RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Accurately identifying alopecia in claims data is important to study this rare medication side effect. OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a claims-based algorithm to identify alopecia in women of childbearing age. METHODS: We linked electronic health records from a large healthcare system in Massachusetts (Mass General Brigham) with Medicaid claims data from 2016 through 2018 to identify all women aged 18 to 50 years with an ICD-10 code for alopecia, including alopecia areata, androgenic alopecia, non-scarring alopecia, or cicatricial alopecia, from a visit to the MGB system. Using eight predefined algorithms to identify alopecia in Medicaid claims data, we randomly selected 300 women for whom we reviewed their charts to validate the alopecia diagnosis. Positive predictive values (PPVs) were computed for the primary algorithm and seven algorithm variations, stratified by race. RESULTS: Out of 300 patients with at least 1 ICD-10 code for alopecia in the Medicaid claims, 286 had chart-confirmed alopecia (PPV = 95.3%). The algorithm requiring two diagnosis codes plus one prescription claim for alopecia treatment identified 55 patients (PPV = 100%). The algorithm requiring 1 diagnosis code for alopecia plus 1 procedure claim for intralesional triamcinolone injection identified 35 patients (PPV = 100%). Across all 8 algorithms tested, the PPV varied between 95.3% and 100%. The PPV for alopecia ranged from 94% to 100% in White and 96%-100% in 48 non-White women. The exact date of alopecia onset was difficult to determine in charts. CONCLUSION: At least one recorded ICD-10 code for alopecia in claims data identified alopecia in women of childbearing age with high accuracy.
Asunto(s)
Alopecia Areata , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Femenino , Humanos , Algoritmos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estados Unidos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare ulcerative skin condition with an increased risk of mortality compared to the general population. The causes of this increased risk are not well understood. Misdiagnosis is common in PG, and many studies are limited by the inclusion of misdiagnosed cases. The goal of this study was to review autopsy findings, identify causes of death, and identify factors that may worsen outcomes among deceased patients confirmed to have PG. METHODS: Data was retrospectively reviewed from the electronic medical records at five academic hospitals. A search was conducted for deceased patients with a diagnosis of PG who had an autopsy performed between 2010 and 2020. We report a descriptive analysis of 11 patients and their clinical characteristics, causes of death, and autopsy findings. RESULTS: The average age of death was 62.9 years. Seven patients had at least one underlying condition known to be associated with PG including inflammatory bowel disease, inflammatory arthritis, or a hematologic disorder. The most common cause of death was infection (n = 6, 54.5%), followed by pulmonary embolism (n = 3, 27.3%), and myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 2, 18.2%). Six patients (54.5%) were taking systemic steroids at the time of death. CONCLUSION: The development of PG may shorten life expectancy among those with underlying conditions associated with PG, and common treatments for PG may contribute to the risk of fatal complications. Awareness of the risk of infection, thrombosis, and malignancy among those with PG is necessary for proper management. Further research is needed to explore the relationship between PG and thromboembolism.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Piodermia Gangrenosa , Úlcera Cutánea , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Autopsia , Piodermia Gangrenosa/complicaciones , Piodermia Gangrenosa/diagnóstico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Melasma and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) are common cosmetic dermatologic conditions that predominantly affect patients with skin phototypes III-VI. Comparing treatment coverage for these pigmentary disorders to treatment coverage for acne vulgaris may demonstrate disparities in insurance coverage for diseases that primarily affect patients of color. OBJECTIVE: Describe differences in Medicaid coverage for topical tretinoin for melasma and PIH vs. acne vulgaris in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of Medicaid insurance plans in all 50 states and the District of Columbia conducted between February 1 and 28, 2023. Data was collected from online publicly available preferred drug lists, prior authorization criteria, and email/telephone inquiries. Information was collected regarding coverage restrictions, including age restrictions, diagnostic restrictions, preferred drug status, and prior authorization requirements. RESULTS: Complete coverage data for all three clinical indications was retrieved from 30 (58.8%) states; partial coverage data for acne vulgaris was retrieved from 16 (31.4%) states; no coverage data was retrieved from 5 (9.8%) states. Of states reporting coverage data, topical tretinoin is covered in 45 (97.8%) states for acne vulgaris and 10 (33.3%) states for melasma and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. There was decreased Medicaid coverage of topical tretinoin for acne vulgaris compared to melasma and PIH (P<0.05). Conclusion: There is differential Medicaid coverage for acne vulgaris compared to pigmentary disorders which disproportionately affect patients of color. Greater advocacy is required to ensure equal treatment for conditions that affect racial minority patients. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(6):e151-e153. doi:10.36849/JDD.8069e  .
Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar , Cobertura del Seguro , Medicaid , Tretinoina , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Acné Vulgar/tratamiento farmacológico , Tretinoina/administración & dosificación , Tretinoina/economía , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Hiperpigmentación/tratamiento farmacológico , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Femenino , Queratolíticos/administración & dosificación , Queratolíticos/economía , Melanosis/tratamiento farmacológico , MasculinoAsunto(s)
Melanosis , Humanos , Melanosis/epidemiología , Melanosis/etnología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Incidencia , Femenino , Factores de Riesgo , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Despite having significantly higher rates of atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, and pigmentary disorders compared to White patients, studies suggest that Asian Americans are underrepresented in outpatient dermatology clinics. In this study, we utilize the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and prioritize disaggregated analyses to evaluate differences between the most populous Asian American subgroups (Chinese, Filipino, Indian, and "Other") in utilization of outpatient dermatologic care. We utilized multivariable logistic regression to compare outpatient dermatologic care use between each Asian American subgroup and Non-Hispanic Whites. Out of 96,559 adults, our study included 5264 self-identified Asian American and 91,295 non-Hispanic White adults. Most Asian participants were female, had health insurance, and had incomes > 2 times above the federal poverty line. We found that, compared to 21.4% for NH whites, lifetime prevalence of total body skin exam was highest among Filipino Americans (12.3%) and lowest among Indian Americans (7%). Additionally, all Asian American subgroups had a significantly lower odd than NH Whites of ever having a total body skin exam, with Indian Americans having the lowest odds. While the benefit of TBSEs in Indian Americans is unclear, it is possible that differing cultural perceptions about dermatologic needs, barriers to care, or immigration status may be contributing to the observed difference. Furthermore, the Indian diaspora encapsulates a range of skin tones, risk factors, and behaviors that may differentially influence dermatologic disease risk, similar to trends identified among Hispanic patients (Trepanowski et al. in J Am Acad Dermatol 88:1206-1209, 2023). Additional research utilizing the seven national databases that have been identified as providing disaggregated Asian racial information (Kamal et al. in J Am Acad Dermatol, 2023) may be useful to further illuminate avenues for intervention.
Asunto(s)
Asiático , Dermatología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Importance: New gene therapies can offer substantial benefits to patients, particularly those with rare diseases who have few therapeutic options. In May 2023, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first topical gene therapy, beremagene geperpavec (B-VEC), for treating both autosomal recessive and autosomal dominant dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB). However, FDA approval was based on limited data in patients with autosomal dominant disease, even though they comprise approximately 50% of all DEB cases. Objective: To estimate projected spending in the US on B-VEC therapy for treating autosomal recessive and autosomal dominant DEB. Design, Setting, and Participants: This economic evaluation used data from the National Epidermolysis Bullosa Registry to estimate the current population of US patients with autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive DEB, with the aim of estimating US spending on B-VEC therapy from an all-payers perspective during 1- and 3-year periods after FDA approval. A base-case cost of $300â¯000 per patient per year was assumed based on a report from the manufacturer (Krystal Biotech). Exposure: Treatment with B-VEC. Main Outcomes and Measures: Estimated overall spending on B-VEC in the first year and over a 3-year period after FDA approval. Several prespecified sensitivity analyses with different assumptions about the eligible patient population and the cost of therapy were performed, and lifetime total costs of treatment per patient were estimated. Results: The estimated number of US patients with DEB who were eligible for treatment with B-VEC in the first year after FDA approval was 894. The estimated total expenditure for B-VEC therapy was $268 million (range, $179 million-$357 million). Over a 3-year period, estimated spending was $805 million (range, $537 million-$1.1 billion). Estimated lifetime total costs per patient were $15 million (range, $10 million-$20 million) per patient with autosomal recessive DEB and $17 million (range, $11 million-$22 million) for patients with autosomal dominant DEB. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this economic evaluation suggest that the FDA's broad indication for the use of B-VEC in treating both autosomal recessive and autosomal dominant DEB will have significant implications for payers.
Asunto(s)
Epidermólisis Ampollosa Distrófica , Epidermólisis Ampollosa , Humanos , Epidermólisis Ampollosa Distrófica/tratamiento farmacológico , Epidermólisis Ampollosa Distrófica/genética , Epidermólisis Ampollosa/genética , Análisis Costo-BeneficioRESUMEN
Sneddon-Wilkinson disease (SWD), IgA pemphigus, and bullous systemic lupus erythematosus (BSLE) are superficial and bullous neutrophilic dermatoses. They are all characterized by sterile neutrophilic infiltrate but differ in the level of skin affected and presence of autoantibodies. Both SWD and IgA pemphigus present with grouped flaccid pustules and have epidermal involvement; it is unclear whether they are distinct or exist on a spectrum of the same disease. IgA pemphigus is distinguished from SWD by positive direct immunofluorescence showing intercellular IgA deposition. BSLE presents with tense bullae, dermal neutrophilic infiltrate, and direct immunofluorescence showing linear IgG deposition along the dermal-epidermal junction.
Asunto(s)
Lupus Eritematoso Cutáneo , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Pénfigo , Enfermedades Cutáneas Vesiculoampollosas , Humanos , Pénfigo/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cutáneas Vesiculoampollosas/diagnóstico , Piel , Autoanticuerpos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/diagnóstico , Inmunoglobulina ARESUMEN
Although there are now two Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatments for severe alopecia areata (AA), many patients still resort to non-medical therapies and lifestyle modifications such as diet and nutrition. The goal of this study was to evaluate the sources and types of dietary and nutritional advice for patients with AA. We distributed a cross-sectional national survey using the National Alopecia Areata Foundation's email list-serv between August 2022 and January 2023. Most respondents were White (76.3%), employed (58.3%) females (84.4%) with a mean age of 52 years. 163 (19.1%) respondents reported receiving diet and/or nutritional advice and 418 (49.5%) respondents reported searching for diet and/or nutritional advice to help with their AA; the most common source of advice was online. The most common dietary changes were the use of vitamins or supplements (30.6%), adherence to diets (23.2%), and the addition of specific foods (21.4%). 209 (50.2%) respondents reported no change in their disease and 197 (47.4%) respondents reported no change in how they felt about their disease compared to before they tried the change. Many AA patients search for or receive unsolicited dietary and nutritional advice and subsequently modify their behavior to manage their disease. However, the efficacy of these changes is unclear. Providers should be mindful of the sources through which patients obtain treatment information as well as the lifestyle changes patients make to counsel patients with evidence-based information. Further investigation is needed to better characterize the direct and indirect costs of dietary and nutritional modification in the treatment of AA.
Asunto(s)
Alopecia Areata , Suplementos Dietéticos , Humanos , Alopecia Areata/dietoterapia , Alopecia Areata/terapia , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Transversales , Adulto , Suplementos Dietéticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Anciano , Dieta/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Vitaminas/administración & dosificación , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Importance: Alopecia areata (AA) has been associated with multiple comorbidities, yet information regarding the timing of comorbidity development after AA diagnosis is limited. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence and new-onset incidence of psychiatric and autoimmune comorbidities in patients with AA in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort analysis used data collected from January 1, 2007, to April 30, 2023, from the Merative MarketScan Research Databases, which contains medical and drug claims data from more than 46 million patients in the US. Data from adolescent and adult patients (aged 12-64 years) diagnosed with AA and patients without AA (ie, controls) were evaluated. For some analyses, patients with AA were matched (1:4) to controls based on sex, age, and geographic region. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prevalence (at the time of AA diagnosis) and incidence (new onset after AA diagnosis) of psychiatric and autoimmune diseases were reported as percentage of patients. Risk of developing a new-onset psychiatric or autoimmune disease after AA diagnosis was calculated as adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) with 95% CIs. Results: At baseline, 63â¯384 patients with AA and 3â¯309â¯107 without AA were identified. After matching, there were 16â¯512 and 66â¯048 patients in the AA and control groups, respectively, with a mean (SD) age of 36.9 (13.4) years and 50.6% of whom were female. Compared with the unmatched controls, patients with AA had higher prevalence of psychiatric (30.9% vs 26.8%; P < .001) and autoimmune (16.1% vs 8.9%; P < .0001) comorbidities at AA diagnosis; incidence was also higher in patients with AA (without history of these comorbidities) vs the matched control group. Patients with AA vs controls had a significantly higher risk of developing a psychiatric (AHR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.3-1.4) or autoimmune (AHR, 2.7; 95% CI, 2.5-2.8) comorbidity. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, patients with AA had a higher prevalence of autoimmune and psychiatric comorbidities at AA diagnosis and demonstrated an elevated risk of new-onset autoimmune and psychiatric comorbidities after their diagnosis. These data highlight the most common comorbidities among patients with AA and may help physicians counsel and monitor patients newly diagnosed with AA.
RESUMEN
Importance: Laboratory testing for the presence of tuberculosis, hepatitis, and other conditions before starting most systemic immunomodulatory agents is recommended in patients with chronic inflammatory skin diseases (CISD) but current testing patterns in the US are unclear. Objective: To determine the prevalence of pretreatment testing that is recommended for patients with CISD (psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa, or atopic dermatitis). Design, Setting, and Participants: This descriptive analysis of US commercial insurance claims databases from December 31, 2002, to December 31, 2020, included adult patients with CISD (psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa, or atopic dermatitis) who started an immunomodulatory agent, including methotrexate, tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors, interleukin (IL)-17Ai, ustekinumab, IL-23i, dupilumab, or apremilast. Main Outcomes and Measures: The proportion of patients who underwent the screening tests as suggested by professional societies-including for tuberculosis, hepatitis, and liver function; complete blood cell counts; and lipid panels-were determined within 6 months before and during 2 years after treatment start. Results: A total of 122â¯308 patients with CISDs (median [IQR] age, 49 [38-58] years; 63â¯663 [52.1%] male) starting systemic immunomodulatory treatment in the US were included. Treatment for patients with CISDs comprised methotrexate (28â¯684), tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors (40â¯965), ustekinumab (12â¯841), IL-23i (6116), IL-17Ai (9799), dupilumab (7787), or apremilast (16â¯116). Complete blood cell count was the most common test, performed in 41% (3161/7787) to 69% (19â¯659/28â¯684) of individuals before initiation across treatments. Between 11% (889/7787) and 59% (3613/6116) of patients had tuberculosis screening within 6 months before treatment, and 3% (149/4577) to 26% (1559/6097) had updated tests 1 year later. Between 13% (1006/7787) and 41% (16â¯728/40â¯965) had hepatitis panels before treatment. Low pretreatment testing levels before apremilast (15% [2331/16â¯116] to 45% [7253/16â¯116]) persisted a year into treatment (9% [816/8496] to 36% [2999/8496]) and were similar to dupilumab (11% [850/7787] to 41% [3161/7787] vs 3% [149/4577] to 25% [1160/4577]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this descriptive analysis of patients with CISDs starting systemic immunomodulatory treatment in the US, less than 60% received the recommended pretreatment testing. Additional research is required to understand whether variations in testing affect patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Hepatitis , Hidradenitis Supurativa , Psoriasis , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Tuberculosis , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Ustekinumab/uso terapéutico , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa , Agentes Inmunomoduladores , Prevalencia , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Tuberculosis/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
Dermatologic diseases have a well-documented association with depression and anxiety, which are in turn often comorbid with alcohol use disorder (AUD). Nonethleess, the relationship between dermatologic disease and AUD, and the relative contribution of depression and anxiety, are poorly understood. Here, we utilize the National Insittutes of Health All of Us Research Program to investigate the association between inflammatory and pigmentary dermatologic diseases with AUD. Furthermore, we investigate whether comorbid depression and anxiety mediates this relationship. We employed a matched case-control model with multivariable logistic regression. We also employed a mediation analysis. We found an increased odds of AUD among patients with atopic dermatitis, acne/rosacea, hidradenitis suppurativa, psoriasis, and pigmentary disorders (vitiligo, melasma, and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation). This was partially mediated by anxiety and depression, especially for diseases with a significant cosmetic component. Overall, these findings highlight the profound psychological and physical health effects that inflammatory and pigmentary disease can have on patients, both independently and in combination with comorbid psychiatric disease.
Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo , Hiperpigmentación , Melanosis , Salud Poblacional , Humanos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Hiperpigmentación/epidemiología , Melanosis/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Limited epidemiologic data has suggested direct associations between hair pigment, race, and incidence of alopecia areata (AA). Here, we examine the relationship between natural hair color, race, and the lifetime risk alopecia. METHODS: In this case-control study, we included UK Biobank patients of all races and self-reported hair color with diagnoses of AA, androgenetic alopecia (AGA), or scarring alopecia (SA). Multivariable logistic regression was used to detect differences in lifetime risk. RESULTS: Findings reveal a significantly increased risk of AA among individuals with black hair compared to dark brown hair (OR 1.71 [95% CI 1.22-2.38], p < 0.001). Those with red or blonde hair showed a decreased risk of AA (0.74 [0.56-0.97]; 0.62 [0.41-0.95], p < 0.05). No racial differences in AA prevalence were observed among individuals with black hair. CONCLUSIONS: Darker hair colors may be associated with a higher risk of AA, lighter hair colors with a lower risk, and differences in hair color could contribute to previously noted racial variations in AA incidence, potentially influencing dermatologists' perspectives on the disease's epidemiology.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune disease associated with high rates of emotional and psychosocial distress. The analysis reported here describes the evolution of measures assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and symptoms of anxiety and depression up to week 104 in patients who achieved sustained scalp hair regrowth during treatment with baricitinib in the BRAVE-AA phase III trials. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis included data from the double-blind, parallel-group, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trials BRAVE-AA1 (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03570749) and BRAVE-AA2 (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03899259). Adults with severe AA (defined as a Severity of Alopecia Tool [SALT] score ≥ 50) randomized to baricitinib 4 mg or baricitinib 2 mg at baseline who achieved SALT score ≤ 20 by week 36 and maintained SALT score ≤ 20 through week 104 on the same dose of baricitinib were included in this analysis of integrated data. Scalp hair regrowth (SALT score) and improvements in Skindex-16 AA Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) domain scores were analyzed over the 104-week period using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: In total, 131 patients (88 on baricitinib 4 mg and 43 on baricitinib 2 mg) were included in this analysis. Across the two groups, the mean age (standard deviation) was 37.2 years (12.7), and 84 (64.1%) patients were female. The interquartile range) for time to achieve a SALT score ≤ 20 for patients treated with baricitinib 4 mg and baricitinib 2 mg was 13.1 and 19.6 weeks, respectively. By week 104, 91% (baricitinib 2 mg) and 96% (baricitinib 4 mg) of patients had achieved a SALT score ≤ 10 on baricitinib treatment. In both groups, progressive improvements in the Skindex-16 AA and HADS domain scores were observed up to week 104. CONCLUSION: This analysis of adults with severe AA treated with baricitinib revealed that achievement of sustained clinically meaningful scalp hair regrowth (SALT score ≤ 20) was associated with improvements in both measures of HRQoL and symptoms of anxiety and depression up to week 104.
RESUMEN
Peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum is an uncommon subtype of pyoderma gangrenosum mainly affecting stoma sites of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. While surgical treatments are often used to assist healing, little is known about the relationship between surgical interventions and the rate of recurrence of peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum. The aim of this study was to identify patient and clinical factors associated with peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum recurrence following surgical intervention. A multi-institutional retrospective case series and literature review was conducted to evaluate patient characteristics and perioperative treatment. Patients of any age with peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum undergoing surgical operations related to their pyoderma gangrenosum or due to another comorbidity were included. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize demographic information. Associations were evaluated using Wilcoxon's rank-sum test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical data. Thirty-seven cases were included, 78.3% of which had a history of inflammatory bowel disease. Overall, 13 (35.1%) cases experienced recurrence at 30 days. There was no significant association identified between patient demographics, stoma location, surgical intervention, or perioperative treatment with rate of recurrence at 30 days post-operation. While no clinical risk factors or treatments were associated with recurrence, our work underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to this disease to address gastrointestinal, dermatologic, and surgical components of treatment.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Piodermia Gangrenosa , Humanos , Piodermia Gangrenosa/etiología , Piodermia Gangrenosa/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/cirugía , Periodo Posoperatorio , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Patients with autoimmune bullous diseases are at an increased risk of infection, both from the underlying skin disease and from immunosuppressive treatments. Limited information is available on vaccine beliefs and behaviors in dermatology patients and adults with autoimmune bullous diseases in particular. To understand vaccine decision making, identify perceived risks and benefits of vaccinations, and discuss individual experiences in patients with autoimmune bullous diseases in the United States. A qualitative study was performed utilizing semi-structured interviews, and analysis was conducted on NVivo. Patterns were identified in the coded data, and representative quotations were recorded for each major theme. Interviews were conducted between February 15, 2022 and September 15, 2022. Twenty patients with a diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid, mucous membrane pemphigoid, pemphigus vulgaris, or pemphigus foliaceous were interviewed. Of the 20 participants, 14 (70%) were female, with a mean (SD, range) age of 64.8 (13.2, 34-83) years. Key themes that emerged from qualitative analysis of the interviews included patient concerns regarding their increased susceptibility to infection, potential exacerbation of skin disease following vaccination, and the effect of immunosuppressive medications on humoral response to vaccines. Lack of appointment availability, difficulty accessing vaccines, and cost were commonly identified barriers to vaccination. These findings provide valuable knowledge for dermatologists in regard to providing counseling specific to patient concerns and to improve communication surrounding vaccination in the dermatology setting.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Penfigoide Ampolloso , Pénfigo , Vacunas , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Toma de DecisionesRESUMEN
At present, there are no standardized guidelines for determining patient eligibility for pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) clinical trials. Thus, we aim to determine which clinical features, histopathological features, or laboratory features should be included in active ulcerative PG clinical trial eligibility criteria for treatment-naïve patients and patients already treated with immunomodulating medications (treatment-exposed patients). This study employed 4 rounds of the Delphi technique. Electronic surveys were administered to 21 international board-certified dermatologists and plastic surgeon PG experts (June 2022-December 2022). Our results demonstrated that for a patient to be eligible for a PG trial, they must meet the following criteria: (i) presence of ulcer(s) with erythematous/violaceous undermining wound borders, (ii) presence of a painful or tender ulcer, (iii) history/presence of rapidly progressing disease, (iv) exclusion of infection and other causes of cutaneous ulceration, (v) biopsy for H&E staining, and (vi) a presence/history of pathergy. These criteria vary in importance for treatment-naïve versus treatment-exposed patients. Given the international cohort, we were unable to facilitate live discussions between rounds. This Delphi consensus study provides a set of specific, standardized eligibility criteria for PG clinical trials, thus addressing one of the main issues hampering progress toward Food and Drug Administration approval of medications for PG.
Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Selección de Paciente , Piodermia Gangrenosa , Humanos , Piodermia Gangrenosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Piodermia Gangrenosa/diagnóstico , Determinación de la Elegibilidad/normas , Úlcera Cutánea/etiología , Úlcera Cutánea/diagnóstico , Úlcera Cutánea/patología , Úlcera Cutánea/tratamiento farmacológico , Biopsia , Piel/patología , Piel/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
Inpatient hospitalization of individuals with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) has increased. Inpatient services may not be familiar enough with this disease to understand how to manage severe HS and/or HS flares. It would be beneficial to the inpatient medical community to establish consensus recommendations on holistic inpatient care of patients with HS. A survey study was developed and distributed by Wake Forest University School of Medicine (Winston-Salem, North Carolina). A total of 26 dermatologists participated in the Delphi process, and the process was conducted in 2 rounds. Participants voted on proposal statements using a 9-point scale (1=very inappropriate; 9=very appropriate). Statements were developed using current published guidelines for management of HS and supportive care guidelines for other severe inpatient dermatologic diseases. A total of 50 statements were reviewed and voted on between the 2 rounds. Consensus was determined using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Twenty-six dermatologists completed the first-round survey, and 24 completed the second-round survey. The 40 consensus recommendations generated through these surveys can serve as a resource for providers caring for inpatients with HS.