RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Understanding the epidemiology and clinical course of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) and its temporal association with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is important, given the clinical and public health implications of the syndrome. METHODS: We conducted targeted surveillance for MIS-C from March 15 to May 20, 2020, in pediatric health centers across the United States. The case definition included six criteria: serious illness leading to hospitalization, an age of less than 21 years, fever that lasted for at least 24 hours, laboratory evidence of inflammation, multisystem organ involvement, and evidence of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) based on reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), antibody testing, or exposure to persons with Covid-19 in the past month. Clinicians abstracted the data onto standardized forms. RESULTS: We report on 186 patients with MIS-C in 26 states. The median age was 8.3 years, 115 patients (62%) were male, 135 (73%) had previously been healthy, 131 (70%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR or antibody testing, and 164 (88%) were hospitalized after April 16, 2020. Organ-system involvement included the gastrointestinal system in 171 patients (92%), cardiovascular in 149 (80%), hematologic in 142 (76%), mucocutaneous in 137 (74%), and respiratory in 131 (70%). The median duration of hospitalization was 7 days (interquartile range, 4 to 10); 148 patients (80%) received intensive care, 37 (20%) received mechanical ventilation, 90 (48%) received vasoactive support, and 4 (2%) died. Coronary-artery aneurysms (z scores ≥2.5) were documented in 15 patients (8%), and Kawasaki's disease-like features were documented in 74 (40%). Most patients (171 [92%]) had elevations in at least four biomarkers indicating inflammation. The use of immunomodulating therapies was common: intravenous immune globulin was used in 144 (77%), glucocorticoids in 91 (49%), and interleukin-6 or 1RA inhibitors in 38 (20%). CONCLUSIONS: Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children associated with SARS-CoV-2 led to serious and life-threatening illness in previously healthy children and adolescents. (Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.).
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/epidemiología , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/virología , Adolescente , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Niño , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Cuidados Críticos , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Inmunomodulación , Inflamación , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Síndrome Mucocutáneo Linfonodular/epidemiología , Síndrome Mucocutáneo Linfonodular/terapia , Síndrome Mucocutáneo Linfonodular/virología , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Respiración Artificial , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/terapia , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
CONTEXT.: United States' clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are often produced by professional societies and used worldwide in daily medical practice. However, studies in various medical specialties demonstrate underrepresentation of women and racial and ethnic minority groups in CPGs. The representation of authors by gender, race, and ethnicity of US pathology CPGs has not been previously evaluated. OBJECTIVE.: To assess if women and individuals from racial and ethnic minority groups are underrepresented as authors of pathology CPGs. DESIGN.: The gender, race, ethnicity, and terminal degrees of authors of 18 CPGs from the College of American Pathologists were coded by using photographs and other available information online and compared to their representation in academic pathology per Association of American Medical Colleges benchmark data. RESULTS.: Two hundred seventy-five author positions (202 physician author positions) were analyzed. Women overall (119 of 275; 43.3%) and women physicians (65 of 202; 32.2%) held fewer positions than all men and men physicians. Women physicians were significantly underrepresented in physician author positions, while White men physicians were significantly overrepresented in all, first, senior, and corresponding authorship roles when compared to the proportion of women and White men physicians among pathology faculty, respectively. Asian men and women physicians were underrepresented as compared to their representation among pathology faculty. CONCLUSIONS.: Men, particularly White men physicians, are overrepresented among pathology CPG author positions, while women physicians and some physicians from racial and ethnic minority groups are underrepresented. Further research is needed to understand the impact of these findings on the careers of underrepresented physicians and the content of guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Médicos Mujeres , Médicos , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Estados Unidos , Etnicidad , Grupos MinoritariosRESUMEN
Background and Objectives: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have significantly influenced medical practice worldwide. Nevertheless, the authorship of CPGs produced by several medical societies has not been representative of the field and population they address, as women and individuals from racial and ethnic minority groups have been underrepresented as authors. We hypothesized that women and individuals from minoritized racial and ethnic groups would also be underrepresented as authors of CPGs produced by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the gender, race, and ethnic composition of authors and subcommittee participants of AAP-produced CPGs published from January 2010 through May 2023 were analyzed and compared to the 2010 and 2021 U.S. population and 2010 and 2022 U.S. medical school pediatric faculty. Results: Women (39.7%, 127/320 of all positions, and 42.5%, 85/200 of named author positions) and women physicians (35.2%, 101/287 of all positions, and 36.4%, 64/176 of named author positions) were significantly underrepresented-while men and men physicians were significantly overrepresented-from their respective composition in the U.S. Census and pediatric faculty. Women and women physicians from all racial and ethnic groups and men and men physicians from minority racial and ethnic groups were significantly underrepresented-from their respective composition in the U.S. Census and pediatric faculty. No Black man was identified as an author. Conclusions: Medical societies that produce CPGs should be cognizant of these inequities and ensure appropriate authorship diversity.
Asunto(s)
Autoria , Etnicidad , Pediatría , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Grupos Raciales , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Masculino , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos Mujeres/estadística & datos numéricos , Sociedades Médicas , Factores SexualesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Gender inequities in editorial board representation and physician compensation are well documented, but few studies have focused on how editors of journals are compensated. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we examined industry-related compensation (from 2014 to 2020) among physician editors of 35 pathology journals using publicly available data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments Database. RESULTS: Of the physician editors included, 135 (69.9%) were men and 58 (30.1%) were women. Similar percentages of men and women physicians who were eligible received payments (112/135 [83.0%] men and 51/58 [87.9%] women; P = .38, χ2 test). Of the total transfer of value ($211,192,532), 112 men received $192,727,555 (91.3%), and 51 women received $18,464,978 (8.7%). Mean total payment per person was $1,720,782 for men and $362,058 for women (P = .05). The payment range for men was $18-$47,568,400 and the range of payments for women was $31-$2,375,637. CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight significant gender inequities in industry-related payments to physician editors of pathology journals. The financial relationships of journal editors and industry deserve further study, particularly as they relate to advancing science and closing both workforce and patient care inequities.
Asunto(s)
Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto , Médicos , Anciano , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Estados Unidos , Estudios Transversales , Conflicto de Intereses , Medicare , Bases de Datos FactualesRESUMEN
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and ventricular assist devices (VADs) are increasingly used in critically ill children. Despite improvements in mechanical design and clinical management, thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events remain significant causes of morbidity and mortality related to the use of both devices. Choice of anticoagulant agents and assays for monitoring continue to present challenges in management. In this review, we describe the incidence and risk factors for thrombosis and hemorrhage, the different types of anticoagulants currently in use, the assays available for monitoring anticoagulation, and management of thromboembolic and bleeding complications in children on mechanical circulatory support (MCS). We conclude by emphasizing the areas that need further study to minimize the risk for thrombosis and hemorrhage in the use of ECMO and VAD in children.