[Linkage of claims data with data from epidemiological cancer registries: possibilities and limitations in the German federal states]. / Verknüpfung von Abrechnungsdaten gesetzlicher Krankenkassen mit Daten epidemiologischer Krebsregister: länderspezifische Möglichkeiten und Limitationen.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been an increasing demand for the reuse of research data in accordance with the so-called FAIR principles. This would allow researchers to conduct projects on a broader data basis and to investigate new research questions by linking different data sources. OBJECTIVES: We explored if nationwide linking of claims data from statutory health insurances (SHI) with data from population-based cancer registries can be used to obtain additional information on cancer that is missing in claims data and to assess the validity of SHI tumour diagnoses. This paper focuses on describing the specific requirements of German federal states for such data linkage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database GePaRD at the Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS and six cancer registries were used as data sources. The logistically complex direct linkage was compared with a less complex indirect linkage. For this purpose, permission had to be obtained for GePaRD and for each cancer registry from the respective responsible authority. RESULTS: Regarding the linkage of cancer registry data with GePaRD, the cancer registries showed profound differences in the modalities for data provision, ranging from a complete rejection to an uncomplicated implementation of linkage procedures. DISCUSSION: In Germany, a consistent legal framework is needed to adequately enable the reuse and record linkage of personal health data for research purposes according to the FAIR principles. The new law on the consolidation of cancer registry data could provide a remedy regarding the linkage of cancer registry data with other data sources.

Data from Population-based Cancer Registration for Secondary Data Analysis: Methodological Challenges and Perspectives.

Population-based cancer registries have a long-standing role in cancer monitoring. Scientific use of cancer registry data is one important purpose of cancer registration, but use of cancer registry data is not restricted to cancer registries. Cancer registration in Germany is currently heading towards population-based collection of detailed clinical data. This development together with additional options for record linkage and long-term follow-up will offer new opportunities for health services and outcome research. Both regional population-based registries and the German Centre for Cancer Registry Data (ZfKD) at the Robert Koch-Institute as well as international cancer registries and consortia or organizations may provide external researchers access to individual or aggregate level data for secondary data analysis. In this review, we elaborate on the access to cancer registry data for research purposes, availability of specific data items, and options for data linkage with external data sources. We also discuss as well as on limitations in data availability and quality, and describe typical biases in design and analysis.

Incidence of advanced colorectal cancer in Germany: comparing claims data and cancer registry data.

BACKGROUND: Incidence rates of advanced cancer stages are important, e.g., for monitoring cancer screening programs. However, information from cancer registries on tumor stage is often incomplete. Exemplified by colorectal cancer (CRC), we explored the potential of German claims data to estimate incidence rates of advanced cancer stages. METHODS: We used claims data of the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database (GePaRD; information on > 20 million persons) to identify incident patients with advanced CRC based on ICD-10 codes for CRC and secondary malignant neoplasms. We calculated annual age-standardized incidence rates (ASIRs) of advanced CRC per 100,000 for the years 2008-2015 stratified by the presence of affected lymph nodes only (C77) vs. distant metastases (C78-C79) and compared them to ASIRs determined using data (2008-2014) from the German Centre for Cancer Registry Data (ZfKD). RESULTS: In GePaRD, the ASIRs of advanced CRC per 100,000 in 2014 were 21.5 among men and 14.9 among women. Compared to ZfKD data the ASIR in GePaRD was 2.58 lower in men and 0.27 higher in women (per 100,000) in 2014. Stratification by presence of distant metastases showed divergent patterns: the ASIRs regarding distant metastases were ~ 50% (women) and ~ 30% (men) higher, and the ASIRs regarding affected lymph nodes only were ~ 40% lower in GePaRD as compared to ZfKD. CONCLUSION: While ASIRs of advanced CRCs overall agreed well between claims and cancer registry data in 2014, the analyses stratified by presence of distant metastases showed differences. Cancer registries might underestimate ASIRs of CRCs with distant metastases.

[Prospects for a nationwide mortality registry: lessons learned from the Bremen Mortality Index]. / Perspektiven für ein bundesweites Mortalitätsregister: Erfahrungen mit dem Bremer Mortalitätsindex.

The time of death and the diseases leading to death provide important information for health research and disease registries. They facilitate conclusions about the state of health of a population and contribute to the assessment of health promotion measures as well as disease prevention and care. In many countries, these data are provided through mortality registries.In Germany, these data are available on death certificates, which must be filled out by physicians with all information available for each death. However, use of these data for research is very difficult as there is no central registry. Instead, regional health authorities archive the respective death certificates locally. Furthermore, the data provided on death certificates are partly uncoded or only available in paper form. Bremen is the only federal state that has more than 20 years of expertise with a regional mortality registry that demonstrates how health research can benefit from an efficient processing and provision cause of death (CoD) data and how this may also improve the quality of cancer registration.Currently, automatic coding of the CoD by the statistical offices is being implemented on a national level. As a consequence, the free-text information from death certificates will have to be recorded electronically. This requires organizational restructuring that offers a unique opportunity to make all the necessary provisions that are needed for the establishment of mortality registries at the federal state level. This would be an important step towards the establishment of a long overdue national mortality registry - a research data infrastructure guaranteeing international competitiveness.

Survival of patients with hepatobiliary tract and duodenal cancer sites in Germany and the United States in the early 21st century.

Hepatobiliary tract cancers (HBTCs) are a heterogeneous group of cancers with high mortality. Because most of these cancers, with the exception of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), are rare, few data are available concerning the population level survival expectations of patients with HBTC. Here, we describe survival of patients with HBTC in Germany with comparison to survival in the US. Therefore, data were extracted from 12 databases in Germany and the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER13) database in the US. Period analysis and modeled period analysis were used to calculate 5-year relative survival estimates for patients with HBTC diagnosed from 1997 to 2013. HCC was the most common HBTC in each database, accounting for over 1/3 of HBTC in Germany and about half of cases in the US. Overall age adjusted 5-year relative survival for HBTC in 2006-2013 was 19.1% in Germany and 20.6% in the US. Five-year relative survival increased by 3.8% units in Germany and 4.5% units in the US between 2002-2005 and 2010-2013. Five-year relative survival for individual types of HBTC ranged from 9.8% in Germany and 2.9% in the US for not otherwise specified biliary tract cancers to 44.4% and 50.1%, respectively, in Germany and the US for duodenal cancers. In conclusion, survival for HBTC remains poor in both Germany and the US, although a small increase in survival in the past decade was observed. Further work to find better treatment options for HBTC is needed to improve survival.

Risk of second primary cancers in women diagnosed with endometrial cancer in German and Swedish cancer registries.

Along with the increasing incidence and favorable prognosis, more women diagnosed with endometrial cancer may develop second primary cancers (SPCs). We aimed at investigating risk of SPCs after endometrial cancer in Germany and Sweden to provide insight into prevention strategies for SPCs. Endometrial cancer patients diagnosed at age ≥15 years in Germany during 1997-2011 and in Sweden nationwide during 1997-2012 were selected. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), calculated as the ratio of observed to expected numbers of cases, were used to assess the risk of a specific second cancer after endometrial cancer for both German and Swedish datasets. Among 46,929 endometrial cancer survivors in Germany and 18,646 in Sweden, overall 2,897 and 1,706 SPCs were recorded, respectively. Significantly elevated SIRs were observed in Germany for ovarian (SIR = 1.3; 95%CI:1.1-1.5) and kidney cancers [1.6 (1.3-1.8)], while in Sweden the SIRs were 5.4 (4.6-6.3) and1.4 (1.0-1.9), respectively. Elevated risk for second ovarian endometrioid carcinoma was pronounced after early (<55 years) onset endometrial cancer in Germany [9.0 (4.8-15)] and Sweden [7.7 (5.1-11)]. In Germany elevated risks were found for second ovarian endometrioid carcinoma after endometrioid histology of first endometrial cancer [6.3 (4.0-9.4)] and for second kidney cancer after clear cell histology of endometrial cancer [4.9 (1.6-11)]. We found exceptionally elevated risk of second ovarian endometrioid carcinoma after endometrial cancer of the same histology or of early onset. Risk for second kidney cancer was also increased, particularly after endometrial cancer of clear cell histology. Cancer prevention strategies should focus on these cancers after endometrial cancer diagnosis.

