A multi-center comparison of surgical techniques for corpus Callosotomy in pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy.

OBJECTIVES: Corpus callosotomy (CC) is used to reduce seizures, primarily in patients with generalized drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). The invasive nature of the procedure contributes to underutilization despite its potential superiority to other palliative procedures. The goal of this study was to use a multi-institutional epilepsy surgery database to characterize the use of CC across participating centers. METHODS: Data were acquired from the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium (PERC) Surgery Database, a prospective observational study collecting data on children 0-18 years referred for surgical evaluation of DRE across 22 U.S. pediatric epilepsy centers. Patient, epilepsy, and surgical characteristics were collected across multiple CC modalities. Outcomes and complications were recorded and analyzed statistically. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients undergoing 85 CC procedures at 14 participating epilepsy centers met inclusion criteria. Mean age at seizure onset was 2.3 years (0-9.4); mean age for Phase I evaluation and surgical intervention were 9.45 (.1-20) and 10.46 (.2-20.6) years, respectively. Generalized seizure types were the most common (59%). Complete CC was performed in 88%. The majority of CC procedures (57%) were via open craniotomy, followed by laser interstitial thermal therapy (LiTT) (20%) and mini-craniotomy/endoscopic (mc/e) (22%). Mean operative times were significantly longer for LiTT, whereas mean estimated blood loss was greater in open cases. Complications occurred in 11 cases (13%) and differed significantly between surgical techniques (p < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in length of postoperative stay across approaches. Mean follow-up was 12.8 months (range 1-39). Favorable Engel outcomes were experienced by 37 (78.7%) of the patients who underwent craniotomy, 10 (58.8%) with LiTT, and 12 (63.2%) with mc/e; these differences were not statistically significant. SIGNIFICANCE: CC is an effective surgical modality for children with DRE. Regardless of surgical modality, complication rates are acceptable and seizure outcomes generally favorable. Newer, less-invasive, surgical approaches may lead to increased adoption of this efficacious therapeutic option for pediatric DRE.

Determinants of successful ictal SPECT injection in phase 1 epilepsy presurgical evaluation: Findings from the pediatric epilepsy research consortium surgery database project.

OBJECTIVES: The main goal of presurgical evaluation in drug-resistant focal epilepsy is to identify a seizure onset zone (SOZ). Of the noninvasive, yet resource-intensive tests available, ictal single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) aids SOZ localization by measuring focal increases in blood flow within the SOZ via intravenous peri-ictal radionuclide administration. Recent studies indicate that geographic and center-specific factors impact utilization of these diagnostic procedures. Our study analyzed successful ictal SPECT acquisition (defined as peri-ictal injection during inpatient admission) using surgery-related data from the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium (PERC) surgery database. We hypothesized that a high seizure burden, longer duration of video EEG monitoring (VEEG), and more center-specific hours of SPECT availability would increase the likelihood of successful ictal SPECT. METHODS: We identified study participants (≤18 years of age) who underwent SPECT as part of their phase 1 VEEG from January 2018 to June 2022. We assessed association between ictal SPECT outcomes (success vs. failure) and variables including patient demographics, epilepsy history, and center-specific SPECT practices. RESULTS: Phase 1 VEEG monitoring with ictal SPECT injection was planned in 297 participants and successful in 255 participants (85.86%). On multivariable analysis, the likelihood of a successful SPECT injection was higher in patients of non-Hispanic ethnicity (p = 0.040), shorter duration VEEG (p = 0.004), and higher hours of available SPECT services (p < 0.001). Higher seizure frequency (p = 0.033) was significant only in bivariate analysis. Patients treated at centers with more operational hours were more likely to experience pre-admission protocols prior to VEEG (p = 0.002). SIGNIFICANCE: There is inter-center variability in protocols and SPECT acquisition capabilities. Shorter duration of EEG monitoring, non-Hispanic ethnicity (when on private insurance), extended operational hours of nuclear medicine as noted on multivariate analysis and higher seizure frequency in bivariate analysis are strongly associated with successful ictal SPECT injection. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: In pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scans can be helpful in localizing seizure onset zone. However, due to many logistical challenges described below, which include not only the half-life of the technetium isotope used to inject intravenously during a seizure (called the ictal SPECT scan) but also available nuclear scanner time in addition to the unpredictability of seizures, obtaining an ictal SPECT during a planned elective inpatient hospital stay is not guaranteed. Thus, as healthcare costs increase, planning a prolonged hospital stay during which an ictal SPECT scan is not feasible is not optimal. We leveraged our prospective surgery database to look at center-specific factors and patient-specific factors associated with an ictal SPECT injection in the first, pediatric-focussed, large-scale, multicenter, prospective, SPECT feasibility study. We found that longer availability of the scanner is the most important center-specific factor in assuring ictal SPECT injection. Although seizure frequency is an important patient-specific factor on bivariate analysis, this factor lost statistical significance when other factors like patient insurance status and video EEG duration were also considered in our multivariable logistical model.

Responsive Neurostimulation in Drug-Resistant Pediatric Epilepsy: Findings From the Epilepsy Surgery Subgroup of the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium.

BACKGROUND: Responsive neurostimulation (RNS), a closed-loop intracranial electrical stimulation system, is a palliative surgical option for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). RNS is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients aged ≥18 years with pharmacoresistant partial seizures. The published experience of RNS in children is limited. METHODS: This is a combined prospective and retrospective study of patients aged ≤18 years undergoing RNS placement. Patients were identified from the multicenter Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium Surgery Registry from January 2018 to December 2021, and additional data relevant to this study were retrospectively collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients received RNS during the study period. The mean age at implantation was 14.9 years; the mean duration of epilepsy, 8.1 years; and the mean number of previously trialed antiseizure medications, 4.2. Five patients (9%) previously trialed dietary therapy, and 19 patients (34%) underwent prior surgery. Most patients (70%) underwent invasive electroencephalography evaluation before RNS implantation. Complications occurred in three patients (5.3%) including malpositioned leads or transient weakness. Follow-up (mean 11.7 months) was available for 55 patients (one lost), and four were seizure-free with RNS off. Outcome analysis of stimulation efficacy was available for 51 patients: 33 patients (65%) were responders (≥50% reduction in seizure frequency), including five patients (10%) who were seizure free at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: For young patients with focal DRE who are not candidates for surgical resection, neuromodulation should be considered. Although RNS is off-label for patients aged <18 years, this multicenter study suggests that it is a safe and effective palliative option for children with focal DRE.

Epilepsy surgery in children with genetic etiologies: A prospective evaluation of current practices and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses current practices and outcomes of epilepsy surgery in children with a genetic etiology. It explores the pre-surgical workup, types of surgeries, and post-surgical outcomes in a broad array of disorders. METHODS: Patients ≤18 years who completed epilepsy surgery and had a known genetic etiology prior to surgical intervention were extrapolated from the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium (PERC) surgery database, across 18 US centers. Data were assessed univariably by neuroimaging and EEG results, genetic group (structural gene, other gene, chromosomal), and curative intent. Outcomes were based on a modified International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) outcome score. RESULTS: Of 81 children with genetic epilepsy, 72 % had daily seizures when referred for surgery evaluation, which occurred a median of 2.2 years (IQR 0.3, 5.2) after developing drug resistance. Following surgery, 68 % of subjects had >50 % seizure reduction, with 33 % achieving seizure freedom [median follow-up 11 months (IQR 6, 17). Seizure freedom was most common in the monogenic structural group, but significant palliation was present across all groups. Presence of a single EEG focus was associated with a greater likelihood of seizure freedom (p=0.02). SIGNIFICANCE: There are meaningful seizure reductions following epilepsy surgery in the majority of children with a genetic etiology, even in the absence of a single structural lesion and across a broad spectrum of genetic causes. These findings highlight the need for expedited referral for epilepsy surgery and support of a broadened view of which children may benefit from epilepsy surgery, even when the intent is palliative.