A new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay system for human serum hepatic triglyceride lipase.

There is no established method for measuring human hepatic triglyceride (TG) lipase (HTGL) concentration in serum. In this study, we developed new monoclonal Abs (MoAbs) (9A1 mouse MoAb and 141A1 rat MoAb) that react with HTGL both in serum and in postheparin plasma (PHP) and established a novel ELISA system for measuring serum HTGL and PHP-HTGL concentrations. To confirm the specificity of MoAbs, we performed immunoprecipitation-immunoblotting analysis. Both 9A1 mouse MoAb and 141A1 rat MoAb were able to immunoprecipitate not only recombinant HTGL and PHP-HTGL but also serum HTGL, demonstrating that HTGL exists in serum obtained without heparin injection. This method yielded intra- and interassay coefficients of variation of <6% and showed no cross-reactivity with LPL or endothelial lipase. In clinical analysis on 42 male subjects with coronary artery disease, there were strong positive correlations of serum HTGL concentration to PHP-HTGL concentration (r = 0.727, P < 0.01). Serum HTGL concentrations showed positive correlations to serum TGs (r = 0.314, P < 0.05) and alanine aminotransferase (r = 0.406, P < 0.01), and tendencies toward positive correlations to LDL cholesterol, small dense LDL, and γGTP. These results suggest that this new ELISA method for measuring serum HTGL is applicable in daily clinical practice.

The role of plasma lipoprotein lipase, hepatic lipase and GPIHBP1 in the metabolism of remnant lipoproteins and small dense LDL in patients with coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between plasma lipoprotein lipase (LPL), hepatic triglyceride lipase (HTGL), glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchored HDL binding protein1 (GPIHBP1) concentration and the metabolism of remnant lipoproteins (RLP) and small dense LDL (sdLDL) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is not fully elucidated. METHODS: One hundred patients who underwent coronary angiography were enrolled. The plasma LPL, HTGL and GPIHBP1 concentrations were determined by ELISA. The time dependent changes in those lipases, lipids and lipoproteins were studied at a time-point just before, and 15min, 4h and 24h after heparin administration. RESULTS: The LPL concentration exhibited a significant positive correlation with HDL-C, and inversely correlated with TG and RLP-C. The HTGL concentration was positively correlated with RLP-C and sdLDL-C. The HTGL ratio of the pre-heparin/post-heparin plasma concentration and sdLDL-C/LDL-C ratio were significantly greater in CAD patients than in non-CAD patients. GPIHBP1 was positively correlated with LPL and inversely correlated with RLP-C and sdLDL-C. CONCLUSION: The HTGL concentration was positively correlated with RLP-C and sdLDL-C, while LPL and GPIHBP1 were inversely correlated with RLP-C and sdLDL-C. These results suggest that elevated HTGL is associated with increased CAD risk, while elevated LPL is associated with a reduction of CAD risk.

An automated method for measuring lipoprotein lipase and hepatic triglyceride lipase activities in post-heparin plasma.

BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and hepatic triglyceride lipase (HTGL) play a central role in triglyceride-rich lipoprotein metabolism by catalyzing the hydrolysis of triglycerides. Quantification of LPL and HTGL activity is useful for diagnosing lipid disorders, but there has been no automated method for measuring these lipase activities. METHODS: The automated kinetic colorimetric method was used for assaying LPL and HTGL activity in the post-heparin plasma using the natural long-chain fatty acid 2-diglyceride as a substrate. LPL activity was determined with apoCII and HTGL activity was determined without apoCII with 2 channel of auto-analyzer. RESULTS: The calibration curve for dilution tests of the LPL and HTGL activity assay ranged from 0.0 to 500 U/L. Within-run CV was obtained within a range of 5%. No interference was observed in the testing of specimens containing potentially interfering substances. The measurement range of LPL activity in the post-heparin plasma was 30-153 U/L, while HTGL activity was 135-431 U/L in normal controls. CONCLUSIONS: The L PL and HTGL activity assays are applicable to quantitating the LPL and HTGL activity in the post-heparin plasma. This assay is more convenient and faster than radiochemical assay and highly suitable for the detection of lipid disorders.