Survival in patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia in Germany and the United States: Major differences in survival in young adults.

Previous epidemiologic studies on AML have been limited by the rarity of the disease. Here, we present population level data on survival of patients with AML in Germany and the United States (US). Data were extracted from 11 population-based cancer registries in Germany and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER13) database in the US. Patients diagnosed with AML in 1997-2011 were included. Period analysis was used to estimate 5-year relative survival (RS) and trends in survival in the early 21st century. Overall 5-year age-adjusted RS for patients with AML in 2007-2011 was greater in Germany than in the US at 22.8% and 18.8%, respectively. Five-year RS was higher in Germany than in the US at all ages, with particularly large differences at ages 15-24 for whom 5-year RS was 64.3% in Germany and 55.0% in the US and 35-44, with 5-year RS estimates of 61.8% in Germany and 46.6% in the US. Most of the difference in 5-year RS was due to higher 1-year RS, with overall 1-year RS estimates of 47.0% in Germany and 38.5% in the US. A small increase in RS was observed between 2003-2005 and 2009-2011 in both countries, but no increase in survival was observed in either country for ages 75+. To our knowledge, this is the first detailed description of AML survival in Germany. Comparison to the US suggests that further analysis into risk factors for poor outcomes in AML in the US may be useful in improving survival.

Survival of patients with gastric lymphoma in Germany and in the United States.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: This study aims to examine survival for gastric lymphomas and its main subtypes, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (MALT), and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), in Germany and in the United States. METHODS: Data for patients diagnosed in 1997-2010 were used from 10 population-based German cancer registries and compared to the data from the US Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) 13 registries database. Patients age 15-74 diagnosed with gastric lymphomas were included in the analysis. Period analysis and modeled period analysis were used to estimate 5-year and 10-year relative survival (RS) in 2002-2010 and survival trends from 2002-2004 to 2008-2010. RESULTS: Overall, the database included 1534 and 2688 patients diagnosed with gastric lymphoma in 1997-2010 in Germany and in the United States, respectively. Survival was substantially higher for MALT (5-year and 10-year RS: 89.0% and 80.9% in Germany, 93.8% and 86.8% in the United States) than for DLBCL (67.5% and 59.2% in Germany, and 65.3% and 54.7% in the United States) in 2002-2010. Survival was slightly higher among female patients and decreased by age for gastric lymphomas combined and its main subtypes. A slight, nonsignificant, increase in the 5-year RS for gastric lymphomas combined was observed in Germany and the United States, with increases in 5-year RS between 2002-2004 and 2008-2010 from 77.1% to 81.0% and from 77.3% to 82.0%, respectively. Five-year RS of MALT exceeded 90% in 2008-2010 in both countries. CONCLUSIONS: Five-year RS of MALT meanwhile exceeds 90% in both Germany and the United States, but DLBCL has remained below 70% in both countries.

Survival among adolescents and young adults with cancer in Germany and the United States: an international comparison.

Serious concern arose in the scientific literature about the state of and progress in cancer survival among adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients in the recent years. We provide an up-to-date international comparison of survival among AYA patients. Using population-based cancer data from 11 German cancer registries and the SEER Program of the United States (covering populations of 39 and 33 million people, respectively), standardized tumor group classifications, period analysis and modeling, we compared the 5-year relative survival of AYA patients in the age groups 15-29 and 30-39 to survival seen among adults aged 40-49 for the 2002-2006 period. Additionally, we also provide an age-specific survival comparison between the two countries. In 2002-2006, for the overwhelming majority of the more than 30 types of cancer examined, AYA patients aged both 15-29 and 30-39 years had higher or similar survival than patients in the age group 40-49 in both countries. A numerically large and statistically significant survival deficit among AYA patients was only found for breast carcinomas in both populations, and colorectal and stomach carcinoma in the United States for the age group 15-29. Overall, results of the country-specific comparisons did not indicate systematic differences. With very few exceptions, no survival deficit between AYA patients and adults aged 40-49 years was found in either of the examined countries in the first decade of the 21st century.