Arthroscopic iliopsoas tenotomies: a systematic review of surgical technique and outcomes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the technique, results and complications of arthroscopic iliopsoas tenotomies either on native hips or total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: A systematic review was performed using 3 databases: PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library from January 2000 to December 2018 in accordance with the PRISMA procedure. The literature search, data extraction and quality assessment were conducted by 2 independent reviewers. Surgical technique, clinical outcomes, recurrences and complication rate were evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 115 articles reviewed, 20 articles concerned native hips and 8 articles THA. 3 levels of release were described. For native hips, the recurrence rate was higher for central compartment than peripheral or lesser trochanter releases. Complication rates were similar for hip arthroscopy but remained low in all series. Loss of strength was evaluated mainly using the MRC muscle scale. Most studies noted strength recovery. MRI analysis of muscle atrophy was greater for lesser trochanter than for central compartment release but unrelated to loss of strength. The complication rate was low for tenotomy after THA, heterotopic ossification being the most common complication. CONCLUSIONS: Central compartment releases lead to the highest rate of recurrence due to incomplete release. Peripheral releases have a potential risk of vascular injury. The lesser trochanteric approach has the disadvantage of not having direct access to the joint. The main difficulty with THA lies in the diagnosis of cup/iliopsoas impingement. Diagnostic tests with infiltration should be made before iliopsoas release to prevent its failure. Cup protrusion of over 8mm is a potential indication for acetabular revision.

Do clinical results of arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis correlate with CT fusion ratio?

BACKGROUND: CT analysis of arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis rarely finds complete fusion. The aim of the present study was to determine, at 12 months' follow-up of arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis: (1) CT fusion ratio, (2) functional results, and (3) the correlation between the two. HYPOTHESIS: Incomplete fusion ratio does not impair the result of arthrodesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A continuous series of 22 arthroscopic subtalar arthrodeses was assessed at 12 months' follow-up. The procedure used a posterior approach without bone graft, with stabilization by 2 compression screws. Clinical assessment comprised of a numerical analog pain scale (NAS, AOFAS and SF12) scores. Satisfaction was assessed on an NAS and on Odom's criteria. CT analysis at 12 months determined the posterior subtalar joint fusion ratio. RESULTS: At follow-up, 2 patients showed non-union (9.1%). Among the 20 patients with fusion (91%), fusion was complete (>67°) in 16 (72.7%) and partial (34-66%) in 4 (18.2%). Mean fusion ratio at 12 months was 77.7%±14.8 (range, 36-98%). Functional gains (Δ) were: Δ pain NAS 4.8±2 (range, 1-10) and Δ AOFAS score 31.1±14 (range, 10-59). Mean satisfaction score was 8±2.5 (range, 3-10). There were no significant correlations between fusion ratio and any clinical or satisfaction scores. CONCLUSION: Although clinical gain was systematic, functional and satisfaction scores were independent of whether subtalar fusion ratio was partial or complete. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study.