Efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in octogenarians.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether catheter ablation is safe and effective in patients over the age of 80. BACKGROUND: There is a tendency to withhold invasive therapy in the elderly until it has been proven safe and effective. METHODS: Over a two-year period from February 1, 1996 to February 1, 1998, 695 consecutive patients underwent 744 catheter ablation procedures of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. These patients were divided into three groups based on age: > or =80 years, 60 to 79 years and <60 years. Acute ablation success, using standard criteria and complication rates for these three groups were determined. RESULTS: There were 37 patients > or =80 years, 275 patients 60 to 79 years and 383 patients <60 years old. The overall acute ablation success rate for the entire group was 95% with no difference in rates among the three groups (97%, > or =80 years; 94%, 60-79 years; 95%, <60 years). The percentage of patients undergoing His bundle ablation was greatest in the > or =80-year-old group (43% vs. 19% vs. 2%, p < 0.01), and the percentage of patients undergoing accessory pathway ablation was greatest in the <60-year-old patients (0% vs. 4% vs. 25%, p < 0.01). The overall complication rate for the entire group was 2.6%, and there was only one major/life-threatening complication. There was no difference in complication rates among the groups (0%, > or =80 years; 2.2%, 60 to 79 years; 3.1%, <60 years). Based on the sample size, the 95% confidence interval is 0% to 7.8% for an adverse event in the octogenarian. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablative therapy for the arrhythmias attempted in the very elderly appears to be effective with low risk. Ablation results appear to be comparable with those noted in younger patients.

Effect of different location of atrial lead position on nearfield and farfield electrograms in dual chamber pacemaker-defibrillators.

The normal functioning of dual chamber pacemaker-cardioverter defibrillator (AV pacer/ICD) may be affected by oversensing of the farfield R wave (FFRW) by the atrial channel. This study aimed to investigate whether placement of the AV pacer/ICD's atrial lead at a lateral (LAT) wall location compared to a medial (MED) location i.e. the appendage of the right atrium, would reduce the amplitude of FFRWs but not the nearfield atrial electrograms (AEGMs) during sinus rhythm (SR) and ventricular fibrillation (VF). In 17 patients, real time electrograms were recorded during SR and induced VF through the atrial lead initially at the MED and subsequently at the LAT location. In 10 patients the electrograms in SR were also recorded on a computerized data acquisition and recording system at different band-pass filter settings. Although FFRWs were recorded both at MED and LAT locations, they were much smaller, 3.5+/-4.1mm during SR and 1.7+/-2.2mm during VF at the LAT location. At 30-500Hz band-pass filter, lower amplitudes of FFRWs 0.14+/-0.09 mV were recorded at the LAT location. The V/A ratios of the amplitudes of FFRWs and AEGMs were smaller at the LAT location during SR and VF. The nearfield AEGMs were of similar amplitudes at the MED and LAT locations. These data indicate that lower amplitudes of FFRWs are recorded by placement of the atrial lead at the lateral wall of the right atrium. Oversensing of FFRWs may be prevented to improve functioning of the AV pacer-ICD.