Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 125
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Radiographics ; 43(11): e230054, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37824413

RESUMEN

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common primary pancreatic malignancy, ranking fourth in cancer-related mortality in the United States. Typically, PDAC appears on images as a hypovascular mass with upstream pancreatic duct dilatation and abrupt duct cutoff, distal pancreatic atrophy, and vascular encasement, with metastatic involvement including lymphadenopathy. However, atypical manifestations that may limit detection of the underlying PDAC may also occur. Atypical PDAC features include findings related to associated conditions such as acute or chronic pancreatitis, a mass that is isointense to the parenchyma, multiplicity, diffuse tumor infiltration, associated calcifications, and cystic components. Several neoplastic and inflammatory conditions can mimic PDAC, such as paraduodenal "groove" pancreatitis, autoimmune pancreatitis, focal acute and chronic pancreatitis, neuroendocrine tumors, solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, metastases, and lymphoma. Differentiation of these conditions from PDAC can be challenging due to overlapping CT and MRI features; however, certain findings can help in differentiation. Diffusion-weighted MRI can be helpful but also can be nonspecific. Accurate diagnosis is pivotal for guiding therapeutic planning and potential outcomes in PDAC and avoiding biopsy or surgical treatment of some of these mimics. Biopsy may still be required for diagnosis in some cases. The authors describe the typical and atypical imaging findings of PDAC and features that may help to differentiate PDAC from its mimics. ©RSNA, 2023 Online supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center. See the invited commentary by Zins in this issue.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Pancreatitis Crónica , Humanos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas
2.
Radiographics ; 43(4): e220113, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36893051

RESUMEN

The commonly taught tenet that intratesticular lesions are always malignant and extratesticular scrotal lesions are always benign is a simplistic statement that erroneously minimizes the significance of extratesticular scrotal masses and their diagnosis. Yet, disease in the extratesticular space is commonly encountered by clinicians and radiologists and is often a source of uncertainty in diagnosis and management. Given the embryologically rooted complex anatomy of this region, a wide range of pathologic conditions is possible. Radiologists may not be familiar with some of these conditions; further, many of these lesions can have a specific sonographic appearance, allowing accurate diagnosis that can minimize surgical intervention. Lastly, malignancies can occur in the extratesticular space-although this is less common than in the testicles-and proper recognition of findings that warrant additional imaging or surgery is critical in optimizing outcomes. The authors present a compartmental anatomic framework for differential diagnosis of extratesticular scrotal masses and provide a comprehensive illustrative display of many of the pathologic conditions that can be encountered to familiarize radiologists with the sonographic appearances of these lesions. They also review management of these lesions and scenarios where US may not be definitive in diagnosis and selective use of scrotal MRI can be helpful. © RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.


Asunto(s)
Escroto , Neoplasias Testiculares , Masculino , Humanos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Escroto/diagnóstico por imagen , Escroto/patología , Ultrasonografía , Neoplasias Testiculares/patología
3.
Radiographics ; 42(1): 87-105, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34855543

RESUMEN

The widespread use of high-spatial-resolution cross-sectional imaging has led to an increase in detection of incidental pancreatic cystic lesions. These lesions are a diverse group, ranging from indolent and premalignant lesions to invasive cancers. The diagnosis of several of these lesions can be suggested on the basis of their imaging appearance, while many other lesions require follow-up imaging and/or aspiration. The smaller cystic lesions, often branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, have overlapping imaging characteristics that make diagnostic assessment of the natural history and malignancy risk confusing. Expert panels have developed societal guidelines, based on a consensus, for surveillance of these lesions. However, these guidelines are often inconsistent and are constantly evolving as additional scientific data are accumulated. Identification of features associated with increased risk of malignancy is important for proper management. The concept of field defect, whereby pancreatic adenocarcinoma develops at a site different from the site of the pancreatic cyst, adds to the complexity of screening guidelines. As a result of the differences in guidelines, key stakeholders (eg, radiologists, gastroenterologists, and surgeons) must review and come to a consensus regarding which guideline, or combination of guidelines, to follow at their individual institutions. Standardized reporting and macros are helpful for ensuring the uniformity of interpretations. Radiologists play a critical role in the detection and characterization of pancreatic cystic lesions, in the follow-up recommendations for these lesions, and in the detection of associated cancer. An invited commentary by Zaheer is available online. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2021.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Quiste Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Humanos , Páncreas , Quiste Pancreático/diagnóstico por imagen , Quiste Pancreático/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología
4.
Radiographics ; 39(2): 388-412, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30707646

RESUMEN

Intraluminal pathologic conditions of the bile ducts and gallbladder are common, most frequently consisting of calculi and adenocarcinoma. In recent years, intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile ducts (IPN-B), which is analogous to intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas, has been recognized as a distinct pathologic entity and a precursor lesion to adenocarcinoma of the bile ducts. Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm (ITPN) of the bile duct was subsequently described as a distinct pathologic entity. With increased awareness and advances in imaging techniques, these lesions are diagnosed with increased frequency at preoperative imaging. A similar neoplasm in the gallbladder is referred to as intracholecystic papillary neoplasm. These lesions are often diagnosed at a preinvasive stage and have a better prognosis than invasive cholangiocarcinoma when treated with curative resection, underscoring the importance of an accurate imaging diagnosis. The most common causes of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder are cholesterol polyps and adenomyomatosis. These lesions need to be differentiated from the less common but clinically important adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder. Imaging is crucial to identify polyps that are at high risk for malignancy so that the appropriate management choice between imaging follow-up and cholecystectomy can be made by the treating physicians. Other less common gallbladder tumors, such as gallbladder adenomas, lymphoma, and metastases to the gallbladder, can manifest as intraluminal tumors; and awareness of these lesions is also important. In this article, the recent literature is reviewed; and the imaging appearances, histopathologic findings, and management of uncommon intraluminal tumors of the bile ducts and gallbladder and their mimics are discussed. ©RSNA, 2019.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Papilar/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adenoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/patología , Carcinoma Papilar/patología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Enfermedades de la Vesícula Biliar/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo
5.
J Comput Assist Tomogr ; 43(1): 29-38, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30211798

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to review the etiopathogenesis, molecular cytogenetics, histopathology, clinical features, and multimodality imaging features of desmoid fibromatosis. Recent advances in the management of desmoid fibromatosis will also be discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Desmoid fibromatosis is a rare soft tissue neoplasm with a high incidence of local recurrence. Imaging plays an important role in the diagnosis and management of this disease.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Imagen/métodos , Fibromatosis Agresiva/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Imagen Multimodal/métodos
6.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 210(2): W70-W79, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29355401

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Differentiation of scrotal lesions is often dictated by whether they are intraor extratesticular. However, these regions are not entirely isolated, and disease processes can span both spaces. We review a variety of lesions that can involve both regions, describe the relevant anatomy, and illustrate their imaging appearances. CONCLUSION: Identification of involvement of both intra- and extratesticular regions by a single process can narrow the differential considerations and help arrive at the correct diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Escroto/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Testiculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Escroto/patología , Enfermedades Testiculares/patología
7.
Radiographics ; 37(7): 2026-2042, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29131770

RESUMEN

Characterization of renal tumors is critical to determine the best therapeutic approach and improve overall patient survival. Because of increased use of high-resolution cross-sectional imaging in clinical practice, renal masses are being discovered with increased frequency. As a result, accurate imaging characterization of these lesions is more important than ever. However, because of the wide array of imaging features encountered as well as overlapping characteristics, identifying reliable imaging criteria for differentiating malignant from benign renal masses remains a challenge. Multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging based on various anatomic and functional parameters has an important role and adds diagnostic value in detection and characterization of renal masses. MR imaging may allow distinction of benign solid renal masses from several renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes, potentially suggest the histologic grade of a neoplasm, and play an important role in ensuring appropriate patient management to avoid unnecessary surgery or other interventions. It is also a useful noninvasive imaging tool for patients who undergo active surveillance of renal masses and for follow-up after treatment of a renal mass. The purpose of this article is to review the characteristic MR imaging features of RCC and common benign renal masses and propose a diagnostic imaging approach to evaluation of solid renal masses using multiparametric MR imaging. ©RSNA, 2017.


