Prostate cancer risk in men of differing genetic ancestry and approaches to disease screening and management in these groups.

Prostate cancer is the second most common solid tumour in men worldwide and it is also the most common cancer affecting men of African descent. Prostate cancer incidence and mortality vary across regions and populations. Some of this is explained by a large heritable component of this disease. It has been established that men of African and African Caribbean ethnicity are predisposed to prostate cancer (PrCa) that can have an earlier onset and a more aggressive course, thereby leading to poorer outcomes for patients in this group. Literature searches were carried out using the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies associated with PrCa risk and its association with ancestry, screening and management of PrCa. In order to be included, studies were required to be published in English in full-text form. An attractive approach is to identify high-risk groups and develop a targeted screening programme for them as the benefits of population-wide screening in PrCa using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in general population screening have shown evidence of benefit; however, the harms are considered to weigh heavier because screening using PSA testing can lead to over-diagnosis and over-treatment. The aim of targeted screening of higher-risk groups identified by genetic risk stratification is to reduce over-diagnosis and treat those who are most likely to benefit.

The BARCODE1 Pilot: a feasibility study of using germline single nucleotide polymorphisms to target prostate cancer screening.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility and uptake of a community-based prostate cancer (PCa) screening programme selecting men according to their genetic risk of PCa. To assess the uptake of PCa screening investigations by men invited for screening. The uptake of the pilot study would guide the opening of the larger BARCODE1 study recruiting 5000 men. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Healthy males aged 55-69 years were invited to participate via their general practitioners (GPs). Saliva samples were collected via mailed collection kits. After DNA extraction, genotyping was conducted using a study specific assay. Genetic risk was based on genotyping 130 germline PCa risk single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). A polygenic risk score (PRS) was calculated for each participant using the sum of weighted alleles for 130 SNPs. Study participants with a PRS lying above the 90th centile value were invited for PCa screening by prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and biopsy. RESULTS: Invitation letters were sent to 1434 men. The overall study uptake was 26% (375/1436) and 87% of responders were eligible for study entry. DNA genotyping data were available for 297 men and 25 were invited for screening. After exclusions due to medical comorbidity/invitations declined, 18 of 25 men (72%) underwent MRI and biopsy of the prostate. There were seven diagnoses of PCa (38.9%). All cancers were low-risk and were managed with active surveillance. CONCLUSION: The BARCODE1 Pilot has shown this community study in the UK to be feasible, with an overall uptake of 26%. The main BARCODE1 study is now open and will recruit 5000 men. The results of BARCODE1 will be important in defining the role of genetic profiling in targeted PCa population screening. Patient Summary What is the paper about? Very few prostate cancer screening programmes currently exist anywhere in the world. Our pilot study investigated if men in the UK would find it acceptable to have a genetic test based on a saliva sample to examine their risk of prostate cancer development. This test would guide whether men are offered prostate cancer screening tests. What does it mean for patients? We found that the study design was acceptable: 26% of men invited to take part agreed to have the test. The majority of men who were found to have an increased genetic risk of prostate cancer underwent further tests offered (prostate MRI scan and biopsy). We have now expanded the study to enrol 5000 men. The BARCODE1 study will be important in examining whether this approach could be used for large-scale population prostate cancer screening.

How can we recruit more men of African or African-Caribbean ancestry into our research? Co-creating a video to raise awareness of prostate cancer risk and the PROFILE study.

BACKGROUND: Men of African ancestry are at increased risk of developing prostate cancer (PrCa) compared to men from other backgrounds. The PROFILE study aims to understand whether genetic information can better target who needs PrCa screening. PROFILE has so far had difficulty reaching men of African or African -Caribbean ancestry to take part. In this involvement project we worked in partnership with a group of such men to co-create a video to raise awareness of PrCa risk amongst this community and promote participation in the study. METHODS: We recruited seven men of African or African-Caribbean ancestry who completed an initial survey on the Cancer Patients' Voice platform. We then held an online discussion panel and maintained contact to encourage dialogue and planning of the video. Utilising a participatory approach, the ideas for the video were decided in collaboration with the panel who held expert knowledge of various communities and understood the messages that would best resonate and engage with other men of the same origins. Once the video had been edited and finalised, two members of the group expressed interest in writing up the project and are listed as co-authors. RESULTS: The video in its entirety was driven by the panel's ideas. The choice of a barber shop setting; leading with a positive case study and highlighting the importance of men's family members rather than a focus on scientific language, statistics or researchers were all features that were discussed and agreed upon by the panel. The men shared the video within their networks. It was placed on websites and promoted as part of a social media campaign during Black History Month. CONCLUSIONS: Groups with the greater healthcare needs and the most to gain from advances in care and treatment can often be the most excluded from research participation. This is pertinent in PrCa research where men of African or African-Caribbean ancestry are at greater risk. The project gave equal power and decision making to the men and provides an example of successful inclusive involvement. The result was a unique approach to making a study video.

METHODS: We engaged seven men of African or African-Caribbean ancestry: three PROFILE study participants and four from the Race, Ethnicity and Cultural Heritage (REACH) staff forums across the Royal Marsden Hospital and the Institute of Cancer Research. They completed a survey, joined an online discussion panel and we continued working together. The group decided on the structure and content of the video; to include a PrCa survivor who had been successfully screened and treated early for his disease, and a daughter of one of the panellists. The men were also involved in the dissemination plans of the finished video, and two agreed to be co-authors of this paper. FINDINGS: Features of the video led by the men included the choice of a barber shop setting; leading with a positive shared story and highlighting the importance of family rather than science, statistics or researchers. DISSEMINATION: The group shared the video within their networks. It was placed on websites and promoted as part of a social media campaign during Black History Month.

This project involved working in partnership with men of African or African-Caribbean ancestry to co-create a video intended to raise awareness of prostate cancer (PrCa) risk and promote participation in a genetic screening study called PROFILE. Men of African or African-Caribbean ancestry are at increased risk of developing PrCa compared to other men. The PROFILE study aims to understand whether genetic information can better target who needs PrCa screening. The study has had problems recruiting men from these communities.

A synergistic interaction between lapatinib and chemotherapy agents in a panel of cell lines is due to the inhibition of the efflux pump BCRP.

Lapatinib is a specific HER1 and 2 targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor now widely used in combination with chemotherapy in the clinical setting. In this work, we investigated the interactions between lapatinib and specific chemotherapy agents (cisplatin, SN-38, topotecan) in a panel of cell lines [breast (n = 2), lung (n = 2), testis (n = 4)]. A high-sensitivity cell proliferation/cytotoxicity ATP assay and flow cytometry were used to determine cell viability, apoptosis, and the effect of the drugs on cell-cycle distribution. CalcuSyn analysis was employed to formally identify synergistic interactions between drugs. Intracellular concentrations of SN-38 were measured using a novel high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) technique. Flow cytometry and HPLC techniques were used to identify the effect of lapatinib on drug influx and efflux pumps, using specific substrates and inhibitors of these pumps. Results showed significant synergy between SN-38, and lapatinib in the majority of cell lines (combination index < 0.75), associated with increased apoptosis. This synergy was not universal but, when observed (Susa S/R, H1975, H358, and MDA-MB-231 cell lines), was related to SN-38 intracellular accumulation (2.2- to 4.8-fold increase, P < 0.05 for each), attributable to the inhibition of the breast cancer-related protein (BCRP) efflux pump by lapatinib. Flow cytometry analysis showed that lapatinib (10 µmol/L) inhibited the efflux of mitoxantrone, a specific substrate of the BCRP pump, in a manner similar to fumitremorgin C, a known BCRP inhibitor, confirming lapatinib as a BCRP inhibitor. This work shows that lapatinib has a direct inhibitory effect on BCRP accounting for the synergistic findings. The synergy is cell line dependent and related to the activity of specific efflux pumps.

The relative activity of cisplatin, oxaliplatin and satraplatin in testicular germ cell tumour sensitive and resistant cell lines.

BACKGROUND: Germ cell tumours (GCT) can become resistant to cisplatin, which is associated with a relatively poor prognosis. Oxaliplatin and satraplatin have been developed to overcome cisplatin resistance in other cancers, but their effect in cisplatin resistant (cisR) GCTs is unclear. In this work we address this issue by comparing their efficacy in three paired sensitive and cisR GCT cell lines. METHODS: Three established cisplatin sensitive (cisS) and resistant cell line pairs were used (GCT27, GCT27r: SUSA, SUSAr: 833k, 833kr). Viability was assessed using a luciferase based ATP assay and EC(50) and EC(80) concentrations were calculated. Western blot analysis and flow cytometry was used for further assessment. RESULTS: Sensitivity to the three platinum compounds was broadly similar in the three cisS lines GCT cell lines (EC(50) = 0.27-0.51 microM for cisplatin, 0.52-0.79 microM for oxaliplatin, 0.31-1.26 microM for satraplatin). EC(50) values for cisplatin in the three cisR sub lines were 1.8- to 3.8-fold higher than in the sensitive parental lines. Cross resistance to satraplatin and oxaliplatin occurred in all three cisR cell lines (resistance factor 1.9-4.4), with the exception of oxaliplatin in the 833Kr (resistance factor 0.9). Differences in the effect of specific drugs on cell cycle distribution, p53, p21 and MDM2 were observed. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that satraplatin and oxaliplatin could theoretically be used in chemo-naive GCTs and support the further clinical evaluation of these agents in this setting. The mechanism of cross resistance to these drugs appears multifactorial.