Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Echocardiography ; 38(9): 1618-1623, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34510510

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate ET and TVFR in normal patients, PLFLGAS, LGLFAS, and classic pre and post TAVR. BACKGROUND: Severe aortic stenosis (AS) is defined echocardiographically. Generating a pressure gradient to meet diagnostic criteria is dependent on left ventricular contractility, stroke volume, and ejection time.  Abnormalities in these decrease the mean pressure gradient across the valve creating pathology termed low flow, low gradient AS. This occurs in two subtypes, low ejection fraction LFLGAS and paradoxical LFLGAS (PLFLGAS), in which EF is normal but stroke volume is < 35 ml/m2 . Paradoxical LFLGAS is difficult to diagnose and does not have a confirmatory echocardiographic parameter. Transvalvular flow rate (TVFR), which is defined as stroke volume divided by the ejection time, provides a direct measure of flow across the aortic valve. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center between 2016 and 2019 was performed. Patients were classified by AS subtype. ET and TVFR were measured pre and post TAVR and statistically compared using SPSS statistics software and ANOVA analysis. RESULTS: Pre TAVR TVFR in the normal population, severe AS population, and LFLGAS were not significantly different. The pre TAVR TVFR in paradoxical LFLGAS patients was significantly lower than other groups. TVFR improved to the greatest degree post TAVR in PLFLGAS but did not meet statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The significantly lower TVFR demonstrated in PLFLGAS provides a comprehensive, direct measurement of aortic valve hemodynamics and PLFLGAS pathology and can aid in diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Volumen Sistólico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Función Ventricular Izquierda
2.
Curr Atheroscler Rep ; 18(7): 45, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27260146

RESUMEN

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following an acute coronary syndrome or after placement of a coronary artery stent is superior to aspirin alone for prevention of atherothrombotic events but carries an increased bleeding risk. DAPT should be continued for at least 12 months based on current guidelines. Recent randomized trials demonstrate reduced ischemic events including myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and death with continued DAPT for up to 30 months or longer, particularly in the post-MI population. However, this clinical benefit is accompanied by an increased risk of bleeding. Additional trials show mixed safety and efficacy with duration of DAPT of less than 12 months. The current data emphasizes the need to individualize DAPT duration at the patient level to balance the clinical benefits of a reduced risk of cardiovascular ischemic events with the greater risk of clinically significant bleeding. Patients at an increased risk of ischemic events and a lower risk of bleeding should be strongly considered for prolonged DAPT beyond the 1 year currently recommended in the practice guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/prevención & control , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control
3.
Eur Heart J Case Rep ; 5(7): ytab223, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34286179

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis requires demonstration of interventricular interdependence which can prove difficult even with invasive haemodynamics. Its treatment requires invasive surgical procedures prior to which diagnostic certainty is necessary. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an underutilized tool for identification of this pathology. CASE SUMMARY: We present two cases of heart failure due to interventricular interdependence with inconclusive invasive haemodynamic. Prior to recommending invasive surgical treatment, confirmation of the diagnosis was required. This was achieved using cardiac MRI leading to pericardiectomy followed by clinical improvement. DISCUSSION: These cases demonstrate the clinical utility, sensitivity, and specificity of cardiac MRI for ventricular interdependence.

4.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 28(5): 686-697, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30407107

RESUMEN

Cardiovascular disease is now the leading cause of pregnancy-related deaths in the United States. Increasing maternal mortality in the United States underscores the importance of proper cardiovascular management. Significant physiological changes during pregnancy affect the heart's ability to respond to pathological processes such as hypertension and heart failure. These physiological changes further affect the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of cardiac medications. During pregnancy, these changes can significantly alter medication efficacy and metabolism. This article systematically reviews the literature on safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of cardiovascular drugs used for hypertension and heart failure during pregnancy and lactation. The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association hypertension guidelines recommend transitioning pregnant patients to methyldopa, nifedipine, or labetalol. Heart failure medications, including beta-blockers, furosemide, and digoxin, are relatively safe and can be used effectively. Medications that block the renin angiotensin-aldosterone system have been shown to be beneficial in the general population; however, they are teratogenic and, therefore, contraindicated in pregnancy. Cardiovascular medications can also enter breast milk and, therefore, care must be taken when selecting drugs during the lactation period. A summary of the safety of drugs during pregnancy and lactation from an online resource, LactMed by the National Library of Medicine's TOXNET database, is included. High-risk pregnant patients with cardiovascular disease require a multispecialty team of doctors, including health care providers from obstetrics and gynecology, maternal fetal medicine, internal medicine, cardiovascular disease specialists, and specialized pharmacology expertise.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Lactancia Materna , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Embarazo , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/epidemiología , Estados Unidos
5.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 26(3): 214-221, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27870603

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: For nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been found noninferior to warfarin for stroke/systemic embolization prevention, and major bleeding events. Recent meta-analysis of NOACs versus warfarin in atrial fibrillation (AF) showed that women on warfarin have greater risk of stroke/embolism than men, and when both are treated with NOACs, differences disappear. METHODS: NOACs differ in pharmacologic properties, thus they may differ from one another in their effects on women with AF. Using dose-adjusted warfarin as the common comparator, an indirect comparison of rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran 110 and 150 mg, and edoxaban 30 and 60 mg for efficacy (stroke/embolism prevention) and safety (major bleeding events) in women with AF was performed. Data from ROCKET-AF, RE-LY, ENGAGE AF TIMI, and ARISTOTLE were analyzed and compared according to the Bucher method. RESULTS: No significant difference was found for any NOAC compared with alternatives in safety or efficacy for women with AF. Examination of odds ratio comparisons alone showed possible favorable efficacy in dabigatran 150 mg, and unfavorable efficacy with favorable safety in edoxaban 30 mg. CONCLUSION: NOACs may slightly differ in their effect in women; the potential differences are very small and likely clinically negligible. Thus, NOACs can be used interchangeably in women according to patient and physician preferences to increase adherence.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Administración Oral , Dabigatrán/efectos adversos , Dabigatrán/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Oportunidad Relativa , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Piridonas/efectos adversos , Piridonas/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Rivaroxabán/efectos adversos , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , Tiazoles/efectos adversos , Tiazoles/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Warfarina/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA