Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 62
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Environ Res ; 230: 114582, 2023 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36965799

RESUMEN

The current paradigm of carcinogenesis as a cellular evolutionary process driven by mutations of a few critical driver genes has immediate logical implications for the epidemiology of cancer. These include the impact of age on cancer risk, the role played by inherited tumor predisposition syndromes, and the interaction of genetics and environmental exposures on cancer risk. In this paper, we explore the following logical epidemiological consequences of carcinogenesis as a clonal process of mutation accumulation, with special emphasis on asbestos-related cancers, specifically malignant mesothelioma:1 All cancers, including mesothelioma, can and do occur spontaneously, i.e., in the absence of exposure to any environmental carcinogens. 2. Age is an important determinant of cancer risk, with or without exposure to environmental carcinogens. 3. Genetic tumor predisposition syndromes, such as the BAP1 syndrome, increase enormously the risk of cancer even in the absence of exposure to environmental carcinogens. We illustrate these concepts by applying a multistage clonal expansion model to U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry data for pleural and peritoneal malignant mesotheliomas in 1975-2018.


Asunto(s)
Amianto , Carcinógenos Ambientales , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Mesotelioma Maligno , Humanos , Mesotelioma Maligno/complicaciones , Incidencia , Carcinógenos Ambientales/toxicidad , Síndrome , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Amianto/toxicidad , Carcinogénesis/inducido químicamente , Carcinogénesis/genética
2.
Environ Res ; 230: 115607, 2023 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36965793

RESUMEN

This paper summarizes recent insights into causal biological mechanisms underlying the carcinogenicity of asbestos. It addresses their implications for the shapes of exposure-response curves and considers recent epidemiologic trends in malignant mesotheliomas (MMs) and lung fiber burden studies. Since the commercial amphiboles crocidolite and amosite pose the highest risk of MMs and contain high levels of iron, endogenous and exogenous pathways of iron injury and repair are discussed. Some practical implications of recent developments are that: (1) Asbestos-cancer exposure-response relationships should be expected to have non-zero background rates; (2) Evidence from inflammation biology and other sources suggests that there are exposure concentration thresholds below which exposures do not increase inflammasome-mediated inflammation or resulting inflammation-mediated cancer risks above background risk rates; and (3) The size of the suggested exposure concentration threshold depends on both the detailed time patterns of exposure on a time scale of hours to days and also on the composition of asbestos fibers in terms of their physiochemical properties. These conclusions are supported by complementary strands of evidence including biomathematical modeling, cell biology and biochemistry of asbestos-cell interactions in vitro and in vivo, lung fiber burden analyses and epidemiology showing trends in human exposures and MM rates.


Asunto(s)
Amianto , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Mesotelioma , Humanos , Amianto/toxicidad , Mesotelioma/inducido químicamente , Mesotelioma/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Pulmón/patología , Asbestos Anfíboles/toxicidad , Inflamación/metabolismo
3.
Crit Rev Toxicol ; 50(3): 189-200, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32162564

RESUMEN

The proportional hazards (PH) model is commonly used in epidemiology despite the stringent assumption of proportionality of hazards over time. We previously showed, using detailed simulation data, that the impact of a modest risk factor cannot be estimated reliably using the PH model in the presence of confounding by a strong, time-dependent risk factor. Here, we examine the same and related issues using a real dataset. Among 97,303 women in the prospective Nurses' Health Study cohort from 1994 through 2010, we used PH regression to investigate how effect estimates for cigarette smoking are affected by increasingly detailed specification of time-dependent exposure characteristics. We also examined how effect estimates for fine particulate matter (PM2.5), a modest risk factor, are affected by finer control for time-dependent confounding by smoking. The objective of this analysis is not to present a credible estimate of the impact of PM2.5 on lung cancer risk, but to show that estimates based on the PH model are inherently unreliable. The best-fitting model for cigarette smoking and lung cancer included pack-years, duration, time since cessation, and an age-by-pack-years interaction, indicating that the hazard ratio (HR) for pack-years was significantly modified by age. In the fully adjusted best-fitting model for smoking including pack-years, the HR per 10-µg/m3 increase in PM2.5 was 1.06 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.90, 1.25); the HR for PM2.5 in the full cohort ranged between 1.02 and 1.10 in models with other smoking adjustments, indicating a residual confounding effect of smoking. The HR for PM2.5 was statistically significant only among former smokers when adjusting for smoking pack-years (HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.00, 1.82 in the best-fitting smoking model), but not in models adjusting for smoking duration and average packs (pack-years divided by duration). The association between cumulative smoking and lung cancer is modified by age, and improved model fit is obtained by including multiple time-varying components of smoking history. The association with PM2.5 is residually confounded by smoking and modified by smoking status. These findings underscore limitations of the PH model and emphasize the advantages of directly estimating hazard functions to characterize time-varying exposure and risk. The hazard function, not the relative hazard, is the fundamental measure of risk in a population. As a consequence, the use of time-dependent PH models does not address crucial issues introduced by temporal factors in epidemiological data.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire/estadística & datos numéricos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Fumar/epidemiología , Adulto , Humanos , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Am J Epidemiol ; 187(6): 1210-1219, 2018 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29522073

RESUMEN

The Diesel Exhaust in Miners Study (DEMS) (United States, 1947-1997) reported positive associations between diesel engine exhaust exposure, estimated as respirable elemental carbon (REC), and lung cancer mortality. This reanalysis of the DEMS cohort used an alternative estimate of REC exposure incorporating historical data on diesel equipment, engine horsepower, ventilation rates, and declines in particulate matter emissions per horsepower. Associations with cumulative REC and average REC intensity using the alternative REC estimate and other exposure estimates were generally attenuated compared with original DEMS REC estimates. Most findings were statistically nonsignificant; control for radon exposure substantially weakened associations with the original and alternative REC estimates. No association with original or alternative REC estimates was detected among miners who worked exclusively underground. Positive associations were detected among limestone workers, whereas no association with REC or radon was found among workers in the other 7 mines. The differences in results based on alternative exposure estimates, control for radon, and stratification by worker location or mine type highlight areas of uncertainty in the DEMS data.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/análisis , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Enfermedades Profesionales/mortalidad , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Radón/análisis , Emisiones de Vehículos/análisis , Adulto , Carbono/análisis , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Masculino , Minería , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
5.
Risk Anal ; 38(4): 777-794, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29168991

RESUMEN

The basic assumptions of the Cox proportional hazards regression model are rarely questioned. This study addresses whether hazard ratio, i.e., relative risk (RR), estimates using the Cox model are biased when these assumptions are violated. We investigated also the dependence of RR estimates on temporal exposure characteristics, and how inadequate control for a strong, time-dependent confounder affects RRs for a modest, correlated risk factor. In a realistic cohort of 500,000 adults constructed using the National Cancer Institute Smoking History Generator, we used the Cox model with increasing control of smoking to examine the impact on RRs for smoking and a correlated covariate X. The smoking-associated RR was strongly modified by age. Pack-years of smoking did not sufficiently control for its effects; simultaneous control for effect modification by age and time-dependent cumulative exposure, exposure duration, and time since cessation improved model fit. Even then, residual confounding was evident in RR estimates for covariate X, for which spurious RRs ranged from 0.980 to 1.017 per unit increase. Use of the Cox model to control for a time-dependent strong risk factor yields unreliable RR estimates unless detailed, time-varying information is incorporated in analyses. Notwithstanding, residual confounding may bias estimated RRs for a modest risk factor.


Asunto(s)
Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Regresión , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar , Factores de Tiempo
6.
Risk Anal ; 35(5): 766-9, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25676287

RESUMEN

Inappropriate measures of exposure, including inadequate consideration of latency in the analysis of chronic effects of air pollution, may lead to overestimation of the impact of air pollution on health effects. A relatively simple way to check the plausibility of results on chronic effects of air pollution would be to report in parallel the smoking-associated risks.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Humanos
7.
Risk Anal ; 35(4): 676-700, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25857246

RESUMEN

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in 2012 upgraded its hazard characterization of diesel engine exhaust (DEE) to "carcinogenic to humans." The Diesel Exhaust in Miners Study (DEMS) cohort and nested case-control studies of lung cancer mortality in eight U.S. nonmetal mines were influential in IARC's determination. We conducted a reanalysis of the DEMS case-control data to evaluate its suitability for quantitative risk assessment (QRA). Our reanalysis used conditional logistic regression and adjusted for cigarette smoking in a manner similar to the original DEMS analysis. However, we included additional estimates of DEE exposure and adjustment for radon exposure. In addition to applying three DEE exposure estimates developed by DEMS, we applied six alternative estimates. Without adjusting for radon, our results were similar to those in the original DEMS analysis: all but one of the nine DEE exposure estimates showed evidence of an association between DEE exposure and lung cancer mortality, with trend slopes differing only by about a factor of two. When exposure to radon was adjusted, the evidence for a DEE effect was greatly diminished, but was still present in some analyses that utilized the three original DEMS DEE exposure estimates. A DEE effect was not observed when the six alternative DEE exposure estimates were utilized and radon was adjusted. No consistent evidence of a DEE effect was found among miners who worked only underground. This article highlights some issues that should be addressed in any use of the DEMS data in developing a QRA for DEE.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/inducido químicamente , Emisiones de Vehículos/toxicidad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo , Estados Unidos
8.
Risk Anal ; 35(4): 663-75, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25683254

RESUMEN

To develop a quantitative exposure-response relationship between concentrations and durations of inhaled diesel engine exhaust (DEE) and increases in lung cancer risks, we examined the role of temporal factors in modifying the estimated effects of exposure to DEE on lung cancer mortality and characterized risk by mine type in the Diesel Exhaust in Miners Study (DEMS) cohort, which followed 12,315 workers through December 1997. We analyzed the data using parametric functions based on concepts of multistage carcinogenesis to directly estimate the hazard functions associated with estimated exposure to a surrogate marker of DEE, respirable elemental carbon (REC). The REC-associated risk of lung cancer mortality in DEMS is driven by increased risk in only one of four mine types (limestone), with statistically significant heterogeneity by mine type and no significant exposure-response relationship after removal of the limestone mine workers. Temporal factors, such as duration of exposure, play an important role in determining the risk of lung cancer mortality following exposure to REC, and the relative risk declines after exposure to REC stops. There is evidence of effect modification of risk by attained age. The modifying impact of temporal factors and effect modification by age should be addressed in any quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of DEE. Until there is a better understanding of why the risk appears to be confined to a single mine type, data from DEMS cannot reliably be used for QRA.


Asunto(s)
Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Emisiones de Vehículos/toxicidad , Carcinógenos/toxicidad , Humanos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
11.
Cancer Causes Control ; 25(1): 59-72, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24293001

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Controversy persists over whether cancer risk is increased in communities surrounding oil fields, especially in the Oriente region of Ecuador. This ecologic study uses quantitative exposure data, updated mortality data, and improved statistical methods to study the impact of oil exploration and production activities on cancer mortality rates in the Oriente. METHODS: Cancer mortality rates in the Oriente in 1990 through 2010 were compared between seven cantons with active oil exploration and production as of 1990 and thirteen cantons with little or no such activities. Poisson regression was used to estimate mortality rate ratios (RRs) adjusted for age and sex. In a two-stage analysis, canton-specific log-RRs were regressed against quantitative estimates of cumulative barrels of oil produced and well-years per canton, adjusting for canton-level demographic and socioeconomic factors. RESULTS: Overall and site-specific cancer mortality rates were comparable between oil-producing and non-oil-producing cantons. For overall cancer mortality in males and females combined, the RR comparing oil-producing to non-oil-producing cantons was 0.85 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.72-1.00]. For leukemia mortality, the corresponding RR was 0.80 (95 % CI 0.57-1.13). Results also revealed no excess of mortality from acute non-lymphocytic, myeloid, or childhood leukemia. Standardized mortality ratios were consistent with RRs. Canton-specific RRs showed no pattern in relation to oil production volume or well-years. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this first ecologic study to incorporate quantitative measures of oil exploration and production showed no association between the extent of these activities and cancer mortality, including from cancers associated with benzene exposure.


Asunto(s)
Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Aceites/efectos adversos , Ecología , Ecuador , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
12.
Crit Rev Toxicol ; 44(5): 436-49, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24766058

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether available epidemiological and toxicological data suggest an increased risk of mesothelioma among workers exposed to synthetic vitreous fibers (SVF). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of epidemiological studies on the risk of mesothelioma among workers exposed to SVF, and toxicological studies on SVF and mesothelioma. RESULTS: Seven cohort studies were conducted among workers employed in production of rock/slag wool, glass wool, or continuous glass filament in the United States, Canada, and Europe. Of the six deaths from mesothelioma identified in these studies, three had exposure to asbestos. A review of death certificates in a study of rock wool production workers identified one additional probable death. A formal comparison with expected deaths is not feasible. Four community-based case-control studies were identified, of which three reported an increased risk among SVF-exposed workers. The number of cases not exposed to asbestos was less, and residual confounding from asbestos exposure misclassification may explain the association in these studies. The toxicology review of SVF suggested that they present a low hazard mostly due to their low biopersistence, typically with a half-life in rat studies of tens of days compared to amphibole asbestos which has a half-life of 400-500 days. CONCLUSIONS: The combined evidence from epidemiology and toxicology provide little evidence that exposure to SVF increases the risk of mesothelioma.


Asunto(s)
Amianto/toxicidad , Mesotelioma/epidemiología , Mesotelioma/patología , Fibras Minerales/toxicidad , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Animales , Canadá/epidemiología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Semivida , Humanos , Incidencia , Mesotelioma/etiología , Ratas , Medición de Riesgo , Pruebas de Toxicidad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
13.
Crit Rev Toxicol ; 44(6): 499-522, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24806876

RESUMEN

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently conducted a risk assessment for exposure to Libby amphibole asbestos that is precedent-setting for two reasons. First, the Agency has not previously conducted a risk assessment for a specific type of asbestos fiber. Second, the risk assessment includes not only an inhalation unit risk (IUR) for the cancer endpoints, but also a reference concentration (RfC) for nonmalignant disease. In this paper, we review the procedures used by the Agency for both cancer and nonmalignant disease and discuss the strengths and limitations of these procedures. The estimate of the RfC uses the benchmark dose method applied to pleural plaques in a small subcohort of vermiculite workers in Marysville, Ohio. We show that these data are too sparse to inform the exposure-response relationship in the low-exposure region critical for estimation of an RfC, and that different models with very different exposure-response shapes fit the data equally well. Furthermore, pleural plaques do not represent a disease condition and do not appear to meet the EPA's definition of an adverse condition. The estimation of the IUR for cancer is based on a subcohort of Libby miners, discarding the vast majority of lung cancers and mesotheliomas in the entire cohort and ignoring important time-related factors in exposure and risk, including effect modification by age. We propose that an IUR based on an endpoint that combines lung cancer, mesothelioma, and nonmalignant respiratory disease (NMRD) in this cohort would protect against both malignant and nonmalignant disease. However, the IUR should be based on the entire cohort of Libby miners, and the analysis should properly account for temporal factors. We illustrate our discussion with our own independent analyses of the data used by the Agency.


Asunto(s)
Asbestos Anfíboles/normas , Asbestos Anfíboles/toxicidad , Exposición por Inhalación/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , United States Environmental Protection Agency/legislación & jurisprudencia , Silicatos de Aluminio/toxicidad , Determinación de Punto Final , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Mesotelioma/inducido químicamente , Mesotelioma/patología , Ohio , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos
14.
Crit Rev Toxicol ; 44(5): 450-66, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24766059

RESUMEN

Geographic modeling is increasingly being used to estimate long-term environmental exposures in epidemiologic studies of chronic disease outcomes. However, without validation against measured environmental concentrations, personal exposure levels, or biologic doses, these models cannot be assumed a priori to be accurate. This article discusses three examples of epidemiologic associations involving exposures estimated using geographic modeling, and identifies important issues that affect geographically modeled exposure assessment in these areas. In air pollution epidemiology, geographic models of fine particulate matter levels have frequently been validated against measured environmental levels, but comparisons between ambient and personal exposure levels have shown only moderate correlations. Estimating exposure to magnetic fields by using geographically modeled distances is problematic because the error is larger at short distances, where field levels can vary substantially. Geographic models of environmental exposure to pesticides, including paraquat, have seldom been validated against environmental or personal levels, and validation studies have yielded inconsistent and typically modest results. In general, the exposure misclassification resulting from geographic models of environmental exposures can be differential and can result in bias away from the null even if non-differential. Therefore, geographic exposure models must be rigorously constructed and validated if they are to be relied upon to produce credible scientific results to inform epidemiologic research. To our knowledge, such models have not yet successfully predicted an association between an environmental exposure and a chronic disease outcome that has eventually been established as causal, and may not be capable of doing so in the absence of thorough validation.