Asunto(s)
Adenoma Oxifílico/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiomiolipoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Células Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos
8.
Radiographics ; 36(7): 2049-2063, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27831842

RESUMEN

Urachal anomalies are more common than previously thought, with more cases discovered incidentally, because of the increased use of cross-sectional imaging. Although an abnormal persistence of an embryologic communication between the bladder and the umbilicus is often recognized and managed in childhood, it may persist into adulthood, with a greater risk of morbidity. Congenital urachal anomalies that are detected early can benefit from an optimized management including surgical approach with a complete resection of the urachal remnant in cases when spontaneous resolution or medical management has failed. At imaging, the different types of urachal anomalies have a distinct appearance. A patent urachus is recognized as an elongated patent connection between the bladder and the umbilicus. An umbilical-urachal sinus is depicted as a blind focal dilatation at the umbilical end, whereas a vesicourachal diverticulum is a focal outpouching at the vesical end. Urachal cysts are visualized as midline fluid-filled sacs most frequently located near the bladder dome. Complications of urachal anomalies have nonspecific clinical findings and can mimic other abdominal and pelvic processes. Potential complications, such as infection and tumors, should be recognized early to ensure optimal management. Understanding of the embryonic development of the urachus is necessary for the radiologist to diagnose the wide variety of urachal disease. ©RSNA, 2016.


Asunto(s)
Ultrasonografía/métodos , Quiste del Uraco/diagnóstico por imagen , Uraco/anomalías , Uraco/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos
9.
Radiographics ; 36(2): 414-32, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26849154

RESUMEN

Adrenal lesions are a common imaging finding. The vast majority of adrenal lesions are adenomas, which contain intracytoplasmic (microscopic) fat. It is important to distinguish between adenomas and malignant tumors, and chemical shift magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can be used to accomplish this distinction by depicting the fat in adenomas. Chemical shift imaging is based on the difference in precession frequencies of water and fat molecules, which causes them to be in different relative phases during the acquisition sequence and allows in-phase and opposed-phase images to be obtained. It is important to acquire these images by using the earliest possible echo times, with the opposed-phase echo before the in-phase echo, and by using a single breath hold to preserve diagnostic accuracy. Intracytoplasmic fat is depicted as signal drop on opposed-phase images when compared with in-phase images. Both qualitative and quantitative methods for assessing signal drop are detailed. The appearances of adrenal adenomas and other adrenal tumors on chemical shift MR images are described, and discriminatory ability at chemical shift MR imaging compared with that at adrenal computed tomography (CT) is explained. Other adrenal-related conditions in which chemical shift MR imaging is helpful are also discussed. Chemical shift MR imaging is a robust tool for evaluating adrenal lesions that are indeterminate at nonenhanced CT. However, it is important to know the advantages and disadvantages, including several potential imaging pitfalls. The characterization of adrenal lesions by using chemical shift MR imaging and adrenal CT should always occur in the appropriate clinical setting.


Asunto(s)
Adenoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/diagnóstico por imagen , Glándulas Suprarrenales/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Tejido Adiposo/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/secundario , Tumor de Resto Suprarrenal/diagnóstico por imagen , Artefactos , Agua Corporal , Carcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemosiderosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos , Hallazgos Incidentales , Lipoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Primarias Múltiples/diagnóstico por imagen , Feocromocitoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Protones , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
10.
Radiographics ; 35(1): 125-41, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25590393

RESUMEN

Cystic renal lesions are commonly encountered in abdominal imaging. Although most cystic renal lesions are benign simple cysts, complex renal cysts, infectious cystic renal disease, and multifocal cystic renal disease are also common phenomena. The Bosniak classification system provides a useful means of categorizing cystic renal lesions but places less emphasis on their underlying pathophysiology. Cystic renal diseases can be categorized as focal, multifocal, or infectious lesions. Diseases that manifest with focal lesions, such as cystic renal cell carcinoma, mixed epithelial and stromal tumor, and cystic nephroma, are often difficult to differentiate but have differing implications for follow-up after resection. Multifocal cystic renal lesions can be categorized as acquired or heritable. Acquired entities, such as glomerulocystic kidney disease, lithium-induced nephrotoxicity, acquired cystic kidney disease, multicystic dysplastic kidney, and localized cystic renal disease, often have distinct imaging and clinical features that allow definitive diagnosis. Heritable diseases, such as autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, von Hippel-Lindau disease, and tuberous sclerosis, are usually easily identified and have various implications for patient management. Infectious diseases have varied imaging appearances, and the possibility of infection must not be overlooked when assessing a cystic renal lesion. A thorough understanding of the spectrum of cystic renal disease will allow the radiologist to make a more specific diagnosis and provide the clinician with optimal recommendations for further diagnostic testing and follow-up imaging.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Renales Quísticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Medios de Contraste , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Enfermedades Renales Quísticas/clasificación , Enfermedades Renales Quísticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos
11.
Abdom Imaging ; 40(6): 1567-80, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25682292

