Overcoming challenges to reduce time to antibiotic therapy in febrile neutropenic children: insights from a Mexican center.

BACKGROUND: Providing quality supportive therapy for children with cancer is essential to reduce the high mortality rates in low- and middle-income countries. Febrile neutropenia is the most common life-threatening complication of cancer in children. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of the 'Golden Hour' intervention in reducing the time to administer antibiotics and its impact on clinical outcomes in a Mexican hospital. METHODS: A comparative study of children with febrile neutropenia who attended the emergency department at the Hospital Universitario "Dr. José Eleuterio González" was performed between January 2017 and December 2022. In May 2019, this center joined the collaborative 'Mexico in Alliance with St. Jude' project. An adapted improvement program was developed based on the implementation of an algorithm comprising institutional guidance, supplies kit, standardization of sample processing, training of healthcare providers, and patient education. The time to antibiotic administration was compared with clinical outcomes between the historical control and post-intervention groups. RESULTS: A total of 291 patients were included, 122 in the pre-intervention period and 169 in the intervention period. Only 5.7 % of the pre-intervention group received the first dose of antibiotics within 60 min of presenting to the emergency department compared to 84.6 % in the intervention group (p-value <0.000). The median times to antibiotic administration in the pre-intervention and post-intervention periods were 269.4 and 50.54 min, respectively (p-value <0.000). Clinical deterioration and admission to the pediatric intensive care unit decreased significantly from 6.6 % to 2.3 % (p-value = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Sustainability of the quality improvement project 'Golden Hour' in low- to mid-income countries demonstrated high effectiveness in reducing time to antibiotic administration among children with febrile neutropenia and improved clinical outcomes over three years of implementation.

Low-dose rituximab in steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease.

BACKGROUND: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) is a major complication that puts patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) at risk of death or infection. Currently, there is no gold standard for the first-line treatment of patients who do not respond to steroids, and there are several therapeutic options being evaluated in clinical trials for this disease to be used even in the first-line treatment for GvHD. There is evidence of the benefit of rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody, at a standard dose of 375 mg/m2 weekly in the treatment of steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus disease (SR-cGvHD). OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the safety and efficacy of low-dose rituximab in a middle-income center in northeastern Mexico STUDY DESIGN: We report the experience of 26 patients with chronic graft-versus-graft disease who received low-dose rituximab (100 mg weekly for 4 weeks). We utilized the advances in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria for diagnosis, scoring, trial design, and assessment of treatment response. RESULTS: We obtained a 5-year overall survival of 23.6%, including four patients with complete response. The 1-year event-free survival was 70% for patients with rituximab. During the treatment, there were 3 hospitalizations, and the causes were: immune thrombocytopenia, a parapneumonic effusion, and a cerebral vascular event. The median length of hospital stay was twelve days. CONCLUSION: A low dose of rituximab is an available and cost-effective option for patients with steroid-refractory cGvHD.