Inter-observer variation in image interpretation and the prognostic importance of non-expansile lung in malignant pleural effusion.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Non-expansile lung (NEL) frequently complicates management of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) and is an important factor in clinical practice and trials. NEL is frequently diagnosed on a single radiographic observation, but neither the inter-observer agreement of this approach nor the prognostic importance of NEL in MPE has been reported. METHODS: A multicentre retrospective cohort study was performed in two UK pleural centres. NEL was defined as <50% pleural re-apposition on post-drainage radiographs by primary and secondary assessors at each site. Inter-observer agreement was assessed by Cohen's kappa (κ). Kaplan-Meier methodology and multivariate Cox models were used to assess the prognostic impact of NEL versus no NEL and 'complete NEL' versus 'complete expansion', based on a single assessor's results from each site. RESULTS: NEL was identified by the primary assessor in 33 of 97 (34%) in Cohort 1 and 15 of 86 (17%) in Cohort 2. Inter-observer agreement between assessors was only fair-to-moderate (Cohort 1 κ: 0.38 (95% CI: 0.21-0.55), Cohort 2 κ: 0.51 (95% CI: 0.30-0.72)). In both cohorts, NEL was associated with shorter median overall survival (Cohort 1: 188 vs 371 days, Cohort 2: 192 vs 412 days). This prognostic association was independent in Cohort 1 (hazard ratio (HR): 2.19, 95% CI: 1.31-3.66) but not in Cohort 2 (HR: 1.42, 95% CI: 0.71-2.87). Survival was inferior in both cohorts in cases of complete NEL versus complete expansion. CONCLUSION: Radiographic NEL is common but inter-observer agreement is only fair-to-moderate. NEL is associated with adverse survival. These data do not support the use of single radiographic assessments to classify NEL.

Pre-EDIT: A Randomized Feasibility Trial of Elastance-Directed Intrapleural Catheter or Talc Pleurodesis in Malignant Pleural Effusion.

BACKGROUND: Talc slurry pleurodesis (TSP) prevents recurrence of symptomatic malignant pleural effusion (MPE) in 71% to 78% patients. Nonexpansile lung (NEL) frequently accounts for TSP failure but is often occult predrainage, impairing selection of patients. NEL is associated with high pleural elastance (PEL), but technical limitations have hampered the development of PEL as a predictive NEL marker. We performed a single-center, randomized, controlled, open-label feasibility trial of EDIT (elastance-directed indwelling pleural catheter or TSP) management, using a novel digital manometer and a new definition of high PEL. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic MPE were randomized 1:1 between EDIT and standard care (TSP). EDIT involved PEL assessment during large-volume thoracentesis; patients with high PEL (maximum PEL sustained over 250 mL [MaxPEL250] ≥ 14.5 cm H2O/L) were allocated to immediately receive an indwelling pleural catheter; the remainder underwent immediate drain placement for TSP. The primary outcome measure was recruitment feasibility, defined a priori as 30 patients over 12 months. Secondary outcomes included safety, technical reliability, and the aspiration volume required to detect high PEL. The accuracy of the PEL definition for NEL was analyzed post hoc. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were randomized (one allocation failure) over 12 months. PEL assessment (mean duration, 33 minutes) was successful in 13 of 15 patients (87%). No directly attributable serious adverse events occurred. High PEL was detected in seven of 13 patients (54%), associated with 100% sensitivity and 67% specificity for NEL, and was first detected at a median volume of 325 mL (range, 250-800 mL). CONCLUSIONS: A phase 3 trial testing the effect of EDIT management on symptomatic MPE recurrence following TSP is feasible. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03319186; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Pre-EDIT: protocol for a randomised feasibility trial of elastance-directed intrapleural catheter or talc pleurodesis (EDIT) in malignant pleural effusion.

INTRODUCTION: Non-expansile lung (NEL) is a common cause of talc pleurodesis (TP) failure in malignant pleural effusion (MPE), but is often occult prior to drainage. Reliable detection of NEL would allow patients to be allocated between intrapleural catheter (IPC) and TP. High pleural elastance (PEL) has been associated with NEL in observational studies. Pre-EDIT is a randomised feasibility trial of elastance-directed IPC or TP (EDIT) management using a novel, purpose-built digital pleural manometer (Rocket Medical, UK). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Consecutive patients with MPE without prior evidence of NEL or preference for IPC will be randomised 1:1 between EDIT management and standard care (an attempt at TP). The primary objective is to determine whether sufficient numbers of patients (defined as 30 within 12 months (or 15 over 6 months)) can be recruited and randomised to justify a subsequent phase III trial testing the efficacy of EDIT management. Secondary objectives include safety, technical feasibility and validation of study design elements, including the definition of PEL using 4D pleural MRI before and after fluid aspiration. EDIT involves PEL assessment during a large volume pleural fluid aspiration, followed by an attempt at TP or placement of an IPC within 24 hours. Patients will be allocated to IPC if the rolling average PEL sustained over at least 250 mL fluid aspirated (PEL250) is ≥ 14.5 cm H2O/L. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Pre-EDIT was approved by the West of Scotland Regional Ethics Committee on 8 March 2017 (Ref: 17/WS/0042). Results will be presented at scientific meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03319186; Pre-results.