Biomarkers - Part 1.

BACKGROUND: The CSF amyloid to tau ratio can isolate cognitively healthy participants into normal Aß42/tau (CH-NAT) or a pathological Aß42/tau (CH-PAT) with a low or high risk of cognitive decline, respectively. We aim to determine if plasma Aß42/tau ratios can differentiate CH-NAT from CH-PAT participants. METHOD: Study participants (> 65 years of age) were recruited, and demographic, neurological, and neuropsychological data were obtained in an ongoing HMRI Brain Aging study. Overnight fasting plasma and CSF were collected within a month of examination, and the levels of Aß38, Aß40, Aß42 (MSD 6E10 kit), and total tau were quantified using the MSD electrochemiluminescence platform. Differences in fluid biomarker levels and the plasma ratios (n = 55) and CSF ratios (Aß42/Aß40, n = 41, Aß42/tau, n = 55) were determined using nonparametric student t-test and correlations using a Spearman test. RESULT: Aß40 and Aß42 levels were higher (15-18-fold, and 10-14-fold, respectively), while tau levels are 8-13-fold higher in CSF than in plasma. Plasma and CSF Aß40 were not distinct in CH-NAT compared with CH-PAT. In contrast, Aß42 levels were 30.9% lower in CH-PAT (16.3 ± 18.3 pg/ml) compared with CH-NAT plasma (23.6 ± 26.4 pg/mL) (p < 0.05). CSF Aß42 levels in CH-PAT (171.6 ± 124.6 pg/mL) were lower by 47.6% compared with CH-NAT (327.6 ± 182.6 pg/ml) (p < 0.0001). The Aß42/Aß40 ratio was significantly lower in both plasma and CSF (Table 1A). Similarly, the Aß42/tau ratio was significantly lower in plasma and CSF (Table 1B). Individually, plasma levels of Aß42 and tau did not correlate with CSF levels. However, the ratio of Aß42 to total tau in plasma significantly correlated with the CSF ratios (Spearman r = 0.36, p = 0.0071). Finally, CSF Aß42/Aß40 ratio correlated with Aß42/tau ratio for all samples, CH (n = 100) and MCI (n = 35) (Fig. 1). CONCLUSION: While not as robust as CSF ratios, plasma Aß42/Aß40 and Aß42/tau ratios can isolate cognitively healthy participants with lower risk from participants with a higher risk of cognitive decline. Thus, plasma represents a less invasive medium for the biomarker classification of aging participants.

Randomized trial of lacosamide versus fosphenytoin for nonconvulsive seizures.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal treatment of nonconvulsive seizures in critically ill patients is uncertain. We evaluated the comparative effectiveness of the antiseizure drugs lacosamide (LCM) and fosphenytoin (fPHT) in this population. METHODS: The TRENdS (Treatment of Recurrent Electrographic Nonconvulsive Seizures) study was a noninferiority, prospective, multicenter, randomized treatment trial of patients diagnosed with nonconvulsive seizures (NCSs) by continuous electroencephalography (cEEG). Treatment was randomized to intravenous (IV) LCM 400mg or IV fPHT 20mg phenytoin equivalents/kg. The primary endpoint was absence of electrographic seizures for 24 hours as determined by 1 blinded EEG reviewer. The frequency with which NCS control was achieved in each arm was compared, and the 90% confidence interval (CI) was determined. Noninferiority of LCM to fPHT was to be concluded if the lower bound of the CI for relative risk was >0.8. RESULTS: Seventy-four subjects were enrolled (37 LCM, 37 fPHT) between August 21, 2012 and December 20, 2013. The mean age was 63.6 years; 38 were women. Seizures were controlled in 19 of 30 (63.3%) subjects in the LCM arm and 16 of 32 (50%) subjects in the fPHT arm. LCM was noninferior to fPHT (p = 0.02), with a risk ratio of 1.27 (90% CI = 0.88-1.83). Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar in both arms, occurring in 9 of 35 (25.7%) LCM and 9 of 37 (24.3%) fPHT subjects (p = 1.0). INTERPRETATION: LCM was noninferior to fPHT in controlling NCS, and TEAEs were comparable. LCM can be considered an alternative to fPHT in the treatment of NCSs detected on cEEG. Ann Neurol 2018;83:1174-1185.