RESUMEN
We performed anorectal testing in 18 cis-gender men who have sex with men with symptoms consistent with mpox virus (MPXV) infection. We found rectal MPXV DNA in 9/9 with and 7/9 without proctitis. Future study of anorectal testing is needed and may inform the diagnosis and pathogenesis of MPXV disease.
Asunto(s)
Mpox , Proctitis , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Masculino , Humanos , Monkeypox virus/genética , Homosexualidad Masculina , Proctitis/diagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The recommendation for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients 65 to 80 years of age is equivocal, leaving patients with a difficult decision. We evaluated whether TAVR compared to SAVR is associated with reduced odds for loss of independent living in patients ≤65, 66 to 79, and ≥80 years of age. Further, we explored mechanisms of the association of TAVR and adverse discharge. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing TAVR or SAVR within a large academic medical system who lived independently before the procedure were included. A multivariable logistic regression model, adjusting for a priori defined confounders including patient demographics, preoperative comorbidities, and a risk score for adverse discharge after cardiac surgery, was used to assess the primary association. We tested the interaction of patient age with the association between aortic valve replacement (AVR) procedure and loss of independent living. We further assessed whether the primary association was mediated (ie, percentage of the association that can be attributed to the mediator) by the procedural duration as prespecified mediator. RESULTS: A total of 1751 patients (age median [quartiles; min-max], 76 [67, 84; 23-100]; sex, 56% female) were included. A total of 27% (222/812) of these patients undergoing SAVR and 20% (188/939) undergoing TAVR lost the ability to live independently. In our cohort, TAVR was associated with reduced odds for loss of independent living compared to SAVR (adjusted odds ratio [OR adj ] 0.19 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.14-0.26]; P < .001). This association was attenuated in patients ≤65 years of age (OR adj 0.63 [0.26-1.56]; P = .32) and between 66 and 79 years of age (OR adj 0.23 [0.15-0.35]; P < .001), and magnified in patients ≥80 years of age (OR adj 0.16 [0.10-0.25]; P < .001; P -for-interaction = .004). Among those >65 years of age, a shorter procedural duration mediated 50% (95% CI, 28-76; P < .001) of the beneficial association of TAVR and independent living. CONCLUSIONS: Patients >65 years of age undergoing TAVR compared to SAVR had reduced odds for loss of independent living. This association was partly mediated by shorter procedural duration. No association between AVR approach and the primary end point was found in patients ≤65 years of age.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vida Independiente , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether continuous remote patient monitoring (RPM) could significantly reduce return Emergency Department (ED) revisits among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients discharged from the emergency Department. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted from a total of 2833 COVID-19 diagnosed patients who presented to the Montefiore Medical Center ED between September 2020-March 2021. Study patients were remotely monitored through a digital platform that was supervised 24/7 by licensed healthcare professionals. Age and time-period matched controls were randomly sampled through retrospective review. The primary outcome was ED revisit rates among the two groups. RESULTS: In our study, 150 patients enrolled in the RPM program and 150 controls were sampled for a total of 300 patients. Overall, 59.1% of the patients identified as Hispanic/Latino. The RPM group had higher body mass index (BMI) (29 (25-35) vs. 27 (25-31) p-value 0.020) and rates of hypertension (50.7% (76) vs. 35.8% (54) p-value 0.009). There were no statistically significant differences in rates of ED revisit between the RPM group (8% (12)) and control group (9.3% (14)) (OR: 0.863; 95% CI:0.413-1. 803; p- 0.695). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Our study explored the impact of continuous monitoring versus intermittent monitoring for reducing ED revisits in a largely underrepresented population of the Bronx. Our study demonstrated that continuous remote patient monitoring showed no significant difference in preventing ED revisits compared to non-standardized intermittent monitoring. However, potential other acute care settings where RPM may be useful for identifying high-risk patients for early interventions warrant further study.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Monitoreo Fisiológico , Alta del Paciente , Readmisión del Paciente , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We investigated the impact of anemia based on admission hemoglobin (Hb) level as a prognostic risk factor for severe outcomes in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted from a random sample of 733 adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) obtained from a total of 4356 laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 cases who presented to the Emergency Department of Montefiore Medical Center between March-June 2020. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of in-hospital severe outcomes of COVID-19. A secondary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Among the 733 patients included in our final analysis, 438 patients (59.8%) presented with anemia. 105 patients (14.3%) had mild, and 333 patients (45.5%) had moderate-severe anemia. Overall, 437 patients (59.6%) had a composite endpoint of severe outcomes. On-admission anemia was an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality, (Odds Ratio 1.52, 95% CI [1.01-2.30], p = 0.046) but not for composite severe outcomes. However, moderate-severe anemia (Hb < 11 g/dL) on admission was independently associated with both severe outcomes (OR1.53, 95% CI [1.05-2.23], p = 0.028) and mortality (OR 1.67, 95% CI [1.09-2.56], p = 0.019) during hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Anemia on admission was independently associated with increased odds of all-cause mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Furthermore, moderate-severe anemia (Hb <11 g/dL) was an independent risk factor for severe COVID-19 outcomes. Moving forward, COVID-19 patient management and risk stratification may benefit from addressing anemia on admission.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Anemia/sangre , COVID-19/sangre , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hipotensión/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/epidemiología , Choque Séptico/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anemia/terapia , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/mortalidad , Causas de Muerte , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Hospitalización , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Increasing awareness of scientific misconduct has prompted various fields of medicine, including orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery, and dentistry to characterize the reasons for article retraction. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the reasons for and the rate of article retraction in the field of anesthesia within the last 30 years. METHODS: Based on a reproducible search strategy, two independent reviewers searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Retraction Watch website to identify retracted anesthesiology articles. Extracted data included: author names, year of publication, year of the retracted article, journal name, journal five-year impact factor, research type (clinical, basic science, or review), reason for article retraction, number of citations, and presence of a watermark indicating article retraction. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty articles were included for data extraction. Reasons for article retraction could be grouped into six broad categories. The most common reason for retraction was fraud (data fabrication or manipulation), which accounted for nearly half (49.4%) of all retractions, followed by lack of appropriate ethical approval (28%). Other reasons for retraction included publication issues (e.g., duplicate publications), plagiarism, and studies with methodologic or other non-fraud data issues. Four authors were associated with most of the retracted articles (59%). The majority (69%) of publications utilized a watermark on the original article to indicate that the article was retracted. Journal Citation Reports journal impact factors ranged from 0.9 to 48.1 (median [interquartile range (IQR)], 3.6 [2.5-4.0]), and the most cited article was referenced 197 times (median [IQR], 13 [5-26]). Most retracted articles (66%) were cited at least once by other journal articles after having been withdrawn. CONCLUSIONS: Most retracted articles in anesthesiology literature were retracted because of research misconduct. Limited information is available in the retraction notices, unless explicitly stated, so it is challenging to distinguish between an honest error and research misconduct. Therefore, a standardized reporting process with structured retraction notices is desired.
Asunto(s)
Anestesiología , Neurocirugia , Mala Conducta Científica , Humanos , Factor de Impacto de la Revista , PlagioRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The Transfusion Risk and Clinical Knowledge (TRACK) scoring system has been developed for predicting perioperative blood transfusions. However, the TRACK score needs to be validated externally in the US population. The primary objective of this study is to validate TRACK at the authors' institution. DESIGN: This study was a single-center retrospective analysis. SETTING: Operating room and intensive care units of academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Adult cardiac surgery patients. INTERVENTIONS: The authors retrospectively queried all cardiac surgeries at the authors' institution between 2010 and 2015 from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. The TRACK scores were determined for all patients. The authors used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to assess the discriminatory power of TRACK in predicting any perioperative, intraoperative, and postoperative transfusions. The maximum Youden's index was used to determine optimal cutoff scores for predicting perioperative transfusions. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The authors analyzed 2,776 cardiac surgery patients with 51.8% transfused perioperatively. The average TRACK score (mean ± standard deviation) in transfused versus non-transfused patients was 12.4 ± 7.2 versus 6.1 ± 5.4, respectively (p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve was 0.768 (95% confidence interval 0.800-0.835, p < 0.001) for any perioperative transfusion. Optimal sensitivity (67%) and specificity (73%) for predicting any perioperative transfusions was achieved with a TRACK score cutoff of greater than or equal to 22 of 32. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the validity of the TRACK score in predicting blood perioperative transfusions in cardiac surgery patients at the authors' institution. This study supports the external validity of TRACK and adds to its clinical utility by establishing cutoff scores for identifying patients at high risk of transfusion.
Asunto(s)
Transfusión Sanguínea/métodos , Transfusión Sanguínea/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/normas , Competencia Clínica/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conducts inspections of clinical investigation sites as a component of clinical trial regulation. The FDA describes the results of these inspections in the Clinical Investigator Inspection List (CLIIL). More serious violations are followed up in FDA warning letters issued to investigators. The primary objective of the current study is to qualitatively and quantitatively describe the CLIIL data and contents of FDA-issued warning letters from 2010 to 2014. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the CLIIL and FDA warning letters. For the CLIIL, we quantified the frequency of each violation among other data points. We compared recent data (2010-2014) to the previous 5 years (2005-2009). To analyze FDA warning letters, we developed a coding system to quantify the frequency of violations found. RESULTS: We analyzed 3637 inspections in the CLIIL database and 60 warning letters. Overall, there was a decrease or no change in all violations in the CLIIL database. The largest violation code reported was "failure to follow investigational plan" in both the 2005-2009 and 2010-2014 timeframes. Coding of FDA warning letters shows that the most common violations reported were failing to maintain accurate case histories (10.82%), enrolling ineligible subjects (8.85%), and failing to perform required tests (8.52%). CONCLUSIONS: The overall decrease in violations is encouraging. But, the high proportion of violations related to failure to follow the investigational plan is concerning as the complexity of trials increases. We conclude that more detailed information is necessary to accurately evaluate these violations. The current study provides a model for creating more granular data of violations to better inform clinical investigators and improve clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/normas , Correspondencia como Asunto , Investigadores/normas , Mala Conducta Científica , United States Food and Drug Administration/normas , Investigación Biomédica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Bases de Datos Factuales/normas , Humanos , Investigadores/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mala Conducta Científica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislación & jurisprudenciaAsunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , HumanosRESUMEN
Language barriers can prevent pain physicians and patients from forming meaningful rapport and drive health care disparities. Non-adherence with scheduled pain clinic appointments deprives patients with chronic pain of needed specialist care. Objective: We evaluated the benefit of comprehensive initiatives to overcome language barriers to improve patient adherence with initial scheduled chronic pain clinic appointments. Design: After implementation of our initiative, we performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis and fit logistic regression models to investigate the association between demographic factors and adherence. Setting: We collected retrospective data from an observational cohort with a scheduled appointment at the adult inner-city underserved outpatient Pain Center at Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York. Patients: Between March 2012 and March 2014, 14,459 appointments were scheduled; 3,035 of these appointments represented initial first visits; patients had a mean age of 53 years; 15% were predominantly Spanish-speaking, 65% were female. Interventions: Our initiative to overcome language barriers in our pain clinic included appointment reminders in the patient's preferred language, Spanish-speaking staff, and unified locations with equitable access. Outcome Measures: Our dependent variable was adherence with a first scheduled pain clinic appointment. Results: We found that after implementation of our initiative, speaking Spanish was now statistically significantly associated with higher rates of adherence with appointments (Odds Ratio 1.32, 95% confidence interval [1.061.64]). Conclusions: We infer from our results that coordinated initiatives to overcome language barriers can be beneficial in improving appointment adherence and access to care by enhancing rapport and communication between pain physicians and their patients. Perspective: The results of this retrospective cross-sectional analysis of patients' adherence with scheduled appointments in an inner-city chronic pain clinic suggests that targeted initiatives including a pre-clinic reminder phone call in the patient's own language may help to overcome language barriers and improve access to care.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/terapia , Barreras de Comunicación , Lenguaje , Cooperación del Paciente/etnología , Adulto , Citas y Horarios , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Población UrbanaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Even as the use of peripheral nerve blockade in the perioperative setting is increasing, neural injury secondary to accidental intraneural injection remains a significant patient safety concern. Current modalities, including electrical stimulation and ultrasound imaging, still lack consistency and absolute reliability in both the detection and prevention of this complication. The measurement of electrical impedance (EI) could be an easy and valuable additional tool to detect intraneural needle placement. Our objectives in this study were to measure the change in EI with intraneural needle advancement in recently amputated human limbs. METHODS: The study was conducted within 45 minutes of amputation. The nerves that were studied were the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa in above-knee amputations or the tibial nerve below the calf in below-knee amputations. The amputated limb was placed on a tray and under ultrasound imaging guidance, an insulated peripheral block needle connected to a nerve stimulator was placed extraneurally and subsequently advanced intraneurally. The experiment was repeated on the same nerve after exposure by surgical dissection. The differences in impedance measurements between intraneural and extraneural needle placement were compared. RESULTS: In the below-knee amputated extremity (tibial nerve, n = 6) specimens based on the ultrasound methods, mean ± SD for ultrasound-guided intraneural impedance was 10 ± 2 kΩ compared with an extraneural impedance of 6 ± 1.6 kΩ (P = 0.005). The difference between intraneural and extraneural impedance after open dissection was also significant when we repeated the analysis based on the same specimens (P = 0.005). Similarly, in the above-the-knee amputated extremity (sciatic nerve, n = 5) specimens, mean intraneural impedance was 35.2 ± 7.9 kΩ compared with an extraneural impedance of 25.2 ± 5.3 kΩ (P = 0.037). The difference between intraneural and extraneural impedance obtained after open dissection was also significant when we repeated the analysis based on the same specimens (P = 0.0002). The impedance values were consistent and similar to those obtained after open dissection. CONCLUSIONS: There is no reliable "gold standard" to predict or prevent intraneural needle placement during peripheral nerve blockade. This small sample-sized study demonstrated that there is a change in EI with intraneural needle advancement. In clinical practice, measurement of the EI in conjunction with nerve stimulation may serve as another tool to use for identifying intraneural needle placement during peripheral nerve blockade.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Extremidad Inferior/inervación , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Traumatismos de los Nervios Periféricos/prevención & control , Nervio Ciático/anatomía & histología , Nervio Tibial/anatomía & histología , Impedancia Eléctrica , Humanos , Inyecciones , Agujas , Bloqueo Nervioso/efectos adversos , Bloqueo Nervioso/instrumentación , Traumatismos de los Nervios Periféricos/etiología , Nervio Ciático/diagnóstico por imagen , Nervio Tibial/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía IntervencionalRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine whether there is a numerical difference between quantitative blood loss (QBL) versus visual estimation of blood loss (EBL) during cesarean delivery (CD), and whether initiation of QBL leads to increased recognition and intervention for postpartum hemorrhage. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 250 patients undergoing CD with only EBL documented and 250 patients undergoing CD with both EBL and QBL documented at Montefiore Medical Center between October 2017 and November 2018. Since May 2018, the protocol for all CD included documentation of EBL and QBL. RESULTS: Average EBL when documented alone (897.0 ml ± 301.0 ml) trended lower than average EBL when documented with QBL (940.0 ml ± 371.0 ml, P = 0.161). For CD with both blood loss documented, average EBL (940.0 ml ± 371.0 ml) was significantly lower than average QBL (1065.3 ml ± 649.8 ml, P = 0.0001). CD with both blood loss documented had a greater number of blood transfusions (24 CD, 9.6%) versus only EBL documented (14 CD, 5.6%) (P = 0.125). CONCLUSION: The use of QBL may function in the algorithm to determine up-front resuscitative intervention to improve maternal outcomes and merits further study.
Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Hemorragia Posparto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Hemorragia Posparto/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Volumen SanguíneoRESUMEN
Aim: We sought to investigate the impact of social determinants of health on pain clinic attendance. Materials & methods: Retrospective data were collected from the Pain Center at Montefiore Medical Center from 2016 to 2020 and analyzed with multivariable logistic regression. Results: African-Americans were less likely to attend appointments compared with White patients (odds ratio [OR]: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.70-0.77; p < 0.001). Males had decreased attendance compared with females (OR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.87-0.92; p < 0.001). Compared with commercial, those with Medicaid (OR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.66-0.72; p < 0.001) and Medicare (OR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.73-0.80; p < 0.001) insurance had decreased attendance. Conclusion: Significant disparities exist in pain clinic attendance based upon social determinants of health including race, gender and insurance type.
We aimed to investigate social determinants of health, such as race and type of insurance, and their role in patients' attendance of pain clinic appointments. Data were collected over several years and statistical analysis was performed on over 145,000 patient encounters. It was found that patients with Medicaid and Medicare were less likely to attend appointments compared with patients with commercial insurance. Black or AfricanAmerican patients were also less likely to attend compared with White patients. Spanish speaking patients were more likely to attend compared with English speaking patients, showing that previous interventions aimed at reducing the language barrier for Spanish speaking patients continue to be successful after many years. Overall, significant disparities exist in pain clinic attendance based upon social determinants of health. Further research is needed to investigate reasons and potential areas of interventions. Patients insured with Medicare and Medicaid may also have greater transportation issues, a potential focus for further studies and targeted interventions.
Asunto(s)
Medicare , Clínicas de Dolor , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Anciano , Estados Unidos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , MedicaidRESUMEN
Purpose: Ultrasound guidance during nerve blockade poses the challenge of maintaining in-plane alignment of the needle tip. The needle guidance device maintains needle alignment and assists with in-plane needle visualization. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of this device by comparing procedure performance during brachial plexus blockade with the conventional approach. Methods: After the Institutional Review Board approval and obtaining informed consent, 70 patients receiving either interscalene or supraclavicular nerve blocks were randomly assigned into 2 groups, a conventional approach versus utilizing the needle guidance device. An independent observer recorded: total procedure time; needle insertion time; number of unplanned redirections; and number of reinsertions. Additionally, physician satisfaction and ease of needle visualization were assessed. Results: Data from seventy patients were analyzed. The median [25th percentile-75th percentile] time to complete the block by the device assisted needle guidance group was 3 (2-3.75) minutes and 4 (3-6) minutes in the conventional approach group (p < 0.001). Additionally, subgroup analyses were performed in the supraclavicular block and interscalene block. Supraclavicular blockade, needle insertion time (median [25th percentile-75th percentile] in seconds) (106 [92-162] vs 197 [140-278]), total procedure time (3 [2-3] vs 4.5 [4-6] in minutes) and unplanned needle redirections (2 [1-5] vs 5.5 [3-9]) were significantly lower in needle guidance group (p < 0.001). With interscalene blockade, needle insertion time (86 [76-146] vs 126 [94-295]) and unplanned needle redirections (2 [1-3] vs 4 [2-8.5]) were significantly lower with needle guidance (p < 0.001), but total procedure time was similar. All the physicians reported that they would use the needle guidance again, and 90% would prefer it for in-plane blocks. Conclusion: Performing regional blocks using the needle guidance device reduces needle insertion time and unplanned needle redirections in brachial plexus blockade. Moreover, physician satisfaction also improved compared to the use of the conventional technique.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The rate of cesarean delivery is on the rise in the USA. Satisfactory postoperative analgesia remains a top priority for cesarean delivery. Multimodal analgesia with a reduction in opioid consumption and improvement in patient satisfaction is a goal for anesthesiologists caring for this patient population. Our study sought to assess whether IV acetaminophen in four divided doses over 24 h decreased pain scores and opioid requirements in patients undergoing cesarean delivery with neuraxial anesthesia. METHODS: 66 patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 12 mg, fentanyl 10 µg, and preservative-free morphine 150 µg were randomized to receive either IV acetaminophen or IV placebo for four consecutive doses in the first 24 h postoperatively. The need for rescue medication using morphine equivalence, pain scores, patient satisfaction, and side effects were assessed by a blinded researcher in the first 24 and 48 h postoperatively. RESULTS: There was no difference in opioid requirements in the acetaminophen versus placebo group, 44.32 ± 23 mg versus 47.59 ± 28 mg (p = .607), respectively at 24 h. There was also no difference at 48 h, 57.95 ± 20 mg versus 56.59 ± 22 mg (p = .795). Postoperative pain scores, patient satisfaction, and adverse events were similar in both groups as well. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study failed to demonstrate any additional benefits of administering multiple doses of IV acetaminophen for treating postoperative pain in patients who have undergone CS surgery and receiving intra-thecal morphine as part of their anesthesia and analgesia. TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER: NCT02069184.
Asunto(s)
Acetaminofén , Analgésicos no Narcóticos , Analgésicos Opioides , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Morfina , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , EmbarazoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 quarantine measures have created new challenges in the delivery of medical care, especially in the realm of medical and interventional chronic pain management. This study evaluated the effect of COVID-19 social distancing and quarantine measures on symptoms of pain and anxiety, as well as substance abuse and health care engagement in patients with chronic pain and the role of the clinic's virtual assessment initiatives in managing these patients. METHODS: A 24-question cross-sectional survey was conducted with patients with chronic pain seen at the Montefiore Medical Center Comprehensive Pain Clinic from June 2020 through July 2020. The survey was administered to 552 high-utilizer patients via telephone, evaluating domains such as pain, anxiety, substance use, and health care engagement. The questions were quantitively assessed on a Likert scale or a numerical rating scale. We used descriptive statistics to report our results. RESULTS: Of the 1,023 patients identified as high utilizers of the pain clinic, 552 patients participated in the survey. The median (25th-75th percentile) pain score reported was 7 (5-9) for all responders. Approximately 50% of the patients reported that they were anxious about their pain and somewhat or very concerned that their pain would be uncontrolled during the pandemic. Further, the severity of the pain reported was associated with sleep, appetite, and mood changes. In our cohort, 95% of all patients denied using alcohol, 92% denied using marijuana, and 98% denied using other recreational drugs to manage their pain during the pandemic. In addition, just more than three-fourths (79%) of all patients reported needing to speak with their health care provider during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: The survey conducted among high-utilizers demonstrated that patients who remained engaged with their health care team reported minimal concerns regarding chronic pain and associated symptoms during the COVID-19 quarantine period. In addition, the early implementation of virtual consults in the pain clinic may have contributed to mitigating patient concerns. Finally, the study also identified the importance of outreach and patient education on the availability and utilization of telemedicine services. Consequently, it is reasonable to implement virtual assessments and visits alongside other education outreach methods to engage patients with chronic pain who frequently utilize chronic pain health care resources.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Dolor Crónico , Drogas Ilícitas , Telemedicina , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , PandemiasRESUMEN
Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Patients. Sixty-three adult patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists Status I-III who are undergoing elective primary total hip arthroplasty. Interventions. Patients were randomized to the control group (no block) or the ESPB group (preoperative ultrasound-guided lumbar ESPB). Intraoperatively, all patients received spinal anesthesia with moderate sedation. Postoperatively, patients received a standardized multimodal analgesia protocol. Measurements. The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption at 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included cumulative opioid consumption at 8 hours and through 48 hours postoperatively and pain scores at 24 and 48 hours post surgery. Main Results. Thirty-one patients were randomized to the control group (spinal alone) and 32 patients to the ESPB group. The median opioid requirement in the first 8 hours after surgery was higher in the control group (28 mg of oral morphine equivalents (OME) versus 5 mg of OME in the ESPB group) (p = 0.013). There was no statistically significant difference in opioid consumption between the groups at 24 hours (p = 0.153) or 48 hours (p = 0.357) postoperatively. There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores between the two groups through 24 hours (p = 0.143) or 48 hours (p = 0.617) after surgery. Conclusion: Lumbar ESPB reduces opioid utilization during the first 8 hours postoperatively after total hip arthroplasty but not thereafter. Evaluating the use of either adding a local anesthetic adjunct to the ESPB or using longer-acting local anesthetic warrants further investigation.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of renal injury among pediatric patients who received aprotinin while undergoing cardiac surgery compared with those who received ε-aminocaproic acid (EACA). DESIGN: A retrospective observational study. SETTING: A single academic center. PARTICIPANTS: Pediatric cardiac patients who had cardiopulmonary bypass and received aprotinin or EACA. INTERVENTION: Patients undergoing pediatric cardiac surgery received aprotinin from 2005 to 2007 and EACA from 2008 to 2009. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was acute kidney injury (AKI) defined as serum Cr elevation at discharge more than 1.5 times the baseline value. Secondary outcomes included bleeding, blood transfusion, and the volume of chest tube drainage in the first 24 hours postoperatively. One hundred seventy-eight patients met inclusion criteria; 120 patients received aprotinin, and 58 patients received EACA. These 2 groups did not differ significantly in age, weight, or duration of cardiac bypass. Logistic regression analysis, adjusted for confounding variables (ie, baseline Cr, sex, age, CPB time, inotropic support and vasopressors), showed a higher odds of suffering AKI at discharge with the usage of aprotinin (odds ratio = 4.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-19.5; p = 0.03). The volume of the first 24 hours of chest tube drainage was not significantly different between groups, as well as packed red blood cells and cryoprecipitate units. However, fresh frozen plasma and platelets showed statistically significant differences with more transfusion in the EACA group. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, the authors observed a higher odds of AKI for aprotinin usage compared with EACA, suggesting that the known concern for adults with adverse kidney effects with aprotinin is also appropriate for pediatric patients.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/inducido químicamente , Ácido Aminocaproico/efectos adversos , Aprotinina/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/inducido químicamente , Lesión Renal Aguda/sangre , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Factores de Edad , Niño , Preescolar , Creatina/sangre , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular/efectos de los fármacos , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular/fisiología , Humanos , Lactante , Pruebas de Función Renal/métodos , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/sangre , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
In recent years, the delivery of health services has undergone a major paradigm shift towards expanded outpatient services and widespread use of telemedicine. Post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a treatment recalcitrant neuropathic pain condition referring to pain persisting more than three months from the initial onset of an acute herpes zoster. QUTENZA® (capsaicin 8% patch) is a single 1-hr localized treatment for PHN and can provide several months of pain relief per application. However, patient access to capsaicin 8% patch is limited due to sensitive handling protocols that require the patch application to occur under physicians or healthcare professionals under the close supervision of a physician. Herein, we describe a successful treatment of PHN at-home, using capsaicin 8% patch, performed under full supervision and instruction from a physician using video telehealth services. SIGNIFICANCE: This is a case report of the successful treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia at-home using Capsaicin 8% patch. The procedure was performed under full supervision and instruction from a physician using video telehealth services. Not only did the patient tolerate the procedure and have significant efficacy, she voiced preference to repeat treatment in this manner versus going back to the office.
Asunto(s)
Neuralgia Posherpética , Telemedicina , Capsaicina , Femenino , Humanos , Neuralgia Posherpética/tratamiento farmacológico , Dimensión del Dolor , Fármacos del Sistema Sensorial , Parche TransdérmicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is an extremely prevalent disease, whose etiology is often multifactorial. Facet joint arthropathy is one of the most common causes of CLBP. Facet joints are innervated by the medial branches of the primary and adjacent level dorsal rami and are, therefore, key potential targets for the symptomatic management of CLBP. A lumbar medial branch nerve block (MBB) procedure is often used to assist in the diagnosis of facet mediated CLBP. For unclear reasons, some patients experience protracted relief of CLBP after diagnostic MBBs alone. OBJECTIVE: To describe the phenomenon of protracted relief of CLBP after diagnostic MBBs and search for predictors of this response. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent MBB procedures by a single practitioner, over a 2 year period, was conducted. SETTING: All patients were seen at the Montefiore Multidisciplinary Pain Program, Bronx, NY. METHODS: Data from follow up visits was used to categorize patient's response to MBBs as having no relief (NR), transient relief (TR) or protracted relief (PR). Patient demographics and characteristics were collected, and a multivariate analysis investigating associations with PR was conducted. RESULTS: 146 patients met inclusion criteria. 41 patients (28%) had NR, 54 (37%) had TR, and 51 (35%) had PR. CLBP symptom duration of < 6 months (P = 0.013) and unilateral back pain symptoms (P = 0.0253) were significantly associated with PR after MBB. LIMITATION: This is a retrospective study with a relatively small sample size conducted on patients belonging to a single practitioner. Outcomes were based largely on subjective patient satisfaction scores. CONCLUSIONS: In select patients, MBB may produce protracted relief of CLBP symptoms. The authors present distinct hypotheses which may help explain the therapeutic effects of diagnostic MBB procedures.