Skin tears in mammography: A narrative review.

Skin tears are classed as traumatic wounds mainly caused by shearing and frictional forces. Incidences of skin tears are noted to be significant mostly in the elderly population and those with fragile and vulnerable skin. Individuals undergoing mammography are susceptible to skin tears due to factors associated with skin breakdown such as thinning of the epidermis, use of steroids, presence of moisture, but this, when compounded with the procedure of mammography can increase the risk further. Mammography, an x-ray imaging method, which exerts adequate compression force on the breast tissue for the mammographer to obtain a high-quality image for diagnostic purposes. However, when compression force is applied during mammography resulting incidences of cutaneous skin tears can occur. Lack of and under reporting of skin tears during mammography makes it difficult to ascertain the extent of this problem and scale of its incidence. Therefore, the purpose of this narrative review is to focus on providing an overview of skin tears associated with mammography and a discussion of the current literature with regards to its incidence and diagnosis. In addition, the review will also discuss the theoretical and contextual perspective of the prevention and management strategies associated with skin tears.

DNA accumulation and transfer within an operational forensic exhibit storeroom.

The increased sensitivity of current DNA profiling technologies allows the detection of trace amounts of DNA. With these advancements, there is an increased probability of detecting trace levels of DNA from contamination. Studies which investigate the accumulation and transfer of DNA within forensic laboratories provide insight into the possible mechanisms which may result in the contamination of exhibits. To gain a greater understanding of the level of DNA transfer between exhibit packaging and forensic workspaces, the accumulation of DNA within an operational forensic exhibit storeroom was investigated. Samples were collected from previously cleaned forensic exhibit storeroom shelves at various time points over a 14-week period. To determine the source of accumulating DNA, profiles generated from shelf samples were compared to the laboratory staff elimination database and the profiles generated from exhibits stored on each of the shelves sampled over the course of the study. Additionally, all samples were compared using STRmix™ mixture-to-mixture profile analysis, to identify the presence of common non-staff DNA donors and DNA from exhibits stored on the shelves sampled. As sampling time intervals increased, there was a significant increase in DNA quantity (ng) and number of profile contributors. The shelf height was also observed to influence the number of profile contributors, with higher numbers of contributors being found on lower shelves. DNA profiles generated from the shelf samples were matched to DNA from forensic staff members who enter the storeroom and police employees, who do not enter the storeroom. There were three instances where a common DNA profile contributor was identified between a shelf sample and the profile generated from an exhibit.This study provides insight into whether current exhibit storage procedures are still adequate given the highly sensitive DNA profiling systems currently used.

The readout thickness versus the measured thickness for a range of screen film mammography and full-field digital mammography units.

PURPOSE: To establish a simple method to determine breast readout accuracy on mammography units. METHODS: A thickness measuring device (TMD) was used in conjunction with a breast phantom. This phantom had compression characteristics similar to human female breast tissue. The phantom was compressed, and the thickness was measured using TMD and mammography unit readout. Measurements were performed on a range of screen film mammography (SFM) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) units (8 units in total; 6 different models/manufacturers) for two different sized paddles and two different compression forces (60 and 100 N). RESULTS: The difference between machine readout and TMD for the breast area, when applying 100 N compression force, for nonflexible paddles was largest for GE Senographe DMR+ (24 cm × 30 cm paddle: +14.3%). For flexible paddles the largest difference occurred for Hologic Lorad Selenia (18 cm × 24 cm paddle: +26.0%). CONCLUSIONS: None of the units assessed were found to have perfect correlation between measured and readout thickness. TMD measures and thickness readouts were different for the duplicate units from two different models/manufacturers.

What's on the bag? The DNA composition of evidence bags pre- and post-exhibit examination.

Current forensic DNA profiling kits and techniques enable the detection of trace amounts of DNA. With advancements in kit sensitivity, there is an increased probability of detecting DNA from contamination. Research into DNA transfer within operational forensic laboratories provides insight into the possible mechanisms that may lead to exhibit contamination. To gain a greater understanding of the potential for evidence bags to act as DNA transfer vectors, the level of DNA accumulating on the exterior of evidence bags during the exhibit examination process was investigated. The exterior of 60 evidence bags were tapelifted before and after the examination of the exhibit inside of the bag resulting in 120 DNA profiles. These DNA profiles were compared to DNA profiles of staff working within the building and samples taken from the exhibit inside the bag. Common DNA profile contributors from each sample were also identified through STRmix™ mixture to mixture analysis. The average DNA quantity and number of profile contributors was higher in samples taken from the bag before exhibit examination than after examination. Fifty six percent of all samples taken identified a match between DNA recovered from the evidence bag and at least one staff member. On 11 bags, a common contributor was identified between the exhibit in the bag and the exhibit package post-examination. In one instance a DNA profile, matching that of a donor, on the exhibit bag before examination was also detected on a sample taken from the exhibit, raising the possibility of outer bag-to-exhibit DNA contamination. This study demonstrates that operational forensic laboratories must consider exhibit packages as a potential source of DNA contamination and evaluate their exhibit handling and storage procedures accordingly.

Examining the effectiveness of supplementary imaging modalities for breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To systematically review studies on the effectiveness of supplementary imaging for breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search of peer-reviewed publications in English (January 2000 to March 2021) was carried out. Eight databases were used to retrieve the studies: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Clinical Answers, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Methodology Register, PubMed, and Web of Science. Two radiographers and an academic independently reviewed the articles to determine if the studies met inclusion criteria. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Summary estimates of diagnostic accuracy were obtained by using proportion and diagnostic metanalysis. RESULTS: From 3764 studies that underwent title and abstract screening, 221 studies underwent full-text screening. Of these 42 were included in the qualitative and quantitative synthesis. Results for sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, cancer detection rates, recall and biopsy rates in women with dense breasts undergoing supplementary imaging were reported. Studies included in this review were heterogeneous, as was the proportion of women undergoing prevalence and incidence screening rounds. CONCLUSIONS: Supplementary screening among women with dense breasts who had recent negative mammograms can consistently identify additional cancers and lead to further recalls and biopsies.

Impact of Contralateral Breast Shielding on the Risk of Developing Radiation-induced Cancer from Full-field Digital Mammography Screening.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of contralateral breast shielding on the risk of developing radiation-induced cancer from four-view full-field digital mammography (FFDM) screening. METHODS: A poly methyl methacrylate-polyethylene breast phantom and adult ATOM dosimetry phantom were used to measure organ dose on four FFDM machines using craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique projections for each breast. A lead rubber shield of 0.25 mm equivalent lead thickness was used to protect the contralateral breast. Organs dose, effective dose, and effective risk were calculated. For effective risk estimations, the impact of the shield was considered for the routine screening views. RESULTS: The contralateral breast dose was reduced by more than 95%. For each FFDM machine, contralateral breast dose reduction in µGy were 35.20 reduced to 1.93, 41.40 reduced to 0.01, 22.85 reduced to 1.24, and 22.76 reduced to 1.66. Effective risk reduction was significant (P < .05). For all FFDM machines, a small reduction was identified in sternum bone marrow dose due to the use of contralateral breast shield. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study demonstrate the value of a contralateral breast shield. More research is required to determine whether such a shield has clinical utility.

Calculating Individual Lifetime Effective Risk from Initial Mean Glandular Dose Arising from the First Screening Mammogram.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to use the initial mean glandular dose (MGD) arising from the first screening mammogram to estimate the individual total screening lifetime effective risk. METHODS: Organ doses from full-field digital mammography (FFDM) screening exposures (craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique for each breast) were measured using a simulated approach, with average breast thickness and adult ATOM phantoms, on 16 FFDM machines. Doses were measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters accommodated inside the ATOM phantom; examined breast MGD was calculated. Total effective risk during a client's lifetime was calculated for 150 screening scenarios of different screening commencement ages and frequencies. For each scenario, a set of conversion factors were obtained to convert MGD values into total effective risk. RESULTS: For the 16 FFDM machines, MGD contributes approximately 98% of total effective risk. This contribution is approximately constant for different screening regimes of different screening commencement ages. MGD contribution remains constant, but the risk reduced because the radiosensitivity of all body tissues, including breast tissue, reduces with age. Three sets of conversion factors were obtained for three screening frequencies (annual, biennial, triennial). Three relationship graphs between screening commencement age and total effective risk, as percentages of MGD, were created. CONCLUSIONS: Graphical representation of total risk could be an easy way to illustrate the total effective risk during a client's lifetime. Screening frequency, commencement age, and MGD are good predictors for total effective risk, generating more understandable data for clients than MGD.

The impact of simulated motion blur on lesion detection performance in full-field digital mammography.

OBJECTIVE: Motion blur is a known phenomenon in full-field digital mammography, but the impact on lesion detection is unknown. This is the first study to investigate detection performance with varying magnitudes of simulated motion blur. METHODS: 7 observers (15 ± 5 years' reporting experience) evaluated 248 cases (62 containing malignant masses, 62 containing malignant microcalcifications and 124 normal cases) for 3 conditions: no blurring (0 mm) and 2 magnitudes of simulated blurring (0.7 and 1.5 mm). Abnormal cases were biopsy proven. Mathematical simulation was used to provide a pixel shift in order to simulate motion blur. A free-response observer study was conducted to compare lesion detection performance for the three conditions. The equally weighted jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic was used as the figure of merit. Test alpha was set at 0.05 to control probability of Type I error. RESULTS: The equally weighted jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis found a statistically significant difference in lesion detection performance for both masses [F(2,22) = 6.01, p = 0.0084] and microcalcifications [F(2,49) = 23.14, p < 0.0001]. The figures of merit reduced as the magnitude of simulated blurring increased. Statistical differences were found between some of the pairs investigated for the detection of masses (0.0 vs 0.7 and 0.0 vs 1.5 mm) and all pairs for microcalcifications (0.0 vs 0.7, 0.0 vs 1.5 and 0.7 vs 1.5 mm). No difference was detected between 0.7 and 1.5 mm for masses. CONCLUSION: The mathematical simulation of motion blur caused a statistically significant reduction in lesion detection performance. These false-negative decisions could have implications for clinical practice. Advances in knowledge: This research demonstrates for the first time that motion blur has a negative and statistically significant impact on lesion detection performance in digital mammography.

Mathematical modelling of radiation-induced cancer risk from breast screening by mammography.

OBJECTIVES: Establish a method to determine and convey lifetime radiation risk from FFDM screening. METHODS: Radiation risk from screening mammography was quantified using effective risk (number of radiation-induced cancer cases/million). For effective risk calculations, organ doses and examined breast MGD were used. Screening mammography was simulated by exposing a breast phantom for cranio-caudal and medio-lateral oblique for each breast using 16 FFDM machines. An ATOM phantom loaded with TLD dosimeters was positioned in contact with the breast phantom to simulate the client's body. Effective risk data were analysed using SPSS software to establish a regression model to predict the effective risk of any screening programme. Graphs were generated to extrapolate the effective risk of all screening programmes for a range of commencement ages and time intervals between screens. RESULTS: The most important parameters controlling clients' total effective risk within breast screening are the screening commencement age and number of screens (correlation coefficients were -0.865 and 0.714, respectively). Since the tissue radio-sensitivity reduces with age, the end age of screening does not result in noteworthy effect on total effective risk. CONCLUSIONS: The regression model can be used to predict the total effective risk for clients within breast screening but it cannot be used for exact assessment of total effective risk. Graphical representation of risk could be an easy way to represent risk in a fashion which might be helpful to clients and clinicians.

Analysis of motion during the breast clamping phase of mammography.

OBJECTIVE: To measure paddle motion during the clamping phase of a breast phantom for a range of machine/paddle combinations. METHODS: A deformable breast phantom was used to simulate a female breast. 12 mammography machines from three manufacturers with 22 flexible and 20 fixed paddles were evaluated. Vertical motion at the paddle was measured using two calibrated linear potentiometers. For each paddle, the motion in millimetres was recorded every 0.5 s for 40 s, while the phantom was compressed with 80 N. Independent t-tests were used to determine differences in paddle motion between flexible and fixed, small and large, GE Senographe Essential (General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI) and Hologic Selenia Dimensions paddles (Hologic, Bedford, MA). Paddle tilt in the medial-lateral plane for each machine/paddle combination was calculated. RESULTS: All machine/paddle combinations demonstrate highest levels of motion during the first 10 s of the clamping phase. The least motion is 0.17 ± 0.05 mm/10 s (n = 20) and the most motion is 0.51 ± 0.15 mm/10 s (n = 80). There is a statistical difference in paddle motion between fixed and flexible (p < 0.001), GE Senographe Essential and Hologic Selenia Dimensions paddles (p < 0.001). Paddle tilt in the medial-lateral plane is independent of time and varied from 0.04 ° to 0.69 °. CONCLUSION: All machine/paddle combinations exhibited motion and tilting, and the extent varied with machine and paddle sizes and types. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This research suggests that image blurring will likely be clinically insignificant 4 s or more after the clamping phase commences.

A mammography image set for research purposes using BI-RADS density classification.

PURPOSE: Breast density categorization consistency is important when performing research, and minimization of interoperator and intraoperator variability is essential. This research aimed to validate a set of mammography images for visual breast density estimation to achieve consistency in future research projects and to determine observer performance. METHODS: Using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) as the visual grading scale, 50 mammography images were scored for density grade by 8 observers. RESULTS: Six of 8 observers achieved near-complete intraobserver agreement (kappa > 0.81). Strong agreement among observers (kappa = 0.61-0.8) was found in 10 of 28 paired observation episodes on the first iteration and 12 of 28 on the second. No observers demonstrated a delta variance above 1. Fleiss' kappa was used to evaluate concordance among all observers on the first and second iterations (first iteration, 0.64; second iteration, 0.56). DISCUSSION: This research illustrates the difficulties of comparing observer visual performance scores because differences can exist when studies are repeated by and among individuals. CONCLUSION: We confirmed that the 50 images were suitable for research purposes. Some variability existed among observers; however, overall density classification agreement was strong. Future research should include repeating this study with digitally acquired images.