RESUMEN

Choledochal cysts are rare cystic dilatations of the intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic biliary tree, which may be mistaken for other cystic lesions if their characteristic features are not recognized. The etiology is unknown, and likely multifactorial, and it is uncertain whether they are congenital or acquired. Multiple imaging modalities can be used to diagnose choledochal cysts, including ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. MRCP has replaced the more invasive techniques as the gold standard of diagnosis. In addition, MRCP is helpful in detecting an abnormal pancreaticobiliary junction, which is seen in the majority of choledochal cysts. Reaching a correct diagnosis is essential, given the associated risk of complications, including cholangitis, biliary strictures, stones, and malignancy, and accurately assessing the location and length of involvement is important for surgical planning. This review aims to familiarize radiologists with the different types of choledochal cysts and their imaging features according to the Todani classification.


Asunto(s)
Conductos Biliares/diagnóstico por imagen , Conductos Biliares/patología , Colangiografía/métodos , Quiste del Colédoco/diagnóstico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Adulto , Anciano , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Pancreatocolangiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Medios de Contraste , Femenino , Humanos , Aumento de la Imagen , Imagenología Tridimensional , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Ultrasonografía , Adulto Joven
12.
Abdom Imaging ; 40(7): 2747-60, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26036792

RESUMEN

Hemorrhage of the kidneys and adrenal glands has many etiologies. In the adrenal glands, trauma, anticoagulation, stress, sepsis, surgery, and neoplasms are common causes of hemorrhage. In the kidneys, reasons for hemorrhage include trauma, bleeding diathesis, vascular diseases, infection, infarction, hemorrhagic cyst rupture, the Antopol-Goldman lesion, and neoplasms. Angiomyolipoma and renal cell carcinoma are the neoplasms most commonly associated with hemorrhage in the kidneys and adrenal cortical carcinoma, metastases, and pheochromocytoma are associated with hemorrhage in the adrenal glands. Understanding the computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging features, and causes of hemorrhage in the kidneys and adrenal glands is critical. It is also important to keep in mind that mimickers of hemorrhage exist, including lymphoma in both the kidneys and adrenal glands, and melanoma metastases in the adrenal glands. Appropriate imaging follow-up of renal and adrenal hemorrhage should occur to exclude an underlying malignancy as the cause. If there is suspicion for malignancy that cannot be definitively diagnosed on imaging, surgery or biopsy may be warranted. Angiography may be indicated when there is a suspected underlying vascular disease. Unnecessary intervention, such as nephrectomy, may be avoided in patients with benign causes or no underlying disease. Appropriate management is dependent on accurate diagnosis of the cause of renal or adrenal hemorrhage and it is incumbent upon the radiologist to determine the etiology.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/diagnóstico , Glándulas Suprarrenales , Hemorragia/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Renales/diagnóstico , Riñón , Enfermedades de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/etiología , Glándulas Suprarrenales/diagnóstico por imagen , Glándulas Suprarrenales/lesiones , Angiografía , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Riñón/lesiones , Enfermedades Renales/etiología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Ultrasonografía
13.
Abdom Imaging ; 40(2): 237-45, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25128214

RESUMEN

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a surgical technique that has been evolving rapidly. Endoscopic submucosal dissection was initiated in 1999, in Japan, for en-bloc resection of large lesions of the stomach (Zhou et al., World J Gastroenterol 19:6962-6968, 2013, ; Kobara et al., Clin Exp Gastroenterol 7:67-74, 2014). Since then, many additional therapies utilizing natural transluminal endoscopic approach have evolved. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a minimally invasive type of transluminal endoscopic surgery that was recently developed for the treatment of achalasia and esophageal motility disorders. The peroral endoscopic myotomy is a less invasive surgical treatment that is suitable for all types of achalasia and used as an alternate to the Heller myotomy. The radiographic findings of achalasia and surgical changes after Heller myotomy have been described, however, very little is available on the post-POEM esophagram appearance. The purpose of this article is to illustrate the anatomy, surgical procedure, and normal and abnormal findings seen on esophagrams in patients who have undergone a POEM.


