Aneuploidy screening after preimplantation genetic testing: a national survey of physician knowledge and practice.

PURPOSE: To assess the knowledge of generalist OB/GYN providers on aneuploidy screening recommendations for patients who utilized preimplantation genetic testing, and to survey providers' current practice habits. METHODS: A 12-question survey was distributed by email to OB/GYN physicians in the USA. Demographic information was also collected. RESULTS: A total of 178 survey responses were included for analysis. Sixty-seven percent correctly identified the current ACOG recommendation to offer additional aneuploidy screening/invasive diagnostic testing regardless of PGT status, and 66% said their practice is consistent with this recommendation. Ninety-one percent of responders correctly answered that in vitro fertilization does not always include PGT and 63% of responders were able to correctly identify the 3 available types of PGT. Thirty-three percent (n = 58) were attending physicians, and 67% (n = 120) were resident physicians. Most participants (81%, n = 145) stated they have been in practice 0-9 years, and the remaining 19% (n = 33) stated they have been in practice ≥ 10 years. CONCLUSION: Significant knowledge gaps of PGT and aneuploidy screening recommendations after PGT exist among generalist OB/GYN physicians. Efforts should be made to educate providers on the importance of offering aneuploidy screening and diagnostic testing to patients who utilized PGT to improve patient care.

Assessing the accuracy and quality of YouTube videos on early pregnancy loss.

Objective: To assess the accuracy and quality of YouTube videos pertaining to early pregnancy loss for use as a patient education tool. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted via YouTube search using the keywords "miscarriage," "spontaneous abortion," "pregnancy loss," and "pregnancy failure." The first 20 results for each keyword search, sorted by both relevance and view count, were compiled into a list. Descriptive characteristics, including the numbers of views, likes, dislikes, video length, and duration of upload were collected. All videos were independently evaluated by two physician researchers using two unique assessment tools. The Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose (CRAAP) test was used to measure the reliability of video content. The Miscarriage-Specific Question Score (MSQS) criterion was used to objectively assess video content specific to miscarriage. Inter-rater agreement was analyzed via kappa coefficient and Pearson correlation. Results: 160 videos were screened, among which 74 videos were included for analysis. The mean CRAAP score was 8.3 out of a total possible score of 15, demonstrating good quality sources, though not of academic level. Mean MSQS score was 8.1 out of a total possible score of 24, demonstrating "fair" accuracy and comprehensiveness. Pearson correlations were 0.87 and 0.86 for CRAAP and MSQS total scores, respectively, demonstrating excellent inter-rater reliability. Conclusion: YouTube videos related to early pregnancy loss span a wide range of quality, accuracy, and purpose. While some videos provide effective content, mean rater scores demonstrate that YouTube is not a reliable source for patient education on early pregnancy loss.