RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The bidirectional relationship between disease activity and mental health in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has prompted investigations into the efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions such as acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) on biopsychosocial outcomes. We aimed to examine the efficacy of an ACT program (intervention) in comparison with a cognitive behavioral therapy-informed psychoeducation program (active control) for individuals with IBD and coexistent psychological distress. Both programs were delivered online through a hybrid format (i.e., therapist-led and participant-led sessions). METHODS: A total of 120 adults with IBD were randomized to either the intervention (N = 61) or active control groups (N = 59). Efficacy was determined using linear mixed models for group differences, in rate of changes in study outcomes, between baseline, postintervention, and 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: The primary outcome health-related quality of life significantly improved in the intervention group when compared with the active control group, with a significantly different rate of change observed from baseline to postintervention ( t [190] = 2.15, P = 0.033) in favor of the intervention group with a medium effect size (ß = 0.41, mean difference = 0.07, 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.12, P = 0.014). Similarly, the secondary outcome Crohn's disease activity significantly reduced in the intervention group when compared with the active control group, with a significantly different rate of change observed from baseline to 3-month follow-up ( t [90] = -2.40, P = 0.018) in favor of the intervention group with a large effect size (ß = -0.77, mean difference = -9.43, 95% confidence interval -13.72 to -5.13, P < 0.001) ( P = 0.014). Furthermore, when observing the rate of change in outcomes over time for the groups separately, anxiety symptoms and pain significantly improved in the intervention group only, and conversely, ulcerative colitis activity and stress symptoms significantly improved in the active control group only. All other outcomes (N = 14) significantly improved over time in both groups including IBD activity, gastrointestinal unhelpful thinking patterns, visceral anxiety, fatigue interference, fatigue severity, fatigue frequency, psychological inflexibility, self-efficacy, resilience, current health status, depression symptoms, IBD control, and pain catastrophizing; however, these changes were not significantly different between the groups. DISCUSSION: Both programs were of benefit to people with IBD and distress. However, ACT offers a significant added benefit for health-related quality of life and self-reported Crohn's disease activity and may be a useful adjuvant therapy in integrated IBD care.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and functional dyspepsia (FD) are common disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). The Rome IV criteria are the gold standard for research when diagnosing DGBI. However, bothersomeness, or the degree to which symptoms are distressing or disruptive to a person's daily life, is a potential treatment-seeking motivator that is not assessed by the Rome criteria. The Rome Foundation developed and published diagnostic criteria for clinical practice that include bothersomeness. We aimed to evaluate these constructs via patient focus groups to determine what prompts healthcare-seeking as a means to assess its value in the Rome clinical criteria. METHODS: Adults meeting Rome IV criteria for IBS, FD, or both participated in focus groups in Australia and the United States. Semi-structured interview transcripts were analyzed using Template Thematic Analysis, with three a priori and other a posteriori themes refined iteratively through team discussion and consensus. KEY RESULTS: Participants confirmed the frequency and duration of symptoms was not sufficient to reflect illness experience. Four major themes emerged: (1) Bothersomeness should be included in assessments of IBS and FD; (2) Patients find many DGBI symptoms bothersome; (3) Bothersomeness traverses multiple domains of quality of life; (4) Patients may hesitate to seek medical advice due to past negative experiences. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: These findings support the value of the Rome Clinical Criteria. They emphasize the importance of expanding assessments of patients with DGBI to include how bothersome they perceive symptoms to be, how much symptoms interfere with their daily life, and what may moderate their decisions to seek treatment.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mental health has been identified as contributing to the pathogenesis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). Resultingly, psychotherapeutic interventions, such as Mindfulness-Based Interventions (MBI), have been increasingly investigated for improving IBD outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the current state of evidence of MBI's for individuals living with IBD. METHODS: We performed a systematic review searching Medline, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane and Scopus, to identify controlled clinical trials, investigating MBI's for various IBD biopsychosocial outcomes. Data was pooled using the inverse-variance random effects model, with restricted maximum likelihood estimation, providing the standardized mean difference (SMD) between control and experimental groups, at both short and long-term follow up. RESULTS: We identified 8 studies with 575 participants. Meta-analytic results found that MBI's were more efficacious than control groups in the short-term improvement of stress (SMD = -0.38, 95% CI [-0.65, -0.10], p = 0.007), mindfulness (SMD = 0.59, 95% CI [0.36, 0.83], p = 0.00001), C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (SMD = -0.25, 95% CI [-0.49, -0.01], p = 0.04) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (SMD = 0.45, 95% CI [0.24, 0.66], p = 0.0001) (including all emotional, bowel, social and systemic subscales). This was maintained in the long-term for stress (SMD = -0.44, 95% CI [-0.88, -0.01], p < 0.05) and mindfulness (SMD = 0.52, 95% CI [0.14, 0.90], p = 0.008), but not for HRQoL, with no long-term data available for CRP. CONCLUSIONS: Given that MBI's appear to be effective in improving several IBD outcomes, they may be a useful adjuvant therapy in wholistic IBD care, with further trials warranted.