RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency and associated characteristics of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among pregnant and postpartum individuals. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Prenatal care at a single academic tertiary care centre. POPULATION: Pregnant and postpartum individuals enrolled in prenatal care at a single academic tertiary care centre from 22 March 2021 to 2 April 2021, concurrent with state guidelines recommending COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy. METHODS: We used logistic regression to identify characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, and adjusted for: age, parity, race, trimester of pregnancy, and chronic comorbidities. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, defined as uncertainty or refusal of the vaccine, despite the availability of vaccine services, in accordance with the World Health Organization (WHO) Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on vaccine hesitancy. RESULTS: Of the 485 individuals screened and approached, 456 (94%) enrolled and completed the survey (435/456, 95% pregnant). The frequency of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was 46% (95% CI 41%-51%). Sociodemographic characteristics, including non-Hispanic Black race, younger age, lower education, public health insurance receipt, parity >1, and reported substance use, were associated with a higher odds of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, but not clinical risk conditions. Individuals who had a family or friend vaccinated for COVID-19, prior or planned vaccination for tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis (Tdap) and/or influenza, and who perceived that vaccination benefited the baby were less likely to express COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was frequent among pregnant and postpartum individuals. Those who may face barriers to accessing healthcare services were more likely to report vaccine hesitancy. These results can inform interventions to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake in pregnancy. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy is frequent among pregnant and postpartum individuals, and those who face barriers to accessing healthcare services are more likely to report COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular , Tos Ferina , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Vacunación , Vacilación a la Vacunación , Tos Ferina/prevención & controlRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between initial COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and subsequent vaccination among pregnant and postpartum individuals. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: A Midwestern tertiary-care academic medical center. Individuals completed a baseline vaccine hesitancy assessment from 22 March 2021 to 2 April 2021, with subsequent ascertainment of vaccination status at 3-6 months follow-up. METHODS: We used multivariable Poisson regression to estimate the relative risk of vaccination by baseline vaccine hesitancy status, and then characteristics associated with vaccination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-report of COVID-19 vaccination, and secondarily, consideration of COVID-19 vaccination among those not vaccinated. RESULTS: Of 456 individuals (93% pregnant, 7% postpartum) initially surveyed, 290 individuals (64%; 23% pregnant, 77% postpartum) provided subsequent vaccination status (median = 17 weeks). Of these 290 individuals, 40% (116/290) reported COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy upon enrolment, of whom 52% reported subsequent vaccination at follow-up. Few individuals transitioned during the study period from vaccine hesitant to vaccinated (10%); in comparison, 80% of those who were not vaccine hesitant were vaccinated at follow-up (aRR 0.19, 95% CI 0.11-0.33). Among those who remained unvaccinated at follow-up, 38% who were vaccine hesitant at baseline were considering vaccination, compared with 71% who were not vaccine hesitant (aRR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33-0.67). Individuals who were older, parous, employed and of higher educational attainment were more likely to be vaccinated, and those who identified as non-Hispanic black, were Medicaid beneficiaries, and were still pregnant at follow-up were less likely to be vaccinated. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy persisted over time in the peripartum period, and few individuals who reported hesitancy at baseline were later vaccinated. Interventions that address vaccine hesitancy in pregnancy are needed.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Anomalías Urogenitales , Vacunas , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Padres , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Vacunación , Vacilación a la VacunaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Human plasma and tissue lycopene concentrations are heterogeneous even when consuming controlled amounts of tomato or lycopene. OBJECTIVES: Our objective is to determine whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in or near known or putative carotenoid metabolism genes [ß-carotene 15,15' monooxygenase 1 (BCO1), scavenger receptor class B type 1 (SCARB1), ATP-binding cassette transporter subfamily A member 1 (ABCA1), microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTTP), apolipoprotein B-48, elongation of very long chain fatty acids protein 2 (ELOVL2), and ATP-binding cassette subfamily B member 1 (ABCB1), and an intergenic superoxide dismutase 2, mitochondrial-associated SNP] are predictive of plasma lycopene responses to steady state tomato juice consumption. METHODS: Secondary linear regression analyses of data from a dose-escalation study of prostate cancer patients [n = 47; mean ± SEM age: 60 ± 1 y; BMI (in kg/m2): 32 ± 1] consuming 0, 1, or 2 cans of tomato-soy juice/d (163 mL/can; 20.6 mg lycopene 1.2 mg ß-carotene/can) for 24 ± 0.7 d before prostatectomy were conducted to explore 11 SNP genotype effects on the change in plasma lycopene and plasma and prostate tissue concentrations of lycopene, ß-carotene, phytoene, and phytofluene. RESULTS: Two BCO1 SNP genotypes were significant predictors of the change in plasma lycopene, with SNP effects differing in magnitude and direction, depending on the level of juice intake (rs12934922 × diet group P = 0.02; rs6564851 × diet group P = 0.046). Further analyses suggested that plasma ß-carotene changes were predicted by BCO1 rs12934922 (P < 0.01), prostate lycopene by trending interaction and main effects of BCO1 SNPs (rs12934922 × diet group P = 0.09; rs12934922 P = 0.02; rs6564851 P = 0.053), and prostate ß-carotene by BCO1 SNP interaction and main effects (rs12934922 × diet group P = 0.01; rs12934922 P < 0.01; rs7501331 P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, SNPs in BCO1 and other genes may modulate human plasma and prostate tissue responses to dietary lycopene intake and warrant validation in larger, human controlled feeding intervention and cohort studies. Genetic variants related to carotenoid metabolism may partially explain heterogeneous human blood and tissue responses and may be critical covariates for population studies and clinical trials. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01009736.
Asunto(s)
Licopeno/sangre , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Neoplasias de la Próstata/dietoterapia , Proteínas de Soja , beta-Caroteno 15,15'-Monooxigenasa/genética , Bebidas/análisis , Carotenoides/sangre , Genotipo , Humanos , Desequilibrio de Ligamiento , Licopeno/metabolismo , Solanum lycopersicum/metabolismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/enzimología , beta Caroteno/sangre , beta-Caroteno 15,15'-Monooxigenasa/metabolismoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of community-level social vulnerability with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and vaccination among pregnant and postpartum individuals. METHODS: Prospective cohort study assessing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among pregnant and postpartum individuals. We performed a baseline survey on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy from 03/22/21 to 04/02/21, and a follow-up survey on COVD-19 vaccination status 3- to 6-months later. The primary exposure was the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention SVI (Social Vulnerability Index), measured in quartiles. Higher SVI quartiles indicated greater community-level social vulnerability with the lowest quartile (quartile 1) as the referent group. The primary outcome was COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy on the baseline survey (uncertainty or refusal of the vaccine), and the secondary outcome was self-report of not being vaccinated (unvaccinated) for COVID-19 on the follow-up survey. RESULTS: Of 456 assessed individuals, 46% reported COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy on the baseline survey; and of 290 individuals (290/456, 64%) who completed the follow-up survey, 48% (140/290) were unvaccinated. The frequency of baseline vaccine hesitancy ranged from 25% in quartile 1 (low SVI) to 68% in quartile 4 (high SVI), and being unvaccinated at follow-up ranged from 29% in quartile 1 to 77% in quartile 4. As social vulnerability increased, the risk of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy at baseline increased (quartile 2 aRR (adjusted relative risk): 1.46; 95% CI:0.98 to 2.19; quartile 3 aRR: 1.86; 95% CI:1.28 to 2.71; and quartile 4 aRR: 2.24; 95% CI:1.56 to 3.21), as did the risk of being unvaccinated at follow-up (quartile 2 aRR: 1.00; 95% CI:0.66 to 1.51; quartile 3 aRR: 1.68; 95% CI:1.17 to 2.41; and quartile 4 aRR: 1.82; 95% CI:1.30 to 2.56). CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant and postpartum individuals living in an area with higher community-level social vulnerability were more likely to report COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and subsequently to be unvaccinated at follow-up.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Vulnerabilidad Social , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacilación a la Vacunación , Estudios Prospectivos , Vacunación , Periodo PospartoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite current guidelines recommending universal vaccination, the frequency of vaccination in pregnancy for influenza and tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis remains low. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the association between community-level social vulnerability and influenza and anticipated tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccinations among pregnant and postpartum individuals. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of vaccine hesitancy in the peripartum period among pregnant and postpartum participants enrolled in prenatal care at a single tertiary care center from March 22, 2021, to April 02, 2021. Participant addresses were geocoded using ArcGIS and linked at the census tract level. The primary exposure was community-level social vulnerability as measured by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Social Vulnerability Index. This index incorporates 15 census variables to produce a composite score and subscores across 4 major thematic domains (socioeconomic status, household composition and disability, minority status and language, and housing type and transportation). The scores range from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating greater social vulnerability. The primary outcomes were self-reported influenza vaccination during the current influenza season and having received or planning to receive the tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccination in pregnancy. We used multivariable logistic regression and adjusted for age, self-reported race and ethnicity, parity, trimester of pregnancy, and chronic comorbid conditions. RESULTS: Of 456 assessed individuals (95% pregnant individuals and 5% postpartum individuals), the frequency of influenza vaccination was 58% (95% confidence interval, 53-62), and the anticipated tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccination was 72% (95% confidence interval, 68-76). Individuals from communities with a higher Social Vulnerability Index were less likely to report vaccination in pregnancy than those from communities with a lower Social Vulnerability Index. Specifically, for each 0.1-unit increase in the Social Vulnerability Index, the odds of influenza vaccination (adjusted odds ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.46) and anticipated tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccination (adjusted odds ratio, 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.53) decreased by >70%. By domain, the Social Vulnerability Index subscores of socioeconomic status (influenza adjusted odds ratio, 0.20 [95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.40]; tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis adjusted odds ratio, 0.25 [95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.53]) and housing type and transportation (influenza adjusted odds ratio, 0.41 [95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.84; tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis adjusted odds ratio, 0.39 [95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.87) were inversely associated with a lower odds of influenza and tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccinations. CONCLUSION: Pregnant and postpartum individuals living in areas with higher social vulnerability were less likely to report influenza and anticipated tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccinations in pregnancy. The Social Vulnerability Index could be used as a tool to improve vaccine equity and address disparities in vaccination in pregnancy.