RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the lymphatic-specific morbidity (specifically, lower extremity lymphedema) associated with laparoscopic management of early-stage endometrial cancer using the sentinel lymph node (SLN) algorithm by type of actual nodal assessment. METHODS: An ambispective study was conducted on consecutive patients surgically treated for apparent early-stage endometrial cancer who underwent laparoscopic staging according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network SLN algorithm at a single institution from January 2020 to August 2023. Data on patient characteristics, surgical details, and post-operative complications were collected. Lymphedema screening was performed using a validated questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 239 patients were analyzed, with a questionnaire response rate of 85.4%. The study population was grouped based on actual surgical staging: hysterectomy+SLN (54.8%), hysterectomy+systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy (27.2%), and hysterectomy only (18%). The prevalence of lymphedema was significantly lower in the hysterectomy+SLN group compared with the hysterectomy+systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy group (21.4% vs 44.6%, p=0.003). Multivariable analysis showed a threefold increase in the risk of lymphedema for the hysterectomy+systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy group compared with the hysterectomy+SLN group: OR 3.11 (95% CI 1.47 to 6.58). No significant associations were found between lymphedema and other patient or tumor characteristics. CONCLUSION: In the setting of a laparoscopic approach for early-stage endometrial cancer surgery, SLN mapping is associated with a significant reduction in lymphatic complications compared with a systematic lymph node dissection. Our findings provide additional evidence endorsing the adoption of SLN mapping during minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer. This technique ensures comparable diagnostic accuracy and also minimizes complications.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: For a long time, surgery of insular gliomas was considered at high risk for postoperative cognitive deficits, but recent studies highlighted the feasibility of the surgical approach. The aims of our study were to investigate the presence of language impairment before and after surgery and the relationship between language impairment and tumor volume preoperatively and extent of resection (EOR) 3 months after surgery. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with insular gliomas underwent an extensive language assessment before and few days after surgery, and after 3 months. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IOM) and brain mapping with direct electrical stimulation (DES) were used in all the cases; 8 patients underwent awake craniotomy. Statistical analysis was performed on the language tests administered. RESULTS: Patients with pure left insular lesion showed language impairment before and after surgery. Overall, patients with a left lesion showed a drop of performance after surgery followed by a partial recovery. Moreover, when the tumor involved the insula and adjacent networks, we observed a more severe deficit. No correlations were found between tumor volume, EOR, and language impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Left insular lobe is an important hub in language networks; its involvement determines pre- and postsurgical deficits, together with the involvement of white matter connections. Tumor volume and EOR are not risk factors per se directly related to language functioning. Surgery of insular gliomas is possible with a pre- and intraoperative extensive study of the patient with IOM and awake surgery, and encouraged by the trend of cognitive recovery highlighted.