Time to optimize vaccination strategies in blood cancer patients.

Immune response to vaccinations is dampened in patients with indolent lymphomas due to disease and treatment-related factors. The study by Lim et al. demonstrated impaired humoral response but intact cellular response to the SARS-CoV2 vaccine in patients with follicular lymphoma receiving front-line therapy. The results highlight the importance of several factors in predicting immune response to vaccination and provide estimates of immune response for different clinical scenarios and treatment points. Commentary on: Lim et al. Immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with follicular lymphoma receiving frontline chemoimmunotherapy. Br J Haematol 2024;205:440-451.

Revisiting intrathecal thiotepa: Efficacy and safety in secondary CNS malignancies.

Treating metastatic malignancies to the central nervous system (CNS) is challenging because many drugs cannot cross the blood-brain-barrier (BBB). Direct intrathecal (IT) drug administration into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a strategy to overcome this problem. Thiotepa has effective CNS penetration but its popularity has waned over the last two decades due to concerns about its efficacy and potential systemic toxicity. This review evaluates the available evidence for the use of IT thiotepa in hematologic malignancies and non-CNS solid tumors with leptomeningeal disease metastases (LMD). Our search shows that IT thiotepa is a reasonable alternative in hematologic malignancies and LMD due to solid organ malignancies. This suggests a potential role of IT thiotepa in second-or third-line treatment or a substitute role in cases of drug-shortages and adverse effects with other agents. Future research should focus on rigorous comparative trials to establish its definitive role in the evolving landscape of CNS-directed chemotherapy.

Impact of Prior Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Treatment on Brexucabtagene Autoleucel outcomes in Adults with B-cell ALL.

The effect of prior inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) treatment on brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) outcomes remains unclear in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), particularly the influence off previous InO response and the timing of administration. We conducted a retrospective multicenter analysis of 189 patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) ALL treated with brexu-cel. Over half of the patients received InO before brexu-cel (InO-exposed). InO-exposed patients were more heavily pretreated (p= 0.02) and frequently had active marrow disease pre-apheresis (p= 0.03). Response rate and toxicity profile following brexu-cel were comparable for InO-exposed and InO-naïve; however, consolidation therapy post brexu-cel response was utilized at a higher rate in InO-naïve patients (p= 0.005). With a median follow up of 11.4 months, InO-exposed patients had inferior progression-free survival (PFS) (p=0.013) and overall survival (OS) (p=0.006) in univariate analyses; however, prior InO exposure did not influence PFS (HR 1.20, 95%CI, 0.71-2.03) in multivariate models. When InO-exposed patients were stratified according to prior InO response, InO responders had superior PFS (p=0.002) and OS (p<0.0001) relative to InO-refractory. The timing of administering InO did not affect brexu-cel outcomes, with comparable PFS (p=0.51) and OS (p=0.86) for patients receiving InO as bridging therapy or pre-apheresis. In conclusion, while InO exposure was associated with inferior survival outcomes following brexu-cel in unadjusted analyses, these associations were no longer significant in multivariate analyses, suggesting it is unlikely that InO negatively impacts brexu-cel efficacy. Our data instead imply that InO-exposed recipients of brexu-cel tend to be higher-risk patients with intrinsic adverse leukemia biology.