Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 49
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 2024 Sep 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39297634

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This research aimed to establish the inaugural evidence-based cancer survivorship guidelines for Japan, with a particular focus on exercise and physical activity, in order to enhance health outcomes for cancer survivors. METHODS: A panel of experts, including oncologists, physicians, exercise scientists, epidemiologists and patient advocates, utilized a modified Delphi process and systematic reviews to establish consensus on exercise recommendations for cancer survivors. The panel focused on setting the objectives of the Clinical Practice Guidelines and addressing crucial clinical issues in Japan. Recommendations were formulated based on the strength and certainty of evidence, the benefit-harm balance and patient values and preferences. RESULTS: The panel formulated exercise recommendations for cancer survivors of two age groups: 18-64 years and ≥65 years. The recommendations for both age groups are consistent, emphasizing the importance of regular exercise and physical activity tailored to individual capabilities and health conditions. The guidelines underline the benefits of exercise in improving the overall health and quality of life of cancer survivors. This consensus on exercise recommendations marks a significant step in the development of comprehensive cancer survivorship guidelines in Japan, with potential implications for improving clinical outcomes and advancing research in cancer survivorship. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines will serve as a critical resource for cancer survivors, highlighting exercise as a key component of survivorship care, and for clinicians, in recommending appropriate physical activities to improve survivor health and well-being.

2.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 9: CD014820, 2024 Sep 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39301879

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is characterised by a rapid decline in kidney function and is caused by a variety of clinical conditions. The incidence of AKI in hospitalised adults is high. In animal studies, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) have been shown to act as a novel nephroprotective agent against ischaemic, toxic, and septic AKI by inhibiting apoptosis, promoting cell proliferation, and inducing antioxidant and anti-inflammatory responses. As a result, ESAs may reduce the incidence of AKI in humans. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted on the efficacy and safety of ESAs, but no prior systematic reviews exist that comprehensively examine ESAs with respect to AKI prevention, although the effectiveness of these agents has been examined for a range of other diseases and clinical situations. OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to look at the benefits and harms of ESAs for preventing AKI in the context of any health condition. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 30 August 2024 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs and quasi-RCTs (in which allocation to treatment was based on alternate assignment or order of medical records, admission dates, date of birth or other non-random methods) that compared ESAs with placebo or standard care in people at risk of AKI. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias for included studies. We used random-effects model meta-analyses to perform quantitative synthesis of the data. We used the I2 statistic to measure heterogeneity amongst the studies in each analysis. We indicated summary estimates as a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes with their 95% confidence interval (CI). We assessed the certainty of the evidence for each main outcome using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 20 studies (36 records, 5348 participants) were included. The number of participants ranged from 10 to 1302, and most studies were carried out in single centres (13/20). All the included studies compared ESAs to placebo or usual care. Many of the studies were judged to have unclear or high risk of reporting bias, but were at low risk for other types of bias. ESAs, when compared to control interventions, may make little or no difference to the risk of AKI (18 studies, 5314 participants: RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.10; I² = 19%; moderate-certainty evidence), death (18 studies, 5263 participants: RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.06; I² = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence), or the initiation of dialysis (14 studies, 2059 participants: RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.51; I² = 0%; low-certainty evidence). Even with standardised measurement of AKI, the studies showed no difference in results between different routes of administration (subcutaneous or intravenous), background diseases (cardiac surgeries, children or neonates, other adults at risk of AKI), or duration or dose of ESA. ESAs may make little or no difference to the risk of thrombosis when compared to control interventions (8 studies, 3484 participants: RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.24; I² = 0%). Similarly, there were probably no differences in kidney function measures and adverse events such as myocardial infarction, stroke or hypertension. However, this may be due to the low incidence of these adverse events. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In patients at risk of AKI, ESAs probably do not reduce the risk of AKI or death and may not reduce the need for starting dialysis. Similarly, there were probably no differences in kidney function measures and adverse events such as thrombosis, myocardial infarction, stroke or hypertension. There are currently two ongoing studies that have either not been completed or published, and it is unclear whether they will change the results. Caution should be exercised when using ESAs to prevent AKI.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Hematínicos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Lesión Renal Aguda/prevención & control , Hematínicos/uso terapéutico , Hematínicos/efectos adversos , Sesgo , Eritropoyetina/uso terapéutico , Eritropoyetina/efectos adversos , Adulto
3.
Clin Exp Nephrol ; 28(3): 217-224, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37924431

