Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Endoscopy ; 47(11): 980-7, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26126159

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Mucosal neoplasia arising in Barrett's esophagus can be successfully treated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) followed by radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The aim of the study was to compare clinical outcomes of patients with high grade dysplasia (HGD) or intramucosal cancer (IMC) at baseline from the United Kingdom RFA registry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prior to RFA, visible lesions and nodularity were removed entirely by EMR. Thereafter, patients underwent RFA every 3 months until all visible Barrett's mucosa was ablated or cancer developed (end points). Biopsies were taken at 12 months or when end points were reached. RESULTS: A total of 515 patients, 384 with HGD and 131 with IMC, completed treatment. Prior to RFA, EMR was performed for visible lesions more frequently in the IMC cohort than in HGD patients (77 % vs. 47 %; P < 0.0001). The 12-month complete response for dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia were almost identical in the two cohorts (HGD 88 % and 76 %, respectively; IMC 87 % and 75 %, respectively; P = 0.7). Progression to invasive cancer was not significantly different at 12 months (HGD 1.8 %, IMC 3.8 %; P = 0.19). A trend towards slightly worse medium-term durability may be emerging in IMC patients (P = 0.08). In IMC, EMR followed by RFA was definitely associated with superior durability compared with RFA alone (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The Registry reports on endoscopic therapy for Barrett's neoplasia, representing real-life outcomes. Patients with IMC were more likely to have visible lesions requiring initial EMR than those with HGD, and may carry a higher risk of cancer progression in the medium term. The data consolidate the approach to ensuring that these patients undergo thorough endoscopic work-up, including EMR prior to RFA when necessary.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Esófago de Barrett/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esófago/cirugía , Lesiones Precancerosas/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Esófago de Barrett/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Esofagoscopía , Esófago/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Membrana Mucosa/patología , Membrana Mucosa/cirugía , Lesiones Precancerosas/patología , Sistema de Registros , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reino Unido
3.
Head Neck ; 43(8): 2342-2352, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33786910

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To determine whether virtual surgical planning and three-dimensional printed cutting guides (3D/VSP) improved radiographic bone union compared to conventional methods (CM) in fibula free flap (FFF) reconstruction of the mandibles. METHODS: Retrospective study from the years 2000-2018 at a tertiary hospital. Osseous union was evaluated by a radiologist blinded to each patient's treatment. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty patients who underwent FFF tissue transfer, 28 with VSP and 3D cutting guides. Bony union was not achieved in 46 (20%) patients who underwent CM compared to 1 (4%) of patients with VSP and guides (p = 0.036). FFF complication was significantly higher in CM with 87 patients (38%) compared to three patients (11%) in 3D/VSP (p = 0.005). Median time to bony union for patients who underwent CM was 1.4 years compared to 0.8 years in 3D/VSP. CONCLUSIONS: 3D/VSP reduced the rate of radiographic nonunion and flap-related complications in FFF reconstruction for mandibular defects.


Asunto(s)
Colgajos Tisulares Libres , Reconstrucción Mandibular , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Cirugía Asistida por Computador , Peroné/cirugía , Humanos , Mandíbula/diagnóstico por imagen , Mandíbula/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA