Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 66(5): 533-41, 2002 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12201587

RESUMEN

Yellow fever (YF) is a significant health problem in South America and Africa. Travelers to these areas require immunization. The United States, infested with Aedes aegypti mosquitoes, is at risk of introduction of this disease. There is only a single U.S. manufacturer of YF 17D vaccine, and supplies may be insufficient in an emergency. A randomized, double-blind outpatient study was conducted in 1,440 healthy individuals, half of whom received the U.S. vaccine (YF-VAX) and half the vaccine manufactured in the United Kingdom (ARILVAX). A randomly selected subset of approximately 310 individuals in each treatment group was tested for YF neutralizing antibodies 30 days after vaccination. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of individuals who developed a log neutralization index (LNI) of 0.7 or higher. Seroconversion occurred in 98.6% of individuals in the ARILVAX group and 99.3% of those in the YF-VAX group. Statistically, ARILVAX was equivalent to YF-VAX (P = .001). Both vaccines elicited mean antibody responses well above the minimal level (LNI 0.7) protective against wild-type YF virus. The mean LNI in the YF-VAX group was higher (2.21) than in the ARILVAX group (2.06; P = .010) possibly because of the higher dose contained in YF-VAX. Male gender, Caucasian race, and smoking were associated with higher antibody responses. Both vaccines were well tolerated. Overall, the treatment groups were comparable with respect to safety except that individuals in the ARILVAX group experienced significantly less edema, inflammation, and pain at the injection site than those in the YF-VAX group. No serious adverse events were attributable to either vaccine. YF-VAX participants (71.9%) experienced one or more nonserious adverse events than ARILVAX individuals (65.3%; P = .008). The difference was due to a higher rate of injection site reactions in the YF-VAX group. Mild systemic reactions (headache, myalgia, malaise, asthenia) occurred in roughly 10% to 30% of participants during the first few days after vaccination, with no significant difference across treatment groups. Adverse events were less frequent in individuals with preexisting immunity to YF, indicating a relationship to virus replication.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas Virales/uso terapéutico , Vacuna contra la Fiebre Amarilla/uso terapéutico , Fiebre Amarilla/inmunología , Alanina Transaminasa/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Aspartato Aminotransferasas/sangre , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Recuento de Leucocitos , Recuento de Plaquetas , Proyectos de Investigación , Tamaño de la Muestra , Reino Unido , Vacunas Virales/efectos adversos , Vacuna contra la Fiebre Amarilla/efectos adversos
2.
Vaccine ; 20(7-8): 1004-18, 2002 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11803060

RESUMEN

ChimeriVax is a live, attenuated recombinant virus constructed from yellow fever (YF) 17D in which the envelope protein genes of YF 17D are replaced with the corresponding genes of another flavivirus. A ChimeriVax vaccine was developed against Japanese encephalitis (JE). A randomized, double-blind, outpatient study was conducted to compare the safety and immunogenicity of ChimeriVax-JE and YF 17D. Six YF immune and six non-immune adults were randomized to receive a single SC inoculation of ChimeriVax-JE (5log(10)PFU), ChimeriVax-JE (4log(10)PFU) or YF-VAX((R)) (5log(10)PFU). Mild, transient injection site reactions and flu-like symptoms were noted in all treatment groups, with no significant difference between the groups. Nearly all subjects inoculated with ChimeriVax-JE at both dose levels developed a transient, low-level viremia which was similar in magnitude and duration to that following YF-VAX). Neutralizing antibody seroconversion rates to ChimeriVax-JE was 100% in the high and low dose groups in both naïve and YF immune subjects; seroconversion to wild-type JE strains was similar or lower than to the homologous (vaccine) virus. Mean neutralizing antibody responses were higher in the ChimeriVax-JE high dose groups (naïve subjects LNI 1.55, PRNT(50) 254; YF immune subjects LNI 2.23, PRNT(50) 327) than in the low dose groups (naïve subjects 1.38, PRNT(50) 128; YF immune subjects LNI 1.62, PRNT(50) 270). JE antibody levels were higher in YF immune than in naïve subjects, dispelling concerns about anti-vector immunity. The safety and immunogenicity profile of ChimeriVax-JE vaccine appears to be similar to that of YF 17D. The new vaccine holds promise for prevention of JE in travelers and residents of endemic countries. The ChimeriVax technology platform is being exploited for development of new vaccines against dengue and West Nile.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Flavivirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la Encefalitis Japonesa/inmunología , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/inmunología , Vacunas Sintéticas/inmunología , Vacuna contra la Fiebre Amarilla/inmunología , Adulto , Alanina Transaminasa/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina M/sangre , Recuento de Leucocitos , Masculino , Vacunas Atenuadas/inmunología , Vacunas Sintéticas/efectos adversos , Viremia/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA