Diluted povidone-iodine irrigation prior to wound closure in primary and revision total joint arthroplasty of hip and knee: a review of the evidence.

Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) of the Hip and of the Knee is a tremendous complication associated with high patient morbidity, cost, and increased health care resource utilization. Over the last few years, several perioperative strategies have been developed in the hopes of reducing the risk of early superficial and deep surgical site infection (SSI). One of the most performed intraoperative treatments to reduce the risk of SSI in total joint arthroplasty is the use of dilute povidone-iodine (DPI) irrigation prior to wound closure. For this reason, we believed a systematic review of the literature was needed to better understand the current literature on the efficacy of dilute betadine in reducing PJI. The search terms for this systematic review was performed for keywords "betadine", "povidone-iodine", "lavage", "irrigation" and "arthroplasty". A total of six studies were included, four of these reported the outcome of primary total joint arthroplasty, and two of these reported the outcome of revision total joint arthroplasty. Some studies reported that the use of DPI is effective to reduce the incidence of infective complications, meanwhile other studies did not find differences when DPI was used. More studies must be addressed to provide the efficacy of DPI irrigation.

Cementless versus cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of comparative studies.

There are still some controversies regarding the clinical use of cementless UKAs. The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether cementless medial UKA leads to similar outcomes compared to cemented medial UKA. This search was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidelines (PRISMA). The random effects model with 95% confidence interval (CI) was applied to the analysis. The I2 statistic was used to assess study heterogeneity. Six studies were eligible for inclusion (4784 UKAs, 4776 patients): 2947 cemented UKAs (61.6%) and 1837 cementless UKAs (38.4%). The overall mean follow-up was 4.9 years. The all-cause reoperation rate was 11.3% (80 of 706) at mean 5.7-year follow-up for cemented UKA and 6.9% (57 of 824) at mean 4.1-year follow-up for the cementless. The overall revision rate was 10.2% (303 of 2947) for the cemented and 5.8% (108 of 1837) for the cementless. Aseptic loosening was the most frequent reason of revision (2.3% cemented vs 0.5% cementless). The overall rate of radiolucent lines (RLL) was 28.3% (63 of 223) in the cemented cohort and 11.1% in the cementless (26 of 234). All the studies reported improved functional outcomes. Cementless UKA provides at least equivalent if not better results compared to cemented UKA. Despite the use of cemented UKA outnumber cementless fixation, available data shows that cementless UKA had a reduced midterm revision rate, while providing similar functional outcomes.

Staggered bilateral total knee arthroplasty during a single hospitalization: is it still an option? a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral knee osteoarthritis requiring total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be addressed simultaneously in one surgical setting, staggered a few days apart during a single hospitalization, or staged several weeks to months apart. Several studies have reported on the complications and clinical outcomes of staggered bilateral TKA (BTKA) in a single hospitalization. However, there is no consensus regarding the safety and efficacy of this practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature, utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and identifying articles that reported the clinical outcomes and postoperative complications following staggered BTKA. RESULTS: Overall, six articles were included for analysis, including 43,892 patients in total. Females (n = 25,931; 59% of all patients) outnumbered males (n = 17,961; 40.1% of all patients), and most patients were middle-aged or elderly (mean age: 68.0 years). The majority of studies (83%) used a 1-week interval as the maximum time for single-hospitalization staggered BTKA. Five studies (83%) reported no difference in mortality rates between staggered, simultaneous, or staged BTKA. Compared to staged BTKA, staggered BTKA conferred an increased rate of blood transfusions. There was no consensus that staggered BTKA led to reduced complications rates, compared to simultaneous or staged BTKA. CONCLUSIONS: Single-hospitalization staggered BTKA does not appear to be safer than the well-established simultaneous or staged procedures. Overall, the data suggest that staggered BTKA will continue to decline in utilization, as staggered BTKA does not appear to yield clinical advantage over simultaneous BTKA in a medically appropriate patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: systematic review (lowest level of studies included).

Arthroscopic partial repair with versus without biodegradable subacromial spacer for patients with massive rotator cuff tears: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether arthroscopic partial repair with the additional use of a biodegradable subacromial spacer would be proven better treatment for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (MRCT) compared to single arthroscopic partial repair. METHODS: A matched-pairs case-control study of 32 patients suffering from irreparable MRCT who underwent an arthroscopic partial repair with (Group B: 16 patients) or without (Group A: 16 patients) InSpace Balloon (ISB®; Orthospace, Caesarea, Israel) implantation was conducted. For the clinical and functional assessment of the patients, the visual analog scale, Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES), Range of Motion (RoM), and patients' satisfaction were obtained. RESULTS: The two groups were matched in all baseline demographic and clinical characteristics (n.s.). All mean final quantitative postoperative clinical and functional scores of group A (partial repair and ISB) and group B (single partial repair), as well as active RoM, were significantly improved (t test) in comparison with the mean preoperative values (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in relation to the two success rate criteria (ASES minimal clinically important difference or MCID > 17, Constant score MCID > 10.4), as well as pain relief and RoM 12 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic partial repair, either with or without ISB implantation, resulted in significantly improved clinical and functional short-term outcomes for the treatment of MRCT. Patients who were treated with combined partial repair and ISB implantation had a potential propensity toward better functional outcomes and higher patient satisfaction compared to the single-partial-repair-treated group. However, given that these differences were not significant, we feel that further studies are required to clarify the potential therapeutic value of ISB implantation in the treatment of irreparable MRCT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. CLINICAL TRIALS' REGISTRY: German Clinical Trials Register (WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform). ID number: DRKS00014725. Date of registration: 07/05/2018.

Arthroscopic anatomic complete versus non-anatomic repair of massive rotator cuff tears: a systematic review of comparative trials.

Several clinical studies have compared the clinical and functional outcomes of arthroscopic anatomic complete repair and arthroscopic partial repair for massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs). To our knowledge, no systematic review of these comparative trials has been published yet. A systematic analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) using the MEDLINE/PubMed database and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Six studies were eligible for analysis, and they were level III case-control studies. There were 223 cases of complete repair and 208 cases of partial repair (mean age range 59-67 years, mean follow-up range 24-45 months). All studies reported significant postoperative improvement in the reported subjective scores and range of motion in both groups. Complete repair was associated with at least equal or better functional outcomes compared to the partial repair. The rate of complications requiring reoperation in the complete and partial repair cohorts was 1.3% and 3.4%, respectively. Although the overall rate of radiographic integrity of the complete and partial repair cohorts was 61.1% and 26.7%, respectively, we found no clinical relevance in this finding. There is moderate-to-good quality evidence to support that both arthroscopic complete and partial repairs of MRCTs are associated with satisfactory functional outcomes and low rate of complications requiring reoperation. Complete repair is associated with at least equal or better functional outcomes compared to the partial repair and, therefore, it should remain the first line of treatment.

Total shoulder arthroplasty with hybrid fixation of glenoid components consisting of cementless porous metal pegs or cage along with cemented backside polyethylene surface: a systematic review.

Recently, hybrid glenoid components have been developed, consisting of cementless highly porous metal central peg, monoblock keel or cage along with cemented backside polyethylene surface. The aims of this study were twofold: (1) to determine the revision and complication rates of hybrid glenoid components, consisting of porous metal pegs or coatings attached to the polyethylene, for aseptic loosening in TSA and (2) to evaluate the rate of radiolucent lines in patients who underwent TSA with hybrid glenoid components consisting of porous metal pegs or coatings attached to the polyethylene. The US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE), EMBASE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were queried for publications utilizing the following keywords: "hybrid" OR "bone-ingrowth" OR "bone ingrowth" AND "TSA" OR "total" AND "shoulder" AND "arthroplasty" OR "replacement". Five articles were included for analysis (470 operated shoulders, mean follow-up: 47.5 months). The overall weighted mean modified methodology Coleman score was 51.2/100, indicating a moderate level of overall methodological quality. The survival rate of hybrid glenoid components was 97.4% (458 out of 470 cases), while the rate of glenoid-related complications was 2.8% (13 cases). Finally, there were 54 cases (out of 313 reported; 17.3%) with glenoid radiolucency (none of them required revision). TSA with hybrid fixation glenoid components was associated with high survivorship and low rate of glenoid component-related complications at 4 years mean follow-up. In addition, there was limited evidence to show that the short- to mid-term outcome of TSA using hybrid glenoid components is not inferior to the outcome of cemented all-polyethylene glenoid components.

Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears versus anatomic complete arthroscopic repair: a case-control study.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tear (RCT) produces satisfactory clinical outcomes comparable to those of an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study (prospectively collected data, mean follow-up: 32.7 months ± 29.5; range 12-80 months) was conducted with patients with massive RCT who underwent either an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair (group A: 34 patients) or a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair (partial repair or medialized repair, group B: 30 patients). The rate of success was calculated primarily by the number of patients per group who achieved a minimal clinically important difference between the preoperative and postoperative values of (a) the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score, (b) the constant score and (c) secondarily, the visual analogue scale (VAS-pain). Active range of motion (shoulder forward flexion, abduction, external rotation in 0° and 90° abduction), muscle strength and external rotation lag sign were also assessed. RESULTS: No significant statistical differences amongst groups were found concerning the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. All postoperative clinical and functional scores were significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.001). According to our primary and secondary success rate criteria, both treatments were found to be successful, whereas there was no significant difference amongst them. CONCLUSIONS: Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive RCT illustrated satisfactory outcomes, which are not significantly different from those reported after an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair.

The clinical outcome of chondrolabral-preserving arthroscopic acetabuloplasty for pincer- or mixed-type femoroacetabular impingement: A systematic review.

While preservation and repair of the acetabular labrum are increasingly being recognized as important goals in hip arthroscopy, controversies still exist regarding the clinical outcome of arthroscopic acetabuloplasty with chondrolabral preservation. A systematic review was conducted and implemented by two independent reviewers, who used the MEDLINE/PubMed database and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for their search. These databases were queried with the terms "arthroscopic acetabuloplasty" and "chondrolabral preservation" and "arthroscopic acetabular recession." From the 55 initial studies the reviewers finally chose and assessed five clinical studies which were eligible to their inclusion-exclusion criteria. The reviewed studies included in total 444 patients, mainly young, between 30 and 40 years old. The follow-up evaluation varied between 24 and 41 months, while all studies utilized at least a 24-month final end-point assessment. All five studies illustrated improved outcome with the use of chondrolabral preservation acetabuloplasty without labral detachment. The rate of complications was very low. The different techniques of arthroscopic acetabuloplasty combined with chondrolabral preservation illustrated encouraging results in patients suffering from pincer-type or mixed-type FAI. However, the available clinical evidence was limited and insufficient to establish any superiority of these techniques over the traditional labral detachment and sequential reattachment. In relation to the optimal treatment of FAI without isolated CAM, further research of higher quality is recommended to be conducted in order to lead to definitive conclusions.