Probiotics: insights and new opportunities for Clostridioides difficile intervention.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a life-threatening disease caused by the Gram-positive, opportunistic intestinal pathogen C. difficile. Despite the availability of antimicrobial drugs to treat CDI, such as vancomycin, metronidazole, and fidaxomicin, recurrence of infection remains a significant clinical challenge. The use of live commensal microorganisms, or probiotics, is one of the most investigated non-antibiotic therapeutic options to balance gastrointestinal (GI) microbiota and subsequently tackle dysbiosis. In this review, we will discuss major commensal probiotic strains that have the potential to prevent and/or treat CDI and its recurrence, reassess the efficacy of probiotics supplementation as a CDI intervention, delve into lessons learned from probiotic modulation of the immune system, explore avenues like genome-scale metabolic network reconstructions, genome sequencing, and multi-omics to identify novel strains and understand their functionality, and discuss the current regulatory framework, challenges, and future directions.

Phase 3 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of oteseconazole in the treatment of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis and acute vulvovaginal candidiasis infections.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis affects nearly 138 million women globally each year. In the United States, fluconazole is considered the standard of care for acute vulvovaginal candidiasis, but until recently there was no US Food and Drug Administration-approved drug for the treatment of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Oteseconazole is a novel oral selective inhibitor of fungal lanosterol demethylase (sterol 14α-demethylase cytochrome P450, an enzyme required for fungal growth) approved for the treatment of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral oteseconazole (VT-1161) in the prevention of recurrent culture-verified acute vulvovaginal candidiasis episodes through 50 weeks in participants with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis and to compare the efficacy of oteseconazole and fluconazole in the treatment of the presenting acute vulvovaginal candidiasis episode. STUDY DESIGN: Women and postmenarcheal girls aged ≥12 years with a history of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (N=219) were enrolled at 38 US sites. Eligible participants presenting with an active vulvovaginal candidiasis infection entered an induction phase in which they were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive 600 mg oral oteseconazole on day 1 and 450 mg on day 2, with matching placebo capsules, or to 3 sequential 150-mg oral doses (once every 72 hours) of fluconazole, with matching placebo capsules. Following the 2-week induction phase, the 185 participants with resolved acute vulvovaginal candidiasis infection (a clinical signs and symptoms score of <3) entered the maintenance phase and received 150 mg of oteseconazole or placebo weekly for 11 weeks. Participants were observed for an additional 37 weeks. RESULTS: In the induction phase, oteseconazole was noninferior to fluconazole in the proportion of participants in the intent-to-treat population with resolved acute vulvovaginal candidiasis infection at the week 2 (day 14) test-of-cure visit, with 93.2% of participants on oteseconazole vs 95.8% on fluconazole achieving resolution. In the maintenance phase, oteseconazole was superior to placebo in the proportion of participants in the intent-to-treat population with ≥1 culture-verified acute vulvovaginal candidiasis episode through 50 weeks, 5.1% compared with 42.2%, respectively (P<.001). Overall, treatment-emergent adverse event rates were similar in both groups: 54% for participants who received oteseconazole in the induction and maintenance phases vs 64% for participants who received fluconazole in the induction phase and placebo in the maintenance phase. Most treatment-emergent adverse events in each group were mild or moderate, with 3.4% of treatment-emergent adverse events graded as severe or higher in the OTESECONAZOLE/oteseconazole group vs 4.2% in FLUCONAZOLE/placebo group. CONCLUSION: In participants with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis, oteseconazole was safe and efficacious in the treatment and prevention of recurrent acute vulvovaginal candidiasis episodes and was noninferior to vulvovaginal candidiasis standard-of-care fluconazole in the treatment of the presenting acute vulvovaginal candidiasis infection.

Scorpion Envenomation in Pregnancy.

Scorpion envenomation affects more than 1 million people every year and represents an important public health problem worldwide. The effects of envenomation range from localized pain and paresthesias to overactivation of the sympathetic nervous system, leading to neurotoxicity and even death. Of the individuals affected by scorpion envenomation, certain populations, such as young children and older adults, are at high risk for severe disease. Substantial literature exists on the management of envenomation in children; however, scant literature exists that addresses the same phenomenon in pregnant women. This review serves to identify the effects of scorpion envenomation on pregnant women and the treatment options available to them. After thorough review of the treatment modalities that are used to treat scorpion envenomation, we developed a treatment algorithm that may help guide the management of pregnant women who present with scorpion envenomation.

Clinical evaluation of a new Pap test-based method for screening of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae using liquid-based cytology media.

OBJECTIVES: The majority of chlamydial and gonococcal infections in women are asymptomatic and, if left untreated, may result in serious sequelae. Simple and accurate testing of men and women at risk for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) is the single most effective strategy for control of sexually transmitted infections. New tests using easy-to-acquire samples, such as the Papanicolaou (Pap) test, need to be validated in an effort to expand and improve detection. The objective of this study was to determine the performance of a new nucleic acid amplification test using two liquid-based cytology media for the detection of CT and GC. METHODS: The study was conducted in two phases at 11 geographically diverse, high- and low-prevalence sites. Three endocervical reference swabs as well as an endocervical SurePath or PreservCyt liquid cytology specimen sampled with a broom or brush/spatula were collected in a randomized order from each subject. Reference endocervical swabs were tested with three Food and Drug Administration-approved methods and compared to two new automated tests, the CT Q Amplified DNA Assay (CTQ) and the GC Q Amplified DNA Assay (GCQ). RESULTS: For the SurePath phase, 1838 subjects were enrolled. The sensitivity and specificity of the CTQ assay were 95.0% and 99.7%, respectively, and the GCQ assay was 100% for both. In the PreservCyt phase, 2164 subjects were enrolled. The sensitivity and specificity of the CTQ assay were 94.1% and 99.8%, respectively, and the GCQ assay was 95.3% and 99.95%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the results. CONCLUSIONS: In this investigation, high sensitivity and specificity of the CTQ and GCQ assays were demonstrated for samples collected in either of two liquid-based cytology media when compared with endocervical swabs. The results were similar in both collection methods (broom or brush/spatula) and in high- and low-risk populations.

Clinical challenges in diagnosis and treatment of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis.

Vulvovaginal candidiasis is a common infection associated most often with the overgrowth of the fungal species Candida albicans. Although most women will have at least one episode of vulvovaginal candidiasis in their lifetime, some will experience recurrent infections. Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis can significantly impact quality of life, causing both physical and psychological symptoms, and poses a substantial financial burden for women and the health care system. Acute vulvovaginal candidiasis infections are often diagnosed symptomatically by clinicians or self-diagnosed by patients themselves; this can result in over- and underdiagnosis, as well as misdiagnosis, and has the potential to lead to ineffective treatment and incomplete infection resolution. Clinical diagnosis should include confirmatory laboratory tests, including microscopy and fungal culture, especially in women with a history of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis, who are more likely than women with vulvovaginal candidiasis to be infected with less-common Candida species or with azole-resistant strains. With proper diagnosis, most acute vulvovaginal candidiasis episodes can be successfully treated; however, women with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis may require long-term maintenance therapy. US-based guidelines recommend ⩽6 months of maintenance fluconazole treatment, but infection recurs in up to 50% of women treated. There are currently no US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis; however, several promising treatments for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis are in development.

Imiquimod 3.75% cream applied daily to treat anogenital warts: combined results from women in two randomized, placebo-controlled studies.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if new imiquimod formulations using a shorter treatment duration are safe and efficacious to treat anogenital warts. METHODS: In two studies 534 women ≥12 years of age (mean 33.4) with 2-30 warts (mean 7.9) and total wart area ≥10 mm(2) (mean 166.3) were randomized (1:2:2) to placebo (106), imiquimod 2.5% (212) or 3.75% (216) creams applied once daily until complete clearance or a maximum of 8 weeks. RESULTS: For placebo, imiquimod 2.5% and 3.75%, respectively, complete clearance of all warts was achieved in 14.2%, 28.3%, and 36.6% of women (intent-to-treat, P = 0.008 imiquimod 2.5%, and P < 0.001 3.75% versus placebo). Mean changes in wart counts were -10.7%, -50.9%, and -63.5% (per-protocol, P < 0.001 each active versus placebo) and safety-related discontinuation rates 0.9%, 1.4%, and 2.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Imiquimod 3.75% applied daily for up to 8 weeks was well tolerated and superior to placebo in treating women with external anogenital warts.

Clinical validation of the Cervista HPV HR and 16/18 genotyping tests for use in women with ASC-US cytology.

OBJECTIVE: High-risk (HR) human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is important in cervical cancer screening for triage to colposcopy. This study evaluated the clinical performance of the Cervista HPV HR and 16/18 genotyping tests for detection of HPV in cervical cytology specimens. METHODS: The tests were prospectively evaluated in a multicenter clinical study. DNA was extracted from approximately 4000 residual liquid-based cytology specimens collected during routine liquid-based Papanicolaou tests at standard of care visits and was assessed for the presence of HR HPV and/or HPV types 16 and 18. All women with cytology results of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) or greater underwent colposcopic examination and biopsies were collected. Test results were compared with local colposcopy and histology results from a central pathology review panel. RESULTS: There were 1347 subjects with complete data sets of cytology, HR HPV, colposcopy, and histology included in the analysis of the HPV HR test. Sensitivity of the HPV HR test for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2+ among women with ASC-US cytology was 92.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 84.1-96.9) and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 99.1% (95% CI: 98.1-99.6). Sensitivity for detection of > or =CIN 3 in women with ASC-US was 100% (95% CI: 85.1-100) and the NPV was 100% (95% CI: 99.4-100). The specificity of the test for detection of > or =CIN 2 and > or =CIN 3 was 44.2% (95% CI: 41.5-46.9) and 43% (95% CI: 40.3-45.7), respectively. The HPV 16/18 genotyping test also performed as expected in women with ASC-US cytology who were positive for HR HPV. CONCLUSION: The Cervista HPV HR test can be clinically used for detecting HR HPV types in conjunction with cervical cytology for use in triage of women with ASC-US cytology during routine cervical cancer screening.

Once daily valacyclovir for reducing viral shedding in subjects newly diagnosed with genital herpes.

OBJECTIVE: Genital herpes (GH) recurrences and viral shedding are more frequent in the first year after initial HSV-2 infection. The objective of this study was to provide the first evaluation of valacyclovir 1 g once daily compared to placebo in reducing viral shedding in subjects newly diagnosed with GH. METHODS: 70 subjects were randomized to receive valacyclovir 1 g daily or placebo in a crossover design for 60 days with a 7-day washout period. A daily swab of the genital/anal-rectal area was self-collected for HSV-2 detection by PCR. Subjects attended the clinic for routine study visits and GH recurrence visits. Treatment differences were assessed using a nonparametric crossover analysis. RESULTS: 52 subjects had at least one PCR measurement in both treatment periods and comprised the primary efficacy population. Valacyclovir significantly reduced HSV-2 shedding during all days compared to placebo (mean 2.9% versus 13.5% of all days (P < .01), a 78% reduction). Valacyclovir significantly reduced subclinical HSV-2 shedding during all days compared to placebo (mean 2.4% versus 11.0% of all days (P < .01), a 78% reduction). However, 79% of subjects had no GH recurrences while receiving valacyclovir compared to 52% of subjects receiving placebo (P < .01). CONCLUSION: In this study, the frequency of total and subclinical HSV-2 shedding was greater than reported in earlier studies involving subjects with a history of symptomatic genital recurrences. Our study is the first to demonstrate a significant reduction in viral shedding with valacyclovir 1 g daily compared to placebo in a population of subjects newly diagnosed with HSV-2 infection.

Improved GI tolerability with monthly ibandronate in women previously using weekly bisphosphonates.

OBJECTIVE: This subanalysis of CURRENT, an open-label, 6-month, multicenter study, assesses changes in gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability with once-monthly oral ibandronate in women who switched from once-weekly bisphosphonates and had reported GI symptoms with their previous weekly bisphosphonate regimen. METHODS: Postmenopausal women currently taking a weekly bisphosphonate switched to 150 mg monthly ibandronate. At the start of the treatment phase and after 6 months of therapy, all participants completed the Osteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q), a validated instrument consisting of four domains: convenience, satisfaction, quality of life, and side effects. This subanalysis assessed GI tolerability in those women who reported GI symptoms at baseline in the side effects domain of OPSAT-Q and change in satisfaction in those who had reported stomach upset within 48 hours of taking their previous bisphosphonate at screening. RESULTS: Of women who reported GI symptoms at baseline, >60% reported an improvement in heartburn or acid reflux after switching to monthly ibandronate. Further, >70% reported improvements in stomach upset (excluding heartburn or acid reflux). Of those women who reported stomach upset within 48 hours of taking their previous weekly bisphosphonate at screening (n = 89), >80% reported improved overall satisfaction compared with baseline. Monthly ibandronate was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: A majority of women who experienced GI tolerability issues with weekly bisphosphonates reported improvements in GI symptoms after transitioning from a weekly bisphosphonate to monthly ibandronate for 6 months.

Bone turnover marker profile in relation to the menstrual cycle of premenopausal healthy women.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the bone turnover marker profile during the menstrual cycle of premenopausal women. DESIGN: This was a noninterventional study. Levels of bone turnover markers, including serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (sCTX), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, procollagen type 1 N propeptide, and urinary N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen, were measured in blood and urine samples during one menstrual cycle. Levels were expressed as raw test results and percent change from serum luteinizing hormone peak. Differences in mean levels of bone turnover markers between menstrual phases and subphases were examined. RESULTS: Fifty-five women comprised the per-protocol population. Mean sCTX values were 0.48 ng/mL during the follicular phase (FP), 0.47 ng/mL at serum luteinizing hormone peak, and 0.43 ng/mL during the luteal phase (LP). Additionally, the mean percent change from luteinizing hormone peak varied from +4.35% during the FP to -5.11% during the LP (P = 0.0014). Mean sCTX levels during the early and through mid FP were significantly higher than levels during the mid and late LP. The pattern for urinary N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen was similar to that of sCTX but not statistically significant. There was a statistically significant tendency for procollagen type I N propeptide levels to be lower during the FP relative to the LP. Levels of osteocalcin and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase did not vary significantly during the menstrual cycle. CONCLUSIONS: Levels of some bone turnover markers varied during the menstrual cycle. A statistically significant change in sCTX (9.46%) occurred between the FP and LP of the menstrual cycle.

Maximizing effectiveness of bisphosphonate therapy for osteoporosis.

While highly prevalent, osteoporosis is greatly underdiagnosed and undertreated in clinical practice. Even when appropriate treatments are prescribed, patient adherence to bisphosphonate therapy is low. As osteoporosis is a silent disease, and therapy is required for many months before benefit is realized, strategies to increase bone mineral density (BMD) and improve medication adherence are important aspects of every patient's care plan. Osteoporotic bone loss occurs without symptoms, and there are often no warning signs before a fracture occurs. Osteoporotic fractures are the most severe consequence of osteoporosis. Bisphosphonates are the most frequently prescribed treatment option for postmenopausal osteoporosis, as they effectively increase BMD, slow bone turnover, and reduce fracture rates. Strategies to improve adherence to osteoporosis therapy include reducing dosing frequency, changing the route of administration, educating the patient about optimum bisphosphonate administration, and sending patient reminders.

A case report of an ovarian lipoma.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian lipomas are a rare entity, with most being described as part of a teratomatous origin. This is a case report of a lipoma of an ovary not associated with a teratoma or an hyperandrogenic state. CASE: A 66-year-old female underwent an exploratory laparotomy and a left ovarian tumor measuring about 7 to 8 cm was removed. Microscopic examination demonstrated a pattern of proliferation of benign adipose tissue with focal areas of fibrovascular septae and no other tissue of different origin. CONCLUSIONS: A MEDLINE search did not reveal any well-documented cases of a pure ovarian lipoma. The cases reported were associated with teratomas, lipid cell tumors, and lipoleiomyomas. Thus, it appears that lipomas of the ovary are rare, but can occur.

Hormone therapy in menopausal women with fibroids: is it safe?

Menopause is an important transition in the life of women. It has been estimated that by the year 2030, worldwide 1.2 billion women will be menopausal. The most bothersome symptoms of menopause are believed to be due to declines in estrogen levels in postmenopausal women. Thus, hormone therapy is an effective treatment option for menopausal women, although prolonged use of hormone therapy is associated with a slightly increased risk of breast cancer, thromboembolism, and stroke. A literature search for studies evaluating the effects of hormone therapy in menopausal women with asymptomatic fibroids demonstrated variable effects of hormone therapy on the volume and size of the fibroids. Some studies have demonstrated an increase in size of pre-existing asymptomatic fibroids and formation of new fibroids with higher doses of progestogen in combination therapy. The finding of low resistance index in uterine arteries of women with asymptomatic fibroids is associated with an increased risk of fibroid growth, and thus making the measurement of pulsatility index of uterine arteries a possible screening tool before initiating hormone therapy in menopausal women with fibroids. Although the effect of hormone treatment is variable and statistically insignificant in many cases, the newer selective estrogen receptor modulators having tissue-specific estrogen agonistic and antagonistic actions such as raloxifene have a favorable clinical profile and may be better alternatives in women with asymptomatic fibroids.

Intravenous ferric carboxymaltose compared with oral iron in the treatment of postpartum anemia: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate efficacy of rapid, large-dose intravenous (IV) administration of ferric carboxymaltose compared with oral iron therapy in anemic postpartum women. METHODS: In a randomized, controlled trial, we assigned anemic women (hemoglobin [Hb] less than or equal to 10 g/dL) within 10 days postpartum to receive either IV ferric carboxymaltose (less than or equal to 1,000 mg over 15 minutes, repeated weekly to achieve a total calculated replacement dose) or ferrous sulfate (FeSO(4)) 325 mg orally thrice daily for 6 weeks. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-four patients received 350 IV doses of ferric carboxymaltose (mean total dose 1,403.1 mg) in 3, 2, or 1 injection (10.9%, 79.3%, or 9.8% of patients, respectively); 178 received FeSO(4). Patients assigned to IV ferric carboxymaltose compared with those assigned to oral iron achieved a Hb rise greater than or equal to 2.0 g/dL earlier (7.0 compared with 14.0 days, P<.001), were more likely to achieve a Hb rise greater than or equal to 3.0 g/dL at any time (86.3% compared with 60.4%, P<.001), and were more likely to achieve a Hb greater than 12.0 g/dL (90.5% compared with 68.6%, P<.001). A similar proportion of patients achieved a Hb rise greater than or equal to 2.0 g/dL (96.4% compared with 94.1%, IV compared with oral, P=.443). There were no serious adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSION: Large-dose IV ferric carboxymaltose administration is a new iron agent that is effective for the treatment of postpartum anemia. When compared with oral ferrous sulfate, IV ferric carboxymaltose is better tolerated, prompts a more rapid Hb response, and corrects anemia more reliably. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00396292 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the human papillomavirus 16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in women older than 25 years: 7-year follow-up of the phase 3, double-blind, randomised controlled VIVIANE study.

BACKGROUND: Although the risk of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is greatest in young women, women older than 25 years remain at risk. We present data from the VIVIANE study of the HPV 16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in adult women after 7 years of follow-up. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, randomised controlled trial, healthy women older than 25 years were enrolled (age stratified: 26-35 years, 36-45 years, and ≥46 years). Up to 15% in each age stratum had a history of HPV infection or disease. Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive HPV 16/18 vaccine or aluminium hydroxide control, with an internet-based system. The primary endpoint was vaccine efficacy against 6-month persistent infection or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or greater (CIN1+) associated with HPV 16/18. We did analyses in the according-to-protocol cohort for efficacy and total vaccinated cohort. Data for the combined primary endpoint in the according-to-protocol cohort for efficacy were considered significant when the lower limit of the 96·2% CI around the point estimate was greater than 30%. For all other endpoints and cohorts, data were considered significant when the lower limit of the 96·2% CI was greater than 0%. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00294047. FINDINGS: The first participant was enrolled on Feb 16, 2006, and the last study visit took place on Jan 29, 2014. 4407 women were in the according-to-protocol cohort for efficacy (n=2209 vaccine, n=2198 control) and 5747 women in the total vaccinated cohort (n=2877 vaccine, n=2870 control). At month 84, in women seronegative for the corresponding HPV type in the according-to-protocol cohort for efficacy, vaccine efficacy against 6-month persistent infection or CIN1+ associated with HPV 16/18 was significant in all age groups combined (90·5%, 96·2% CI 78·6-96·5). Vaccine efficacy against HPV 16/18-related cytological abnormalities (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) and CIN1+ was also significant. We also noted significant cross-protective efficacy against 6-month persistent infection with HPV 31 (65·8%, 96·2% CI 24·9-85·8) and HPV 45 (70·7%, 96·2% CI 34·2-88·4). In the total vaccinated cohort, vaccine efficacy against CIN1+ irrespective of HPV was significant (22·9%, 96·2% CI 4·8-37·7). Serious adverse events related to vaccination occurred in five (0·2%) of 2877 women in the vaccine group and eight (0·3%) of 2870 women in the control group. INTERPRETATION: In women older than 25 years, the HPV 16/18 vaccine continues to protect against infections, cytological abnormalities, and lesions associated with HPV 16/18 and CIN1+ irrespective of HPV type, and infection with non-vaccine types HPV 31 and HPV 45 over 7 years of follow-up. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA.

Risk of fracture and treatment to prevent osteoporosis-related fracture in postmenopausal women. A review.

OBJECTIVE: To review the antifracture efficacy of pharmacologic therapy approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. STUDY DESIGN: For this literature review, published trials of antiresorptive therapy with the bisphosphonates risedronate and alendronate, the selective estrogen receptor modulator raloxifene and calcitonin were reviewed; hormone replacement therapy was not included as this modality is not indicated for treatment of osteoporosis. RESULTS: In controlled trials of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, risedronate reduced the incidence of clinically evident vertebral fracture after 6 months of therapy and radiographically detected vertebral and nonvertebral fracture after 1 year. In similar trials, alendronate also reduced the risk of clinical vertebral fractures in 1 year. Risedronate and alendronate were both well tolerated, but some trials of alendronate were closed to women with recent upper gastrointestinal disease. In a large, controlled trial, raloxifene demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of clinical vertebral fracture but not in the risk of nonvertebral fracture. Raloxifene is also associated with a 3-fold increased risk of thromboembolism. Calcitonin reduced the incidence of vertebral fracture, but there are no conclusive data on prevention of nonvertebral fracture. CONCLUSION: Antiresorptive therapy can reduce the risk of osteoporotic vertebral fracture. The bisphosphonates are also effective in reducing the risk of hip fracture in women with osteoporosis.

The impact of liquid-based cytology in decreasing the incidence of cervical cancer.

Major advances in screening have lowered the death rate from cervical cancer in the United States. One of the first major advances in cervical cancer screening was the Papanicolaou (Pap) test. The second major advance was liquid-based cytology (LBC). This review presents a wide range of data, discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the available information regarding Pap technologies, and reviews the meta-analyses, which have examined the differences in clinical performance. The review concludes with information on new and future developments to further decrease cervical cancer deaths.

Comparing screening methods for osteoporosis.

Recently, much has been published about osteoporosis and the suspected vast numbers of patients who are undiagnosed or at risk. Various groups, including the US Preventative Services Task Force and The National Osteoporosis Foundation, have attempted to highlight the recommendations regarding who and when to screen. We know that for a screening test to be effective, not only must it predict morbidity far enough in advance that something can be done but it also must be widely available and cost effective. There are several methods of screening with varying sensitivity and specificity for identifying people at risk for osteoporotic fracture. After an examination of all available approved testing methods, it seems that dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and calcaneal ultrasound best predict patients at risk for fracture. However, because of the length of time needed to demonstrate bone mineral changes and the small magnitude of these changes, DEXA seems to be the most cost-effective method to follow patients who are receiving treatment.