Asunto(s)
Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/análisis , Modelos Teóricos , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Contaminación del Aire/análisis , Niño , Geografía , Humanos , Leucemia/etiología , Leucemia/patología , Paraquat/análisis , Paraquat/toxicidad , Material Particulado/análisis , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
16.
JAMA ; 311(2): 164-71, 2014 Jan 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24399555

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: January 2014 marks the 50th anniversary of the first surgeon general's report on smoking and health. This seminal document inspired efforts by governments, nongovernmental organizations, and the private sector to reduce the toll of cigarette smoking through reduced initiation and increased cessation. OBJECTIVE: To model reductions in smoking-related mortality associated with implementation of tobacco control since 1964. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Smoking histories for individual birth cohorts that actually occurred and under likely scenarios had tobacco control never emerged were estimated. National mortality rates and mortality rate ratio estimates from analytical studies of the effect of smoking on mortality yielded death rates by smoking status. Actual smoking-related mortality from 1964 through 2012 was compared with estimated mortality under no tobacco control that included a likely scenario (primary counterfactual) and upper and lower bounds that would capture plausible alternatives. EXPOSURES: National Health Interview Surveys yielded cigarette smoking histories for the US adult population in 1964-2012. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Number of premature deaths avoided and years of life saved were primary outcomes. Change in life expectancy at age 40 years associated with change in cigarette smoking exposure constituted another measure of overall health outcomes. RESULTS: In 1964-2012, an estimated 17.7 million deaths were related to smoking, an estimated 8.0 million (credible range [CR], 7.4-8.3 million, for the lower and upper tobacco control counterfactuals, respectively) fewer premature smoking-related deaths than what would have occurred under the alternatives and thus associated with tobacco control (5.3 million [CR, 4.8-5.5 million] men and 2.7 million [CR, 2.5-2.7 million] women). This resulted in an estimated 157 million years (CR, 139-165 million) of life saved, a mean of 19.6 years for each beneficiary (111 million [CR, 97-117 million] for men, 46 million [CR, 42-48 million] for women). During this time, estimated life expectancy at age 40 years increased 7.8 years for men and 5.4 years for women, of which tobacco control is associated with 2.3 years (CR, 1.8-2.5) (30% [CR, 23%-32%]) of the increase for men and 1.6 years (CR, 1.4-1.7) (29% [CR, 25%-32%]) for women. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Tobacco control was estimated to be associated with avoidance of 8 million premature deaths and an estimated extended mean life span of 19 to 20 years. Although tobacco control represents an important public health achievement, efforts must continue to reduce the effect of smoking on the nation's death toll.


Asunto(s)
Esperanza de Vida , Mortalidad Prematura/tendencias , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar , Fumar/mortalidad , Control Social Formal , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Regulación Gubernamental , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Registros Médicos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Teóricos , Prevalencia , Salud Pública , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
17.
Risk Anal ; 32 Suppl 1: S190-201, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22882889

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A consortium of six research groups estimated the impact on lung cancer mortality of changes in smoking behavior that began around the publication of the Surgeon General's report (SGR). This chapter presents the results of that effort. We quantified the cumulative impact of changes in smoking behaviors on lung cancer mortality in the United States over the period 1975-2000. METHODS: The six groups used common inputs and independent models to estimate the number of U.S. lung cancer deaths averted over the period 1975-2000 as a result of changes in smoking behavior beginning in the mid fifties, and the number of deaths that could have been averted if tobacco control had completely eliminated all smoking following issuance of the first SGR on Smoking and Health in 1964. RESULTS: Approximately 795,000 deaths (550,000 men and 245,000 women) were averted over the period 1975-2000 as a result of changes in smoking behavior since in 1950s. In the year 2000 alone approximately 70,000 lung cancer deaths were averted (44,000 among men and 26,000 among women). However, these represent approximately 30% of lung cancer deaths that could have potentially been averted over the period 1975-2000 if smoking was eliminated completely. In the 10-year period 1991-2000, this fraction increased to about 37%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show the substantial impact of changes in smoking behavior since the 1950s. Despite a major impact of changing smoking behaviors, tobacco control effort are still needed to further reduce the burden of this disease.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/prevención & control , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Fumar/efectos adversos , Simulación por Computador , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Política de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos Teóricos , Salud Pública , Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
18.
Risk Anal ; 32 Suppl 1: S69-84, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22882894

RESUMEN

In this chapter we review the epidemiology of lung cancer incidence and mortality among never smokers/nonsmokers and describe the never smoker lung cancer risk models used by the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Network (CISNET) modelers. Our review focuses on those influences likely to have measurable population impact on never smoker risk, such as secondhand smoke, even though the individual-level impact may be small. Occupational exposures may also contribute importantly to the population attributable risk of lung cancer. We examine the following risk factors in this chapter: age, environmental tobacco smoke, cooking fumes, ionizing radiation including radon gas, inherited genetic susceptibility, selected occupational exposures, preexisting lung disease, and oncogenic viruses. We also compare the prevalence of never smokers between the three CISNET smoking scenarios and present the corresponding lung cancer mortality estimates among never smokers as predicted by a typical CISNET model.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Gases , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Estadísticos , Modelos Teóricos , Exposición Profesional , Radiación Ionizante , Radón , Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Fumar/efectos adversos
19.
Risk Anal ; 32 Suppl 1: S99-S116, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22882896

RESUMEN

As a member of the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET), the lung cancer (LC) group at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC) developed a model for evaluating U.S. lung cancer mortality trends and the impact of changing tobacco consumption. Model components include a biologically based two-stage clonal expansion (TSCE) model; a smoking simulator to generate smoking histories and other cause mortality; and adjustments for period and birth cohort to improve calibration to U.S. LC mortality. The TSCE model was first calibrated to five substantial cohorts: British doctors, American Cancer Society CPS-I and CPS-II, Health Professionals' Follow-Up Study (HPFS), and Nurses' Health Study (NHS). The NHS and HPFS cohorts included the most detailed smoking histories and were chosen to represent the effects of smoking on U.S. LC mortality. The calibrated TSCE model and smoking simulator were used to simulate U.S. LC mortality. Further adjustments were necessary to account for unknown factors. This provided excellent fits between simulated and observed U.S. LC mortality for ages 30-84 and calendar years 1975-2000. The FHCRC LC model may be used to study the effects of public health information on U.S. LC trends and the impact of tobacco control policy. For example, we estimated that over 500,000 males and 200,000 females avoided LC death between 1975 and 2000 due to increasing awareness since the mid 1950s of the harmful effects of smoking. We estimated that 1.1 million male and 0.6 million female LC deaths were avoidable if smokers quit smoking in 1965.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Fumar/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Calibración , Estudios de Cohortes , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Educación en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Estadísticos , Modelos Teóricos , Salud Pública , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Procesos Estocásticos , Factores de Tiempo , Reino Unido , Estados Unidos , Washingtón
20.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 105(42): 16284-9, 2008 Oct 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18936480

RESUMEN

The observation that the age-specific incidence curve of many carcinomas is approximately linear on a double logarithmic plot has led to much speculation regarding the number and nature of the critical events involved in carcinogenesis. By a consideration of colorectal and pancreatic cancers in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry we show that the log-log model provides a poor description of the data, and that a much better description is provided by a multistage model that predicts two basic phases in the age-specific incidence curves, a first exponential phase until the age of approximately 60 followed by a linear phase after that age. These two phases in the incidence curve reflect two phases in the process of carcinogenesis. Paradoxically, the early-exponential phase reflects events between the formation (initiation) of premalignant clones in a tissue and the clinical detection of a malignant tumor, whereas the linear phase reflects events leading to initiated cells that give rise to premalignant lesions because of abrogated growth/differentiation control. This model is consistent with Knudson's idea that renewal tissue, such as the colon, is converted into growing tissue before malignant transformation. The linear phase of the age-specific incidence curve represents this conversion, which is the result of recessive inactivation of a gatekeeper gene, such as the APC gene in the colon and the CDKN2A gene in the pancreas.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/patología , Distribución por Edad , Biología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Caracteres Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA