RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This research aimed to develop best-practice recommendations for identifying the "standard of care" (SoC) and integrate it when it is the comparator in diagnostic economic models (SoC comparator). METHODS: A multi-methods approach comprising 2 pragmatic literature reviews and 9 expert interviews was used. Experts rated their agreement with draft recommendations based on the authors' analysis of the reviews. These were refined iteratively to produce final recommendations. RESULTS: Fourteen best-practice recommendations are provided. Care pathway mapping (using quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods approaches) should be used for identifying the SoC comparator. Guidelines analysis can be integrated with expert opinion to identify pathway variability and discrepancies from clinical practice. For integrating the SoC comparator into the model, recommendations around structure, input sourcing, data aggregation and reporting, input uncertainty, and model variability are presented. For example, modelers should consider that the reference standard is not synonymous with the SoC, and the SoC may not be the only comparator. The comparator limitations should be discussed with clinical experts, but elicitation of its diagnostic accuracy is not recommended. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis is recommended when evaluating the overall input uncertainty, and deterministic sensitivity analysis is useful when there is high model uncertainty or SoC variability. Consensus could not be reached for some topics (eg, the role of real-world data, model averaging, and alternative model structures), but the reported discussions provide points for consideration. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first guidance to support modelers when identifying and operationalizing the SoC comparator in diagnostic cost-effectiveness models.
Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Modelos Económicos , Nivel de Atención , Humanos , Entrevistas como AsuntoRESUMEN
Real-world data (RWD) and the derivations of these data into real-world evidence (RWE) are rapidly expanding from informing healthcare decisions at the patient and health system level to influencing major health policy decisions, including regulatory approvals and coverage. Recent examples include the approval of palbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy for male breast cancer and the inclusion of RWE in the label of paliperidone palmitate for schizophrenia. This interest has created an urgency to develop processes that promote trust in the evidence-generation process. Key stakeholders and decision-makers include patients and their healthcare providers; learning health systems; health technology assessment bodies and payers; pharmacoepidemiologists and other clinical reseachers, and policy makers interested in bioethical and regulatory issues. A key to optimal uptake of RWE is transparency of the research process to enable decision-makers to evaluate the quality of the methods used and the applicability of the evidence that results from the RWE studies. Registration of RWE studies-particularly for hypothesis evaluating treatment effectiveness (HETE) studies-has been proposed to improve transparency, trust, and research replicability. Although registration would not guarantee better RWE studies would be conducted, it would encourage the prospective disclosure of study plans, timing, and rationale for modifications. A joint task force of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) and the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE) recommended that investigators preregister their RWE studies and post their study protocols in a publicly available forum before starting studies to reduce publication bias and improve the transparency of research methods. Recognizing that published recommendations alone are insufficient, especially without accessible registration options and with no incentives, a group of experts gathered on February 25 and 26, 2019, in National Harbor, Maryland, to explore the structural and practical challenges to the successful implementation of the recommendations of the ISPOR/ISPE task force for preregistration. This positioning article describes a plan for making registration of HETE RWE studies routine. The plan includes specifying the rationale for registering HETE RWE studies, the studies that should be registered, where and when these studies should be registered, how and when analytic deviations from protocols should be reported, how and when to publish results, and incentives to encourage registration. Table 1 summarizes the rationale, goals, and potential solutions that increase transparency, in addition to unique concerns about secondary data studies. Definitions of terms used throughout this report are provided in Table 2.
Asunto(s)
Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Investigación/tendencias , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Pragmáticos como Asunto , Desarrollo de Programa , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
Real-world data (RWD) and the derivations of these data into real-world evidence (RWE) are rapidly expanding from informing healthcare decisions at the patient and health system level to influencing major health policy decisions, including regulatory approvals and coverage. Recent examples include the approval of palbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy for male breast cancer and the inclusion of RWE in the label of paliperidone palmitate for schizophrenia. This interest has created an urgency to develop processes that promote trust in the evidence-generation process. Key stakeholders and decision-makers include patients and their healthcare providers; learning health systems; health technology assessment bodies and payers; pharmacoepidemiologists and other clinical reseachers, and policy makers interested in bioethical and regulatory issues. A key to optimal uptake of RWE is transparency of the research process to enable decision-makers to evaluate the quality of the methods used and the applicability of the evidence that results from the RWE studies. Registration of RWE studies-particularly for hypothesis evaluating treatment effectiveness (HETE) studies-has been proposed to improve transparency, trust, and research replicability. Although registration would not guarantee better RWE studies would be conducted, it would encourage the prospective disclosure of study plans, timing, and rationale for modifications. A joint task force of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) and the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE) recommended that investigators preregister their RWE studies and post their study protocols in a publicly available forum before starting studies to reduce publication bias and improve the transparency of research methods. Recognizing that published recommendations alone are insufficient, especially without accessible registration options and with no incentives, a group of experts gathered on February 25 and 26, 2019, in National Harbor, Maryland, to explore the structural and practical challenges to the successful implementation of the recommendations of the ISPOR/ISPE task force for preregistration. This positioning article describes a plan for making registration of HETE RWE studies routine. The plan includes specifying the rationale for registering HETE RWE studies, the studies that should be registered, where and when these studies should be registered, how and when analytic deviations from protocols should be reported, how and when to publish results, and incentives to encourage registration. Table 1 summarizes the rationale, goals, and potential solutions that increase transparency, in addition to unique concerns about secondary data studies. Definitions of terms used throughout this report are provided in Table 2.
Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Confianza , Economía Farmacéutica , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Proyectos de InvestigaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prenatal exposure to influenza or fever is associated with risk of congenital malformations. Oseltamivir is used to treat influenza and to provide post-exposure prophylaxis. We examined the association between oseltamivir use during pregnancy and birth outcomes. METHODS: This was a nationwide registry-based prevalence study with individual level data linkage, in a setting of universal health care access. We included all recorded pregnancies in Denmark in 2002-2013, and used data from population registries to examine associations between dispensings for oseltamivir during pregnancy (first trimester, second/third trimester, none) and congenital malformations, foetal death, preterm birth, foetal growth, and low 5-min Apgar score. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using propensity score matching. RESULTS: The study included 946,176 pregnancies. Of these, 449 had first-trimester exposure and 1449 had second/third-trimester exposure to oseltamivir. Adjusted ORs following first-trimester exposure were 0.94 (95% CI 0.49 to 1.83) for any major congenital malformation and 1.75 (95% CI 0.51 to 5.98) for congenital heart defects, based on 7 exposed cases. The association with congenital heart defects was present for etiologically implausible exposure periods and for known safe exposures. There was no evidence of an association between prenatal exposure to oseltamivir and any of the other birth outcomes assessed. CONCLUSIONS: The study does not provide evidence of risk associated with oseltamivir treatment additional to that associated with influenza infection.
Asunto(s)
Gripe Humana/tratamiento farmacológico , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Oseltamivir/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Adulto , Anomalías Congénitas/epidemiología , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/epidemiología , Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/inducido químicamente , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Symptomatic relief is an important treatment goal for patients with COPD. To date, no diary for evaluating respiratory symptoms in clinical trials has been developed and scientifically-validated according to FDA and EMA guidelines. The EXACT - Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS) scale is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure designed to address this need. The E-RS utilizes 11 respiratory symptom items from the existing and validated 14-item EXACT, which measures symptoms of exacerbation. The E-RS total score quantifies respiratory symptom severity, and 3 domains assess breathlessness, cough and sputum, and chest symptoms. METHODS: This study examined the performance of the E-RS in each of 3 controlled trials with common and unique validation variables: one 6-month (N = 235, US) and two 3-month (N = 749; N = 597; international). Subjects completed the E-RS as part of a daily eDiary. Tests of reliability, validity, and responsiveness were conducted in each dataset. RESULTS: In each study, RS-Total score was internally consistent (Cronbach α) (0.88, 0.92, 0.92) and reproducible (intra-class correlation) in stable patients (2 days apart: 0.91; 7 days apart: 0.71, 0.74). RS-Total scores correlated significantly with the following criterion variables (Spearman's rho; p < 0.01, all comparisons listed here): FEV1% predicted (-0.19, -0.14, -0.15); St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) (0.65, 0.52, 0.51); Breathlessness, Cough, and Sputum Scale (BCSS) (0.89, 0.89); modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale (mMRC) (0.40); rescue medication use (0.43, 0.42); Functional Performance Inventory Short-Form (FPI-SF) (0.43); 6-minute walk distance (6-MWT) (-0.30, -0.14) and incremental shuttle walk (ISWT) (-0.18) tests. Correlations between these variables and RS-Breathlessness, RS-Cough and Sputum, RS-Chest Symptoms scores supported subscale validity. RS-Total, RS-Breathlessness, and RS-Chest Symptoms differentiated mMRC levels of breathlessness severity (p < 0.0001). RS-Total and domain scores differentiated subjects with no rescue medication use and 3 or more puffs (p < 0.0001). Sensitivity to changes in health status (SGRQ), symptoms (BCSS), and exercise capacity (6MWT, ISWT) were also shown and responder definitions using criterion- and distribution-based methods are proposed. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest the E-RS is a reliable, valid, and responsive measure of respiratory symptoms of COPD suitable for use in natural history studies and clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: MPEX: NCT00739648 ; AZ1: NCT00949975 ; AZ 2: NCT01023516.
Asunto(s)
Pulmón/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Anciano , Tos/diagnóstico , Tos/etiología , Tos/fisiopatología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Método Doble Ciego , Disnea/diagnóstico , Disnea/etiología , Disnea/fisiopatología , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Tolerancia al Ejercicio , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/complicaciones , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Esputo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To develop preliminary good practice recommendations for synthesising and linking evidence of treatment effectiveness when modelling the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic tests. METHODS: We conducted a targeted review of guidance from key Health Technology Assessment (HTA) bodies to summarise current recommendations on synthesis and linkage of treatment effectiveness evidence within economic evaluations of diagnostic tests. We then focused on a specific case study, the cost-effectiveness of troponin for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction, and reviewed the approach taken to synthesise and link treatment effectiveness evidence in different modelling studies. RESULTS: The Australian and UK HTA bodies provided advice for synthesising and linking treatment effectiveness in diagnostic models, acknowledging that linking test results to treatment options and their outcomes is common. Across all reviewed models for the case study, uniform test-directed treatment decision making was assumed, i.e., all those who tested positive were treated. Treatment outcome data from a variety of sources, including expert opinion, were utilised for linked clinical outcomes. Preliminary good practice recommendations for data identification, integration and description are proposed. CONCLUSION: Modelling the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic tests poses unique challenges in linking evidence on test accuracy to treatment effectiveness data to understand how a test impacts patient outcomes and costs. Upfront consideration of how a test and its results will likely be incorporated into patient diagnostic pathways is key to exploring the optimal design of such models. We propose some preliminary good practice recommendations to improve the quality of cost-effectiveness evaluations of diagnostics tests going forward.
Asunto(s)
Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina , Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica , Humanos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , AustraliaRESUMEN
The aim of this study was to perform a 1-yr trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of tiotropium versus salmeterol followed by a 5-yr model-based CEA. The within-trial CEA, including 7,250 patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), was performed alongside the 1-yr international randomised controlled Prevention of Exacerbations with Tiotropium (POET)-COPD trial comparing tiotropium with salmeterol regarding the effect on exacerbations. Main end-points of the trial-based analysis were costs, number of exacerbations and exacerbation days. The model-based analysis was conducted to extrapolate results to 5 yrs and to calculate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). 1-yr costs per patient from the German statutory health insurance (SHI) perspective and the societal perspective were 126 (95% uncertainty interval (UI) 55-195) and 170 (95% UI 77-260) higher for tiotropium, respectively. The annual number of exacerbations was 0.064 (95% UI 0.010-0.118) lower for tiotropium, leading to a reduction in exacerbation-related costs of 87 (95% UI 19-157). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 1,961 per exacerbation avoided from the SHI perspective and 2,647 from the societal perspective. In the model-based analyses, the 5-yr costs per QALY were 3,488 from the SHI perspective and 8,141 from the societal perspective. Tiotropium reduced exacerbations and exacerbation-related costs, but increased total costs. Tiotropium can be considered cost-effective as the resulting cost-effectiveness ratios were below commonly accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds.
Asunto(s)
Albuterol/análogos & derivados , Broncodilatadores/economía , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/economía , Derivados de Escopolamina/economía , Anciano , Albuterol/economía , Teorema de Bayes , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Económicos , Probabilidad , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Xinafoato de Salmeterol , Derivados de Escopolamina/uso terapéutico , Bromuro de Tiotropio , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIMS: Clinical trials have shown that anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), e.g. warfarin, decreases the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF); however, increased bleeding risk is one of the safety concerns. The primary objective was to conduct a systematic review of the published literature, assessing the risk of major bleeding and mortality in patients with AF treated with VKAs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Online searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, and the Cochrane Library were performed to a pre-specified protocol from 1960 to March 2012 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and from January 1990 to March 2012 for observational studies. A total of 47 studies (16 RCTs and 31 observational studies) were included. Cumulative follow-up was 61,563 patient-years for RCTs and 484 241 patient-years for observational studies. The overall median incidence of major bleeding was 2.1 per 100 patient-years (range, 0.9-3.4 per 100 patient-years) for RCTs and 2.0 per 100 patient-years (range, 0.2-7.6 per 100 patient-years) for observational studies. With study year as a proxy for changing management patterns, some evidence of bleeding rates and/or their reporting increasing over time was noted. Mortality rates from observational studies were inadequately reported to allow comparison with those from RCT data. CONCLUSION: The median rate of major bleeding in observational studies and RCTs is similar. The larger heterogeneity in bleeding rates observed in a real-life setting could reflect a high variability in standard of care of patients on VKAs and/or methodological differences between observational studies and/or variability in data sources.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/mortalidad , Hemorragia/mortalidad , Tromboembolia/mortalidad , Tromboembolia/prevención & control , Vitamina K/antagonistas & inhibidores , Comorbilidad , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Incidencia , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous cost-effectiveness analyses analyzed warfarin for stroke prevention in randomized trial settings. Given the complexities of warfarin treatment, cost-effectiveness should be examined within a real-world setting. METHODS: Our model followed patients with atrial fibrillation at moderate to high risk of stroke through primary and recurrent ischemic stroke, hemorrhages--intracranial and extracranial, and the resulting disability. Four scenarios were examined: (1) all patients start on warfarin with perfect control, that is, international normalized ratio (INR) values always within range; (2) all patients start on warfarin with trial-like control, where INR can fall outside the recommended range; (3) all patients start on warfarin with real-world INR control; and (4) real-world prescription (and control) of warfarin, aspirin, or neither for warfarin-eligible patients. Reported warfarin discontinuation rates were used. Main outcomes were total number of events, quality adjusted life years, and costs in a US setting. RESULTS: The total number of primary and recurrent ischemic strokes in a 1,000-patient cohort (age 70 years, lifetime analysis) was 626, 832, 984, and 1,171 in scenarios 1 to 4, respectively. The corresponding mean quality adjusted life years per patient were 7.21, 6.92, 6.75, and 6.67 for scenarios 1 to 4, respectively. Costs per patient were $68,039, $77,764, $84,518, and $87,248 in scenarios 1 to 4, respectively. If "perfect" adherence to warfarin was assumed, except for discontinuations for clinical reasons, strokes would decrease to 503, 737, 909, and 1,120 in scenarios 1 to 4, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and cost outcomes are strongly dependent on the quality of anticoagulation and rates of warfarin discontinuation. Clinicians should work to improve both. Policy makers should use real-world INR control and warfarin discontinuation rates when assessing cost-effectiveness.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/economía , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Cardiopatías/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Trombosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Warfarina/economía , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Cardiopatías/etiología , Humanos , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Trombosis/etiología , Warfarina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Sexual distress is an important component of diagnostic criteria for sexual dysfunctions, but little is known about the factors associated with sexual distress in women with low sexual desire. AIM: To investigate the correlates of sexual distress in women with self-reported low sexual desire. METHODS: The Prevalence of Female Sexual Problems Associated with Distress and Determinants of Treatment Seeking study was a cross-sectional, nationally representative, mailed survey of U.S. adult women. There were 31,581 respondents (response rate 63.2%) to the 42-item questionnaire that measured sexual function, sexual distress, demographic, and health-related factors. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore the correlates of distress. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Low sexual desire was defined as a response of "never" or "rarely" to the question, "How often do you desire to engage in sexual activity?" Sexual distress was measured with the Female Sexual Distress Scale (range 0-48), with a score of 15 or higher indicating presence of distress. RESULTS: Of 10,429 women with low desire, 2,868 (27.5%) had sexual distress (mean age 48.6 years, 81% with a current partner). Women without distress were 10 years older on average, and 44% had a current partner. Having a partner was strongly related to distress (odds ratio 4.6, 95% confidence interval 4.1-5.2). Other correlates were age, race, current depression, anxiety, lower social functioning, hormonal medication use, urinary incontinence, and concurrent sexual problems (arousal or orgasm). Dissatisfaction with sex life was more common in women with low desire and distress (65%) than in those without distress (20%). CONCLUSIONS: Age has a curvilinear relationship with distress, and the strongest correlate of sexual distress was having a current partner. Sexual distress and dissatisfaction with sex life are strongly correlated. Distress is higher in women with low sexual desire in a partner relationship; further research on this factor is needed.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/etiología , Disfunciones Sexuales Psicológicas/psicología , Adulto , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción Personal , Prevalencia , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Disfunciones Sexuales Psicológicas/diagnóstico , Disfunciones Sexuales Psicológicas/epidemiología , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Few direct head-to-head comparisons have been conducted between drugs for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP). Approved or recommended drugs in this indication include duloxetine (DLX), pregabalin (PGB), gabapentin (GBP) and amitriptyline (AMT). We conducted an indirect meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and tolerability of DLX with PGB and GBP in DPNP, using placebo as a common comparator. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL databases and regulatory websites for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group or crossover clinical trials (RCTs) assessing DLX, PGB, GBP and AMT in DPNP. Study arms using approved dosages with assessments after 5-13 weeks were eligible. Efficacy criteria were: reduction in 24-hour pain severity (24 h PS) for all three drugs, and response rate (>or= 50% pain reduction) and Patient Global Impression of Improvement/Change (PGI-I/C) for DLX and PGB only. Tolerability criteria included: discontinuation, diarrhoea, dizziness, headache, nausea and somnolence. Direct comparisons versus placebo were conducted with pooled fixed - and random-effects analyses on endpoints reported in at least two studies of each drug. Indirect comparisons were performed between DLX and each of PGB and GBP using Bayesian simulation. RESULTS: Three studies of DLX, six of PGB, two of GBP and none of AMT met the inclusion criteria. In random-effects and fixed-effects analyses of DLX, PGB and GBP, all were superior to placebo for all efficacy parameters, with some tolerability trade-offs. Indirect comparison of DLX with PGB found no differences in 24 h PS, but significant differences in PGI-I/C, favouring PGB, and in dizziness, favouring DLX were apparent. Comparing DLX and GBP, there were no statistically significant differences. CONCLUSION: From the few available studies suitable for indirect comparison, DLX shows comparable efficacy and tolerability to GBP and PGB in DPNP. Duloxetine provides an important treatment option for this disabling condition.
Asunto(s)
Aminas/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Ciclohexanocarboxílicos/uso terapéutico , Neuropatías Diabéticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Sistema Nervioso Periférico/fisiopatología , Tiofenos/uso terapéutico , Ácido gamma-Aminobutírico/análogos & derivados , Análisis de Varianza , Teorema de Bayes , Neuropatías Diabéticas/fisiopatología , Clorhidrato de Duloxetina , Femenino , Gabapentina , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Pregabalina , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ácido gamma-Aminobutírico/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Children with autism receive different types of non-drug treatments. We aimed to describe caregiver-reported pattern of care and its variability by geography and healthcare coverage in a US-wide sample of children aged 3-17 years. We recruited caregivers from the Simons Foundation Powering Autism Research for Knowledge (SPARK) cohort. Two online questionnaires (non-drug treatment, Autism Impact Measure) were completed in September/October 2017. Primary outcome measures were caregiver-reported types and intensities of treatments (behavioral, developmental/relationship, speech and language (SLT), occupational, psychological, "other"; parent/caregiver training) in the previous 12 months. Main explanatory variables were geography and type of healthcare coverage. We investigated associations between the type/intensity of treatments and geography (metropolitan/nonmetropolitan) or coverage (Medicaid vs privately insured by employer) using regression analysis. Caregivers (n = 5,122) were mainly mothers (92.1%) with mean (SD) age of 39.0 (7.3) years. Mean child age was 9.1 (3.9) years; mostly males (80.0%). Almost all children received at least one intervention (96.0%). Eighty percent received SLT or occupational therapy, while 52.0% received both. Behavioral therapy and SLT were significantly more frequent and more intense in metropolitan than in nonmetropolitan areas. No consistently significant associations were seen between healthcare coverage and frequency or intensity of interventions. At least one barrier such as "waiting list" and "no coverage" was reported by 44.8%. In conclusion, in children sampled from SPARK, we observed differences between metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas, while we did not find significant differences between those privately insured versus Medicaid. Autism Res 2019, 12: 517-526 © 2019 The Authors. Autism Research published by International Society for Autism Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. LAY SUMMARY: The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry recommends the use of multiple treatment modalities in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We wanted to understand what types of treatment children (aged 3-17 years) with ASD receive in the United States, how and where the treatments take place and for how long. We invited caregivers from Simons Foundation Powering Autism Research for Knowledge ("SPARK ," https://sparkforautism.org/) to complete the study questions online. Participants reported on utilization of conventional, non-drug treatments for ASD, including behavioral interventions, developmental/relationship interventions, speech and language therapy (SLT), occupational therapy, psychological therapy, and parent/caregiver training. People that completed the study (n = 5,122) were primarily mothers of the child with ASD (92%); most of the children were boys (80%). The ASD care for the child was mostly coordinating by the mother. Almost all children received at least some type of non-drug therapies (96%), most often SLT and/or occupational therapy, mainly provided in school. Behavioral therapy was most often received in public school in rural areas, while at home in urban areas. We saw less use of behavioral therapy and SLT in rural areas, but overall comparable use between children covered by Medicaid and those covered by private insurance. Almost half the caregivers reported at least one barrier to treatment, such as "waiting list" and "no coverage." More than half said that their child benefited "much" or "very much" from the therapies received. While overall non-drug treatment rates for children with ASD were high in the United States in our study, differences existed depending on where the family lives; not only regarding the type of therapy, but also where it takes place.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno del Espectro Autista/terapia , Terapia Conductista/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia Ocupacional/estadística & datos numéricos , Logopedia/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Terapia Conductista/métodos , Cuidadores , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Medicaid , Terapia Ocupacional/métodos , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Logopedia/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
The article Psychometric Validation of the Autism Impact Measure (AIM), written by Richard Houghton, Brigitta Monz, Kiely Law, Georg Loss, Stephanie Le Scouiller, Frank de Vries and Tom Willgoss was originally published electronically on the publisher's internet portal (currently SpringerLink) on 09 April 2019 without open access.With the author(s)' decision to opt for Open Choice the copyright of the article changed on May 2019 to © The Author(s) 2019 and the article is forthwith distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
RESUMEN
The Autism impact measure (AIM) is a caregiver-reported questionnaire assessing autism symptom frequency and impact in children, previously shown to have good test-retest reliability, convergent validity and structural validity. This study extended previous work by exploring the AIM's ability to discriminate between 'known-groups' of children, and estimating thresholds for clinically important responses. Data were collected online and electronically on computer and mobile devices; hence, it was also possible to confirm other psychometric properties of the AIM in this format. This study provides confirmatory and additional psychometric validation of the AIM. The AIM offers a valid, quick and inexpensive method for caregivers to report core symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) including communication deficits, difficulties with social interactions and repetitive behaviors.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno del Espectro Autista/diagnóstico , Psicometría , Cuidadores , Niño , Comunicación , Femenino , Humanos , Relaciones Interpersonales , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of self-reported sexual problems (any, desire, arousal, and orgasm), the prevalence of problems accompanied by personal distress, and to describe related correlates. METHODS: The 31,581 female respondents aged 18 years and older were from 50,002 households sampled from a national research panel representative of U.S. women. Correlates of each distressing sexual problem were evaluated using multiple logistic regression techniques. RESULTS: The age-adjusted point prevalence of any sexual problem was 43.1% and 22.2% for sexually related personal distress (defined as a score of at least 15 on Female Sexual Distress Scale). Any distressing sexual problem (defined as reporting both a sexual problem and sexually related personal distress, Female Sexual Distress Scale score of at least 15) occurred in 12.0% of respondents and was more common in women aged 45-64 years (14.8%) than in younger (10.8%) or older (8.9%) women. Correlates of distressing sexual problems included poor self-assessed health, low education level, depression, anxiety, thyroid conditions, and urinary incontinence. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of distressing sexual problems peaked in middle-aged women and was considerably lower than the prevalence of sexual problems. This underlines the importance of assessing the prevalence of sexually related personal distress in accurately estimating the prevalence of sexual problems that may require clinical intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Humor/epidemiología , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/epidemiología , Disfunciones Sexuales Psicológicas/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos del Humor/complicaciones , Prevalencia , Calidad de Vida , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/psicología , Disfunciones Sexuales Psicológicas/complicaciones , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Antidepressant prescribing patterns and factors influencing the choice of antidepressant for the treatment of depression were examined in the Factors Influencing Depression Endpoints Research (FINDER) study, a prospective, observational study in 12 European countries of 3468 adults about to start antidepressant medication for their first episode of depression or a new episode of recurrent depression. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) were the most commonly prescribed antidepressant (63.3% patients), followed by serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs, 13.6%), but there was considerable variation across countries. Notably, tricyclic and tetracyclic antidepressants (TCAs) were prescribed for 26.5% patients in Germany. The choice of the antidepressant prescribed was strongly influenced by the previous use of antidepressants, which was significantly associated with the prescription of a SSRI (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.54, 0.76), a SNRI (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.18, 1.88) or a combination of antidepressants (OR 2.78; 95% CI 1.96, 3.96). Physician factors (age, gender, speciality) and patient factors (severity of depression, age, education, smoking, number of current physical conditions and functional syndromes) were associated with initial antidepressant choice in some models. In conclusion, the prescribing of antidepressants varies by country, and the type of antidepressant chosen is influenced by physician- as well as patient-related factors.
Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Comparación Transcultural , Trastorno Depresivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Inhibidores de Captación Adrenérgica/uso terapéutico , Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Quimioterapia Combinada , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos de Investigación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Prevención Secundaria , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Factors influencing outcomes of depression in clinical practice, especially health-related quality of life (HRQoL), are poorly understood. The Factors Influencing Depression Endpoints Research (FINDER) study is a European prospective, observational study designed to estimate the HRQoL of adults with a clinically diagnosed depressive episode at baseline, and 3 and 6 months after commencing antidepressant medication. We report here the study design and baseline patient characteristics. HRQoL was assessed by the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D). Patient ratings on Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were also obtained. Results (n=3468) showed that SF-36 mental component summary (mean 22.2) was more than two SDs below general population norms (mean 50.0) and one SD below clinical depression norms (mean 34.8); the physical component summary (mean 46.1) was similar to general population (mean 50.0) and clinical depression norms (mean 45.0). Mean EQ-5D scores were also lower than general population norms. Mean HADS-Depression and -Anxiety subscores were 12.3 and 13.0, respectively. Fifty-six percent of patients reported an overall pain VAS score of at least 30mm and 70% of these patients had no physical explanation for their pain. Further investigation into factors associated with HRQoL in depression after treatment initiation is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Comparación Transcultural , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Estado de Salud , Dolor/diagnóstico , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Proyectos de Investigación , Adolescente , Adulto , Edad de Inicio , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/epidemiología , Dimensión del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
Current health care policies advocate patient participation in treatment decision making. Little evidence on possible differences between European women's preferences for involvement in this process exists. In this study we explore preferences for involvement in treatment decision making in 15 European countries in a sample of 9434 women seeking treatment for urinary incontinence in an outpatient setting. Their generally preferred role in treatment decisions was assessed using the Control Preferences Scale. Results show variations within and between countries in preferences for involvement in treatment decision making. The 'collaborative role' was the most preferred role in Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Sweden, Switzerland, the Netherlands and the UK. In Greece, Portugal and Spain the 'passive role' was most preferred. Over a third of women in Denmark, Finland and Norway preferred an 'active role'. Multinominal regression analyses found that, after adjusting for case mix and factors previously associated with role preferences, country membership was strongly associated with role preferences, with women living in Southern European countries preferring a more passive role. Such clear differences are of interest in the current health care environment where active patient participation is being encouraged. Greater efforts need to be made to establish whether patient preferences are genuine or merely a learned response influenced by cultural attitudes and traditions so that a balance can be struck between assisting women to play a more active role in the treatment decision-making process without disregarding some women's genuine preferences to play a more passive role.
Asunto(s)
Participación del Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Incontinencia Urinaria/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Recolección de Datos , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
Our objective was to assess the 5-year cost effectiveness of bronchodilator therapy with tiotropium, salmeterol or ipratropium for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System (NHS). A probabilistic Markov model was designed wherein patients moved between moderate, severe or very severe COPD and had the risk of exacerbation and death. Probabilities were derived from clinical trials. Spanish healthcare utilisation, costs and utilities were estimated for each COPD and exacerbation state. Outcomes were exacerbations, exacerbation-free months, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and cost(-effectiveness). The mean (SE) 5-year number of exacerbations was 3.50 (0.14) for tiotropium, 4.16 (0.40) for salmeterol and 4.71 (0.54) for ipratropium. The mean (SE) number of QALYs was 3.15 (0.08), 3.02 (0.15) and 3.00 (0.20), respectively. Mean (SE) 5-year costs were 6,424 euro (305 euro) for tiotropium, 5,869 euro (505 euro) for salmeterol, and 5,181 euro (682 euro) for ipratropium (2005 values). Ipratropium and tiotropium formed the cost-effectiveness frontier, with tiotropium being preferred when willingness to pay (WTP) exceeded 639 euro per exacerbation-free month and 8,157 euro per QALY. In Spain, tiotropium demonstrated the highest expected net benefit for ratios of the willingness to pay per QALY, well within accepted limits.
Asunto(s)
Albuterol/análogos & derivados , Broncodilatadores/economía , Ipratropio/economía , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Derivados de Escopolamina/economía , Albuterol/economía , Albuterol/uso terapéutico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Ipratropio/uso terapéutico , Cadenas de Markov , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Xinafoato de Salmeterol , Derivados de Escopolamina/uso terapéutico , España , Bromuro de TiotropioRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Regulatory agencies often request prospective, product-specific post-authorization pregnancy exposure registries to monitor safety during pregnancy, even though studies using existing health databases could also be employed. OBJECTIVES: Using multiple sclerosis (MS) as a case study, we evaluated various study designs and data sources previously used to study medication exposure in pregnancy. METHODS: We examined (1) strengths and limitations of study designs used for pregnancy safety studies in women exposed to MS-specific medications during pregnancy and (2) existing data sources used to conduct such studies in other disease areas. For the data sources identified, we contacted data custodians to determine the feasibility of assessing the risk of adverse outcomes in women with MS exposed to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) during pregnancy. RESULTS: Of 43 MS-specific studies identified, most of which were prospective registries, very few, regardless of design and study population, produced timely and robust results for spontaneous abortions and major congenital malformations, considering study duration, achievement of target enrollment numbers, inclusion of internal comparators, and publication of results. Building on the successful use of existing healthcare databases to investigate drug safety during pregnancy in other disease areas, we identified 13 data sources that could be used to study intravenous DMT exposures in women with MS. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective, treatment-specific registries have generally failed to deliver robust information. For this reason, other study approaches, in particular cohort studies using existing healthcare databases, should be considered for evaluating the safety of drug exposure in pregnancy, including in MS.