Trending algorithm discriminates hemodynamic from injury related TcMEP amplitude loss.

Jasiukaitis and Lyon (J Clin Monit Comput, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-018-0181-9, 2018) described an motor evoked potential (MEP)amplitude trending system to detect MEP amplitude loss against a background of MEP variability. They found that the end of case value of a running R2 triggered by a set MEP amplitude loss criterion appeared to discriminate new injury from non-injury in a small sample of three patients. The present study examines the predictive capability of the running R2 in a larger sample of patients (21 injured and 19 non-injured). It also varies the amplitude loss criterion (50%, 65% and 80%) for triggering the running R2 and the numbers of points used in the moving linear regression (8, 12 and 16). 40 patients who had undergone correction for lumbar deformity were retrospectively examined. 21 of these woke up with a newly acquired radicular injury, 19 did not but were characterized by hypovolemic hemorrhage. All 40 patients had sufficient MEP amplitude loss sometime during their procedure to cause the monitoring specialist to report this to the surgeon and anesthesia. End-of-case running R2s were significantly larger in the injury group. Using an 80% amplitude loss criterion to trigger the running R2 proved to be too stringent, causing reduced sensitivity. The running R2 appeared to have equivalent sensitivity to that of conventional MEP amplitude loss ratios, but superior specificity within this monitoring challenged sample. The different number of points for the moving regressions did not have any significant effect. End-of-case R2 values greater than 60% appeared to be highly predictive of new post-operative deficit, while values less than 40% appeared to insure no new deficit. The proposed trending system can discriminate injury from non-injury outcomes when compressive radicular injury during correction for lumbar deformity is involved. This discrimination appears to be successful even when MEP amplitude loss for non-iatrogenic reasons (i.e., hemorrhage) is also occurring.

A motor evoked potential trending system may discriminate outcome: retrospective application with three cases.

This report presents a method for tracking Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) amplitudes over the course of a case using a moving least squares linear regression (LSMAs). During a case, newly obtained MEP amplitudes are compared to those predicted by a just previous linear regression (least squares moving average or LSMA). When detected by this comparison, a set criterion amplitude loss will then trigger linear regression of ensuing MEP amplitudes on an expanding step function which tracks the persistence of the amplitude loss for the remainder of the case. Three cases are presented. One in which the patient woke up with a newly acquired weakness in the left tibialis anterior and another in which MEP amplitudes were suddenly lost from the right foot, but after intervention, they were restored again. In a third case the patient again woke up with a new post-operative deficit, but MEP trial sampling had been more limited and variable than in the first two cases. When the linear trending method was applied to the affected myotome in the first case, the expanding step function regression was triggered after the moment of MEP loss and remained at a high level until the end of case. In the second case, the expanding step function regression was also triggered in the relevant myotome at the time of the reported MEP change, but diminished by end of case. In the third case the tracking method again successfully triggered a predictive R-Square despite the limited number of pre-event trials. The R-Square value of the expanding step function regression appears to have discriminative capability with regard to new post-op deficit. Given the importance of the intra-operative MEP for monitoring motor functioning and the high degree of variability that can affect it, the development of new quantitative, statistical methods to detect real from apparent MEP change will be necessary.

Changes in transcranial motor evoked potentials during hemorrhage are associated with increased serum propofol concentrations.

Transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) monitor the integrity of the spinal cord during spine surgery. Propofol-based anesthesia is favored in order to enhance TcMEP quality. During intraoperative hemorrhage, TcMEP amplitudes may be reduced. The serum concentration of propofol may increase during hemorrhage. No study has determined whether changes in TcMEPs due to hemorrhage are related to changes in propofol blood levels. We monitored TcMEPs, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and cardiac output (CO) and hemoglobin in pigs (n = 6) undergoing controlled progressive hemorrhage during a standardized anesthetic with infusions of propofol, ketamine, and fentanyl. We recorded TcMEPs from the rectus femoris (RF) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles bilaterally. A pulmonary artery catheter was placed to measure CO. Progressive hemorrhage of 10% blood volume increments was done until TcMEP amplitude decreased by >60% from baseline. Serum propofol levels were also measured following removal of each 10% blood volume increment. TcMEP responses were elicited every 3 min using constant stimulation parameters. We removed between 20 and 50% of total blood volume in order to achieve the >60% reduction in TcMEP amplitude. MAP and CO decreased significantly from baseline. At maximum hemorrhage, TcMEP amplitude decreased in the RF and TA by an average of 73 and 62% respectively from baseline (P < 0.01). Serum propofol levels varied greatly among animals at baseline (range 410-1720 ng/mL) and increased in each animal during hemorrhage. The mean propofol concentration rose from 1190 ± 530 to 2483 ± 968 ng/mL (P < 0.01). The increased propofol concentration correlated with decreased CO. Multivariate analysis using hierarchical linear models indicated that the decline of TcMEP amplitude was primarily associated with rising propofol concentrations, but was also independently affected by reduced CO. We believe that the decrease in blood volume and CO during hemorrhage increased the serum concentration of propofol by reducing the volume of distribution and/or rate of hepatic metabolism of the drug. Despite wide acceptance of propofol as the preferred anesthetic when using TcMEPs, intravenous anesthetics are vulnerable to altered pharmacokinetics during conditions of hemorrhage and could contribute to false-positive TcMEP changes.

Correction to: Changes in transcranial motor evoked potentials during hemorrhage are associated with increased serum propofol concentrations.

In the original publication of the article, the corresponding author inadvertently omitted one of the co-authors in the author group. The corrected author group is given in this erratum.

Effect of hemorrhage and hypotension on transcranial motor-evoked potentials in swine.

BACKGROUND: Transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcMEPs) monitor spinal cord motor tract integrity. Using a swine model, the authors studied the effects of vasodilatory hypotension, hemorrhage, and various resuscitation efforts on TcMEP responses. METHODS: Twelve pigs were anesthetized with constant infusions of propofol, ketamine, and fentanyl. Animals were incrementally hemorrhaged, until bilateral tibialis anterior TcMEP amplitude decreased to less than 40% of baseline or until 50% of the blood volume was removed. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac output (CO), and oxygen delivery (DO2) were examined. Resuscitation with phenylephrine, epinephrine, and colloid were evaluated. In seven animals, vasodilatory hypotension was examined. Paired comparisons and multivariate analysis were performed. RESULTS: Hemorrhage significantly reduced (as a percentage of baseline, mean±SD) TcMEPs (left, 33±29%; right, 26±21%), MAP (60±17%), CO (49±12%), and DO2 (43±13%), P value less than 0.001 for all. Vasodilation reduced MAP comparably, but TcMEPs, CO, and DO2, were not significantly lowered. After hemorrhage, restoration of MAP with phenylephrine did not improve TcMEPs, CO, or DO2, but similar restoration of MAP with epinephrine restored (to percentage of baseline) TcMEPs (59±40%), and significantly increased CO (81±17%) and DO2 (72±19%) compared with both hemorrhage and phenylephrine, P value less than 0.05 for all. Resuscitation with colloid did not improve TcMEPs. Multivariate analysis revealed that changes in TcMEPs were more closely associated with changes in CO and DO2 as compared with MAP. CONCLUSIONS: Hypotension from hemorrhage, but not vasodilation, is associated with a decrease in TcMEP amplitude. After hemorrhage, restoration of TcMEPs with epinephrine but not phenylephrine indicates that CO and DO2 affect TcMEPs more than MAP. Monitoring CO may be beneficial in major spine surgery when using TcMEP monitoring.

Intraoperative neuromonitoring with MEPs and prediction of postoperative neurological deficits in patients undergoing surgery for cervical and cervicothoracic myelopathy.

OBJECT: The use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) in surgical decompression surgery for myelopathy may assist the surgeon in taking corrective measures to reduce or prevent permanent neurological deficits. We evaluated the efficacy of IONM in cervical and cervicothoracic spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) cases. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed 140 cases involving patients who underwent surgery for CSM utilizing IONM during 2011 at the University of California, San Francisco. Data on preoperative clinical variables, intraoperative changes in transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEPs), and postoperative new neurological deficits were collected. Associations between categorical variables were analyzed with the Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Of the 140 patients, 16 (11%) had significant intraoperative decreases in MEPs. In 8 of these cases, the MEP signal did not return to baseline values by the end of the operation. There were 8 (6%) postoperative deficits, of which 6 were C-5 palsies and 2 were paraparesis. Six of the patients with postoperative deficits had demonstrated persistent MEP signal change on IONM. There was a significant association between persistent MEP changes and postoperative deficits (p < 0.001). The sensitivity of intraoperative MEP monitoring was 75%, the specificity 98%, the positive predictive value 75%, and the negative predictive value 98%. Due to higher rates of false negatives, the sensitivity decreased to 60% in the subgroup of patients with vascular disease comorbidity. The sensitivity increased to 100% in elderly patients and in patients with preoperative motor deficits. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of deltoid and biceps MEP changes in predicting C-5 palsy were 67% and 67%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The authors found a correlation between decreased intraoperative MEPs and postoperative new neurological deficits in patients with CSM. Sensitivity varies based on patient comorbidities, age, and preoperative neurological function. Monitoring of MEPs is a useful adjunct for CSM cases, and the authors have developed a checklist to standardize their responses to intraoperative MEP changes.

The design, development, and implementation of a checklist for intraoperative neuromonitoring changes.

OBJECT: The purpose of this study was to provide an evidence-based algorithm for the design, development, and implementation of a new checklist for the response to an intraoperative neuromonitoring alert during spine surgery. METHODS: The aviation and surgical literature was surveyed for evidence of successful checklist design, development, and implementation. The limitations of checklists and the barriers to their implementation were reviewed. Based on this review, an algorithm for neurosurgical checklist creation and implementation was developed. Using this algorithm, a multidisciplinary team surveyed the literature for the best practices for how to respond to an intraoperative neuromonitoring alert. All stakeholders then reviewed the evidence and came to consensus regarding items for inclusion in the checklist. RESULTS: A checklist for responding to an intraoperative neuromonitoring alert was devised. It highlights the specific roles of the anesthesiologist, surgeon, and neuromonitoring personnel and encourages communication between teams. It focuses on the items critical for identifying and correcting reversible causes of neuromonitoring alerts. Following initial design, the checklist draft was reviewed and amended with stakeholder input. The checklist was then evaluated in a small-scale trial and revised based on usability and feasibility. CONCLUSIONS: The authors have developed an evidence-based algorithm for the design, development, and implementation of checklists in neurosurgery and have used this algorithm to devise a checklist for responding to intraoperative neuromonitoring alerts in spine surgery.

Increases in voltage may produce false-negatives when using transcranial motor evoked potentials to detect an isolated nerve root injury.

OBJECTIVE: Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials (TcMEPs) are sometimes used during lumbar spine surgery in order to detect and prevent an intraoperative nerve root injury. Typically, a fixed stimulus is applied, and one monitors for changes in response amplitude from several myotomes. Increased stimulating voltage may or may not alter the response after an acute injury. METHODS: We suture ligated the dominant root innervating the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle in 7 experiments in swine monitored with TcMEPs. Injury to the root was confirmed by an increase in threshold current needed to evoke an EMG response in the TA (from 0.32 ± 0.10 to 2.3 ± 0.9 mA, P < 0.01). We recorded TcMEPs at baseline, after injury, and with incremental 25 V increases in stimulation up to 100 V. RESULTS: After ligation, mean TcMEP amplitude in the TA decreased by 56% from baseline (P < 0.01). Adding voltage progressively restored mean amplitude to within 17% of baseline, but with wide variability in the response. In 1 experiment, there was no augmentation; 3 studies showed partial improvement toward baseline; and in 3 studies, the amplitude was augmented to levels above baseline. CONCLUSION: An acute nerve root injury may be detected by TcMEP monitoring. However, if the stimulating voltage is increased after injury, the response may or may not be affected. In complex spine procedures, adjustments to TcMEP stimulating parameters are often needed to maintain reproducible responses. However, if these changes are made during a period where injury might occur, this could mask the changes and lead to a false-negative interpretation.

Mixed-muscle electrode placement ("jumping" muscles) may produce false-negative results when using transcranial motor evoked potentials to detect an isolated nerve root injury in a porcine model.

INTRODUCTION: Placing EMG electrode pairs that span several muscles is sometimes used to enhance the efficacy of electromyographic recordings. This technique, often referred to as "jumping," has not been studied when using Motor Evoked Potentials (TcMEP) for detecting isolated spinal nerve root injury during spine surgery. METHODS: TcMEPs were obtained in seven pigs under general anesthesia. One pair of recording electrodes was placed entirely within the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle; a second pair had one lead in the TA and the other in the gastrocnemius muscle (TA-GAS). The dominant root innervating the TA was determined using evoked EMG. MEP amplitudes recorded by the TA and TA-GAS electrodes were compared before and after suture ligation of this root in 12 separate experiments. RESULTS: Mean baseline TcMEP amplitude was not significantly different for the TA vs. TA-GAS. After root ligation, mean amplitude dropped from baseline by 72 +/- 13% in the TA vs. 50 +/- 29% in the TA-GAS (p < 0.01). All amplitudes decreased by >50% in the TA group; half of the TA-GAS group had <50% decrease in amplitude. DISCUSSION: Mixed-myotomal recording electrodes did not consistently increase baseline TcMEP amplitude. The decrease in amplitude after ligation was both smaller and more variable in the "jumped" TA-GAS electrodes. Thus, this technique may allow someone relying on TcMEP monitoring to miss an otherwise detectable isolated nerve root injury (i.e., have a false-negative result).

The reliability of motor evoked potentials to predict dorsiflexion injuries during lumbosacral deformity surgery: importance of multiple myotomal monitoring.

STUDY DESIGN: Case-control analysis of transcranial motor evoked potential (MEP) responses and clinical outcome. OBJECTIVE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of MEPs to predict isolated nerve root injury causing dorsiflexion weakness in selected patients having complex lumbar spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The surgical correction of distal lumbar spine deformity involves significant risk for damage to neural structures that control muscles of ankle and toe dorsiflexion. Procedures often include vertebral translation, interbody fusion, and posterior-based osteotomies. The benefit of using MEP monitoring to predict dorsiflexion weakness has not been well-established. The purpose of this paper is to describe the relationship between neural complications from lumbar surgery and intraoperative MEP changes. METHODS: Included were 542 neurologically intact patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion for the correction of distal lumbar deformity. Two myotomes, including tibialis anterior (TA) and extensor hallucis longus (EHL), were monitored. MEP and free-running electromyography data were assessed in each patient. Cases of new dorsiflexion weakness noted postoperatively were identified. Data in case and control patients were compared. There was no direct funding for this work. The Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care provides salary support for authors one and six. Authors two and three report employment in the field of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring as a study-specific conflict of interest. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (cases) developed dorsiflexion weakness. MEP amplitude decreased in the injured myotomes by an average of 65 ± 21% (TA) and 60±26% (EHL), which was significantly greater than the contralateral uninjured side or for control subjects. (p < .01) Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves showed high sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value for changes in MEP amplitude using either the TA or EHL. Analysis of MEP changes to either TA or EHL yielded a superior ROC curve. Net reclassification improvement analysis showed assessing MEP changes to both TA and EHL improved the predictability of injury. CONCLUSIONS: The use of MEP amplitude change is highly sensitive and specific to predict a new postoperative dorsiflexion injury. Monitoring two myotomes (both TA and EHL) is superior to relying on MEP changes from a single myotome. Electromyography activity was less accurate but compliments MEP use. Additional studies are needed to define optimal intraoperative MEP warning thresholds.

Monitoring cerebral ischemia during cerebrovascular surgery.

Patients undergoing intracranial cerebrovascular surgery under general anesthesia are at risk of cerebral ischemia due to the nature of the surgery and/or the underlying cerebrovascular occlusive disease. It is thus imperative to reliably and continuously monitor cerebral perfusion during this type of surgery to timely reverse ischemic processes. The aim of this review is to discuss the techniques currently available for monitoring cerebral ischemia during cerebrovascular surgery with a focus on the advantages and disadvantages of each technique.

Neurological outcomes and surgical complications in 221 spinal nerve sheath tumors.

OBJECTIVE Among all primary spinal neoplasms, approximately two-thirds are intradural extramedullary lesions; nerve sheath tumors, mainly neurofibromas and schwannomas, comprise approximately half of them. Given the rarity of these lesions, reports of surgical complications are limited. The aim of this study was to identify the rates of new or worsening neurological deficits and surgical complications associated with the resection of spinal nerve sheath tumors and the potential factors related to these outcomes. METHODS Patients were identified through a search of an institutional neuropathology database and a separate review of current procedural terminology (CPT) codes. Age, sex, clinical presentation, presence of neurofibromatosis (NF), tumor type, tumor location, extent of resection characterized as gross total or subtotal, use of intraoperative neuromonitoring, surgical complications, presence of neurological deficit, and clinical follow-up were recorded. RESULTS Two hundred twenty-one tumors in 199 patients with a mean age of 45 years were identified. Fifty-three tumors were neurofibromas; 163, schwannomas; and 5, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs). There were 70 complications in 221 cases, a rate of 32%, which included 34 new or worsening sensory symptoms (15%), 12 new or worsening motor deficits (5%), 10 CSF leaks or pseudomeningoceles (4%), 11 wound infections (5%), 5 cases of spinal deformity (2%), and 6 others (2 spinal epidural hematomas, 1 nonoperative cranial subdural hematoma, 1 deep venous thrombosis, 1 case of urinary retention, and 1 recurrent laryngeal nerve injury). Complications were more common in cervical (36%) and lumbosacral (38%) tumors than in thoracic (18%) lesions (p = 0.021). Intradural and dumbbell lesions were associated with higher rates of CSF leakage, pseudomeningocele, and wound infection. Complications were present in 18 neurofibromas (34%), 50 schwannomas (31%), and 2 MPNSTs (40%); the differences in frequency were not significant (p = 0.834). Higher complication rates were observed in patients with NF than in patients without (38% vs 30%, p = 0.189), although rates were higher in NF Type 2 than in Type 1 (64% vs 31%). There was no difference in the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring when comparing cases with surgical complications and those without (67% vs 69%, p = 0.797). However, the use of neuromonitoring was associated with a significantly higher rate of gross-total resection (79% vs 66%, p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS Resection is a safe and effective treatment for spinal nerve sheath tumors. Approximately 30% of patients developed a postoperative complication, most commonly new or worsening sensory deficits. This rate probably represents an inevitable complication of nerve sheath tumor surgery given the intimacy of these lesions with functional neural elements.

The effect of age on motor evoked potentials in children under propofol/isoflurane anesthesia.

Intraoperative transcranial motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring may help prevent neurologic injury during spine surgery. This type of monitoring may be difficult in the pediatric population under general anesthesia. We retrospectively reviewed data from 56 children, aged 2 to 18 yr, who were to undergo surgical correction of idiopathic scoliosis with MEP monitoring. Under combined isoflurane-propofol general anesthesia, before incision, we examined the minimum stimulating threshold voltage required to achieve a 50-microvolt or greater MEP response amplitude. Younger age was associated with an increase in the threshold voltage needed to elicit a sufficient MEP response. In addition, younger age was associated with longer stimulating pulse trains and greater need to adjust stimulating scalp electrodes. Body surface area, height, weight, and body mass index were also significant factors, but they were not independent predictors, after adjusting for age. Younger children received significantly lower levels of isoflurane and comparable doses of propofol, compared with older patients. Stronger stimulation needed to produce MEP responses in younger patients may reflect immaturity of their central nervous system, specifically conduction by the descending corticospinal motor tracts. Greater attention must be given to optimizing physiologic variables, limiting depressant anesthetics, and selecting the most favorable stimulating conditions in children, especially those <10 yr old.

Progressive suppression of motor evoked potentials during general anesthesia: the phenomenon of "anesthetic fade".

Transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEPs) are useful for assessing the integrity of spinal cord motor tracts during major spine surgery. Anesthetic agents depress the amplitude of MEPs in a dose-dependent fashion. Anecdotal reports suggest that MEP responses degrade or "fade" over the duration of a surgery, despite unchanged anesthetic levels or other physiologic variables. This phenomenon has not been systematically analyzed. We performed a retrospective study of 418 patients who underwent spine surgery at UCSF using intraoperative MEP monitoring. We excluded patients who experienced variations in physiologic parameters that might affect MEP signals and those who developed new neurologic deficits. We identified 46 neurologically intact patients and 16 myelopathic patients who had surgery performed using a constant desflurane/N2O/narcotic or desflurane/propofol/narcotic anesthetic regimen. The minimum voltage threshold needed to produce an MEP response of at least 50 microV in amplitude was recorded at the beginning ("baseline") and end of surgery. The voltage threshold was higher at the end of the case than at baseline for each patient, regardless of anesthetic regimen. In normal patients, the rate of rise of the threshold was similar for those receiving propofol (11.4 +/- 6.9 V/hr) or N2O (9.7 +/- 5.9 V/hr) (P = not significant). Myelopathic patients demonstrated a larger rate of rise in voltage threshold, 23.4 +/- 12.2 V/hr, versus normal subjects (P < 0.01). The rate of rise of voltage threshold is inversely proportional to anesthetic duration. Prolonged exposure to anesthetic agents necessitates higher stimulating thresholds to elicit MEP responses, separate from the dose-dependent depressant effect. This retrospective study is limited and cannot explain the mechanism for this observed fade in signals. Recognition of anesthetic fade is essential when interpreting changes to the MEP response to avoid false-positive findings.

Transcranial motor evoked potential recording in a case of Kernohan's notch syndrome: case report.

OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE: Compression of the cerebral peduncle against the tentorial incisura contralateral to a supratentorial mass lesion, the so-called Kernohan-Woltman notch phenomenon, can be an important cause of false localizing motor signs. Here, we demonstrate a case in which clinical, radiological, and electrophysiological findings were used together to define this syndrome. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 21-year-old man sustained a left temporal depressed cranial fracture from a motor vehicle accident. Serial computed tomographic examinations demonstrated no evolution of hematomas or contusions, and he was managed nonsurgically with ventriculostomy for intracranial pressure control. Throughout his course in the neurosurgical intensive care unit, he displayed persistent left hemiparesis. INTERVENTION: Further radiological and electrophysiological studies were undertaken in an attempt to explain his left hemiparesis. Brain magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated T2 prolongation in the central portion of the right cerebral peduncle extending to the right internal capsule. Electrophysiological studies using transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials revealed both a marked increase in voltage threshold, as well as a reduction in the complexity of the motor evoked potential waveform on the hemiparetic left side. This contrasted to significantly lower voltage threshold as well as a highly complex motor evoked potential waveform recorded on the relatively intact contralateral side. CONCLUSION: This is the first time that clinical, radiological, and electrophysiological findings have been correlated in a case of Kernohan's notch syndrome. Compression of the contralateral cerebral peduncle against the tentorial incisura can lead to damage and ipsilateral hemiparesis. The anatomic extent of the lesion can be defined by magnetic resonance imaging and the physiological extent by electrophysiological techniques.

Transcranial motor evoked potentials during basilar artery aneurysm surgery: technique application for 30 consecutive patients.

OBJECTIVE: Microsurgical clipping of basilar artery aneurysms carries a risk of neurological compromise resulting from midbrain or thalamic ischemia. Somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring and electroencephalography are the standard techniques for assessing the level of cerebroprotective anesthesia and monitoring ischemia during temporary occlusion or after permanent clipping. Transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring was added to determine whether this modality improved intraoperative monitoring. METHODS: Combined SSEP/electroencephalographic/TcMEP monitoring was used for 30 consecutive patients with basilar artery apex aneurysms in the past 1.5 years. Voltage thresholds were recorded before, during, and after aneurysm treatment for the last 10 patients. RESULTS: All 30 patients underwent an orbitozygomatic craniotomy for clipping (28 patients), wrapping (1 patient), or superficial temporal artery-superior cerebellar artery bypass (1 patient). Electrophysiological changes occurred for 10 patients (33%), elicited by temporary clipping (6 patients), permanent clipping (3 patients), or retraction (1 patient). Isolated SSEP changes were observed for one patient, isolated TcMEP changes for five patients, and changes in both TcMEPs and SSEPs for four patients. Among patients with simultaneous changes, TcMEP abnormalities were more robust and occurred earlier than SSEP abnormalities. Impaired motor conduction was detected first with an increase in the voltage threshold (from 206 +/- 22 to 410 +/- 49 V, P < 0.05, n = 3) and then with loss of TcMEP responses. SSEP and TcMEP signals returned to baseline values for all patients after corrective measures were taken. CONCLUSION: TcMEP monitoring can be safely and easily added to traditional neurophysiological monitoring during basilar artery aneurysm surgery. These results suggest that TcMEPs may be more sensitive than SSEPs to basilar artery and perforating artery ischemia. This additional intraoperative information might minimize the incidence of ischemic complications attributable to prolonged temporary occlusion or inadvertent perforator occlusion.

Strategies for managing decreased motor evoked potential signals while distracting the spine during correction of scoliosis.

Surgical correction of kyphoscoliosis may result in spinal cord injury and neurologic deficits. Monitoring somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEPs) intraoperatively may allow for early detection and reversal of spinal cord injury. Controlled hypotension and isovolemic hemodilution are often used during these cases to reduce blood loss and transfusion. However, these physiologic parameters may affect the quality of SSEP and MEP signals. Acute reduction or loss of MEP or SSEP signals during spinal distraction presents a crisis for the operative team: should distraction be immediately relieved? The authors describe three patients who showed a decrease in evoked potential signals under hypotensive, hemodiluted conditions at the stage of spinal distraction. Each case illustrates a different strategy for successful management of these patients.

Neuromonitoring during surgery for metastatic tumors to the spine: intraoperative interpretation and management strategies.

Resection of metastatic tumors of the spine poses great technical challenges, with the potential of creating severe neurologic deficits. Several modalities of electrophysiologic monitoring, including SSEPs and MEPs, have evolved to aid in resection of these tumors. This review has presented additional techniques-such as mapping of the dorsal columns with antidromic-elicited SSEPs to plan the myelotomy and direct intra-medullary stimulation-that help to identify the extent of the tumor margin at its interface with functional tracts. Neuromonitoring can potentially minimize the sensory and motor damage that can occur during resection of metastatic tumors of the spine. Further experience with these techniques should allow improved results follow-ing surgical procedures in functionally eloquent are as of the spinal cord during the surgical management of metastatic tumors.

Neurophysiological monitoring for safe surgical tethered cord syndrome release in adults.

BACKGROUND: Release of tethered spinal cord by sectioning of the filum terminale carries a significant risk of injury to the neighboring motor and sensory nerve roots. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring techniques can help to minimize these adverse neurologic outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 67 consecutive patients undergoing tethered cord release. We excluded 52 pediatric patients which limited our study to 15 adult patients treated during a four year period, including patients with a thick filum, low lying conus, myelomeningocele, filum tumor, spinal cord malformation, and/or lipoma. Clinical outcomes were determined from postoperative follow-up visits. Two patients were lost to follow up and were excluded from the clinical outcome analysis. Electrical stimulation of the filum terminale and lumbo-sacral nerve roots in conjunction with electromyogram (EMG) recording was performed intraoperatively. RESULTS: The mean electrical threshold for EMG response during stimulation of the filum terminale was 37.1 volts (V), range 15 to 100 V. In comparison, the lowest threshold obtained by direct stimulation of the ventral nerve roots was a mean of 1.46 V, with a range of 0.1 to 7 V. More than 70% of the patients studied demonstrated a filum to motor root threshold ratio of 100:1 or greater. No patient developed new neurologic symptoms or signs postoperatively. Bowel and bladder function improved in 46% of patients, back pain in 39% and motor function in 31%. Eight percent reported decline in bladder control and worsening back pain postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The often dramatic difference in the threshold of the filum terminale and adjacent motor nerve roots (100:1) helps to identify, isolate, and safely section the filum terminale. Tethered cord release using intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is safe and in the majority of cases leads to improvement or at least, stabilization of neurologic function. Monitoring prevented intraoperative nerve root injury that might have resulted in immediate onset of new neurologic deficits caused by the surgical procedure.

Efficacy of transcranial motor evoked potentials, mechanically elicited electromyography, and evoked electromyography to assess nerve root function during sustained compression in a porcine model.

STUDY DESIGN: This is an animal experiment using transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs), mechanically elicited electromyographic (EMG) responses, and evoked EMG responses during nerve root compression in a pig model. OBJECTIVE: To compare these 3 electrophysiological measures for compression applied to a lumbar nerve root. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lumbar nerve root injury may result in motor weakness in up to 30% of spinal deformity cases. Compressive injury may occur during the surgical approach, decompression, and manipulation of the spine. Using an established porcine model, we examined the changes to TcMEPs, mechanically elicited EMG responses, and evoked EMG responses during varied compressive forces. METHODS: TcMEPs, mechanically elicited EMG responses, and evoked EMG responses were recorded for the tibialis anterior muscle in 16 experiments. Precompression TcMEP and nerve root stimulation threshold (NRT) were obtained. The dominant root was compressed at 1 N (n = 8) or 2 N (n = 8) for 10 minutes. TcMEP was recorded every minute during compression, and TcMEP and NRT were recorded after both compression and 10 minutes of recovery. RESULTS: After 10 minutes of 1-N compression, TcMEP amplitude of the tibialis anterior muscle decreased to 69% ± 13% of baseline (P < 0.02 vs. baseline). The mean NRT increased to 645% ± 433% (P < 0.02 vs. baseline NRT). After the recovery period, TcMEP in the 1-N group returned to 98% ± 11% of baseline (P = 0.36 vs. baseline). After 10 minutes of 2-N compression, TcMEPs from the tibialis anterior muscle decreased to 27% ± 15% of baseline (P < 0.02 vs. baseline). After the recovery period, TcMEP in the 2-N group returned to 30% ± 10% of baseline (P < 0.02 vs. baseline). Tonic EMG activity was observed in 3 nerve roots compressed at 2 N. CONCLUSION: Compression at 1 and 2 N produced consistent changes in TcMEPs and EMG responses. TcMEP monitoring is sensitive to an increase in compressive force. TcMEP amplitude change was correlated to the force applied and the ability of the nerve root to recover. Mechanically elicited EMG responses were not sensitive to nerve root compression. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.