RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic, inflammatory process affecting predominantly anogenital skin, with extragenital involvement in up to 20% of cases. The mainstay of therapy for anogenital LS is topical immunosuppression. However, in treatment-refractory cases, severe, or hypertrophic disease, systemic modalities may be used. Currently, there are no guidelines for systemic therapy in LS. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to provide a review of the current literature on use of systemic therapies for LS, including demographic and clinical features of LS, as well as reported outcomes. METHODS: A primary literature search was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science, from the year the journal was published until June 2022. RESULTS: Ultimately, 71 studies consisting of 392 patients were included. Of these, 65% (n = 254) had anogenital disease, 9% (n = 36) had extragenital disease, and 19% (n = 73) had both anogenital and extragenital disease, and in 7% (n = 29) of cases, location was not specified. The most frequent therapies, stratified by total cases, included oral retinoids (n = 227), methotrexate (n = 59), hydroxychloroquine (n = 36), and systemic steroids (prednisone, methylprednisolone, prednisolone, oral triamcinolone, and other systemic steroids) (n = 60). Overall, 76% (n = 194) of anogenital, 94% (n = 34) of extragenital, and 81% (n = 59) of patients with both anogenital and extragenital involvement were reported to have clinical or symptomatic improvement. CONCLUSION: Overall, we found many therapies that have been used with reported success for extragenital and genital LS. However, future studies are needed to better define treatment outcomes and directly compare efficacy of different therapies for LS.
Asunto(s)
Liquen Escleroso y Atrófico , Humanos , Liquen Escleroso y Atrófico/tratamiento farmacológico , Metotrexato , Resultado del Tratamiento , Piel , Esteroides/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES/PURPOSES OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the content, delivery, and quality of medical information for vulvar lichen sclerosus on the social media platform TikTok. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a descriptive, cross-sectional study. Using the third-party data scraping tool Apify, TikTok videos tagged with #lichensclerosus or "lichen sclerosus" were identified and sorted by view count. A sample of 100 videos was reviewed by 2 independent reviewers, excluding those not discussing lichen sclerosus. Videos were assessed using a coding document, the Patient Educational Materials Assessment Tool, and the DISCERN instrument. Interrater reliability was measured, and statistical analyses included Fleiss' kappa, intraclass correlation coefficient, t tests, and Wilcoxon rank sum test with Holm-Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: Content creators included patients (46%), health care professionals (30%), and others. Topics focused on clinical disease (52%) and treatment (48%). Evidence-based medicine was discussed in 71.7% of treatment-related videos, while 51.7% included nonevidence-based approaches, with a neutral or positive sentiment. Videos discussing topical steroids often had negative sentiments. Quality assessment revealed 61% of videos were understandable, 27% actionable, and 46% contained misinformation. Videos by health care professionals had less misinformation and higher quality scores compared to patient-generated content. Commercially biased videos were more understandable but contained more misinformation. CONCLUSIONS: TikTok serves as a significant platform for sharing information on lichen sclerosus, but nearly half of the content contains misinformation. Health care professionals need to engage in social media to provide accurate information and counteract misinformation. Enhanced collaboration with patient advocates and careful resource sharing can improve the quality and reliability of medical information available online.
RESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Several vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS) clinical severity scales have recently been proposed. In this prospective case series, we characterized histopathology in the context of clinical severity in 6 treatment-naïve postmenopausal patients with VLS. The Vulvar Quality of Life Index (VQLI) and an adaptation of the 2018 International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease Delphi consensus VLS severity score were administered. Vulvar skin punch biopsies were obtained to measure inflammatory density, constituent inflammatory cells, thickness of the stratum corneum and other epidermal layers, dermal edema, and dermal sclerosis. Clinicopathologic correlations were assessed. Two cases demonstrated sparse inflammatory densities, 1 case demonstrated patchy and nodular inflammatory density, 1 case demonstrated dense lichenoid inflammatory density, and 2 cases demonstrated dense lichenoid and epitheliotropic inflammatory densities. Those patients who reported severe pruritus demonstrated the greatest lymphocytic inflammatory densities on histopathological examination. Both cases of ulceration or erosion were associated with severe VQLI scores. Severe VQLI scores were also associated with trends for higher average thickness of the epidermal layers and of dermal sclerosis. Altogether, histopathologic grading of biopsy sites may reflect clinical severity in patients with VLS.
Asunto(s)
Liquen Escleroso y Atrófico , Liquen Escleroso Vulvar , Femenino , Humanos , Liquen Escleroso Vulvar/patología , Calidad de Vida , Esclerosis/patología , Vulva/patología , Epidermis/patología , Liquen Escleroso y Atrófico/patologíaRESUMEN
The prevalence of acute vulvovaginal involvement in toxic epidermal necrolysis can be as high as 70%; up to 28% of female patients will also develop chronic vulvovaginal sequelae. There is little consensus regarding prevention and treatment of the gynecologic sequelae of both Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN). We review acute and chronic sequelae, including erosions, scar formation, chronic skin changes, urethral complications, adenosis, malignant transformation, vulvodynia, and dyspareunia. We provide comprehensive recommendations for acute and long-term vulvovaginal care in adult and pediatric SJS/TEN patients. Treatment should include an ultrapotent topical steroid, followed by a nonirritating barrier cream applied to vulvar and perineal lesions. A steroid should be used intravaginally along with vaginal dilation in all adults (but should be avoided in prepubertal adolescents) with vaginal involvement. Menstrual suppression should be considered in all reproductive age patients until vulvovaginal lesions have healed. Last, referrals for pelvic floor physical therapy and to surgical subspecialties should be offered on a case-by-case basis. This guide summarizes the current available literature combined with expert opinion of both dermatologists and gynecologists who treat a high volume of SJS/TEN patients.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/complicaciones , Enfermedades Vaginales/etiología , Enfermedades Vaginales/terapia , Enfermedades de la Vulva/etiología , Enfermedades de la Vulva/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Vaginales/prevención & control , Enfermedades de la Vulva/prevención & controlRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patient outcomes are improved when dermatologists provide inpatient consultations. Inpatient access to dermatologists is limited, illustrating an opportunity to use teledermatology. Little is known about the ability of dermatologists to accurately diagnose disease and manage inpatients with teledermatology, particularly when using nondermatologist-generated clinical data. METHODS: This prospective study assessed the ability of teledermatology to diagnose disease and manage 41 dermatology consultations from a large urban tertiary care center, using internal medicine referral documentation and photographs. Twenty-seven dermatology hospitalists were surveyed. Interrater agreement was assessed by the κ statistic. RESULTS: There was substantial agreement between in-person and teledermatology assessment of the diagnosis with differential diagnosis (median κ = 0.83), substantial agreement in laboratory evaluation decisions (median κ = 0.67), almost perfect agreement in imaging decisions (median κ = 1.0), and moderate agreement in biopsy decisions (median κ = 0.43). There was almost perfect agreement in treatment (median κ = 1.0), but no agreement in follow-up planning (median κ = 0.0). There was no association between raw photograph quality and the primary plus differential diagnosis or primary diagnosis alone. LIMITATIONS: Selection bias and single-center nature. CONCLUSIONS: Teledermatology may be effective in the inpatient setting, with concordant diagnosis, evaluation, and management decisions.
Asunto(s)
Dermatología/métodos , Hospitalización , Consulta Remota/métodos , Enfermedades de la Piel/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Médicos Hospitalarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Fotograbar , Estudios Prospectivos , Piel/diagnóstico por imagen , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Atención TerciariaRESUMEN
The most problematic vulvovaginal conditions are familiar to dermatologists but may exhibit distinct clinical features or medication management because of the anatomic location. The second article in this continuing medical education series focuses on management pearls for treating vulvar diseases. We highlight key conditions, such as lichen sclerosus, erosive lichen planus, and vulvodynia. In addition, we review conditions that dermatologists may be less familiar with, such as plasma cell vulvitis, desquamative inflammatory vaginitis, vulvar aphthae, and low estrogen states. Nearly 1 in 6 women experience undiagnosed and untreated vulvovaginal discomfort at some point in their lives. Physicians who treat vulvar disorders will improve the quality of life of countless women.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Piel/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Piel/terapia , Vagina/patología , Enfermedades de la Vulva/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Vulva/terapia , Adulto , Atrofia/diagnóstico , Atrofia/terapia , Niño , Enfermedad de Crohn/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Liquen Plano/diagnóstico , Liquen Plano/terapia , Células Plasmáticas/patología , Enfermedades de la Piel/etiología , Úlcera Cutánea/diagnóstico , Úlcera Cutánea/tratamiento farmacológico , Vaginitis/diagnóstico , Vaginitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de la Vulva/etiología , Liquen Escleroso Vulvar/tratamiento farmacológico , Vulvitis/diagnóstico , Vulvitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Vulvodinia/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Patients with vulvar dermatoses often delay seeking medical treatment because of anxiety and embarrassment. Moreover, women frequently self-treat with various home remedies and see multiple clinicians before presenting to a dermatologist. Despite serving as the primary providers for patients with vulvovaginal symptoms, gynecologists typically receive limited training in the causes and management of these conditions. Dermatologists are experts in the evaluation and management of cutaneous disease and should be the caretakers of all skin, including the genitalia. Vulvar disorders are underrecognized by dermatologists for numerous reasons: inadequate training, lack of comfort with both interview and examination techniques, and unfamiliarity with normal anatomic variations. The first article in this continuing medical education series on vulvar dermatoses reviews the fundamentals, approach, and techniques that can be used to ensure a successful visit for both patient and provider.
Asunto(s)
Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Examen Físico , Enfermedades de la Piel/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Vulva/diagnóstico , Adulto , Variación Anatómica , Niño , Documentación , Femenino , Humanos , Anamnesis , Enfermedades de la Piel/etiología , Vulva/anatomía & histología , Enfermedades de la Vulva/etiologíaRESUMEN
Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are life-threatening conditions with high morbidity and mortality. Supportive care management of SJS/TEN is highly variable. A systematic review of the literature was performed by dermatologists, ophthalmologists, intensivists, and gynecologists with expertise in SJS/TEN to generate statements for supportive care guideline development. Members of the Society of Dermatology Hospitalists with expertise in SJS/TEN were invited to participate in a modified, online Delphi-consensus. Participants were administered 9-point Likert scale questionnaires regarding 135 statements. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used to evaluate and select proposed statements for guideline inclusion; statements with median ratings of 6.5 to 9 and a disagreement index of ≤1 were included in the guideline. For the final round, the guidelines were appraised by all of the participants. Included are an evidence-based discussion and recommendations for hospital setting and care team, wound care, ocular care, oral care, urogenital care, pain management, infection surveillance, fluid and electrolyte management, nutrition and stress ulcer prophylaxis, airway management, and anticoagulation in adult patients with SJS/TEN.