 studies (3.6%) used general anesthesia, 506 (42.3%) had deep sedation and eight (0.7%) required anxiolysis only. The remaining 640 studies (53.5%) were performed without sedation. There were two complications in the general anesthesia group (4.7%) versus 17 in the deep sedation group (3.4%). Sedation was considered inadequate in 22 of the 506 deep sedation patients (4.3%). Adequate images were obtained in 95.3% of general anesthesia patients versus 86.6% of deep sedation patients. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the incidence of adverse events or cardiac MRI image adequacy for children receiving general anesthesia by anesthesiologists versus deep sedation by non-anesthesiologists. In summary, this study demonstrates that an appropriately trained sedation provider can provide deep sedation for cardiac MRI without the need for general anesthesia in selected cases.


Asunto(s)
Sedación Profunda/estadística & datos numéricos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico , Cardiopatías/epidemiología , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Imagen por Resonancia Cinemagnética/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Georgia/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Estrés Psicológico/prevención & control
3.
J Asthma ; 47(3): 317-22, 2010 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20394517

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The study aims to assess medication adherence and asthma management behaviors and their modifiable predictors in low-income children with persistent asthma. METHODS: The authors conducted a cohort study of 143 children ages 6 to 11 prescribed a daily inhaled controller medicine that could be electronically monitored. Children were recruited from clinics or the emergency department of an urban children's hospital. Data were collected at baseline (T1) and 1 year later (T2). Outcome measures were adherence to controller medications as measured by electronic monitoring devices, observed metered-dose inhaler and spacer technique, exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, and attendance at appointments with primary health care provider. RESULTS: Medication adherence rates varied across medications, with higher rates for montelukast than for fluticasone. Eleven percent to 15% of children demonstrated metered dose inhaler and spacer technique suggesting no drug delivery, and few (5% to 6%) evidenced significant exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Less than half of recommended health care visits were attended over the study interval. Few psychosocial variables were associated with adherence at T1 or in the longitudinal analyses. Fluticasone adherence at T2 was predicted by caregiver asthma knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of low-income children with persistent asthma receive less than half of their prescribed inhaled controller agent. Patients without Medicaid, with low levels of caregiver asthma knowledge, or with caregivers who began childrearing at a young age may be at highest risk for poor medication adherence.


Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano , Anciano , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
4.
Pediatrics ; 133(6): 1158-62, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24864168

RESUMEN

The majority of public and private payers in the United States currently use the Medicare Resource-Based Relative Value Scale as the basis for physician payment. Many large group and academic practices have adopted this objective system of physician work to benchmark physician productivity, including using it, wholly or in part, to determine compensation. The Resource-Based Relative Value Scale survey instrument, used to value physician services, was designed primarily for procedural services, leading to current concerns that American Medical Association/Specialty Society Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) surveys may undervalue nonprocedural evaluation and management services. The American Academy of Pediatrics is represented on the RUC, the committee charged with maintaining accurate physician work values across specialties and age groups. The Academy, working closely with other primary care and subspecialty societies, actively pursues a balanced RUC membership and a survey instrument that will ensure appropriate work relative value unit assignments, thereby allowing pediatricians to receive appropriate payment for their services relative to other services.


Asunto(s)
Política de Salud/economía , Política de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pediatría/economía , Pediatría/legislación & jurisprudencia , Escalas de Valor Relativo , Academias e Institutos , Niño , Current Procedural Terminology , Tabla de Aranceles , Humanos , Medicare/economía , Medicare/legislación & jurisprudencia , Terminología como Asunto , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA