Biologics in congenital ichthyosis: are they effective?

BACKGROUND: Congenital ichthyoses (CI) comprise a heterogeneous group of genetic diseases requiring lifelong treatment and having a major effect on quality of life. Conventional treatments reduce scaling and skin discomfort; however, they usually have little or no effect on erythema and pruritus. The identification of cytokine alterations in CI raised the possibility of repurposing available biologics. Several case reports in the literature report successes using different biologics. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to report the effects of biologics in real life. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, international multicenter study of patients with CI treated with at least one biologic for a minimum of 3 months. The effect of the biologics was evaluated using an Investigator Global Assessment-Change (IGA-C) scale. A comprehensive literature search was performed in parallel. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients were included, with a mean age of 19.7 years and both sexes equally represented. Patients with Netherton syndrome (NS) or congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma (CIE) represented the majority of patients (30% and 21.4%, respectively). Most patients (84.7%) had a severe or very severe form of CI. The most frequently used biologics were inhibitors targeting interleukin-17 (IL-17), IL-12/IL-23, or the IL-4 receptor. The mean duration of treatment was 22+20.1 months. There were 45 responders (45.9%), including 18 patients (18.3%) who were good responders; all had an erythrodermic CI subset and received one of the three main biologics. In 2 NS and CIE, IL-12/IL-23 and IL-4 receptor inhibitors tended to be most effective. Review of the literature revealed a shorter mean duration of use of biologics (11.5+8.5 months) and higher percentage of responders (85.7%), suggesting reporter bias. CONCLUSION: This series identified subsets of CI that may respond to biologics and will aid in designing future clinical trials of biologics for CI.

Predictive Factors of Non-Response to Vismodegib in Locally Advanced Basal-Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Vismodegib has shown clinical efficacy in the management of locally advanced basal cell carcinomas (laBCC). However, non-response to vismodegib is observed in 2-13.5% of patients in clinical studies. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with non-response to vismodegib in patients with laBCC. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective multicenter study, including patients with laBCC treated with vismodegib, from July 2011 to May 2019. Response to treatment was assessed according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria. Patients were categorized as responders with a complete response or a partial response or non-responders with a stable disease or a progressive disease according to what has been observed during follow-up. Patient demographics, tumor profile, and treatment modalities were compared in responders and non-responders. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients with laBCC were included in the study. Twenty-five (30.1%) were non-responders to vismodegib. History of treatment with radiotherapy, presence of muscle involvement and intermittent treatment with vismodegib were significantly associated with a non-response (p < 0.001, p = 0.025, p < 0.001). Bone involvement (p = 0.2) and morpheaform IaBCC subtype (p = 0.056) were more frequent in non-responders without reaching statistical significance. CONCLUSION: In this study, non-response of laBCC to vismodegib therapy was associated with muscle involvement. Previous radiotherapy and intermittent use of vismodegib have been identified as causes favoring non-response to vismodegib. Due to the low numbers of patients included in the study, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions. Further studies are needed to confirm these data.

Alternative use of BRAF inhibitors in patients with metastatic melanoma unable to swallow pills.

INTRODUCTION: BRAF and MEK inhibitors have been approved for use in metastatic melanoma therapies. All of them are administered as oral capsules or pills. We report two cases treated applying an alternative method of vemurafenib or debrafenib-trametinib administration in patients unable to swallow. CASE REPORT: The first case involved a 38-year-old man who was referred to a dermatologist for dysphagia and anorexia. After a computerized tomography (CT) scan it was concluded that the dysphagia was due to compression by mediastinal metastasis in a context of metastatic BRAF mutant melanoma. The second case involved a 35-year-old man who was diagnosed in March 2017 with melanoma of the back of the hand. Several months later a positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scan was performed. It revealed multiple disseminated metastasis.Management & Outcome: The first patient presented total dysphagia and was unable to swallow pills. It was decided to dissolve vemurafenib in order to facilitate administration. Dysphagia was improved 48 hours later, and oral feeding was reintroduced. Due to severe tablet phobia, the second patient was unable to swallow pills. Dabrafenib capsules were emptied and trametinib pills were grinded. One month later, we noted improved health associated with reduction of the metastases. DISCUSSION: Our study highlights the possibility of crushing or dissolving BRAF and MEK inhibitors in metastatic melanoma patients for whom it is impossible to swallow pills, eliciting a response and achieving significant if temporary clinical benefit.

No detection of Merkel cell polyomavirus in oral lichen planus: Results of a preliminary study in a French cohort of patients.

Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory disease considered as a CD8+ T lymphocyte-mediated autoimmune reaction, which may be triggered by undetermined virus. Recent reports have described the detection of Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) DNA in oral samples from healthy patients and in patients with different forms of oral cancers. We therefore investigated in a prospective way whether MCPyV was detectable in oral lesions of patients with active OLP. Our preliminary results do not support the hypothesis that OLP may be triggered by MCPyV infection. Further studies are needed to evaluate the involvement of other human polyomaviruses in OLP pathogenesis.

Chemotherapy-Related Reticulate Hyperpigmentation: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Inherited or acquired reticulate hyperpigmentation represents a heterogeneous group of infrequent dermatological conditions. The development of reticulate hyperpigmentation has so far been rarely reported to be associated with chemotherapeutic agents, including fluorouracil, bleomycin or a combination of cytarabine and idarubicin. CASE REPORTS: We describe 5 cases of chemotherapy-related reticulate hyperpigmentation in patients treated with different chemotherapeutic regimens, in particular paclitaxel or cytarabine. The lesions were similar in all cases, with reticulate and/or linear hyperpigmented streaks, which were mainly located to the back and buttocks. Histology showed increased melanogenesis, which suggests a direct toxic effect of chemotherapy on melanocytes. Reflectance confocal microscopy was performed in 2 patients showing a similar pattern, with an increased amount of melanin in basal keratinocytes. These features have been compared with the available data through a literature review. CONCLUSION: Reticulate hyperpigmentation is an underestimated but characteristic complication of chemotherapy. Neither specific management nor discontinuation of the chemotherapeutic regimen is required.

Time to Relapse After Discontinuing Systemic Treatment for Psoriasis: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The decision of when to discontinue systemic treatment after achieving remission in psoriasis is an important question. In this systematic review, we sought to evaluate time to relapse after the discontinuation of systemic treatment in psoriasis patients. METHODS: Systematic searches of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were performed for randomized controlled studies reporting time to relapse after discontinuation of systemic drugs in psoriasis patients. In addition, pharmaceutical companies were contacted by the authors regarding missing data from the identified publications. In each publication, the time to psoriasis relapse and the timing of drug discontinuation were carefully assessed. The level of psoriasis control at the time of drug discontinuation and the definition used for psoriasis relapse were taken into account. RESULTS: Thirty articles published before April 2021 were included in the systematic review. Four articles focused on conventional systemic treatments with methotrexate and/or cyclosporine, nine focused on tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists, eight focused on interleukin-17 (IL-17) antagonists, eight focused on IL-12/23 or IL-23 antagonists, and one focused on tofacitinib and apremilast. Different definitions were used to define psoriasis treatment success at the time of drug discontinuation. Similarly, heterogeneous criteria were used to define psoriasis relapse. Comparison between drugs was performed indirectly (i.e. across studies) for most drugs. Considering time of 50% loss of maximum Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) improvement, a shorter median time to psoriasis relapse was observed with traditional systemic treatment (~ 4 weeks) compared to biological agents (from 12 to ~ 34 weeks). When using stringent relapse criteria, such as loss of PASI 90, a longer time to relapse after treatment cessation was observed with IL-23 antagonists (21-42 weeks) versus IL-17 antagonists (7-24 weeks). CONCLUSION: Biological agents are associated with a longer time to relapse than oral systemic agents after drug discontinuation. Among biologicals, IL-23 antagonists are associated with the longest time to relapse. These findings may have clinical consequences for the selection of systemic agents when intermittent treatment is necessary.

Treatment of Subcorneal Pustular Dermatosis (Sneddon-Wilkinson Disease) With Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha.

Subcorneal pustular dermatosis (SPD), also known as Sneddon-Wilkinson disease, is a skin condition for which treatments are poorly codified. Anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) efficacy has been reported in multidrug-resistant SPD, as in our two cases. In the first case, an 83-year-old woman was monitored for SPD, associated with monoclonal IgA gammopathy. After multiple-line treatment failure, infliximab (5mg/kg) led to clinical improvement, noted few days following the first injection, and with complete remission at one month. At 12 months, the patient relapsed and concomitant serum anti-TNFα antibodies were found. A switch to adalimumab led to complete remission in three months with a follow-up of six months. In the second case, a 62-year-old woman was monitored for SPD associated with monoclonal IgA gammopathy recalcitrant to different lines of treatment. Treatment with adalimumab (40mg every two weeks) in combination with dapsone led to significant improvement after two injections. Five months later, she relapsed. It was then decided to reduce the interval between injections to once a week. Rapid improvement was achieved in one month allowing resumption of the original frequency of the injection without relapse after 20 months of follow-up. In conclusion, our cases confirm the previously reported efficacy of anti-TNFα in resistant SPD. They also highlight a risk of secondary loss of efficacy, reinforced by the literature data. Substitution of another TNFα blocker or shortening of interval between injections provided a renewal in response to treatment.

Cytokine Signature in Schnitzler Syndrome: Proinflammatory Cytokine Production Associated to Th Suppression.

Background: Schnitzler syndrome (SchS) is a rare autoinflammatory disease characterized by urticarial exanthema, bone and joint alterations, fever and monoclonal IgM gammopathy. Overactivation of the interleukin(IL)-1 system is reported, even though the exact pathophysiological pathways remain unknown. Objective: To determine ex vivo cytokine profiles of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) from SchS patients prior to treatment and after initiation of anti-IL-1 therapy (anakinra). The sera cytokine profile was studied in parallel. Methods: We collected blood samples from thirty-six untreated or treated SchS. PBMCs were cultured with and without LPS or anti-CD3/CD28. Cytokine levels were evaluated in serum and cell culture supernatants using Luminex technology. Results: Spontaneous TNFα, IL-6, IL-1ß, IL-1α, and IL-1RA release by PBMCs of SchS patients were higher than in controls. LPS-stimulation further induced the secretion of these cytokines. In contrast, after T-cell stimulation, TNFα, IL-10, IFNγ, IL-17A, and IL-4 production decreased in SchS patients compared to healthy controls, but less in treated patients. Whereas IL-1ß serum level was not detected in most sera, IL-6, IL-10, and TNFα serum levels were higher in patients with SchS and IFNγ and IL-4 levels were lower. Of note, IL-6 decreased after treatment in SchS (p = 0.04). Conclusion: Our data strengthen the hypothesis of myeloid inflammation in SchS, mediated in particular by IL-1ß, TNFα, and IL-6, associated with overproduction of the inhibitors IL-1RA and IL-10. In contrast, we observed a loss of Th1, Th2, and Th17 cell functionalities that tends to be reversed by anakinra.