RESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Medical therapy for idiopathic male infertility has historically been empiric and based on small observational studies rather than larger well designed clinical trials. This review is timely and relevant because of the recent publication of several studies that are less susceptible to bias because of being placebo-controlled and more highly powered. RECENT FINDINGS: The largest proportion of recent publications covered antioxidants, with eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in this review. The Males, Antioxidants, and Infertility (MOXI) trial is of particular interest, being a large multicenter RCT, which demonstrated no improvement in semen parameters or live-birth rates with antioxidant use. In addition, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i) have been shown to improve semen parameters, while duloxetine use was not associated with any adverse effects on sperm. Progress was also made in the realm of regenerative medicine, with the realization of the first successful primate model of sperm production from pluripotent stem cells. SUMMARY: It may be time to stop recommending antioxidants for idiopathic male infertility given recent studies suggesting lack of efficacy, but given their relative safety, it is reasonable to continue their use until the evidence is overwhelming. Otherwise, stem cell therapy is another anticipated area of research interest.
Asunto(s)
Infertilidad Masculina , Nacimiento Vivo , Embarazo , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Índice de Embarazo , Infertilidad Masculina/tratamiento farmacológico , Antioxidantes/uso terapéutico , Antioxidantes/farmacología , Semen , Estudios Multicéntricos como AsuntoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The summary presented herein represents Part I of the two-part series dedicated to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility in Men: AUA/ASRM Guideline. Part I outlines the appropriate evaluation of the male in an infertile couple. Recommendations proceed from obtaining an appropriate history and physical exam (Appendix I), as well as diagnostic testing, where indicated. MATERIALS/METHODS: The Emergency Care Research Institute Evidence-based Practice Center team searched PubMed®, Embase®, and Medline from January, 2000 through May, 2019. When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate), or C (low) for support of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendations. In the absence of sufficient evidence, additional information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions (table 1[Table: see text]). This summary is being simultaneously published in Fertility and Sterility and The Journal of Urology. RESULTS: This Guideline provides updated, evidence-based recommendations regarding evaluation of male infertility as well as the association of male infertility with other important health conditions. The detection of male infertility increases the risk of subsequent development of health problems for men. In addition, specific medical conditions are associated with some causes for male infertility. Evaluation and treatment recommendations are summarized in the associated algorithm (figure[Figure: see text]). CONCLUSION: The presence of male infertility is crucial to the health of patients and its effects must be considered for the welfare of society. This document will undergo updating as the knowledge regarding current treatments and future treatment options continues to expand.
Asunto(s)
Infertilidad Masculina/diagnóstico , Medicina Reproductiva/normas , Urología/normas , Consejo/normas , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/métodos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Humanos , Infertilidad Masculina/etiología , Infertilidad Masculina/terapia , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Medicina Reproductiva/métodos , Escroto/diagnóstico por imagen , Análisis de Semen , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Ultrasonografía , Estados Unidos , Urología/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The summary presented herein represents Part II of the two-part series dedicated to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility in Men: AUA/ASRM Guideline. Part II outlines the appropriate management of the male in an infertile couple. Medical therapies, surgical techniques, as well as use of intrauterine insemination (IUI)/in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) are covered to allow for optimal patient management. Please refer to Part I for discussion on evaluation of the infertile male and discussion of relevant health conditions that are associated with male infertility. MATERIALS/METHODS: The Emergency Care Research Institute Evidence-based Practice Center team searched PubMed®, Embase®, and Medline from January 2000 through May 2019. When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate), or C (low) for support of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendations. In the absence of sufficient evidence, additional information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions (table[Table: see text]). This summary is being simultaneously published in Fertility and Sterility and The Journal of Urology. RESULTS: This Guideline provides updated, evidence-based recommendations regarding management of male infertility. Such recommendations are summarized in the associated algorithm (figure[Figure: see text]). CONCLUSION: Male contributions to infertility are prevalent, and specific treatment as well as assisted reproductive techniques are effective at managing male infertility. This document will undergo additional literature reviews and updating as the knowledge regarding current treatments and future treatment options continues to expand.