Opicapone versus entacapone: Head-to-head retrospective data-based comparison of healthcare resource utilization in people with Parkinson's disease new to catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor treatment.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Motor fluctuations are a significant driver of healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in people with Parkinson's disease (pwPD). A common management strategy is to include catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibition with either opicapone or entacapone in the levodopa regimen. However, to date, there has been a lack of head-to-head data comparing the two COMT inhibitors in real-world settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in HCRU and effect on sleep medications when opicapone was initiated as first COMT inhibitor versus entacapone. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we assessed HCRU outcomes in pwPD naïve to COMT inhibition via UK electronic healthcare records (Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episodes Statistics databases, June 2016 to December 2019). HCRU outcomes were assessed before (baseline) and after COMT inhibitor prescription at 0-6 months, 7-12 months and 13-18 months. Opicapone-treated pwPD were algorithm-matched (1:4) to entacapone-treated pwPD. RESULTS: By 6 months, treatment with opicapone resulted in 18.5% fewer neurology outpatient visits compared to entacapone treatment; this effect was maintained until the last follow-up (18 months). In the opicapone group, the mean levodopa equivalent daily dose decreased over the first year and then stabilized, whereas the entacapone-treated group showed an initial decrease in the first 6 months followed by a dose increase between 7 and 18 months. Neither COMT inhibitor had a significant impact on sleep medication use. CONCLUSIONS: This head-to-head study is the first to demonstrate, using 'real-world' data, that initiating COMT inhibition with opicapone is likely to decrease the need for post-treatment HCRU versus initiation of COMT inhibition with entacapone.

Real-world evidence of epidemiology, patient characteristics, and mortality in people with drug-resistant epilepsy in the United Kingdom, 2011-2021.

BACKGROUND: A third of people with epilepsy are drug resistant. People with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) have a higher risk of mortality and physical injuries than those who respond to anti-seizure medication (ASM). This study describes patient characteristics, comorbidities, and mortality in people with DRE in the UK. METHODS: The Clinical Practice Research Datalink was utilised to select people with DRE prescribed a third ASM between 1 January 2011 and 31 March 2021. Annual incidence and prevalence of DRE, patient characteristics, comorbidities, and mortality rates were analysed. Subgroup analysis was performed by age, sex, presence of intellectual disabilities and time from epilepsy diagnosis to DRE. RESULTS: A total of 34,647 people with DRE were included (mean ± SD age 42.68 ± 23.59 years, 52.6% females). During the study period, annual DRE incidence ranged from 1.99% to 3.12%. As of 31 March 2021, DRE prevalence was 26.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 26.3%-26.8%). A greater proportion of people with DRE resided in the most deprived regions, with 21.1% and 16.7% in the top two quintiles of the Index of Multiple Deprivation respectively, compared to < 15% in the three less deprived regions. All-cause mortality ranged from 3,687 to 4,802 per 100,000 persons with DRE, four times higher than that in the general population in the UK. Variations existed across subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable disease burden was observed in people with DRE in the UK. The findings emphasise the importance of early DRE diagnosis and appropriate disease management in people who develop DRE.

Anticoagulant Treatment Adherence and Persistence in German Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment adherence and persistence impact the effectiveness of edoxaban for the prevention of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The objective of this analysis was to assess adherence and persistence of edoxaban vs. other non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). METHODS: Utilizing a German claims database, adults with AF with the first pharmacy claim identified for edoxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or VKAs from January 2013 to December 2017 were included in a propensity score-matched analysis. The first pharmacy claim was the index claim. Adherence (i.e., proportion of days covered [PDC]) and persistence (proportion of patients who continued therapy) were compared between edoxaban and other therapies. Patients receiving once-daily (QD) vs. twice-daily (BID) NOAC were also analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 21,038 patients were included (1236 edoxaban, 6053 apixaban, 1306 dabigatran, 7013 rivaroxaban, and 5430 VKA). After matching, baseline characteristics were well balanced across cohorts. Adherence was significantly higher for edoxaban vs. apixaban, dabigatran, and VKAs (all P < 0.0001). Significantly more edoxaban patients continued therapy vs. rivaroxaban (P = 0.0153), dabigatran (P < 0.0001), and VKAs (P < 0.0001). Time to discontinuation was significantly longer for edoxaban vs. dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and VKAs (all P < 0.0001). More patients receiving NOACs QD had a PDC ≥ 0.8 compared with those receiving NOACs BID (65.3 vs. 49.6%, respectively; P < 0.05); persistence rates were comparable between QD and BID groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AF receiving edoxaban had significantly higher adherence and persistence compared with those receiving VKAs. This trend was also seen in NOAC QD regimens vs. NOAC BID regimens for adherence. These results provide insight into how adherence and persistence may contribute to the effectiveness of edoxaban for stroke prevention in patients with AF in Germany.

Real-world economic and clinical outcomes associated with current hemostatic matrix use in spinal surgery.

Aim: Bleeding during spine surgery is controlled using topical hemostatic agents. Studies have reported outcomes between Surgiflo® and Floseal, the most widely used flowable hemostatic matrices, but have not included the latest Surgiflo formulation which is more adherent to the bleeding surface than prior formulations. Materials & methods: A propensity score-matched analysis was conducted using the Premier Healthcare Database to compare economic and clinical outcomes of adults undergoing inpatient spinal surgery between 2013 and 2018 receiving current Surgiflo or Floseal. Results: This retrospective study included 28,910 patients in each group and found comparable outcomes for bleeding events, overall transfusion rate, inpatient mortality and readmissions between Surgiflo and Floseal. Surgiflo was associated with $430 (USD) lower hospitalization costs, shorter length of stay and shorter operating room time than Floseal.

Topical hemostatic agents such as Surgiflo^® and Floseal are used during invasive surgery to manage bleeding. We compared outcomes of spine surgeries that used either of two most frequently used topical hemostatic agents, Surgiflo or Floseal. This is the largest retrospective study presenting economic and clinical outcomes of patients receiving Surgiflo versus Floseal during spine surgery using the latest product formulations. The study suggests that clinical outcomes are comparable between Surgiflo and Floseal groups and that Surgiflo is associated with lower hospitalization costs, slightly shorter hospital stay and shorter operating room time among patients undergoing spine surgery.