RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Early recognition and prompt, appropriate management may reduce mortality in patients with sepsis. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign's guidelines suggest the use of dynamic measurements to guide fluid resuscitation in sepsis; although these methods are rarely employed to monitor cardiac output in response to fluid administration outside intensive care units. This service evaluation investigated the introduction of a nurse led protocolised goal-directed fluid management using a non-invasive cardiac output monitor to the standard assessment of hypotensive ward patients. METHODS: We introduced the use of a goal-directed fluid management protocol into our critical care outreach teams' standard clinical assessment. Forty-nine sequential patients before and thirty-nine after its introduction were included in the assessment. RESULTS: Patients in the post-intervention cohort received less fluid in the 6 h following outreach assessment (750mls vs 1200mls). There were no differences in clinical background or rates of renal replacement therapy, but rates of invasive and non-invasive ventilation were reduced (0% vs 31%). Although the groups were similar, the post-intervention patients had lower recorded blood pressures. CONCLUSION: IV fluid therapy in the patient with hypotension complicating sepsis can be challenging. Excessive IV fluid administration is commonplace and associated with harm, and the use of advanced non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring by trained nurses can provide objective evaluation of individualised response to treatment. Avoiding excessive IV fluid and earlier institution of appropriate vasopressor therapy may improve patient outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Adoption of dynamic measures of cardiac output outside of critical care by trained critical care nurses is feasible and may translate into improved patient outcomes. In hospitals with a nurse-led critical care outreach service, consideration should be given to such an approach.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Divergence between deterioration to life-threatening COVID-19 or clinical improvement occurs for most within the first 14 days of symptoms. Life-threatening COVID-19 shares clinical similarities with Macrophage Activation Syndrome, which can be driven by elevated Free Interleukin-18 (IL-18) due to failure of negative-feedback release of IL-18 binding protein (IL-18bp). We, therefore, designed a prospective, longitudinal cohort study to examine IL-18 negative-feedback control in relation to COVID-19 severity and mortality from symptom day 15 onwards. METHODS: 662 blood samples, matched to time from symptom onset, from 206 COVID-19 patients were analysed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for IL-18 and IL-18bp, enabling calculation of free IL-18 (fIL-18) using the updated dissociation constant (Kd) of 0.05 nmol. Adjusted multivariate regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between highest fIL-18 and outcome measures of COVID-19 severity and mortality. Re-calculated fIL-18 values from a previously studied healthy cohort are also presented. RESULTS: Range of fIL-18 in COVID-19 cohort was 10.05-1157.7 pg/ml. Up to symptom day 14, mean fIL-18 levels increased in all patients. Levels in survivors declined thereafter, but remained elevated in non-survivors. Adjusted regression analysis from symptom day 15 onwards showed a 100 mmHg decrease in PaO2/FiO2 (primary outcome) for each 37.7 pg/ml increase in highest fIL-18 (p < 0.03). Per 50 pg/ml increase in highest fIL-18, adjusted logistic regression gave an odds-ratio (OR) for crude 60-day mortality of 1.41 (1.1-2.0) (p < 0.03), and an OR for death with hypoxaemic respiratory failure of 1.90 [1.3-3.1] (p < 0.01). Highest fIL-18 was associated also with organ failure in patients with hypoxaemic respiratory failure, with an increase of 63.67 pg/ml for every additional organ supported (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated free IL-18 levels from symptom day 15 onwards are associated with COVID-19 severity and mortality. ISRCTN: #13450549; registration date: 30/12/2020.