Neurologic Manifestations of Long COVID Differ Based on Acute COVID-19 Severity.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize neurologic manifestations in post-hospitalization Neuro-PASC (PNP) and non-hospitalized Neuro-PASC (NNP) patients. METHODS: Prospective study of the first 100 consecutive PNP and 500 NNP patients evaluated at a Neuro-COVID-19 clinic between 5/2020 and 8/2021. RESULTS: PNP were older than NNP patients (mean 53.9 vs 44.9 y; p < 0.0001) with a higher prevalence of pre-existing comorbidities. An average 6.8 months from onset, the main neurologic symptoms were "brain fog" (81.2%), headache (70.3%), and dizziness (49.5%) with only anosmia, dysgeusia and myalgias being more frequent in the NNP compared to the PNP group (59 vs 39%, 57.6 vs 39% and 50.4 vs 33%, all p < 0.003). Moreover, 85.8% of patients experienced fatigue. PNP more frequently had an abnormal neurologic exam than NNP patients (62.2 vs 37%, p < 0.0001). Both groups had impaired quality of life in cognitive, fatigue, sleep, anxiety, and depression domains. PNP patients performed worse on processing speed, attention, and working memory tasks than NNP patients (T-score 41.5 vs 55, 42.5 vs 47 and 45.5 vs 49, all p < 0.001) and a US normative population. NNP patients had lower results in attention task only. Subjective impression of cognitive ability correlated with cognitive test results in NNP but not in PNP patients. INTERPRETATION: PNP and NNP patients both experience persistent neurologic symptoms affecting their quality of life. However, they harbor significant differences in demographics, comorbidities, neurologic symptoms and findings, as well as pattern of cognitive dysfunction. Such differences suggest distinct etiologies of Neuro-PASC in these populations warranting targeted interventions. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:146-159.

A qualitative evaluation of factors influencing Tumor Treating fields (TTFields) therapy decision making among brain tumor patients and physicians.

BACKGROUND: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) Therapy is an FDA-approved therapy in the first line and recurrent setting for glioblastoma. Despite Phase 3 evidence showing improved survival with TTFields, it is not uniformly utilized. We aimed to examine patient and clinician views of TTFields and factors shaping utilization of TTFields through a unique research partnership with medical neuro oncology and medical social sciences. METHODS: Adult glioblastoma patients who were offered TTFields at a tertiary care academic hospital were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview about their decision to use or not use TTFields. Clinicians who prescribe TTFields were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview about TTFields. RESULTS: Interviews were completed with 40 patients with a mean age of 53 years; 92.5% were white and 60% were male. Participants who decided against TTFields stated that head shaving, appearing sick, and inconvenience of wearing/carrying the device most influenced their decision. The most influential factors for use of TTFields were the efficacy of the device and their clinician's opinion. Clinicians (N = 9) stated that TTFields was a good option for glioblastoma patients, but some noted that their patients should consider the burdens and benefits of TTFields as it may not be the desired choice for all patients. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to examine patient decision making for TTFields. Findings suggest that clinician support and efficacy data are among the key decision-making factors. Properly understanding the path to patients' decision making is crucial in optimizing the use of TTFields and other therapeutic decisions for glioblastoma patients.

Global post­marketing safety surveillance of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy in over 25,000 patients with CNS malignancies treated between 2011-2022.

BACKGROUND: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are alternating electric fields that disrupt cancer cell processes. TTFields therapy is approved for recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM), and newly-diagnosed (nd) GBM (with concomitant temozolomide for ndGBM; US), and for grade IV glioma (EU). We present an updated global, post-marketing surveillance safety analysis of patients with CNS malignancies treated with TTFields therapy. METHODS: Safety data were collected from routine post-marketing activities for patients in North America, Europe, Israel, and Japan (October 2011-October 2022). Adverse events (AEs) were stratified by age, sex, and diagnosis. RESULTS: Overall, 25,898 patients were included (diagnoses: ndGBM [68%], rGBM [26%], anaplastic astrocytoma/oligodendroglioma [4%], other CNS malignancies [2%]). Median (range) age was 59 (3-103) years; 66% patients were male. Most (69%) patients were 18-65 years; 0.4% were < 18 years; 30% were > 65 years. All-cause and TTFields-related AEs occurred in 18,798 (73%) and 14,599 (56%) patients, respectively. Most common treatment-related AEs were beneath-array skin reactions (43%), electric sensation (tingling; 14%), and heat sensation (warmth; 12%). Treatment-related skin reactions were comparable in pediatric (39%), adult (42%), and elderly (45%) groups, and in males (41%) and females (46%); and similar across diagnostic subgroups (ndGBM, 46%; rGBM, 34%; anaplastic astrocytoma/oligodendroglioma, 42%; other, 40%). No TTFields-related systemic AEs were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This long-term, real-world analysis of > 25,000 patients demonstrated good tolerability of TTFields in patients with CNS malignancies. Most therapy-related AEs were manageable localized, non-serious skin events. The TTFields therapy safety profile remained consistent across subgroups (age, sex, and diagnosis), indicative of its broad applicability.

Virtual multi-institutional tumor board: a strategy for personalized diagnoses and management of rare CNS tumors.

PURPOSE: Multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) integrate clinical, molecular, and radiological information and facilitate coordination of neuro-oncology care. During the COVID-19 pandemic, our MTB transitioned to a virtual and multi-institutional format. We hypothesized that this expansion would allow expert review of challenging neuro-oncology cases and contribute to the care of patients with limited access to specialized centers. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records from virtual MTBs held between 04/2020-03/2021. Data collected included measures of potential clinical impact, including referrals to observational or therapeutic studies, referrals for specialized neuropathology analysis, and whether molecular findings led to a change in diagnosis and/or guided management suggestions. RESULTS: During 25 meetings, 32 presenters discussed 44 cases. Approximately half (n = 20; 48%) involved a rare central nervous system (CNS) tumor. In 21% (n = 9) the diagnosis was changed or refined based on molecular profiling obtained at the NIH and in 36% (n = 15) molecular findings guided management. Clinical trial suggestions were offered to 31% (n = 13), enrollment in the observational NCI Natural History Study to 21% (n = 9), neuropathology review and molecular testing at the NIH to 17% (n = 7), and all received management suggestions. CONCLUSION: Virtual multi-institutional MTBs enable remote expert review of CNS tumors. We propose them as a strategy to facilitate expert opinions from specialized centers, especially for rare CNS tumors, helping mitigate geographic barriers to patient care and serving as a pre-screening tool for studies. Advanced molecular testing is key to obtaining a precise diagnosis, discovering potentially actionable targets, and guiding management.

Repeated blood-brain barrier opening with an implantable ultrasound device for delivery of albumin-bound paclitaxel in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a phase 1 trial.

BACKGROUND: Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound with concomitant administration of intravenous microbubbles (LIPU-MB) can be used to open the blood-brain barrier. We aimed to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of LIPU-MB to enhance the delivery of albumin-bound paclitaxel to the peritumoural brain of patients with recurrent glioblastoma. METHODS: We conducted a dose-escalation phase 1 clinical trial in adults (aged ≥18 years) with recurrent glioblastoma, a tumour diameter of 70 mm or smaller, and a Karnofsky performance status of at least 70. A nine-emitter ultrasound device was implanted into a skull window after tumour resection. LIPU-MB with intravenous albumin-bound paclitaxel infusion was done every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. Six dose levels of albumin-bound paclitaxel (40 mg/m2, 80 mg/m2, 135 mg/m2, 175 mg/m2, 215 mg/m2, and 260 mg/m2) were evaluated. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity occurring during the first cycle of sonication and albumin-bound paclitaxel chemotherapy. Safety was assessed in all treated patients. Analyses were done in the per-protocol population. Blood-brain barrier opening was investigated by MRI before and after sonication. We also did pharmacokinetic analyses of LIPU-MB in a subgroup of patients from the current study and a subgroup of patients who received carboplatin as part of a similar trial (NCT03744026). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04528680, and a phase 2 trial is currently open for accrual. FINDINGS: 17 patients (nine men and eight women) were enrolled between Oct 29, 2020, and Feb 21, 2022. As of data cutoff on Sept 6, 2022, median follow-up was 11·89 months (IQR 11·12-12·78). One patient was treated per dose level of albumin-bound paclitaxel for levels 1 to 5 (40-215 mg/m2), and 12 patients were treated at dose level 6 (260 mg/m2). A total of 68 cycles of LIPU-MB-based blood-brain barrier opening were done (median 3 cycles per patient [range 2-6]). At a dose of 260 mg/m2, encephalopathy (grade 3) occurred in one (8%) of 12 patients during the first cycle (considered a dose-limiting toxicity), and in one other patient during the second cycle (grade 2). In both cases, the toxicity resolved and treatment continued at a lower dose of albumin-bound paclitaxel, with a dose of 175 mg/m2 in the case of the grade 3 encephalopathy, and to 215 mg/m2 in the case of the grade 2 encephalopathy. Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy was observed in one patient during the third cycle of 260 mg/m2 albumin-bound paclitaxel. No progressive neurological deficits attributed to LIPU-MB were observed. LIPU-MB-based blood-brain barrier opening was most commonly associated with immediate yet transient grade 1-2 headache (12 [71%] of 17 patients). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (eight [47%]), leukopenia (five [29%]), and hypertension (five [29%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred during the study. Imaging analysis showed blood-brain barrier opening in the brain regions targeted by LIPU-MB, which diminished over the first 1 h after sonication. Pharmacokinetic analyses showed that LIPU-MB led to increases in the mean brain parenchymal concentrations of albumin-bound paclitaxel (from 0·037 µM [95% CI 0·022-0·063] in non-sonicated brain to 0·139 µM [0·083-0·232] in sonicated brain [3·7-times increase], p<0·0001) and carboplatin (from 0·991 µM [0·562-1·747] in non-sonicated brain to 5·878 µM [3·462-9·980] µM in sonicated brain [5·9-times increase], p=0·0001). INTERPRETATION: LIPU-MB using a skull-implantable ultrasound device transiently opens the blood-brain barrier allowing for safe, repeated penetration of cytotoxic drugs into the brain. This study has prompted a subsequent phase 2 study combining LIPU-MB with albumin-bound paclitaxel plus carboplatin (NCT04528680), which is ongoing. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health and National Cancer Institute, Moceri Family Foundation, and the Panattoni family.

Cerebrospinal fluid-administered therapies for leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors.

Aims/purpose: Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Several approaches are used to treat LM, including intrathecally administered therapies. We consolidated current studies exploring intrathecal therapies for LM treatment. Patients & methods: A review of clinical trials using intrathecal agents was conducted with outcomes tabulated and trends described. 48 trials met the inclusion criteria. Initial investigations began with cytotoxic agents; following this were formulations with longer cerebrospinal fluid half-lives, targeted antibodies and radionucleotides. Results & conclusion: Outcomes were not reported consistently. Survival, when reported, remained poor. Intrathecal therapies for LM remain a viable option. Their use can be informed by an understanding of efficacy, safety and toxicity. They may be an important component of future LM treatments.

This paper summarizes the findings from 48 clinical trials conducted since the 1970s about the treatment of leptomeningeal metastases through an intrathecal approach (administering drugs directly into the cerebrospinal fluid ­ a fluid that surrounds the brain and spinal cord). The results of these studies suggest that although these therapies show promise for the future, they currently do not clearly and consistently report a benefit. Further work is needed to explore the possible use of these treatments.

Leptomeningeal metastases: the future is now.

Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) constitute an involvement of cancer which is associated with marked morbidity and mortality. The contemporary diagnostic and therapeutic management of LM from solid tumors is reviewed. Therapeutic modalities including systemic therapies, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-directed therapies, and radiation therapy are discussed. This is to provide context for how the field of LM management may evolve in the near term. The future directions currently undergoing investigation for diagnostic, response assessment, and therapeutic purposes are highlighted. This is done within the context of the pathophysiology of the disease. Specifically the role of CSF circulating tumor cells and cell free circulating tumor DNA in diagnosis and response assement are reviewed. Novel therapeutic approaches across a range of modalities are discussed. Numerous ongoing studies which have the potential to alter the management of LM are referenced.

Challenging Cases in Neuro-Oncology.

Neuro-oncology encompasses a broad field focusing on an array of neoplasms, many of which can mimic several diseases. Neurologists will often be involved in the initial diagnostic evaluation and management of these patients. Their insight is central to optimizing the diagnostic yield and providing high-level clinical care. Several neuro-oncologic cases are reviewed with a goal of increasing the understanding of these diseases in a clinically relevant manner and providing updates on the contemporary thinking in the subspecialty.

Neural stem cell delivery of an oncolytic adenovirus in newly diagnosed malignant glioma: a first-in-human, phase 1, dose-escalation trial.

BACKGROUND: Malignant glioma is the most common and lethal primary brain tumour, with dismal survival rates and no effective treatment. We examined the safety and activity of NSC-CRAd-S-pk7, an engineered oncolytic adenovirus delivered by neural stem cells (NSCs), in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma. METHODS: This was a first-in-human, open-label, phase 1, dose-escalation trial done to determine the maximal tolerated dose of NSC-CRAd-S-pk7, following a 3 + 3 design. Patients with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed, high-grade gliomas (WHO grade III or IV) were recruited. After neurosurgical resection, NSC-CRAd-S-pk7 was injected into the walls of the resection cavity. The first patient cohort received a dose starting at 6·25 × 1010 viral particles administered by 5·00 × 107 NSCs, the second cohort a dose of 1·25 × 1011 viral particles administered by 1·00 × 108 NSCs, and the third cohort a dose of 1·875 × 1011 viral particles administered by 1·50 × 108 NSCs. No further dose escalation was planned. Within 10-14 days, treatment with temozolomide and radiotherapy was initiated. Primary endpoints were safety and toxicity profile and the maximum tolerated dose for a future phase 2 trial. All analyses were done in all patients who were included in the trial and received the study treatment and were not excluded from the study. Recruitment is complete and the trial is finished. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03072134. FINDINGS: Between April 24, 2017, and Nov 13, 2019, 12 patients with newly diagnosed, malignant gliomas were recruited and included in the safety analysis. Histopathological evaluation identified 11 (92%) of 12 patients with glioblastoma and one (8%) of 12 patients with anaplastic astrocytoma. The median follow-up was 18 months (IQR 14-22). One patient receiving 1·50 × 108 NSCs loading 1·875 × 1011 viral particles developed viral meningitis (grade 3) due to the inadvertent injection of NSC-CRAd-S-pk7 into the lateral ventricle. Otherwise, treatment was safe as no formal dose-limiting toxicity was reached, so 1·50 × 108 NSCs loading 1·875 × 1011 viral particles was recommended as a phase 2 trial dose. There were no treatment-related deaths. The median progression-free survival was 9·1 months (95% CI 8·5-not reached) and median overall survival was 18·4 months (15·7-not reached). INTERPRETATION: NSC-CRAd-S-pk7 treatment was feasible and safe. Our immunological and histopathological findings support continued investigation of NSC-CRAd-S-pk7 in a phase 2/3 clinical trial. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health.

A multi-center prospective study of re-irradiation with bevacizumab and temozolomide in patients with bevacizumab refractory recurrent high-grade gliomas.

PURPOSE: Survival is dismal for bevacizumab refractory high-grade glioma patients. We prospectively investigated the efficacy of re-irradiation, bevacizumab, and temozolomide in bevacizumab-naïve and bevacizumab-exposed recurrent high-grade glioma, without volume limitations, in a single arm trial. METHODS: Recurrent high-grade glioma patients were stratified based on WHO grade (4 vs. < 4) and prior exposure to bevacizumab (yes vs. no). Eligible patients received radiation using a simultaneous integrated boost technique (55 Gy to enhancing disease, 45 Gy to non-enhancing disease in 25 fractions) with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks IV and temozolomide 75 mg/m2 daily followed by maintenance bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks and temozolomide 50 mg/m2 daily for 6 weeks then a 2 week holiday until progression. Primary endpoint was overall survival. Quality of life was studied using FACT-Br and FACT-fatigue scales. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were enrolled. The majority (n = 36, 67%) were bevacizumab pre-exposed GBM. Median OS for all patients was 8.5 months and 7.9 months for the bevacizumab pre-exposed GBM group. Patients ≥ 36 months from initial radiation had a median OS of 13.3 months compared to 7.5 months for those irradiated < 36 months earlier (p < 0.01). FACT-Br and FACT-Fatigue scores initially declined during radiation but returned to pretreatment baseline. Treatment was well tolerated with 5 patients experiencing > grade 3 lymphopenia and 2 with > grade 3 thrombocytopenia. No radiographic or clinical radiation necrosis occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Re-irradiation with bevacizumab and temozolomide is a safe and feasible salvage treatment for patients with large volume bevacizumab-refractory high-grade glioma. Patients further from their initial radiotherapy may derive greater benefit with this regimen.

American Society of Clinical Oncology 2021 Annual Meeting updates on primary brain tumors and CNS metastatic tumors.

In this report, select key studies presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2021 annual meeting are reviewed. Two major phase III randomized controlled trials were presented at the meeting: GEINO 1401 and EORTC 1709/CCTG CE.8. Both are reviewed in this report. Moreover, important phase II trials, including Alliance A0716701, and key phase I trials are included. All trials presented cover important advances in the understanding of primary brain tumor management. In addition, case series papers, trials in progress and select work on exploratory CSF biomarkers are reviewed. Altogether, research presented at ASCO 2021 highlights important advances in neuro-oncologic topics that may inform future research and practice.

Global post-marketing safety surveillance of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) in patients with high-grade glioma in clinical practice.

INTRODUCTION: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields; antimitotic treatment) delivers low-intensity, intermediate-frequency, alternating electric fields through skin-applied transducer arrays. TTFields (200 kHz) was FDA-approved in glioblastoma (GBM), based on the phase 3 EF-11 (recurrent GBM, rGBM) and EF-14 (newly diagnosed GBM, ndGBM) trials. The most common TTFields-related adverse event (AE) in both trials was array-associated skin irritation. We now report on TTFields-related AEs in the real-world, clinical practice setting. METHODS: Unsolicited, post-marketing surveillance data from TTFields-treated patients (October 2011-February 2019) were retrospectively analyzed using MedDRA v21.1 preferred terms, stratified by region (US, EMEA [Europe, Middle East, Africa], Japan), diagnosis (ndGBM, rGBM, anaplastic astrocytoma/oligodendroglioma, other brain tumors), and age (< 18 [pediatric], 18-64 [adults], ≥ 65 [elderly]; years of age). RESULTS: Of 11,029 patients, 53% were diagnosed with ndGBM and 39% were diagnosed with rGBM at any line of disease recurrence. Most were adults (73%), 26% were elderly, and the male-to-female ratio was ~ 2:1 (close to published ratios of typical GBM populations). The most commonly reported TTFields-related AE was array-associated skin reaction, occurring in patients with ndGBM (38%), rGBM (29%), anaplastic astrocytoma/oligodendroglioma (38%), and other brain tumors (31%); as well as 37% of pediatric, 34% of adult, and 36% of elderly patients. Most skin AEs were mild/moderate and manageable. Other TTFields-related AEs in patients with ndGBM/rGBM included under-array heat sensation (warmth; 11%, 10%, respectively) and electric sensation (tingling; 11%, 9%, respectively), and headache (7%, 6%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This TTFields safety surveillance analysis in > 11,000 patients revealed no new safety concerns, with a favorable safety profile comparable with published TTFields/GBM trials. The safety profile remained consistent among subgroups, suggesting feasibility in multiple populations, including elderly patients.

Acute Neurological Complications of Brain Tumors and Immune Therapies, a Guideline for the Neuro-hospitalist.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients with brain tumors presenting to the emergency room with acute neurologic complications may warrant urgent investigations and emergent management. As the neuro-hospitalist will likely encounter this complex patient population, an understanding of the acute neurologic issues will have value. RECENT FINDINGS: We discuss updated information and management regarding various acute neurologic complications among neuro-oncology patients and neurologic complications of immunotherapy. Understanding of the acute neurologic complications associated with central nervous system tumors and with common contemporary cancer treatments will facilitate the neuro-hospitalist management of these patient populations. While there are aspects analogous to the diagnosis and management in the non-oncologic population, a number of unique features discussed in this review should be considered.

Imaging tryptophan uptake with positron emission tomography in glioblastoma patients treated with indoximod.

INTRODUCTION: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most frequent and aggressive primary tumor of the central nervous system, accounting for over 50% of all primary malignant gliomas arising in the adult brain. Even after surgical resection, adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy, as well as tumor-treating fields, the median survival is only 15-20 months. We have identified a pathogenic mechanism that contributes to the tumor-induced immunosuppression in the form of increased indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) expression; an enzyme that metabolizes the essential amino acid, tryptophan (Trp), into kynurenine (Kyn). However, real-time measurements of IDO1 activity has yet to become mainstream in clinical protocols for assessing IDO1 activity in GBM patients. METHODS: Pre-treatment and on-treatment α-[11C]-methyl-L-Trp (AMT) positron emission tomography (PET) with co-registered MRI was performed on patients with recurrent GBM treated with the IDO1 pathway inhibitor indoximod (D1-MT) and TMZ. RESULTS: Regional intratumoral variability of AMT within enhancing and non-enhancing tumor was noted at baseline. On treatment imaging revealed decreased regional uptake suggesting IDO1 pathway modulation with treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we have validated the ability to use PET of the Trp probe, AMT, for use in visualizing and quantifying intratumoral Trp uptake in GBM patients treated with an IDO1 pathway inhibitor. These data serve as rationale to utilize AMT-PET imaging in the future evaluation of GBM patients treated with IDO1 enzyme inhibitors.

Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Review on Clinical Management.

Glioblastoma is an aggressive primary tumor of the central nervous system. This review will focus on clinical developments and management of newly diagnosed disease, including a discussion about the incorporation of molecular features into the classification of glioblastoma. Such advances will continue to shape our thinking about the disease and how to best manage it. With regards to treatment, the role of surgical resection, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and tumor-treating fields will be presented. Pivotal studies defining our current standard of care will be highlighted, as will key ongoing trials that may influence our management of glioblastoma in the near future.

Clinical activity and safety of atezolizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: Glioblastoma is the most common primary malignant brain tumor. No standard treatment exists for recurrent disease. Glioblastoma is associated with an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, including atezolizumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1), have demonstrated clinical activity in various cancers. Here, we present the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab in patients with glioblastoma from the phase 1a PCD4989g clinical trial (NCT01375842). METHODS: Eligible patients had confirmed recurrent glioblastoma and measurable disease per RANO criteria. Atezolizumab (1200 mg) was administered intravenously every 3 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were monitored for safety; response was evaluated at least every 6 weeks. Baseline biomarkers were evaluated. RESULTS: All 16 patients enrolled had received prior chemotherapy, and 50% prior bevacizumab. Ten patients (63%) experienced a treatment-related event. No treatment-related grade 4-5 events were reported. All deaths occurred due to progression or during follow-up. One patient experienced a partial response (5.3 months); 3 experienced disease stabilization. The median overall survival was 4.2 months (range 1.2 to 18.8+ months). Association between peripheral CD4+ T cells and efficacy was observed. Two patients with IDH1-mutant tumors and 1 with a POLE-mutant tumor experienced ≥ 16 months survival. CONCLUSIONS: Atezolizumab was safe and well tolerated in this group of patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Our preliminary findings suggest that biomarkers, including peripheral CD4+ T cells and hypermutated tumor status, may help guide selection of patients with recurrent glioblastoma who might receive most benefit from atezolizumab therapy, supporting further atezolizumab combination studies in glioblastoma.

Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma-PART 1: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Staging, and Prognosis.

Primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma is a rare CNS neoplasm. Its highest incidence is in the elderly and the immunocompromised. The initial steps in establishing a diagnosis involve CNS imaging. Familiarity with the clinical presentation is important in order to limit the risk of a nondiagnostic biopsy. In addition to confirming the diagnosis, it is wise to evaluate for extra-CNS disease. There are important differences in the presentation and evaluation of immunocompetent patients and those of immunocompromised patients; we will delineate these in this review. Appropriate initial clinical evaluations facilitate optimal therapeutic management for patients with primary CNS lymphoma. This is of particular importance because primary CNS lymphoma is a potentially curable disease, despite the high likelihood of recurrence.

Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma-PART 2: Modern Therapeutic Management and Future Directions.

Primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma, a rare CNS neoplasm associated with high mortality, is responsive to therapeutic interventions. In Part 1 of our two-part coverage of this entity, we provided an overview of the epidemiology of primary CNS lymphoma, followed by a discussion of the diagnostic and staging evaluation, and a review of current prognostication systems. In Part 2, we discuss the management of primary CNS lymphoma, focusing in particular on systemic therapies and radiation. With respect to systemic therapies, we provide details of a variety of regimens built around a backbone of high-dose methotrexate. Future directions for the treatment of primary CNS lymphoma are reviewed as well. These include optimization of consolidation regimens and the pursuit of novel agents.

Antiglutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD65) antibody-associated epilepsy.

Glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) antibody-associated encephalitis causes both acute seizures and chronic epilepsy with predominantly temporal lobe onset. This condition is challenging in diagnosis and management, and the incidence of GAD antibody (Ab)-related epilepsy could be much higher than commonly believed. Imaging and CSF evidence of inflammation along with typical clinical presentations, such as adult onset temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) with unexplained etiology, should prompt testing for the diagnostic antibodies. High serum GAD Ab titer (≥2000U/mL or ≥20nmol/L) and evidence of intrathecal anti-GAD Ab synthesis support the diagnosis. Unlike other immune-mediated epilepsies, antiglutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD65) antibody-mediated epilepsy is often poorly responsive to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and only moderately responsive to immune therapy with steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), or plasma exchange (PLEX). Long-term treatment with more aggressive immunosuppressants such as rituximab (RTX) and/or cyclophosphamide is often necessary and may be more effective than current immunosuppressive approaches. The aim of this review is to review the physiology, pathology, clinical presentation, related ancillary tests, and management of GAD Ab-associated autoimmune epilepsy by searching the keywords and to promote the recognition and the initiation of proper therapy for this condition.

An overview of meningiomas.

Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumor. Important advances are occurring in meningioma research. These are expected to accelerate, potentially leading to impactful changes on the management of meningiomas in the near and medium term. This review will cover the histo- and molecular pathology of meningiomas, including recent 2016 updates to the WHO classification of CNS tumors. We will discuss clinical and radiographic presentation and therapeutic management. Surgery and radiotherapy, the two longstanding primary therapeutic modalities, will be discussed at length. In addition, data from prior and ongoing investigations of other treatment modalities, including systemic and targeted therapies, will be covered. This review will quickly update the reader on the contemporary management and future directions in meningiomas. [Formula: see text].