Water load test before and after PPI therapy in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease may complain of epigastric pain, bloating, early satiety, epigastric fullness, epigastric burning, nausea and vomiting. AIMS: To evaluate the symptoms in response to gastric distension and its relationship to a therapeutic course in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease using the water load test, compared to healthy controls. METHODS: Thirty gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients with grade A oesophagitis (studied before and after 4 weeks of therapy with esomeprazole, 40 mg per day) and 15 patients with reflux-related symptoms demonstrated at wireless pH monitoring (non-erosive reflux disease) were compared to 30 healthy volunteers. RESULTS: Patients with grade A oesophagitis and with reflux-related symptoms ingested significantly lower water volumes than did controls, before onset of fullness, without statistically significant difference between erosive or non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease; this variable improved in patients after treatment. Nausea scores were higher basally in patients, pre- and post-therapy, and improved after therapy. Thirty-minute fullness and bloating scores improved after therapy in all gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients compared to controls and pre-therapy. In all pre-treatment patients, a significant correlation was found only with epigastric fullness; after treatment, there was no significant relationship between the water load and the symptom scores. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with reflux-related symptoms, with or without grade A oesophagitis, the water load test is frequently abnormal, suggesting an altered gastric function. This could explain the incomplete resolution of symptoms after treatment in some patients, and should lead to additional studies aimed at exploring gastric function in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients.

The diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is known to cause erosive esophagitis, Barrett esophagus and has been linked to the development of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Currently, endoscopy is the main clinical tool for visualizing esophageal lesions, but the majority of GERD patients do not have endoscopic visible lesions and other methods are required. Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring is the gold standard in diagnosing GERD, since it measures distal esophageal acid exposure and demonstrates the relationship between symptoms and acid reflux. The effectiveness of selective gastric acid suppressive therapy led to the introduction of short trials of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) to diagnose GERD and they are often used as a first line diagnostic tool in clinical practice and, in particular, in the primary care setting, the current trend being that gastroenterologists are asked to evaluate mainly patients with persistent GERD symptoms while on PPI therapy. In these patients the question is whether the persistent symptoms are or not associated with reflux (acid or nonacid). Recently, either combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring or bilimetry allow to study the mechanisms underlying the persistent symptoms on acid suppressive therapy. Manometry is mandatory prior to any surgical approach and to verify motility disorders that could be associated to GERD.

Acute recurrent diverticulitis is prevented by oral administration of a polybacterial lysate suspension.

AIM: The main cause of acute diverticulitis is the abnormal accumulation of fecal bacteria within the diverticular lumen, leading to a balancing between normal probiotic microflora and pathogenic species; Gram negative Entero-bacteriaceae, mainly Escherichia coli and Proteus spp, are the genders that usually cause the disease-related symptoms, due to their ability to adhere to intestinal mucosa. The intestine is well known as the largest human lymphoepithelial organ and daily produces more antibodies, mainly secretory IgAs, than do all other lymphoid tissues. IgAs have different immune and anti-inflammatory properties. The aim of this study was to verify the efficacy of an oral immunostimulant highly-purified, polymicrobial lysate in the prevention of recurrent attacks of diverticulitis and in the improvement of symptoms. METHODS: The study was carried out on 83 consecutive patients suffering from recurrent symptomatic acute diverticulitis and with at least 2 attacks in the previous year; patients were randomly assigned to receive (group A) an oral polybacterial lysate suspension or to a no-treatment clinical follow-up as controls (group B). RESULTS: A total of 76 patients (41 in group A and 35 in group B) terminated the study period. the sums of the scores for symptoms, reported on day schedules, were calculated and examined by means of ANOVA statistical analysis. Statistical differences between group A vs group B were recorded after 1 month (p<0.05) and 3 months (p<0.01) of treatment with the oral polybacterial lysate suspension. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the administration of an oral enterovaccine for the prophylaxis of recurrent diverticulitis is effective and well tolerated, probably due to a direct stimulation of IgA-mediated mucosal defences.