Reliability and validity of the Arabic translation of the palliative performance scale.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to translate the Palliative Performance Scale (PPSv2) into Arabic and to test the reliability and validity of the PPS Arabic translation (PPS-Arabic). METHOD: The PPSv2 was translated into Modern Standard Arabic using a forward-backward method. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities were tested in a pilot study that included 20 patients. The validation study included 150 cancer patients. Patients were divided according to their treatment plan into three groups (in-remission, palliative chemotherapy, and best supportive care) to perform hypothesis-testing construct validity. Validity was further evaluated by correlating PPS-Arabic with the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale, and Physical Functioning (PF2) and Role Functioning (RF2) scales of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficients for the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were 0.935 (95% CI: 0.88-0.965; p < 0.001) and 0.965 (95% CI: 0.934-0.981; p < 0.001), respectively. The PPS-Arabic internal consistency Cronbach's alpha was 0.986. The average PPS-Arabic score differed significantly (p < 0.001) between the three groups of patients being 89 for in-remission, 58 for palliative chemotherapy, and 38 for best supportive care. The PPS-Arabic score correlated significantly (p < 0.001) with the KPS, ECOG performance scale, and the EORTC QLQ-C30 PF2 and RF2 scales. CONCLUSION: The PPS-Arabic is a reliable and valid tool for the assessment of performance status of cancer patients.

The Emerging Treatment Options of Plasmablastic Lymphoma: Analysis of 173 Individual Patient Outcomes.

Plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) is a newly recognized aggressive subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Its rarity hinders testing effective treatment options in clinical trials. We conducted a systematic review of PubMed and our internal records to retrieve patients with a PBL diagnosis with evaluable treatment outcomes. Aggressive chemotherapy was defined as more intense regimens than CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). We compiled a meta-dataset of 173 patients. The median age at diagnosis was 48.5 years, 75% of patients were male, and stages III/IV accounted for 47% of the cohort. Of 138 patients with known response status after first-line chemotherapy, 63 (45%) achieved a complete response with a 2-year relapse-free survival of 71.6%. Sixty-nine (50%) patients received first-line CHOP. There was no significant difference in the objective response rate among the 2 most commonly used regimens, CHOP and DA-EPOCH (dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin) (69% vs. 79%; P = .4). The median follow-up was 9 months, and the 2-year overall survival (OS) was 47.4%. A univariate analysis identified factors associated with worse OS, including stage III/IV (hazard ratio [HR], 2.82; P < .001), human herpes virus-8-positive (HR, 3.30; P = .01), bone marrow (HR, 1.07; P = .035), and cardiorespiratory involvement (HR, 2.26; P = .015). Meanwhile, Epstein-Varr virus-encoded small RNA-positivity (HR, 0.31; P < .001) and involvement of head and neck (HR, 0.44; P = .009) were associated with better OS. Multivariate analysis showed that aggressive chemotherapy was significantly associated with better OS (HR, 0.22; P = .016). Patients with PBL with high-risk features, such as advanced stage, human herpes virus-8-positivity, bone marrow, and cardiorespiratory involvement, require more aggressive chemotherapy. Bortezomib and lenalidomide are promising add-on agents.