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although rituximab (RTX) is recommended by kidney disease improving global outcomes as one of the standard therapies for primary membranous nephropathy (pMN), given the constraint of insurance coverage, it is not clear how the drug is used in Japan. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted via a web-based survey between November and December 2021. The participants were certified nephrologists and recruited through convenience sampling. Experience with RTX for pMN was compared to experience with RTX for minimal change nephrotic syndrome (MCNS). Reasons for withholding RTX for pMN, even when it is indicated, were also investigated. Furthermore, the proportion difference in RTX experience was analyzed. RESULTS: Responses from 380 nephrologists across 278 facilities were analyzed. RTX was used for pMN by 83 (21.8%), which was less than the 181 (47.6%) who had used RTX for MCNS (ratio of proportions: 0.46). RTX use for pMN was more frequent in facilities performing 41-80 and 81 or more kidney biopsies annually (vs. none) and by physicians with experience in anti-PLA2R antibody measurement. RTX administration for pMN was covered by insurance for 56 (67.5%), was facility-paid for 10 (12.0%), and was copaid by patients for 6 (7.2%). The most common reason for withholding RTX for pMN was difficulty in ensuring financing (146, 79.3%). CONCLUSIONS: RTX use for pMN is less common than for MCNS but not infrequent. Treatment with RTX was more frequent in biopsy-intensive facilities, and it was fully paid by the facility or patient in one-fifth of cases.


Asunto(s)
Glomerulonefritis Membranosa , Nefrosis Lipoidea , Humanos , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Glomerulonefritis Membranosa/patología , Nefrólogos , Japón , Estudios Transversales , Nefrosis Lipoidea/tratamiento farmacológico , Internet
4.
Clin Exp Nephrol ; 28(6): 531-538, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38402500

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: International practice guidelines advocate for the use of anti-phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) antibody testing to diagnose primary membranous nephropathy (pMN). This study aimed to clarify the current status of anti-PLA2R antibody testing in the diagnosis of pMN in Japan and to scrutinize the factors associated with the implementation of this antibody test. METHODS: Utilizing a web-based questionnaire for nephrologists, responses were collected from 306 facilities and 427 nephrologists between November 2021 and December 2021. Preference for anti-PLA2R antibody testing was also investigated. Factors related to the experience of quantifying anti-PLA2R antibodies were estimated by generalized estimating equations using a robust analysis of variance with clusters of facilities of affiliation. RESULTS: Of the 427 respondents, 140 (32.8%) had previous measurement experience at their current workplace and 165 (38.6%) had previous measurement experience overall. In pMN-suspected cases without contraindications to renal biopsy, 147 (34.4%) of the respondents opted to request anti-PLA2R antibody testing. The respondents' experience with anti-PLA2R antibody quantification at their current place of work was generally higher in university hospitals and increased with the annual number of kidney biopsies and the number of years since graduation. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that a significant proportion of nephrologists in Japan have no experience in performing anti-PLA2R antibody assays, and that the assays may be hampered by the limited capabilities of the current workplace and the financial burden on facilities and patients.


Asunto(s)
Glomerulonefritis Membranosa , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Receptores de Fosfolipasa A2 , Humanos , Glomerulonefritis Membranosa/diagnóstico , Glomerulonefritis Membranosa/inmunología , Glomerulonefritis Membranosa/sangre , Receptores de Fosfolipasa A2/inmunología , Japón , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Autoanticuerpos/sangre , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Síndrome Nefrótico/diagnóstico , Síndrome Nefrótico/inmunología , Masculino , Pueblos del Este de Asia
5.
Clin Exp Nephrol ; 2024 Aug 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39168884

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The characteristics of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) who are recipients of public assistance in Japan, and the adequacy of their medical care have not been reported previously. METHODS: The records of patients with CKD stage G5 who visited nine facilities in Japan from April to June 2013 were retrospectively reviewed to compare the characteristics and care of recipients of public assistance with those of non-recipients. Receiving a presentation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) options and polypharmacy were used as indicators of suboptimal medical care. RESULTS: Of the 592 patients included in this analysis (mean age, 69.6 years; male, 59.3%), 56 (9.5%) were recipients of public assistance and 536 (90.5%) were non-recipients of public assistance. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus, unmarried status, and living alone were higher in recipients of public assistance. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, compared with non-recipients of public assistance, recipients of public assistance were less likely to receive a presentation of KRT options (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.56), and were more likely to receive ≥ 10 (aOR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.05-3.51), and ≥ 15 (aOR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.23-6.26) types of medication. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with advanced CKD receiving public assistance were less likely to receive a presentation of KRT options and more likely to receive ≥ 10 and ≥ 15 types of medication, suggesting that recipients of public assistance are more likely to receive suboptimal medical care.

6.
Mod Rheumatol ; 2024 May 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38814660

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To update evidence on the efficacy and safety of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and provide information to the taskforce for the 2024 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology (JCR) clinical practice guidelines (CPG) for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We searched various databases for randomised controlled trials on RA published until June 2022, with no language restriction. For each of the 15 clinical questions, 2 independent reviewers screened the articles, evaluated the core outcomes, and performed meta-analyses. RESULTS: Subcutaneous injection of methotrexate (MTX) showed similar efficacy to oral MTX in MTX-naïve RA patients. Ozoralizumab combined with MTX improved drug efficacy compared to the placebo in RA patients with inadequate response (IR) to csDMARD. Rituximab with and without concomitant csDMARDs showed similar efficacy to other bDMARDs in bDMARD-IR RA patients. Combined Janus kinase inhibitors and MTX achieved similar clinical responses and equal safety during a 4-year period compared to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in MTX-IR RA patients. Biosimilars showed efficacy equivalent to that of the original bDMARDs in csDMARD-IR and bDMARD-IR RA patients. CONCLUSION: This systematic review provides latest evidence for the 2024 update of the JCR CPG for RA management.

7.
Semin Dial ; 36(4): 303-315, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36929612

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the relationship between hyponatremia and worse outcomes in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. METHODS: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases were used to search for relevant articles. The target population was patients on maintenance hemodialysis (those undergoing hemodialysis for ≥60 days). The defined outcomes were death, cardiovascular disease, cognitive decline, and falls. Meta-analysis was performed with a random-effects model of pairwise comparisons of normonatremia and hyponatremia defined for each study, 1-mmol/L increment of sodium analysis, and dose-response analysis using the sodium concentration defined for each study. This study was registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42018087667). RESULTS: Thirteen articles were included. The pairwise analysis revealed that the hazard ratio for all-cause mortality was 1.45 (95% confidence interval, 1.31-1.61). The analysis of 1-mmol/L increment of sodium included six studies with a hazard ratio for all-cause mortality of 0.94 (95% confidence interval, 0.91-0.97) for each 1-mmol/L increase in the serum sodium concentration. In the dose-response analysis, assuming a linear relationship, a sodium increment of 1 mmol/L revealed a hazard ratio for all-cause mortality of 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.96-0.98). Other outcomes could not be integrated. CONCLUSIONS: Hyponatremia is associated with all-cause mortality in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Healthcare providers should pay special attention to even the slightest indication of hyponatremia.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Hiponatremia , Humanos , Hiponatremia/complicaciones , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Sodio
8.
Clin Exp Nephrol ; 27(9): 767-775, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37310570

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: With the publication of the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline for Nephrotic Syndrome 2020," we examined nephrologists' adherence to the recommendations of four of its clinical questions (CQs). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional web-based survey conducted between November and December 2021. The target population comprised nephrologists certified by the Japanese Society of Nephrology who were recruited using convenience sampling. The participants answered six items regarding the four CQs about adult patients with nephrotic syndrome and their characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 434 respondents worked in at least 306 facilities, of whom 386 (88.9%) provided outpatient care for primary nephrotic syndrome. Of these patients, 179 (41.2%) answered that they would not measure anti- phospholipase A2 receptor antibody levels in cases of suspected primary membranous nephropathy (MN) in which kidney biopsy was not possible (CQ1). Regarding immunosuppressants as maintenance therapy after relapse of minimal change nephrotic syndrome (CQ2), cyclosporine was the most common choice (290 [72.5%] and 300 [75.0%] of 400 respondents after the first and second relapses, respectively). The most common treatment for steroid-resistant cases of primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (CQ3) was cyclosporine (323 of 387, 83.5%). For the initial treatment of primary MN with nephrotic-range proteinuria (CQ4), corticosteroid monotherapy was the most common choice (240 of 403, 59.6%), followed by corticosteroid and cyclosporine (114, 28.3%). CONCLUSION: Gaps in recommendations and practices regarding serodiagnosis and treatment of MN (i.e., CQ1 and 4) are observed, suggesting the need to address the barriers to their insurance reimbursement and the lack of evidence behind them.


Asunto(s)
Glomerulonefritis Membranosa , Glomeruloesclerosis Focal y Segmentaria , Adhesión a Directriz , Nefrosis Lipoidea , Síndrome Nefrótico , Adulto , Humanos , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Estudios Transversales , Ciclosporina , Pueblos del Este de Asia , Glomerulonefritis Membranosa/diagnóstico , Glomerulonefritis Membranosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Glomeruloesclerosis Focal y Segmentaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Internet , Nefrólogos , Nefrosis Lipoidea/diagnóstico , Nefrosis Lipoidea/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome Nefrótico/diagnóstico , Síndrome Nefrótico/tratamiento farmacológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
9.
Clin Exp Nephrol ; 27(5): 480-489, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36840902

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evidence on renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASis) effect in reducing urinary protein levels in patients with nephrotic syndrome is insufficient. We determined whether RASis can induce complete remission (CR) in patients on immunosuppressive therapy. METHODS: This cohort study included 84 adults (median age, 65 years; males, 57%) with primary nephrotic syndrome (excluding minimal change disease) not receiving RASis during enrollment in the Japanese Nephrotic Syndrome Cohort Study from January 2009 to December 2010, and were followed up for 5 years. Exposure and outcome were RASi initiation and first CR, respectively. Marginal structural models and Poisson regression were used to account for time-varying covariates and estimate causal effects of RASis on CR. RESULTS: Overall, 51 (61%), 73 (87%), and 55 (66%) patients had membranous nephropathy, were prescribed immunosuppressive agents at baseline (1-month post-renal biopsy and/or at start of immunosuppressive therapy), and were prescribed RASis during the study period, respectively. Sixty-five patients experienced first CR (incidence rate, 5.05/100 person-months). RASi use was associated with a higher (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] 2.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-4.84), and lower (aIRR: 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.68) first CR in patients with membranous nephropathy and other pathologies, respectively. CONCLUSION: RASis are beneficial as adjuvant therapy for inducing remission in patients with membranous nephropathy.


Asunto(s)
Glomerulonefritis Membranosa , Síndrome Nefrótico , Masculino , Adulto , Humanos , Anciano , Síndrome Nefrótico/complicaciones , Glomerulonefritis Membranosa/patología , Estudios de Cohortes , Sistema Renina-Angiotensina , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/farmacología , Antihipertensivos , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/farmacología
10.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 2: CD013109, 2021 02 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33586138

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: People with chronic kidney disease (CKD) requiring dialysis are at a particularly high risk of cardiovascular death and morbidity. Several clinical studies suggested that aldosterone antagonists would be a promising treatment option for people undergoing dialysis. However, the clinical efficacy and potential harm of aldosterone antagonists for people with CKD on dialysis has yet to be determined. OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to evaluate the benefits and harms of aldosterone antagonists, both non-selective (spironolactone) and selective (eplerenone), in comparison to control (placebo or standard care) in people with CKD requiring haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD). SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 5 August 2020 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included parallel randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cross-over RCTs, and quasi-RCTs (where group allocation is by a method that is not truly random, such as alternation, assignment based on alternate medical records, date of birth, case record number, or other predictable methods) that compared aldosterone antagonists with placebo or standard care in people with CKD requiring dialysis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias for included studies. We used a random-effects model meta-analysis to perform a quantitative synthesis of the data. We used the I² statistic to measure heterogeneity among the studies in each analysis. We indicated summary estimates as a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes, mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, or standardised mean differences (SMD) if different scales were used, with their 95% confidence interval (CI). We assessed the certainty of the evidence for each of the main outcomes using the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. MAIN RESULTS: We included 16 studies (14 parallel RCTs and two cross-over RCTs) involving a total of 1446 participants. Thirteen studies compared spironolactone to placebo or standard care and one study compared eplerenone to a placebo. Most included studies had an unclear or high risk of bias. Compared to control, aldosterone antagonists probably reduced the risk of death (any cause) for people with CKD requiring dialysis (9 studies, 1119 participants: RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.67; I² = 0%; moderate certainty of evidence). Aldosterone antagonist probably decreased the risk of death due to cardiovascular disease (6 studies, 908 participants: RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.64; I² = 0%; moderate certainty of evidence) and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular morbidity (3 studies, 328 participants: RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.76; I² = 0%; moderate certainty of evidence). While aldosterone antagonists probably increased risk of gynaecomastia compared with control (4 studies, 768 participants: RR 5.95, 95% CI 1.93 to 18.3; I² = 0%; moderate certainty of evidence), aldosterone antagonists may make little or no difference to the risk of hyperkalaemia (9 studies, 981 participants: RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.72 to 2.78; I² = 47%; low certainty of evidence). Aldosterone antagonists had a marginal effect on left ventricular mass among participants undergoing dialysis (8 studies, 633 participants: SMD -0.42, 95% CI -0.78 to 0.05; I² = 77%). In people with CKD requiring dialysis received aldosterone antagonists compared to control, there were 72 fewer deaths from all causes per 1000 participants (95% CI 47 to 98) with a number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) of 14 (95% CI 10 to 21) and for gynaecomastia were 26 events per 1000 participants (95% CI 15 to 39) with a number need to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) of 38 (95% CI 26 to 68). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on moderate certainty of the evidence, aldosterone antagonists probably reduces the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death and probably reduces morbidity due to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease in people with CKD requiring dialysis. For the adverse effect of gynaecomastia, the risk was increased compared to control. For this outcome, the absolute risk was lower than the absolute risk of death. It is hoped the three large ongoing studies will provide better certainty of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Diálisis Renal , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Sesgo , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/inducido químicamente , Causas de Muerte , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/inducido químicamente , Eplerenona/efectos adversos , Eplerenona/uso terapéutico , Ginecomastia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Hiperpotasemia/inducido químicamente , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides/efectos adversos , Placebos/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/mortalidad , Espironolactona/efectos adversos , Espironolactona/uso terapéutico
11.
Clin Exp Nephrol ; 23(2): 215-222, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30168046

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Metabolic acidosis, which reduces serum bicarbonate levels, contributes to the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The difference between sodium and chloride (Na-Cl) may theoretically predict serum bicarbonate levels. This study aimed to evaluate serum Na-Cl level as a risk factor for renal function decline among patients who participated in the chronic kidney disease Japan cohort (CKD-JAC) study. METHODS: The association between low Na-Cl concentration (< 34 mmol/L) and composite renal function decline events (any initiation of renal replacement therapy or 50% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate) was evaluated among 2143 patients with CKD stage G3a-4. Using Cox regression analysis, hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated after adjusting for the following covariates: age, sex, diabetes mellitus, diabetic nephropathy, cardiovascular disease, anemia, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists, loop diuretics, cigarette smoking, body mass index, serum albumin, systolic blood pressure, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, and CKD stage. RESULTS: Composite renal function decline events were observed in 405 patients (18.9%) over the 4-year follow-up period. Low serum Na-Cl level (< 34 mmol/L) was independently associated with a greater risk for composite renal function decline events (HR 1.384; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.116-1.717). Subgroup analyses identified that the association between low Na-Cl level and composite renal function decline events was stronger among patients with CKD stage G4 and those with anemia. CONCLUSIONS: Our investigation suggests that Na-Cl is an independent predictor of CKD progression, especially among patients with CKD stage G4 and those with anemia.


Asunto(s)
Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Riñón/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/sangre , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/fisiopatología , Cloruro de Sodio/sangre , Acidosis/sangre , Acidosis/fisiopatología , Anciano , Anemia/sangre , Anemia/fisiopatología , Bicarbonatos/sangre , Biomarcadores/sangre , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Regulación hacia Abajo , Femenino , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
12.
Clin Exp Nephrol ; 23(11): 1288-1297, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31385161

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few good-quality clinical trials on adults with nephrotic syndrome exist. Thus, there are discrepancies between real-world practice and clinical practice guidelines. We conducted a questionnaire-based survey to investigate potential discrepancies and the factors associated with variations in clinical practice. METHODS: A questionnaire was administered electronically to all board-certified nephrologists in Japan. To examine clinical practice variations in relation to physician characteristics, we estimated the ratio of the mean duration of steroid therapy using a generalized linear model, and the odds ratio of higher level ordinal variables using an ordered logistic regression model. RESULTS: Responses of the 116 participants showed some variation for the majority of questions. Most participants (94.8%) indicated that screening for malignant tumors was "Conducted for almost all patients". The duration of steroid therapy was found to be longer among physicians seeing ≥ 30 patients with nephrotic syndrome per month, both for minimal-change disease (ratio of mean 1.69; 95% CI 1.07-2.66) and membranous nephropathy (ratio of mean 1.71; 95% CI 1.09-2.69). CONCLUSIONS: We identified practice patterns for nephrotic syndrome and discrepancies between clinical practice guidelines and actual practice. Defining the standard therapy for nephrotic syndrome may be necessary to generate high-quality evidence and develop clinical guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico , Nefrología/estadística & datos numéricos , Síndrome Nefrótico/tratamiento farmacológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Glomerulonefritis Membranosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Japón , Nefrología/normas , Nefrosis Lipoidea/tratamiento farmacológico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
13.
BMC Nephrol ; 20(1): 121, 2019 04 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30953463

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Little is known about salt taste dysfunction among hemodialysis (HD) patients. This study aimed to elucidate the prevalence of salt taste dysfunction and its relationship with interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) among HD patients. METHODS: A single-center cross-sectional study involving 99 maintenance HD patients was conducted in September 2015. Salt taste threshold was measured using a salt-impregnated test strip. Salt taste dysfunction was defined as a recognition threshold of ≥0.8%. IDWG was calculated as the mean value of weight gain at the beginning of each week during a 1-month period before the taste test. We performed a multivariate analysis using the standard linear regression model to investigate the association between salt taste dysfunction and IDWG. RESULTS: Among the 99 participants, 42% had a recognition threshold of 0.6%, whereas 38% had a recognition threshold of ≥1.6%. Overall, the prevalence of salt taste dysfunction was 58%. The mean (±SD) IDWG was 4.9% (±1.7%), and there was no significant difference in IDWG between the two groups with (4.9%) and without (4.8%) salt taste dysfunction (P = 0.90). A multivariate analysis indicated that salt taste dysfunction is not significantly associated with IDWG (mean difference = 0.06; 95% confidence interval = - 0.27 to 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of salt taste dysfunction was very high among HD patients who had a unique distribution of salt taste recognition thresholds with two peaks. We found no significant association between salt taste dysfunction and IDWG.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Renal , Trastornos del Gusto , Correlación de Datos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Trastornos del Gusto/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Gusto/epidemiología , Trastornos del Gusto/etiología , Umbral Gustativo , Aumento de Peso
14.
Clin Exp Nephrol ; 22(5): 1108-1115, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29556893

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The practice patterns of exercise restrictions for patients with chronic kidney disease have not been adequately evaluated yet; thus, we examined them using a cross-sectional design and explored the factors related with those restrictions. METHODS: The Chronic Kidney Disease Japan Cohort study was a multicentre cohort study of Japanese patients (age 20-75 years) living in Japan. We used the information in the questionnaire on the restriction of physical activities offered by physicians to the patients during enrolment. We initially considered and used the following data as the clinical factors that the physician used for decision making on the directions of restriction of physical activities: age, sex, cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD), comorbid diseases, body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin. The logistic regression model was used to explore the factors and estimate their adjusted odds ratio with regard to physician's direction of restriction of physical activities. RESULTS: Physician's direction of exercise restrictions was implemented in 9.9% of the participants. In 17 facilities, the proportion of physician's direction of exercise restriction ranged from 2.9 to 17.8%. The logistic regression analysis showed that the proportion of the factors such as younger age, cardiovascular disease, congestive heart failure and lower eGFR was higher in patients with physician's direction of exercise restrictions. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study suggested the factors related with prescribing exercise restrictions. Further studies examining which patients with CKD need direction of exercise restrictions are needed.


Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis Renal , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
16.
Clin Exp Nephrol ; 19(4): 646-52, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25376866

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2011, the Japanese Society of Nephrology (JSN) published new clinical guidelines for IgA nephropathy (IgAN) with a new risk stratification based on clinical and histological severity. For classification, patients are divided into four groups (low, medium, high, and very high risk). However, differences in responsiveness to each treatment among different groups remain unclear. We evaluate the responsiveness of tonsillectomy plus steroid pulse (TSP) therapy using the new risk stratification. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 111 IgAN patients with TSP therapy between January 2003 and January 2013. Study patients were divided into three groups [low- (n = 40), medium- (n = 43) and high-/very high-risk group (n = 28)]. The primary outcome was clinical remission (CR). The observation period was 1 year following tonsillectomy. RESULTS: 57 out of 111 patients (51.4 %) reached CR. The CR incidence was 70.0, 41.9 and 39.3 % (the low-, the medium- and the high-/very high-risk group, respectively). The incidence of CR was significantly higher in the low-risk group (P = 0.013). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, both the medium- and the high-/very high-risk group showed significantly lower incidence of inducing CR than the low-risk group [(odds ratio 0.324; 95 % confidence interval 0.106-0.939, P = 0.041) (odds ratio 0.239; 95 % confidence interval 0.058-0.910, P = 0.040), respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: The new risk stratification in the 2011 JSN clinical guidelines for IgAN had a positive impact on early CR of TSP therapy.


Asunto(s)
Glomerulonefritis por IGA/tratamiento farmacológico , Glomerulonefritis por IGA/cirugía , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Metilprednisolona/administración & dosificación , Tonsilectomía , Adulto , Femenino , Glomerulonefritis por IGA/epidemiología , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Inducción de Remisión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
17.
Perit Dial Int ; : 8968608241244995, 2024 Jun 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38826118

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clinical data supporting the target haemoglobin range in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) are scarce. This study investigated the association between haemoglobin levels and all-cause mortality in Japanese patients undergoing PD using data from a nationwide dialysis registry. METHODS: A total of 4875 patients aged ≥18 years who were undergoing PD at the end of 2012 were analysed. Patients receiving combination therapy with haemodialysis or missing haemoglobin data were excluded. Haemoglobin values were categorised into six groups (<9.0, 9.0-9.9, 10.0-10.9, 11.0-11.9, 12.0-12.9 and ≥13.0 g/dL) and their association with mortality evaluated. RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 63 years, and 62% were men. The mean haemoglobin level was 10.7 g/dL, and 14% were anuric. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents were used in 89%. During a median follow-up of 3.5 years, 1586 patients died. Haemoglobin levels <9.0 and ≥13.0 g/dL were significantly associated with mortality, as compared with levels of 10.0-10.9 g/dL (adjusted hazard ratios [95% confidence intervals]: 1.25 [1.06-1.48] and 1.45 [1.13-1.88], respectively). Restricted cubic spline analysis revealed a U-shaped association between haemoglobin levels and mortality. A haemoglobin level ≥12 g/dL was associated with mortality in patients with a history of cardiovascular disease (p interaction = 0.023). CONCLUSION: We provide important insights into the target haemoglobin in patients undergoing PD. Our findings suggest that setting a lower upper limit for haemoglobin levels may be beneficial for patients with a history of cardiovascular disease.

18.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 9171, 2024 04 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38649730

RESUMEN

In April 2022, an additional medical fee for exercise instruction during haemodialysis treatment was approved for insurance claims in Japan. We conducted a questionnaire survey to investigate the current situation regarding exercise therapy during haemodialysis treatment after this change. Questionnaires were mailed to 4257 haemodialysis facilities, almost all the haemodialysis facilities in Japan, on January 31, 2023. In total, 1657 facilities responded, of which 550 (33%) provided exercise instruction during haemodialysis treatment, and 65% of these claimed the new fee. Of the 550 facilities that had claimed the fee at the time of survey, 245 (55%) started exercise instruction in April 2022 or later. Exercise instruction focused on resistance training (81%) and aerobic exercise (62%) for 20-30 min (66%) three times a week (80%). The instructors included physicians in 45% of facilities, nurses in 74%, and physical therapists in 36%. Efficacy was evaluated in 76% of the facilities providing instruction, mainly by assessing change in muscle strength (49%). Overall, 39% of facilities had experienced some adverse events, but none were life-threatening. In conclusion, after the change in the insurance regime, exercise instruction during haemodialysis treatment has become more popular, and more patients on haemodialysis are undergoing exercise therapy.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Ejercicio , Diálisis Renal , Humanos , Japón , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Ejercicio Físico , Masculino , Entrenamiento de Fuerza
19.
Nephron ; 148(7): 448-456, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38342092

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to explore the association between urate-lowering agents and reduced response to erythropoietin-stimulating agents in patients suffering from chronic kidney disease G5. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, multicenter study in Japan between April and June 2013, enrolling patients aged 20 years or older with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of ≤15 mL/min/1.73 m2. Exclusion criteria encompassed patients with a history of hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, or organ transplantation. The patients were categorized into four groups based on the use of urate-lowering drugs: high-dose allopurinol (>50 mg/day), low-dose allopurinol (≤50 mg/day), febuxostat, and no-treatment groups. We used a multivariable logistic regression model, adjusted for covariates, to determine the odds ratio (OR) for erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness, defined by an erythropoietin resistance index (ERI) of ≥10, associated with urate-lowering drugs. RESULTS: A total of 542 patients were included in the analysis, with 105, 36, 165, and 236 patients in the high-dose allopurinol, low-dose allopurinol, febuxostat, and no-treatment groups, respectively. The median and quartiles of ERIs were 6.3 (0, 12.2), 3.8 (0, 11.2), 3.4 (0, 9.8), and 4.8 (0, 11.2) in the high-dose allopurinol, low-dose allopurinol, febuxostat, and no-treatment groups, respectively. The multivariate regression model showed a statistically significant association between the high-dose allopurinol group and erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness, compared to the no-treatment group (OR = 1.98, 95% confidence interval: 1.10-3.57). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the use of high-dose allopurinol exceeding the optimal dose may lead to hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.


Asunto(s)
Alopurinol , Eritropoyetina , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Alopurinol/administración & dosificación , Alopurinol/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Eritropoyetina/administración & dosificación , Supresores de la Gota/administración & dosificación , Supresores de la Gota/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Ácido Úrico/sangre , Hematínicos/administración & dosificación , Hematínicos/uso terapéutico , Japón , Febuxostat/administración & dosificación , Febuxostat/uso terapéutico
20.
J Cardiol Cases ; 29(4): 186-189, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38646078

RESUMEN

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), which typically occurs in women at low risk of atherosclerosis. We herein report a case of SCAD in a 57-year-old man who later developed Takayasu arteritis. The patient presented to our hospital complaining of chest pain and was diagnosed with unstable angina. Emergent coronary angiography was performed, and optical coherence tomography revealed that ACS was caused by SCAD. The patient was treated medically without further ballooning or stenting. Because there was a bilateral difference in blood pressure, the systemic artery was screened by contrast-enhanced computed tomography, which showed left subclavian artery occlusion, proximal stenosis of the superior mesenteric artery, right common iliac artery dissection, and left external iliac artery dissection. Based on these results and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography findings, we diagnosed Takayasu arteritis. Prednisolone and tocilizumab were selected for medical treatment, and the patient was in a good condition at one year after the diagnosis. Takayasu arteritis can cause dissection of various arteries and should be suspected when atypical SCAD or multiple dissections are present. Early initiation of immunosuppressive therapy can control disease activity. Learning objective: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an important cause of acute coronary syndrome. In this case, we experienced a case of SCAD which turned out to be the first symptom of Takayasu arteritis. Immunosuppressive therapy was effective for both coronary lesion and systemic vasculitis. Not only fibromuscular dysplasia, but also various types of vasculitis should therefore be considered in the differential diagnosis when encountering atypical SCAD cases.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA