68Ga-DOTA-TOC uptake in neuroendocrine tumour and healthy tissue: differentiation of physiological uptake and pathological processes in PET/CT.

PURPOSE: We wanted to establish the range of (68)Ga-DOTA-TOC uptake in liver and bone metastases of patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NET) and to establish the range of its uptake in pancreatic NET. This would allow differentiation between physiological uptake and tumour-related somatostatin receptor expression in the pancreas (including the uncinate process), liver and bone. Finally, we wanted to test for differences in patients with NET, either treated or not treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). METHODS: In 249 patients, 390 (68)Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT studies were performed. The clinical indications for PET/CT were gastroenteropancreatic NET (194 studies), nongastroenteropancreatic NET (origin in the lung and rectum; 46 studies), NET of unknown primary (111 studies), phaeochromocytoma/glomus tumours (18 studies), and radioiodine-negative metastatic thyroid carcinoma (21 studies). RESULTS: SUVmax (mean ± standard deviation) values of (68)Ga-DOTA-TOC were 29.8 ± 16.5 in 162 liver metastases, 19.8 ± 18.8 in 89 bone metastases and 34.6 ± 17.1 in 43 pancreatic NET (33.6 ± 14.3 in 30 tumours of the uncinate process and 36.3 ± 21.5 in 13 tumours of the pancreatic tail). A significant difference in SUVmax (p < 0.02) was found in liver metastases of NET patients treated with PRRT. There were significant differences in SUVmax between nonmalignant and malignant tissue for both bone and liver metastases and for pancreatic NET including the uncinate process (p < 0.0001). At a cut-off value of 17.1 the specificity and sensitivity of SUVmax for differentiating tumours in the uncinate process were 93.6 % and 90.0 %, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: (68)Ga-DOTA-TOC is an excellent tracer for the imaging of tumours expressing somatostatin receptors on the tumour cell surface, facilitating the detection of even small tumour lesions. The noninvasive PET/CT approach by measurement of regional SUVmax can offer important clinical information to distinguish between physiological and pathological somatostatin receptor expression, especially in the uncinate process. PRRT does not significantly influence SUVmax, except in liver metastases of patients with NET.

Nephrotoxicity and hematotoxicity one year after four cycles of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and its impact on future treatment planning. A retrospective analysis. / Nefrotoxicidad y hematotoxicidad un año después de cuatro ciclos de terapia con péptidos marcados con radionúclidos (PRRT) y su impacto en la planificación del tratamiento futuro. Un análisis retrospectivo.

INTRODUCTION: Nephro- and hematotoxicity after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) have been described in multiple studies with heterogeneous cumulative activities, number of cycles or radiolabelled peptides. Though highly differentiated metastasized neuroendocrine tumours (NET) have long progression free survival, they may progress. We analysed long-term side effects in a homogenous treatment schedule in PRRT-patients and their impact on future oncologic treatment in case of progression. METHODS: From our database 89/384 patients receiving the same PRRT (Lu-177-DOTATATE or Y-90-DOTATOC) 4 times every 10 to 12 weeks and a follow-up at 12 months were analysed. One patient had three and 11 patients had two times four PRRT-cycles resulting in 102 cases. eGFR, Hb, WBC and platelets before the first and one year after the fourth therapy cycle were compared. eGFR-Grading was done according to chronic kidney disease classification (CKD) and grading of hematotoxicity according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Impact of age, gender, cumulative activity, type of PRRT on long-term-toxicity was also assessed. RESULTS: eGFR grade 1-2 dropped from 87/102 at the baseline to 71 cases at follow-up (p<0.001). Before treatment grade 3a was found in 13, grade 3b in 2 cases, and at follow-up grade 3a in 25, grade 3b in 5, and grade 4 in 1 case. Anaemia prior to PRRT and at follow-up was grade 0 in 63 versus 48 (p<0.001), grade 1 in 36 versus 48, and grade 2 in three versus six cases. In white blood cell count and platelets, there were no significant changes in grading occurring. Subgroup analysis revealed that only in the age group 65 and older was there a higher incidence for anaemia (p=0.006). CONCLUSIóN: In roughly 20% of cases an increase in grading of nephro- or hematotoxicity is observed. In those patients, except in one, toxicity findings were mild or moderate one year after completion of four cycles of PRRT with either Y-90- or Lu-177-SST-analogues. In terms of safety, PRRT has no critical impact on further oncologic treatment options in the case of disease progression.