Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Pediatr ; 274: 114192, 2024 Jul 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39004167

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the extent to which pump use is associated with breastfeeding duration. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of weighted data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System from Maine, Michigan, New Mexico, and Utah between 2016 and 2021. Included respondents had a live-born infant at survey completion, initiated breastfeeding, and had nonmissing data for reported pump use and breastfeeding duration. Using Cox proportional hazard regression, we quantified the hazard of breastfeeding cessation and median duration (weeks) of breastfeeding by pump use. Pump use was suspected to be differentially impacted by race and ethnicity; an interaction was tested in our regression model. RESULTS: Our sample included 19 719 mothers (weighted n = 723 808) with mean age (SD) 29.5 years (5.6). Mothers with age <18 years, Medicaid enrollment, race, and ethnicity other than non-Hispanic White, lower income or education, and unmarried status demonstrated lower pump use (P < .001). Pump use was associated with 37% lower hazard of breastfeeding cessation (adjusted hazard ratio 0.63; 95% CI: 0.56-0.70) and 21 additional weeks of breastfeeding on average. The association varied by race and ethnicity (significant interaction observed between pump use and non-Hispanic Black mothers, P = .013); stratified analysis demonstrated the lowest hazard of breastfeeding cessation among non-Hispanic Black and Native American pump users (adjusted hazard ratio 0.47 [0.40-0.54] and 0.51 [0.37-0.70], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Pump use was associated with longer breastfeeding duration; the greatest magnitudes of association were found among non-Hispanic Black and Native American participants, groups disproportionately affected by breastfeeding inequities. Future research examining the context around and causal impact of pump use on breastfeeding outcomes is needed.

2.
Yale J Biol Med ; 97(1): 99-106, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38559458

RESUMEN

Pregnant individuals and infants in the US are experiencing rising morbidity and mortality rates. Breastfeeding is a cost-effective intervention associated with a lower risk of health conditions driving dyadic morbidity and mortality, including cardiometabolic disease and sudden infant death. Pregnant individuals and infants from racial/ethnic subgroups facing the highest risk of mortality also have the lowest breastfeeding rates, likely reflective of generational socioeconomic marginalization and its impact on health outcomes. Promoting breastfeeding among groups with the lowest rates could improve the health of dyads with the greatest health risk and facilitate more equitable, person-centered lactation outcomes. Multiple barriers to lactation initiation and duration exist for families who have been socioeconomically marginalized by health and public systems. These include the lack of paid parental leave, increased access to subsidized human milk substitutes, and reduced access to professional and lay breastfeeding expertise. Breast pumps have the potential to mitigate these barriers, making breastfeeding more accessible to all interested dyads. In 2012, The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) greatly expanded access to pumps through the preventative services mandate, with a single pump now available to most US families. Despite their near ubiquitous use among lactating individuals, little research has been conducted on how and when to use pumps appropriately to optimize breastfeeding outcomes. There is a timely and critical need for policy, scholarship, and education around pump use given their widespread provision and potential to promote equity for those families facing the greatest barriers to achieving their personal breastfeeding goals.


Asunto(s)
Lactancia Materna , Lactancia , Lactante , Femenino , Embarazo , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
3.
Int Breastfeed J ; 19(1): 37, 2024 May 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796467

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Paid parental leave policies may promote breastfeeding, which can have short- and long-term health benefits for both members of the birthing person-infant dyad. In the United States, where 56% of the workforce qualifies for unpaid federal medical leave, certain states have recently enacted paid parental and family leave policies. We aimed to assess the extent to which living in states with versus without paid family leave was associated with feeding regimens that included breastfeeding. METHODS: In this cross-sectional analysis of the 2021 National Immunization Survey-Child, we assessed feeding outcomes: (1) exclusively breastfed (only fed breastmilk-never infant formula-both before and after six months of age), (2) late mixed breastfeeding (formula after six months), (3) early mixed breastfeeding (breastfed, formula before six months), and (4) never breastfed. We conducted Pearson χ2 to compare social-demographic characteristics and multivariable nominal regression to assess extent to paid family leave was associated with breastfeeding regimens, compared with never breastfeeding. RESULTS: Of the 35,995 respondents, 5,806 (25% of weighted respondents) were from states with paid family leave policies. Compared with never breastfeeding, all feeding that incorporated breastfeeding-exclusive breastfeeding, late mixed feeding (breastfed, formula introduced after six months), and early mixed feeding (breastfed, formula introduced before six months)-were more prevalent in states with paid family leave policies. The adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) and differences in adjusted prevalence compared with never breastfeeding in states with versus without paid family leave policies were: aPR 1.41 (95% CI 1.15, 1.73), 5.36% difference for exclusive breastfeeding; aPR 1.25 (95% CI 1.01, 1.53), 3.19% difference for late mixed feeding, aPR 1.32 (95% CI 1.32, 1.97), 5.42% difference for early mixed feeding. CONCLUSION: States with paid family leave policies have higher rates of any breastfeeding and of exclusive breastfeeding than states without such policies. Because all feeding types that incorporate breastfeeding were higher in states with paid family leave policies, expansion of paid family leave may improve breastfeeding rates.


Asunto(s)
Lactancia Materna , Humanos , Lactancia Materna/psicología , Lactancia Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Estados Unidos , Lactante , Adulto , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Permiso Parental , Adulto Joven , Absentismo Familiar , Adolescente
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA