Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BJOG ; 129(6): 986-993, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34743389

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between hospital surgical volume of caesarean hysterectomy and surgical morbidity in women with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort study. SETTING: National Inpatient Sample, January 2016 to December 2018. POPULATION: Six thousand and ten women with PAS who underwent caesarean hysterectomy in 738 centres. METHODS: (1) Comprehensive modelling for relative hospital surgical volume cut-point selection, (2) multinomial regression analysis for characterising hospital surgical volume, and (3) binary logistic regression analysis to examine the volume-outcome relationship. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surgical morbidity (haemorrhage, coagulopathy, shock, urinary tract injury, and death). RESULTS: The majority of centres had five surgeries over the 3-year period (468 centres, 63.4%) and were grouped as the low-volume group. Surgical morbidity decreased after a relative hospital surgical volume of 25 cases (24 centres, 3.3%) was reached, grouped as the high-volume group. The remaining centres were grouped as the mid-volume group (246 centres, 33.3%). In multivariable analysis, women in the high-volume group were more likely to be Black, have lower median household income, medical comorbidity, previous caesarean delivery, placenta praevia or placenta percreta, and to have undergone surgeries at large urban teaching hospitals compared with those in the low-volume group (all, P < 0.05). After controlling for patient demographics, hospital characteristics and pregnancy factors, performance of caesarean hysterectomy at high-volume centres was associated with a 22% decreased risk of surgical complications compared with surgery at the low-volume centres (adjusted odds ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.64-0.94). CONCLUSION: Caesarean hysterectomy for PAS is a rare surgical procedure. Higher hospital surgical volume may be associated with improved surgical outcome in PAS. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Higher hospital caesarean hysterectomy volume may be associated with improved surgical outcome in PAS.


Asunto(s)
Placenta Accreta , Placenta Previa , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Placenta Accreta/etiología , Placenta Accreta/cirugía , Placenta Previa/cirugía , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
BJOG ; 127(8): 957-965, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32086987

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To analyse populational trends and perioperative complications following conservative surgery versus oophorectomy in women <50 years of age with ovarian torsion. DESIGN: Population-based retrospective observational study. SETTING: Nationwide Inpatient Sample in the USA (2001-2015). POPULATION: In all, 89 177 ovarian torsions including 20 597 (23.1%) conservative surgeries and 68 580 (76.9%) oophorectomies. METHODS: (1) Trend analysis to assess utilisation of conservative surgery over time, (2) multivariable binary logistic regression to identify independent factors associated with conservative surgery and (3) inverse probability of treatment weighting with a generalised estimating equation to analyze perioperative complications. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Trends, characteristics and complications related to conservative surgery. RESULTS: Performance of conservative surgery increased from 18.9 to 25.1% between 2001 and 2015 (32.8% relative increase, P = 0.001) but decreased steadily after age 15, and sharply declined after age 35 (P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, younger age exhibited the largest effect size for conservative surgery among the independent factors (adjusted odds ratios 3.39-7.96, P < 0.001). In the weighted model, conservative surgery was associated with an approximately 30% decreased risk of perioperative complications overall (10.0% versus 13.6%, odds ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.62-0.85, P < 0.001) and was not associated with venous thromboembolism (0.2 versus 0.3%, P = 0.457) or sepsis (0.4 versus 0.3%, P = 0.638). CONCLUSION: There has been an increasing utilisation of conservative surgery for ovarian torsion in the USA in recent years. Our study suggests that conservative surgery for ovarian torsion may not be associated with increased perioperative complications. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Conservative surgery for ovarian torsion may not be associated with increased perioperative complications.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Anexos/cirugía , Tratamiento Conservador , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/epidemiología , Ovariectomía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Anomalía Torsional/cirugía , Enfermedades de los Anexos/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Tratamiento Conservador/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Preservación de la Fertilidad , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ovariectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anomalía Torsional/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA