Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Asunto principal
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 23(10): e341-e347, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37517875

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Most patients with multiple myeloma (MM) relapse or become refractory, resulting in high health care costs. However, real-world data regarding the utilization of health care services among the relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) population are scarce. METHODS: Observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study of the utilization of health care services by RRMM patients who had relapsed within the previous 6 months in Spain in a real-world setting. Data were collected from the clinical records and during a single structured interview and included sociodemographic and clinical characteristics at last relapse, the treatment and health care services nature, and were presented using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The 276 patients enrolled (53.3% males), with a mean [SD] age of 67.4 [10.5] years, had experienced their most recent relapse a median (IQR) of 1.61 (0.74, 3.14) months before entering the study. Patients lived a median (IQR) of 9.0 (3.0, 30.0) km away from the hospital and visited the hospital a median (IQR) of 3.0 (2.0, 5.0) times/month to receive treatment for their most recent relapse. They spent a median (IQR) of 15.84 (5.0, 42.0) euros/month on transportation. Since their most recent relapse, most patients had been admitted to a hospital unit (n = 155, 56.2%), had required ≥1 diagnostic tests (n = 227, 82.2%), and had consulted the hematologist (n = 270, 97.8%) a mean (SD) of 5.5 (5.4) times. In half of the visits, patients were accompanied by an actively working caregiver (n = 112, 54.4%). CONCLUSIONS: RRMM treatments are associated with a high utilization of health care services and pose a significant burden for patients and caregivers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03188536.


Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Masculino , Humanos , Niño , Femenino , Mieloma Múltiple/epidemiología , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , España/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios , Salud Global , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico
2.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 22(4): e241-e249, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34774462

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) should be established based on multiple factors, including previous treatment and the sociodemographic/clinical characteristics of the patients. However, patients enrolled in randomized-controlled trials often do not mirror the scenario encountered in real-world practice, thus challenging therapeutic decisions in day-to-day practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study aimed to investigate the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients with RRMM treated in routine practice in Spain and their influence on treatment regimens. RESULTS: The study included 276 RRMM patients (median age 69 years; no gender predominance). Seventy-four percent of patients had CRAB features at the time of study inclusion, 65.9% bone lesions, 28.7% high-risk cytogenetics, and 27.0% were at ISS stage III; 65.1% were retired and lived in urban areas (75.7%) with their relatives (85.8%); 28.7% had some dependence degree. Patients had experienced their last relapse in a median of 1.61 months before enrollment and had received a median of 2 treatment lines (range 1-10). Second-and third-line therapies were mostly based on immunomodulatory drugs, followed by proteasome inhibitors (PIs), whereas monoclonal antibodies prevailed in later treatment lines. The presence of extramedullary plasmacytomas, the absence of osteopenia, and being in the second or third treatment line (vs. later lines) significantly increased the odds of receiving PIs. CONCLUSIONS: RRMM treatment in the real-world setting is highly heterogeneous and is primarily influenced by the number of previous lines. The consideration of patients' clinical and sociodemographic characteristics may support clinicians in making therapeutic decisions.


Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , España/epidemiología
3.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(1)2022 Dec 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36612152

RESUMEN

Although lenalidomide-based combinations, such as lenalidomide plus a proteasome inhibitor or an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, improve the overall response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), there is a tendency to use these regimens as a frontline treatment. This strategy has led to the development of refractoriness early in the disease course, usually after the patient's first treatment. Since lenalidomide-free regimens have so far shown limited efficacy in lenalidomide-refractory patients, there is an unmet need for other treatment options. In this review, we discuss the therapeutic options available to treat the general population of lenalidomide-refractory patients (mono, double and triple refractory) and the subpopulation of patients with other high-risk features such as renal failure, extramedullary disease, and high-risk cytogenetics. Moreover, new promising individual therapies and the possible impact of immunotherapy in RRMM patients are debated.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA