Perspectives From the 12th Annual Minipig Research Forum: Early Inclusion of the Minipig in Safety Assessment Species Selection Should be the Standard Approach.

Over the last decade, the minipig has been established as a species which can be used in biomedical research, including drug development safety assessment. There are no mandatory regulatory guidelines regarding species selection strategy for safety assessment; hence, choice is at the discretion of companies responsible for drug development. A survey of member companies by IQ DruSafe (2016) highlighted inconsistent and low use of the minipig. At the 12th Annual Minipig Research Forum in 2018, presentations and a workshop examined current practices and considered if the minipig could be utilized more from earliest drug development stages. Despite the agreed utility of scientific data and validity of the minipig, especially for small molecules, each company has its own approach in nonrodent species selection, without consistent rationale. The overall objective should be to ensure the most appropriate species is selected and is scientifically based, with the minipig systematically included from early screening stages.

Biochemical and Electroretinographic Characterization of the Minipig Eye in the Context of Drug Safety Investigations.

Minipigs are an emerging nonrodent alternative for ocular toxicology owing to anatomical similarities in the minipig eyes when compared to humans. Ocular structures and components from Göttingen minipigs were characterized and compared to species commonly used in toxicology. Ocular reference data from Göttingen minipig including intraocular pressure, vitreous electrolyte and thiol concentration, and electroretinography (ERG) data are essential to model characterization and data interpretation during drug safety assessments. Intravitreal positive control agents including gentamicin, indocyanine green, and glycine were used to demonstrate ERG alterations caused by retinal cell toxicity, light transmission obstruction, or neurotransmission interferences, respectively. Electrolyte concentrations of the aqueous and vitreous humors from Göttingen minipigs were similar to other species including humans. The reference data presented herein supports the use of the Göttingen minipig as an alternate nonrodent species in ocular toxicology.

Interspecies Comparison of Control Data From Embryo-Fetal Development Studies in Sprague-Dawley Rats, New Zealand White Rabbits, and Göttingen Minipigs.

Species-dependent differences in relative incidence of spontaneous variations and malformations should be considered in the assessment of the translational value of reproductive and developmental safety assessments. The objective of this evaluation was to compare litter parameters and the frequency of external, visceral, and skeletal malformations and variations across species in the Sprague-Dawley rat, New Zealand White rabbit, and Göttingen minipig and to determine whether notable differences exist. Pregnant female rats (n = 824), rabbits (n = 540), and minipigs (n = 70) from vehicle control groups were included in the analysis, equating to 10,749 rat, 5,073 rabbit, and 378 pig fetuses collected at term by cesarean delivery. Preimplantation loss was more frequent than postimplantation loss in the rat and rabbit, whereas the opposite was observed in the minipig. Several external and visceral malformations and variations such as domed head, bent tail, abdominal edema, and anal atresia were observed in all 3 species. Visceral malformations of the heart and major blood vessels were remarkably more frequent in the minipig and rabbit, respectively; ventricular and atrium septum defects were observed in 1.9% and 2.1%, respectively, for the minipig fetuses, whereas they were observed in equal or less than 0.02% among the rat and rabbit fetuses evaluated in this study. Understanding species-dependent differences in spontaneous variations and malformations can be useful for the interpretation of embryo-fetal development study results. The current analysis identified relevant differences between commonly used species in reproductive toxicology with potential implications for data assessment.