Asunto(s)
Acalasia del Esófago/diagnóstico por imagen , Acalasia del Esófago/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/métodos , Esófago/diagnóstico por imagen , Esófago/cirugía , Fluoroscopía , Humanos
14.
Radiographics ; 34(3): 624-41, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24819785

RESUMEN

The ampulla of Vater is an important anatomic landmark where the common bile duct and main pancreatic duct converge in the major duodenal papilla. Imaging evaluation of the ampulla and periampullary region poses a unique diagnostic challenge to radiologists because of the region's complex and variable anatomy and the variety of lesions that can occur. Lesions intrinsic to the ampulla and involved segment of the biliary tree can be neoplastic, inflammatory, or congenital. Neoplastic lesions include ampullary adenocarcinomas and adenomas, which often are difficult to differentiate, as well as pancreatic or duodenal adenocarcinomas, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and cholangiocarcinomas. Ultrasonography (US), computed tomography, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and MR cholangiopancreatography are commonly used to evaluate this region. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic US examination may be necessary for more definitive evaluation. Periampullary conditions in the duodenum that may secondarily involve the ampulla include neoplasms, duodenitis, duodenal diverticula, and Brunner's gland hyperplasia or hamartomas. Because these lesions can exhibit a wide overlap of imaging features and subtle or nonspecific imaging findings, diagnosis is made on the basis of patient age, clinical history, and imaging and laboratory findings. Given the complexity of imaging evaluation of the ampulla and periampullary region, it is essential for radiologists to understand the variety of lesions that can occur and recognize their imaging characteristics.


Asunto(s)
Ampolla Hepatopancreática/patología , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Conducto Colédoco/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico por Imagen/métodos , Ampolla Hepatopancreática/diagnóstico por imagen , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Pancreatocolangiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Conducto Colédoco/diagnóstico por imagen , Conducto Colédoco/patología , Humanos , Perforación Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía
15.
Abdom Imaging ; 39(4): 892-907, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24633598

RESUMEN

Mesenteric abnormalities are often incidentally discovered on cross-sectional imaging performed during daily clinical practice. Findings can range from the vague "misty mesentery" to solid masses, and the possible etiologic causes encompass a wide spectrum of underlying pathologies including infectious, inflammatory, and neoplastic processes. Unfortunately, the clinical and imaging findings are often non-specific and may overlap. This article discusses the various diseases that result in mesenteric abnormalities. It provides a framework to non-invasively differentiate these entities, when possible.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Peritoneales/diagnóstico , Algoritmos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Mesenterio/diagnóstico por imagen , Mesenterio/patología , Imagen Multimodal , Neoplasias Peritoneales/diagnóstico , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
16.
Abdom Imaging ; 39(4): 853-74, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24627043

RESUMEN

Gallbladder perforation is a potentially life-threatening condition commonly seen as a complication of acute cholecystitis. Urgent surgical intervention is often needed to reduce serious morbidity and mortality. It presents a diagnostic challenge due to nonspecific symptoms, leading to a delay in diagnosis. Imaging plays a vital role in early identification of this potentially fatal condition and evaluation by more than one imaging modality may be required to make the diagnosis. Knowledge of specific and ancillary imaging findings is crucial to avoid misdiagnosis. In this article, we will review the risk factors, pathophysiology, and surgical classification of gallbladder perforation and discuss the role of multimodality imaging in its diagnosis. Differential diagnoses on imaging will also be discussed.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Imagen , Enfermedades de la Vesícula Biliar/diagnóstico , Colecistitis Aguda/complicaciones , Colecistografía , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Vesícula Biliar/diagnóstico por imagen , Vesícula Biliar/patología , Enfermedades de la Vesícula Biliar/etiología , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Ultrasonografía
17.
Abdom Imaging ; 39(5): 1014-20, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24705669

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine whether asymmetric spermatic cord vessel enhancement (ASE) on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) indicates scrotal pathology. METHODS: Sixty-one male patients with scrotal symptoms who underwent both scrotal ultrasound (US) and CECT within 24 h were identified through a radiology information system. Twenty-eight emergency department patients who underwent CECT only for unrelated symptoms were included for comparison. Two blinded radiologists independently reviewed each CECT scan for qualitative ASE. These data were compared with US diagnoses, when present. A third blinded radiologist reviewed each CECT scan for quantitative ASE by measuring Hounsfield unit (HU) density ratios. McNemar, Kappa, Student's t test, and ANOVA were used for analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-nine total patients included 28 with CECT only and 61 with CECT and US, of which 41 had abnormal US: 15 acute epididymitis and/or orchitis, 7 testicular neoplasms, 11 varicoceles, and 8 with other pathologies. Twenty patients with normal US and 28 patients with CECT only served as control groups. Identification of ASE agreed with US diagnosis of epididymitis (and/or orchitis) or testicular neoplasm (reader 1: κ = 0.79, reader 2: κ = 0.75) with average 95.5% sensitivity and 88.8% specificity, and no significant difference between readers (p = 0.58). For epididymitis (and/or orchitis) or testicular neoplasm patients, the average ratio of spermatic cord HU density (ipsilateral:contralateral) was significantly different from other patients (4.01 vs. 1.26, p = 0.0025). CONCLUSION: ASE on CECT shows stronger correlation with epididymitis (and/or orchitis) and testicular neoplasm compared with other scrotal pathologies. If discovered on CECT, this should prompt further clinical and/or imaging workup.


Asunto(s)
Medios de Contraste , Epididimitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica/métodos , Cordón Espermático/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Testiculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ultrasonografía , Adulto Joven
18.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 21(6S): S144-S167, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38823942

RESUMEN

Initial imaging evaluation of hydronephrosis of unknown etiology is a complex subject and is dependent on clinical context. In asymptomatic patients, it is often best conducted via CT urography (CTU) without and with contrast, MR urography (MRU) without and with contrast, or scintigraphic evaluation with mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) imaging. For symptomatic patients, CTU without and with contrast, MRU without and with contrast, MAG3 scintigraphy, or ultrasound of the kidneys and bladder with Doppler imaging are all viable initial imaging studies. In asymptomatic pregnant patients, nonionizing imaging with US of the kidneys and bladder with Doppler imaging is preferred. Similarly, in symptomatic pregnant patients, US of the kidneys and bladder with Doppler imaging or MRU without contrast is the imaging study of choice, as both ionizing radiation and gadolinium contrast are avoided in pregnancy. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Hidronefrosis , Sociedades Médicas , Humanos , Hidronefrosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Estados Unidos , Femenino , Embarazo , Diagnóstico por Imagen/métodos , Medios de Contraste
19.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 21(6S): S292-S309, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38823951

RESUMEN

Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. A search for the underlying cause of infection typically includes radiological imaging as part of this investigation. This document focuses on thoracic and abdominopelvic causes of sepsis. In 2017, the global incidence of sepsis was estimated to be 48.9 million cases, with 11 million sepsis-related deaths (accounting for nearly 20% of all global deaths); therefore, understanding which imaging modalities and types of studies are acceptable or not acceptable is imperative. The 5 variants provided include the most commonly encountered scenarios in the setting of sepsis along with recommendations and data for each imaging study. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Sepsis , Sociedades Médicas , Humanos , Sepsis/diagnóstico por imagen , Estados Unidos , Diagnóstico por Imagen/normas
20.
Hepatology ; 55(5): 1432-42, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22109811

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Although most cancers are considered predominantly systemic processes, this may not hold true for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The literature regarding patterns of progression of HCC (local versus systemic) has been relatively sparse. Our objectives were to: (1) analyze patterns of progression in HCC patients presenting with intrahepatic disease from initial treatment until death, and (2) identify clinically relevant risk factors for the development of metastases. Over a 9-year period, 285 patients treated with transarterial locoregional therapies underwent scheduled imaging follow-up from treatment until death and were categorized by pattern of progression: (i) intrahepatic (increased tumor enhancement/size, development/progression of vascular invasion, new hepatic lesions) progression or (ii) extrahepatic (adrenal/bone/lung/lymph node) metastases. Uni/multivariate analyses assessing the risk factors for the development of metastases were performed. The median time from last scan to death was 2.4 months (interquartile range: 1.3-4.8 months). The time to development of metastases, vascular invasion, and/or new lesions was 13.8 months (confidence interval: 11.3-17.7 months). Of the 209 patients followed until death, only 50 developed extrahepatic metastases (24%). Multivariate analyses identified age <65 years (P = 0.038), alpha-fetoprotein >200 ng/mL (P = 0.04), and vascular invasion (P = 0.017) as significant predictors of metastases development. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the risk factors associated with the development of metastases may help guide assessment of patient prognosis. Because 76% of patients presenting with local disease treated with locoregional therapies die without developing extrahepatic metastases, the notion of HCC as a systemic disease, as detected by imaging, may be reconsidered.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundario , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Biopsia con Aguja , Neoplasias Óseas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Óseas/fisiopatología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Intervalos de Confianza , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/fisiopatología , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Peritoneales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/fisiopatología , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA