Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Orthop Sci ; 23(2): 282-288, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29352625

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Repetitive electrical nerve stimulation of the lower limb may improve neurogenic claudication in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) as originally described by Tamaki et al. We tested if this neuromodulation technique affects the F-wave conduction on both sides to explore the underlying physiologic mechanisms. METHODS: We studied a total of 26 LSS patients, assigning 16 to a study group receiving repetitive tibial nerve stimulation at the ankle (RTNS) on one leg, and 10 to a group without RTNS. RTNS conditioning consisted of a 0.3-ms duration square-wave pulse with an intensity 20% above the motor threshold, delivered at a rate of 5 Hz for 5 min. All patients underwent the walking test and the F-wave and M-wave studies for the tibial nerve on both sides twice; once as the baseline, and once after either the 5-min RTNS or 5-min rest. RESULTS: Compared to the baselines, a 5-min RTNS increased claudication distance (176 ± 96 m vs 329 ± 133 m; p = 0.0004) and slightly but significantly shortened F-wave minimal onset latency (i.e., increased F-wave conduction velocity) not only on the side receiving RTNS (50.7 ± 4.0 ms vs 49.2 ± 4.2 ms; p = 0.00081) but also on the contralateral side (50.1 ± 4.6 ms vs 47.9 ± 4.2 ms; p = 0.011). A 5-min rest in the group not receiving RTNS neither had a significant change on claudication distance nor on any F-wave measurements. The M response remained unchanged in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present study verified a beneficial effect of unilaterally applied RTNS of a mild intensity on neurogenic claudication and bilateral F-wave conduction. Our F-wave data suggest that this type of neuromodulation could be best explained by an RTNS-induced widespread sympathetic tone reduction with vasodilation, which partially counters a walking-induced further decline in nerve blood flow in LSS patients who already have ischemic cauda equina.


Asunto(s)
Electromiografía/métodos , Claudicación Intermitente/terapia , Estenosis Espinal/complicaciones , Nervio Tibial , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio/métodos , Caminata/fisiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Claudicación Intermitente/etiología , Región Lumbosacra , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Conducción Nerviosa , Recuperación de la Función , Valores de Referencia , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estenosis Espinal/diagnóstico , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Rehabil Med ; 46(10): 1046-9, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25187993

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether repetitive tibial nerve stimulation (RTNS) affects neurogenic claudication and F-wave conduction in lumbar spinal stenosis. DESIGN: An intervention study: before/after trial. SUBJECTS: Data for 12 central lumbar spinal stenosis patients were compared with 13 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers. METHODS: A conditioning RTNS at the ankle, 0.3-ms duration square-wave pulses with an intensity 20% higher than the motor threshold, was applied at a rate of 5/s for 5 min. We assessed the effects of RTNS on the claudication distance at which the lumbar spinal stenosis patients can no longer continue walking due to increasing leg symptoms, and on tibial F-wave measurements. RESULTS: A comparison between mean pre-RTNS and post-RTNS revealed a significant difference in claudication distance (66 m (standard deviation (SD) 19) vs 133 m (SD 37); p = 0.003), mean F-wave minimal latency (48.3 ms (SD 1.7) vs 44.8 ms (SD 1.0); p = 0.007) and mean F-wave conduction velocity (53.3 m/s (SD 2.0) vs 55.5 m/s (SD 1.9); p = 0.009) in the lumbar spinal stenosis group, but not in the control group. CONCLUSION: RTNS has beneficial effects on neurogenic claudication and F-wave conduction in central lumbar spinal stenosis patients. This phenomenon may have practical value in providing a new therapeutic modality for lumbar spinal stenosis.


Asunto(s)
Claudicación Intermitente/fisiopatología , Claudicación Intermitente/rehabilitación , Estenosis Espinal/fisiopatología , Nervio Tibial/fisiología , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Controlados Antes y Después , Femenino , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares , Masculino , Neuronas Motoras/fisiología , Conducción Nerviosa , Resultado del Tratamiento , Caminata/fisiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA