STRYDE versus PRECICE magnetic internal lengthening nail for femur lengthening.

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic internal lengthening nails (MILNs) have been used for femoral lengthening to avoid complications associated with external fixation. The titanium version of the MILN (PRECICE®) has been in use since 2011 but had limitations (50-75 lb) in post-operative weight bearing. A new stainless-steel version of the MILN (STRYDE®) allows 150-250 lb of post-operative weight bearing. The aim is to compare the outcomes of using these two different MILNs for both unilateral and bilateral femoral lengthening. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted in which patients' records were reviewed from the period from January 2017 to March 2020. A total of 66 femoral lengthening procedures were included in the study and were divided into two groups: STRYDE® group (30 femora) and PRECICE® group (36 femora). Outcomes assessed were the 6-months post-operative Limb Deformity-Scoliosis Research Society (LD-SRS) Score, adjacent joint range of motion (ROM), average distraction rate, bone healing index (BHI), and complications. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in regard to the (LD-SRS) score, hip ROM, or knee ROM. Statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in regard to BHI (average of 0.84 months/cm and 0.67 months/cm for STRYDE® and PRECICE®, respectively) and distraction rate (average of 0.6 mm/day and 0.9 mm/day for STRYDE® and PRECICE®, respectively). No mechanical nail complications were reported in the STRYDE® group compared to three events of nail failure in the PRECICE® group. One femur in the PRECICE® group needed BMAC injection for delayed healing compared to four femurs in the STRYDE® group. CONCLUSION: The STRYDE® MILN yields comparable functional results to those of PRECICE® MILN and shows fewer mechanical nail complications. However, STRYDE® MILN requires a slower distraction rate and yields slower healing (larger BHI). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic study.

Patients With Lower Limb Deformity Report Worse Quality of Life Than Control Subjects Regardless of Degree of Deformity.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine how Limb Deformity Modified Scoliosis Research Society (LD-SRS) scores differ between patients with different types and degrees of limb deformity compared with control subjects. METHODS: Patients who were >17 years and scheduled for reconstructive surgery for limb lengthening or angular deformity with internal and/or external fixation and healthy control subjects were prospectively enrolled. Patients completed the LD-SRS preoperatively. Mechanical axis deviation (MAD) and leg length discrepancy (LLD) were recorded preoperatively. Participants were stratified into five groups based on their diagnosis. ANOVA was used to test for associations between LD-SRS scores and diagnosis as well as mechanical axis deviation. RESULTS: Patients with LLD, angular deformity, or combined LLD and angular deformity reported significantly worse scores than control subjects in LD-SRS Function/Activity, Pain, Self-Image/Appearance, and total score (P < 0.001 for all). Patients with short stature reported significantly worse LD-SRS Self-Image/Appearance (P < 0.001) and total score compared with control subjects (P = 0.015). There was a significant correlation between LLD and LD-SRS Self-Image/Appearance in the LLD and angular deformity group (r = -0.359, P = 0.043). DISCUSSION: Although LD-SRS scores were worse in patients with limb deformity compared to controls, LD-SRS scores were not related to the degree of deformity in most patients, indicating that patient self-perception may be a construct unrelated to objective radiographic or clinical findings.

Humerus Lengthening: A Comparison of the Internal Lengthening Nail to External Fixation.

Introduction: Magnetic internal lengthening nails (MILNs) have been used for humeral lengthening to avoid complications associated with external fixation. Purpose/Questions: We compared the 1-year Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, adjacent joint range of motion (ROM), bone healing index (BHI), length achieved, distraction rate, and complications when lengthening the humerus using MILN vs using external fixation. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 18 patients (22 humeri) from January 2001 to March 2020 divided into 2 groups, the MILN group (7 patients, 7 humeri) and the mono-lateral fixator group (11 patients, 15 humeri). Results: The MILN group showed larger improvement of DASH scores (average 26.8 and 8 for MILN and fixator groups, respectively), less loss of elbow ROM (average 5° and 7° for MILN and fixator groups, respectively), and shorter time to full recovery of elbow ROM (average 39 days and 122 days for MILN and fixator groups, respectively). In the MILN group, there was slower distraction rate (average 0.66 mm/day and 0.86 mm/day for MILN and fixator groups, respectively), less lengthening achieved (average 5.2 cm and 7 cm for MILN and fixator group, respectively), and a lower lengthening percentage (average 19% and 41% for MILN and fixator group, respectively). Bone healing index (BHI) of 0.94 and 0.99 months/cm for the MILN and the fixator groups were similar. Conclusion: Humeral lengthening using the MILN allowed for early full recovery of joint ROM with comparable functional and radiographic outcomes compared with using external fixators.

Core psychosocial issues for children and adolescents in the context of limb lengthening and reconstruction surgery treatment.

PURPOSE: Addressing the psychosocial needs of adolescents can improve surgical outcomes. The aim of this retrospective comparative study was to understand the core psychosocial factors that shaped the experiences of adolescents who underwent multiple limb lengthening/reconstruction surgeries (LLRS). METHODS: A novel 62-question survey was developed and administered to 31 patients from the study institution. Data was obtained using a self-report inventory assessing medical care, communication/connection to doctor, peer relations, physical space, self-esteem, counselling/clergy, physical/emotional support, school issues and concerns about future. This survey and demographic questions were administered to young adults (now aged 18 to 30 years) who underwent LLRS treatment between the ages of 11 to 20 years. RESULTS: Psychosocial needs were determined to be within the categories of body image/self-esteem, subjective perception of treatment, patient-physician relationship, role of parents, peer interactions, academic performance and hospital experience. Patients valued parental involvement while also wanting their surgeon to speak directly to them. They preferred to be in private rooms on the paediatric floor and to not socialize while in the hospital. They were indifferent to keeping up with friends, speaking to a counsellor and having their surgeon inquire about their emotions. They expressed concern about pain, carrying out activities and the financial impact of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescent LLRS patients value focused psychosocial support from their surgeon and caregivers. This perceived level of support influences their ability to cope with their condition. These findings helped us understand the psychological issues and preferences of adolescents who underwent LLRS and can assist orthopaedic surgeons in providing holistic care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.